Forum
»
MIT Study: Vaccine Hesitancy Is 'Highly Informed and Scientifically Literate'.
07-17-2021, 10:33 PM
-
#61
- Singularity7
- Laughing Man
-
- Singularity7
- Laughing Man
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Australia
- Posts: 9,464
- Rep Power: 20518
-
-
Excellent and important read that cuts through all the chaff and gets to the heart of the matter.
https://bandcamp.com/singularity7 - Music collection. Recommend albums. Always looking for more.
07-17-2021, 10:44 PM
-
#62
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
-
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,735
- Rep Power: 169715
-
-
Wow no wincel huh? A basement dweller and a coward, amazing
07-17-2021, 11:05 PM
-
#63
- ltsOgre
- I hate capitalism srs
-
- ltsOgre
- I hate capitalism srs
- Join Date: Feb 2020
- Posts: 5,313
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
They didn't say the vaccine didn't work. In fact they said the opposite. You should get the vaccine.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
I hate capitalism srs
07-17-2021, 11:16 PM
-
#64
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
-
- ChrisLS8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Roseville, California, United States
- Posts: 20,549
- Rep Power: 149080
-
-
Originally Posted By ltsOgre⏩
You are absolutely incorrect. Frankly people like you lefties automatically label anyone who isn't a vaccine proponent as a crazy conspiracy theorist to try and invalidate their opinion as lunacy.They didn't say the vaccine didn't work. In fact they said the opposite. You should get the vaccine.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
There is a big difference as a skeptic who doesn't see the need for a vaccine or doesn't view it as completely safe from a risk/reward perspective and the loony tunes that think they are putting viral vectors or microchips in them.
I have zero plans to get the vaccine for example, I don't feel I need it and I don't trust the lack of long term data.
I don't think you read the whole article and if you did it went over your head.
Thanks for your input, you frauding fat slampig-Sirfapsalot '20
Certified Jimmy Rustler
!!Misc Firearms Crew😌!!
Fuarked Crew
Tradie Crew
LOL @ Tradies Crew
Toxic Male Energy Crew
JayDawg is a ****git Crew
Sock with slip on Sandals Crew
07-17-2021, 11:29 PM
-
#65
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
-
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,735
- Rep Power: 169715
-
-
Originally Posted By ltsOgre⏩
Risk/reward just isn't there for most healthy young peopleThey didn't say the vaccine didn't work. In fact they said the opposite. You should get the vaccine.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
They just said we are approaching anti-vaxers wrong. They are correct about that; there is no possible way to convince them.
07-17-2021, 11:43 PM
-
#66
- AncientYouth
- Registered User
-
- AncientYouth
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 62
- Posts: 22,213
- Rep Power: 65479
-
-
One of the main vaccinecel arguments things i will never agree with..............Take the Vaccine to Protect others!..............Are you fckn kidding me ..............take it to protect yourself if you feel the need and good luck..................but me take an untested , rushed out treatment to protect your obsese co morbity ass WTAF...................risk my good health for your CHit health ..............that you did to yourself ...........

07-18-2021, 12:09 AM
-
#67
07-18-2021, 12:42 AM
-
#68
- lolatpaniccels
- Registered User
-
- lolatpaniccels
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 7,376
- Rep Power: 17711
-
-
Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩
soo true. Let me take this experimental potion that the manufacturer is completely immune from liability to help protect 80 year old and obese *******s. yeah, how about no.One of the main vaccinecel arguments things i will never agree with..............Take the Vaccine to Protect others!..............Are you fckn kidding me ..............take it to protect yourself if you feel the need and good luck..................but me take an untested , rushed out treatment to protect your obsese co morbity ass WTAF...................risk my good health for your CHit health ..............that you did to yourself ...........

07-18-2021, 12:56 AM
-
#69
- moosik85
- Registered User
-
- moosik85
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 14,890
- Rep Power: 81638
-
-
Originally Posted By BigDeeps01⏩
The people most at risk of dying from covid could do far more effective and useful preventive measures then taking an experimental drugRisk/reward just isn't there for most healthy young people
Simple things like: losing weight, exercising, lowering blood pressure, reducing stress etc
All of them totally free and easily accessible
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
07-18-2021, 12:58 AM
-
#70
- pantiespending
- Banned
-
- pantiespending
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Posts: 16,616
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By RICHSTRONG⏩
Really as if the American public isn’t going tj have a huge problem with Biden and China Covid pulling out 2+ trillion dollars in federal budgets to defraud the us constitution and cheat on the election?The left is condescending? Nahhhhhhh
The nsa has to act and they know it. Not is a danger to public interest and national security
Didn’t even read, he’ll have tj answer for it
Idgaf what political party you’re a part of I can’t be tied tj this in any way shape or form it’s already over
Brb...
