Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Faces of Vaccine Takers
  1. Results 2221 to 2250 of 5266
  2. Page 75 of 176
  3. First
  5. 73
  6. 74
  7. 75
  8. 76
  9. 77
  11. Last

Thread: Faces of Vaccine Takers

post 1638994153 05-20-2021, 04:36 AM
-
#2221
  1. Yoopwat
  2. Registered User
  1. Yoopwat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 9,230
  7. Rep Power: 16588
Originally Posted By smegmasniffer⏩
That's you on the left, lol.
Lol that’s quality, wanna be mates?
post 1638994863 05-20-2021, 05:08 AM
-
#2222
  1. Benji Snap
  2. Registered User
  1. Benji Snap
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 6,869
  6. Rep Power: 20127
Originally Posted By smegmasniffer⏩


to be continued when i have time to finish this comic
Wtf... you make all these from scratch? I thought you found them on the net.

Your skill levels are godlike
post 1639007683 05-20-2021, 08:40 AM
-
#2223
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
So much fake news to expose

what Reuters says is happening in Mumbai


Versus.. what an Indian from Mumbai says what's really going on right now. (as of May-21-2021)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RED0WDtkQQtd/


And just a reminder on why Reuters wants to spread fear mongering about their fake scamdemic



and More fake news being exposed in Brazil

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EZOyaL0FG7GK/
Originally Posted By Benji
Wtf... you make all these from scratch? I thought you found them on the net.

Your skill levels are godlike
thank you bro. Yes I like to draw. made all from scratch
post 1639007973 05-20-2021, 08:45 AM
-
#2224
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793


I would ask the pro-vaxx people to discuss this, but only Adam has a lick of sense about him (and I'd put him more middle ground than anything).
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1639008263 05-20-2021, 08:50 AM
-
#2225
  1. AntiDegeneracy
  2. Banned
  1. AntiDegeneracy
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 78
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Yoopwat⏩
I had mine an houragainand can confirm I am now dead
looks like it has reached your brain, RIP
post 1639009323 05-20-2021, 09:04 AM
-
#2226
  1. interfearance
  2. Registered User
  1. interfearance
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 472
  6. Rep Power: 2366
Originally Posted By lolatpaniccels⏩
you can clown people yeah, but no one is barring you from doing the things you want to do because you're getting the shot.

It's the vaxx police that are trying to tie vax status to employment, travel, going into stores, etc.
We can debate side effects and whatever, but the evidence obviously shows that the vaccine is efficacious and stops the spread of the virus... why should it not be a requirement? As long as rules are uniformly applied they are perfectly legal.
post 1639011303 05-20-2021, 09:32 AM
-
#2227
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By interfearance⏩
We can debate side effects and whatever, but the evidence obviously shows that the vaccine is efficacious and stops the spread of the virus... why should it not be a requirement? As long as rules are uniformly applied they are perfectly legal.
Does it?

Why did they change the way in which they do the tests at the same time these vaccines rolled out? The information about PCR tests, how the creator of it spoke openly how they were being misused and were not accurate in the way they were being used, it's all over this thread.

Then they change it and now we're supposed to compare the current numbers using different testing methods to the previous ones? How does that work again?

Anyway, show me this evidence, I would like to see it.
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩


I would ask the pro-vaxx people to discuss this, but only Adam has a lick of sense about him (and I'd put him more middle ground than anything).
noticed you did not comment on this
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1639011753 05-20-2021, 09:38 AM
-
#2228
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 12,844
  5. Rep Power: 108468
Lol at getting the jab ! Good luck with your class action lawsuits that you'll sign onto after you discover you've been maimed
Superight Crew
AntiVaxx Cew
COVID is a jok Crew
post 1639012063 05-20-2021, 09:40 AM
-
#2229
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
This one is hilarious
Woman states she's vaccinated, then get a nosebleed on TV show called : Real Housewives of Dallas

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kmLnG0aABvVZ/
post 1639013853 05-20-2021, 10:02 AM
-
#2230
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By InVentive44⏩
Lol at getting the jab ! Good luck with your class action lawsuits that you'll sign onto after you discover you've been maimed
There won't be any lawsuits, the only thing these vaccines grant full immunity to are the manufacturers of them.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1639014343 05-20-2021, 10:07 AM
-
#2231
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Does it?

Why did they change the way in which they do the tests at the same time these vaccines rolled out? The information about PCR tests, how the creator of it spoke openly how they were being misused and were not accurate in the way they were being used, it's all over this thread.

Then they change it and now we're supposed to compare the current numbers using different testing methods to the previous ones? How does that work again?
What is the claimed / theorized motivation around and impact of that change?

I know they adjusted 'cycle times', but i've never fully understand that or why it may or may not impact the results.
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
There won't be any lawsuits, the only thing these vaccines grant full immunity to are the manufacturers of them.
Only until 2024 tho, and assuming someone doesn't use that CICP thing in the meantime
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639014533 05-20-2021, 10:10 AM
-
#2232
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  3. Join Date: Sep 2006
  4. Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 4,624
  6. Rep Power: 81186
Originally Posted By AdamWW⏩
What is the claimed / theorized motivation around and impact of that change?

I know they adjusted 'cycle times', but i've never fully understand that or why it may or may not impact the results.
because that would produce less "positive" test results. the reason would be that it would mean the numbers start getting substantially lower proving/bolstering the effectiveness of the vaccine
post 1639014633 05-20-2021, 10:11 AM
-
#2233
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
Originally Posted By 1fast1⏩
because that would produce less "positive" test results. the reason would be that it would mean the numbers start getting substantially lower proving/bolstering the effectiveness of the vaccine
I get that, but what is the reason why it would produce less of them?

I've seen this stated many times, but nobody has said why they believe a different cycle time would do that
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639014643 05-20-2021, 10:11 AM
-
#2234
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
Not sure how legit this is, but it's not a stretch of the imagination that these covid-19 vaccines are being used to track and monitor the biolgoical state/location of the vaxxed, after seeing videos of the vaxxed literally triggering bluetooth network connection popups on phones and TVs

https://www.bitchute.com/video/aJXeZ...o3frqq9h-VioOk



Scene from the video showing the database collecting info from vaxxed individuals.

"Current Geo: xxxx
Current body state: xxxx
Vendor_id: E2k Machine
Model name Elbrus-e2k-e2c+"
post 1639014663 05-20-2021, 10:11 AM
-
#2235
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 12,844
  5. Rep Power: 108468
Originally Posted By AdamWW⏩
What is the claimed / theorized motivation around and impact of that change?

I know they adjusted 'cycle times', but i've never fully understand that or why it may or may not impact the results.




Only until 2024 tho, and assuming someone doesn't use that CICP thing in the meantime
The cycle thresholds dictate how many dead particles of the virus the test can see. If you have high threshold you can see dead particles at a magnified rate. For example someone who doesn't have covid but had dead particles from a previous infection would test positive. If you lower the threshold you are looking for active infection.


"A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 37 to 40 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles."


"The research group of French professor Didier Raoult has recently shown that at a cycle threshold (ct) of 25, about 70% of samples remained positive in cell culture (i.e. were infectious); at a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% of samples remained positive; and at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture (see diagram).

This means that if a person gets a “positive” PCR test result at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher (as applied in most US labs and many European labs), the chance that the person is infectious is less than 3%. The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher."
Superight Crew
AntiVaxx Cew
COVID is a jok Crew
post 1639014983 05-20-2021, 10:14 AM
-
#2236
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
Originally Posted By InVentive44⏩
The cycle thresholds dictate how many dead particles of the virus the test can see. If you have high threshold you can see dead particles at a magnified rate. For example someone who doesn't have covid but had dead particles from a previous infection would test positive. If you lower the threshold you are looking for active infection.


"A PCR test is amplifying samples through repetitive cycles. The lower the virus concentration in the sample, the more cycles are needed to achieve a positive result. Many US labs work with 37 to 40 cycles, while many European labs work with 30 to 40 cycles."
But, that would mean having more cycles would actually increase the accuracy/sensitivity, not the other way around....

If the idea is that a higher PCR cycle threshold causes LESS positives... that doesn't make sense. More cycles = more opportunity to see the particles. Right?
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639015173 05-20-2021, 10:16 AM
-
#2237
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  1. InVentive44
  2. Snakin down your chimney
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 12,844
  5. Rep Power: 108468
Originally Posted By AdamWW⏩
But, that would mean having more cycles would actually increase the accuracy/sensitivity, not the other way around....
Did you just read what I said?? If you magnify the cycle threshold you may find dead particle cells that are no longer infectious thus false diagnosing a person with covid who doesn't have an infection.
Superight Crew
AntiVaxx Cew
COVID is a jok Crew
post 1639015393 05-20-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#2238
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
Originally Posted By InVentive44⏩
Did you just read what I said?? If you magnify the cycle threshold you may find dead particle cells that are no longer infectious thus false diagnosing a person with covid who doesn't have an infection.
Dude, chill out, I was just asking for clarification.