Thinking that the whole country isn’t going tj have an issue with this or turn a blind eye?
Na, that’s not going tj happ
07-18-2021, 01:04 AM
-
#71
- 20Mavs11
- Everydang u do is balloon
-
- 20Mavs11
- Everydang u do is balloon
- Join Date: Oct 2011
- Posts: 12,025
- Rep Power: 34497
-
-
Wincel is currently mashing F5 on Reddit waiting for one of the blue hairs to "Disprove" this study. They will literally bend reality like Thanos to prove that the Jab was the right choice even though studies have shown different.
There's a youtube "WingsofRedemption" that will only talk/debate a topic if Reddit has already discussed it. He will regurgitate the information as if it's his own words. If you challenge him on it and Reddit hasn't already answered, he will freeze and try and change the convo. I always lol at these type of people. Nothing but parrots.
There's a youtube "WingsofRedemption" that will only talk/debate a topic if Reddit has already discussed it. He will regurgitate the information as if it's his own words. If you challenge him on it and Reddit hasn't already answered, he will freeze and try and change the convo. I always lol at these type of people. Nothing but parrots.
[Dallas Cowboys][Dallas Mavericks][Texas Rangers][TCU*NCAA][DFW Crew]
[Law of Attraction Crew]
There are glowies on the misc now. Don't fall for the bait.
07-18-2021, 01:15 AM
-
#72
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
-
- BigDeeps01
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,735
- Rep Power: 169715
-
-
Originally Posted By moosik85⏩
But then they couldn't bitch and complain about other people!The people most at risk of dying from covid could do far more effective and useful preventive measures then taking an experimental drug
Simple things like: losing weight, exercising, lowering blood pressure, reducing stress etc
All of them totally free and easily accessible
Simple things like: losing weight, exercising, lowering blood pressure, reducing stress etc
All of them totally free and easily accessible
07-18-2021, 02:11 AM
-
#73
- ninetynine8
- Registered User
-
- ninetynine8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2020
- Posts: 13,219
- Rep Power: 42745
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
lmao i bet he goes no contact. def not a man of his wordWincel posted this in another thread last night:


07-18-2021, 02:16 AM
-
#74
07-18-2021, 06:39 AM
-
#75
- EdwardTheGreat
- Registered User
-
- EdwardTheGreat
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Age: 52
- Posts: 9,092
- Rep Power: 235009
-
-
Originally Posted By Yoopwat⏩
In his daddy's basementDamn Wincel is living rent free
07-18-2021, 06:43 AM
-
#76
- Squidbrah
- Registered User
-
- Squidbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 2,370
- Rep Power: 7056
-
-
Wincel has been scrambling up all night looking over internet nerd forums and his high school science books, hoping to find a morsel of refutation. Bags under his eyes. Three coffee cups laying around. Empty bottle of ********…. Still, he sighs and falls to his knees. He prays to God, asking for a good response. ….
07-18-2021, 06:57 AM
-
#77
Originally Posted By Squidbrah⏩
lmao this is so true. Dude googles every answer for 2 minutes before he posts. He must have a link data base ready to unload his half understood plagiarism.Wincel has been scrambling up all night looking over internet nerd forums and his high school science books, hoping to find a morsel of refutation. Bags under his eyes. Three coffee cups laying around. Empty bottle of ********…. Still, he sighs and falls to his knees. He prays to God, asking for a good response. ….
**Florida Crew**
**Waiting for National Guard Bus Ride to Labor Camp Crew**
07-18-2021, 06:58 AM
-
#78
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
-
- JoshSP1985
- Anti-Circumcision
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Franklin, Indiana, United States
- Posts: 66,936
- Rep Power: 214514
-
-
Originally Posted By RICHSTRONG⏩
Always cracks me up when some women's studies or art history bachelors holder thinks they're some high intellectualThe left is condescending? Nahhhhhhh
*PUREBLOOD CREW*
*DAD CREW*
*SUPER STRAIGHT*
*NATURAL DICK CREW*
*CCW*
07-18-2021, 09:08 AM
-
#79
- kovalchuk71
- Registered User
-
- kovalchuk71
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Location: Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 11,354
- Rep Power: 55679
-
-
Originally Posted By Squidbrah⏩
Lmao. The first thing that came to mind:Wincel has been scrambling up all night looking over internet nerd forums and his high school science books, hoping to find a morsel of refutation. Bags under his eyes. Three coffee cups laying around. Empty bottle of ********…. Still, he sighs and falls to his knees. He prays to God, asking for a good response. ….