But as I said, doesn't this mean more cycles = more positive cases?

If they RAISED the cycle time now after the vaccine, if anything they'd be giving more false positives now vs before... but that's not the argument being made. People are saying that the current case trends are going down because the cycle threshold increased... but as you just said, if anything, it should go UP when that happens (due to more false positives from dead particles).

So if the cycle is higher, then you have more overall positive tests by default, right?
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639015403 05-20-2021, 10:18 AM
-
#2239
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By AdamWW⏩
I get that, but what is the reason why it would produce less of them?

I've seen this stated many times, but nobody has said why they believe a different cycle time would do that
Some video explained it very well, allow me to do a chit-tier version of it:

The tests look for traces of whatever. If they find a certain level of trace amounts of whatever, then the test registers as positive.

Let's say they're looking for dollar bills. You can set the test to recognize a dollar if it finds some amount of loose change. Maybe it's low so that if it finds a single penny, now you have a positive test for a dollar. A more realistic test might be to have at least 50 cents, so if they adjusted the test upwards (as they have recently for corona) now all the guys who had a couple nickels or a handful of loose change but no dollars -- those people will now fail the dollar test.

And I told you I'd do a chitty job, but at the end of the day, the old tests could very often find traces of nothing in a perfectly healthy person who did not have coronavirus but because they set the parameters to be so wildly loose, you'd be getting false positives constantly -- and again, I'll say thecreatorof the tests himself said very openly how they were being used was completely wrong and that Fauci was fuking up. The video is around here somewhere. Just want to add that so it's not just me voicing my opinion, it's the firm opinion of the creator, prior to his recent death.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1639015573 05-20-2021, 10:20 AM
-
#2240
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Some video explained it very well, allow me to do a chit-tier version of it:

The tests look for traces of whatever. If they find a certain level of trace amounts of whatever, then the test registers as positive.

Let's say they're looking for dollar bills. You can set the test to recognize a dollar if it finds some amount of loose change. Maybe it's low so that if it finds a single penny, now you have a positive test for a dollar. A more realistic test might be to have at least 50 cents, so if they adjusted the test upwards (as they have recently for corona) now all the guys who had a couple nickels or a handful of loose change but no dollars -- those people will now fail the dollar test.

And I told you I'd do a chitty job, but at the end of the day, the old tests could very often find traces of nothing in a perfectly healthy person who did not have coronavirus but because they set the parameters to be so wildly loose, you'd be getting false positives constantly -- and again, I'll say thecreatorof the tests himself said very openly how they were being used was completely wrong and that Fauci was fuking up. The video is around here somewhere. Just want to add that so it's not just me voicing my opinion, it's the firm opinion of the creator, prior to his recent death.
I'll have to look for that, Im still not getting it
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639015623 05-20-2021, 10:20 AM
-
#2241
  1. Titansfan08
  2. Registered User
  1. Titansfan08
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Missouri, United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 27,666
  7. Subscribers: 3
  8. Rep Power: 447018
post 1639015723 05-20-2021, 10:21 AM
-
#2242
  1. Uhyeahokay
  2. Banned
  1. Uhyeahokay
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 21,371
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Titansfan08⏩
aware
post 1639016123 05-20-2021, 10:25 AM
-
#2243
  1. BredRoller
  2. Registered User
  1. BredRoller
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 4,837
  6. Rep Power: 43797
Originally Posted By Yoopwat⏩
Lol that’s quality, wanna be mates?
The comic is funny because who truly trusts anything from the government? Take a look at the food pyramid and how poor our health is in general in America. Why would I listen to their recommendations when they've been consistently poverty?
post 1639016233 05-20-2021, 10:26 AM
-
#2244
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  1. AdamWW
  2. team ketchup
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 27,887
  6. Rep Power: 137160
AHHH ok, this video explained it well starting at 4:10






So basically the more cycle time, the LESS likely the virus can actually be cultured (thus lower positives), and in the lower cycle thresholds it will falsely flag people as 'positive' because some of the non-infectious virus (ie from people who HAD the virus but do you HAVE it) will end up being cultured.
"When I die, I hope it's early in the morning so I don't have to go to work that day for no reason"
post 1639016523 05-20-2021, 10:30 AM
-
#2245
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By InVentive44⏩
For example someone who doesn't have covid but had dead particles from a previous infection would test positive. If you lower the threshold you are looking for active infection.
Fyi, as I understood, not even just covid particles, either. Very easily benign flu or any kind of virus even remotely related to coronaviruses would ping a positive, if the test was set high enough.