***Misc Med Crew***
***No Social Media Crew***
07-18-2021, 09:10 AM
-
#80
The author of the study advocates taking the vaccines. They are just saying not to assume all antivaxxers are idiots simply due to them being antivaxxer. The author has discovered a wonderful case of the backfire effect. That doesn't change the fact that most of you guys are idiots, of course. That is obvious for other reasons, such as your sucking dick at math, for example.
07-18-2021, 09:31 AM
-
#81
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
The fact is there is a pandemic and waiting 5 years for "long term" trials just won't cut it. And then you'll whine it wasn't a 20 year trial. And then in 20 years, you'll whine about something else. You aren't an idiot because you're taking an antivaxxer stance. You were an idiot before this stance, and you always will be an idiot after.your mental gymnastics is simply a routine of changing the premise in a shell game.
The study says there could be validity to the hesitancy, so people shouldn't be assumed as idiots. Its fukking crazy that it takes a study to get here, but here we are. Even then, you're using the soft language of the study to argue the opposite of its conclusion. What a shill.
The FACT of the matter is we don't know what the consequences are of a new vaccine until it has been through long term trials.
The study says there could be validity to the hesitancy, so people shouldn't be assumed as idiots. Its fukking crazy that it takes a study to get here, but here we are. Even then, you're using the soft language of the study to argue the opposite of its conclusion. What a shill.
The FACT of the matter is we don't know what the consequences are of a new vaccine until it has been through long term trials.
07-18-2021, 09:34 AM
-
#82
07-18-2021, 09:41 AM
-
#83
- RICHSTRONG
- Pa BITCHES
-
- RICHSTRONG
- Pa BITCHES
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: United States
- Height: 6'2"
- Weight: 350 lbs
- Posts: 85,420
- Subscribers: 14
- Rep Power: 1665576
-
-
I like how libs turn everyone who is Anti(THIS)Vax into everyone being just AntiVax conspiratards. This coming from someone who took the vax and listens to libs daily talk schit on those who didnt.
See monster0ultra's sig
07-18-2021, 09:42 AM
-
#84
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
-
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 55,496
- Rep Power: 57514
-
-
Originally Posted By RICHSTRONG⏩
I hear one liberal constantly jabbering away about it - though I believe vaccines are essential - this lib is ignorant about the vaccine and has no idea how it works just wants Biden's dick.I like how libs turn everyone who is Anti(THIS)Vax into everyone being just AntiVax conspiratards. This coming from someone who took the vax and listens to libs daily talk schit on those who didnt.
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
I can respect someone who knows and understand potential risks.Even then, I think the average individual can see that the history behind other vaccines showed that they were safe and if you change that process that the same guarantee is not in place, especially for new tech. You can't expect someone who has a .001% of dying from covid to inject themselves with short term new bio-tech, especially if they're not even at risk of spreading it. Its an illogical and irrational conclusion otherwise.
I say this over and over, because we see it over and over. Specialists in their respective fields often cannot see the forest for the trees.
I say this over and over, because we see it over and over. Specialists in their respective fields often cannot see the forest for the trees.
The selfish concept of - I am 30, healthy, have no genetic issues, and know that if I get the vaccine I might feel bad for 1 or 2 days and would rather avoid that 1 or 2 days and be a potential carrier and potentially kill others and show no symptoms; therefore, I'm totally cool with not being vaccinated - is just that selfish - the .001% you're talking about. I have virtually no-likelihood of getting Hep A or B. I was still vaccinated.
The conspiracy retard who believes an MRNA vaccine will neutralize their sperm or have them grow gills is just that - a conspiracy retard.
07-18-2021, 09:43 AM
-
#85
- SettingOff
- Banned
-
- SettingOff
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,175
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
cliffs?
07-18-2021, 09:44 AM
-
#86
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
Tell you what. Go get some education in molecular biology and immunology, and I'll take your pov srsly