People say things like they're showing cases of the flu as coronavirus, and who the fuk knows, but the test was so broad that -- yes, it absolutely would show even the trace of a flu virus as a positive for covid.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1639018803 05-20-2021, 10:55 AM
-
#2246
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0


Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Fyi, as I understood, not even just covid particles, either. Very easily benign flu or any kind of virus even remotely related to coronaviruses would ping a positive, if the test was set high enough.

People say things like they're showing cases of the flu as coronavirus, and who the fuk knows, but the test was so broad that -- yes, it absolutely would show even the trace of a flu virus as a positive for covid.
Mfw when I thought we already established that the idea of using PCR test to diagnose someone as covid positive is a SCAM, but i guess some people are slow and demented in the head and need to be remindedagain.. and again.. and again... and again
and again...
again.. and again.. and again... and again
again.. and again.. and again...
and again
again.. and again.. and again...
again.. and again.. and again... and again and again

....
and again
..
and again

....
and again

...

and again

..
and again

and again?

and again


post 1639021013 05-20-2021, 11:25 AM
-
#2247
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
Low budget euthanization in Brazil
When you don't have ventillators to euthanise patients, you do it by hand
gotta get those relief checks from WHO + CDC everytime you list a death as a covid death

Secret recording of hospital worker trying to suffocate an elderly patient in Brazil.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/E3nOcefm9IsF/
post 1639023513 05-20-2021, 11:58 AM
-
#2248
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
So..according to the red cross thevax removes the antibodies of those who already recovered from covid

So... it does exactly the opposite of what you think it should do..

Umm yeah... makes perfect sense..

Again, they think you're too stupid to notice the inconsistencies of their narrrative. And they're right, most of you vaxtards will shrug off whatever is said in this video and go in with your sorry lives as if you haven't been duped into fking yourself up big time

https://www.bitchute.com/video/j8JWuDNPi4JE/
post 1639023733 05-20-2021, 12:01 PM
-
#2249
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1639024503 05-20-2021, 12:16 PM
-
#2250
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  1. smegmasniffer
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,525
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002⏩
crazy that you take the word of news reader. You know who fact checks a local anchor? A couple of people, the director and probably an intern, none of them medical professionals. Locals news gets chit wrong ALL the time. From another a thread where I addressed this
...............



Did a little research. The FDA changed their guidance to allow recovered Covid patients who are vaccinated to give plasma under these conditions.


page 7

https://www.fda.gov/media/136798/download


I think this is sufficient to rule out the assertion that the vaccine wipes out natural antibodies. News outlets fuk things up all the time, as you are well aware. I would say this anchor and whoever wrote the copy misunderstood something. I think what they meant was that vaccinated people who have NOT had Covid do not produce the proper antibodies to combat a current live infection.

This new guidance is from Feb 11th. Before the plasma is given to Covid patients, it's obviously tested. If vaccinated people were giving plasma with the antibodies wiped out, it would have been noticed by now by now.

............



So, which is more accurate, a news reader on one local station or the ACTUAL guidance from the FDA released in Feb??

in b4 mental gymnastics
Funny thing is these "vaccines" not only wipe out antibodies but fks up your immune system and whole body by instructing your cells to produce spike proteins that damage your cells and organs down to the mitochondrial level according to the science.

You chastise the news anchors for getting things wrong all the time and having no scientific background
but then go around
1) believing in covid-19 despite there being no scientific proof the coronavirus has even been isolated or identified in labs
2) believing that these "vaccines" are not a bioweapon despite the scientific evidence all pointing to the very fact that it is
3) cite "Fact checker" articles written by sociology majors from websites like Reuters/USAtoday/Snopes to "deboonk" real scientific data exposing the fraud oof this scamdemic

FDA guidelines mean nothing to me as FDA is just as corrupt to the core as the WHO + Big Pharma. Their former board members were head of MONSANTO ffs.

It seems you only accept and in "science" when it soothes your mind. You are disingenuous with you consistency in the belief in science, thus none of your opinions matter to me.




Hello?? HELLO?? anybody home??

Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts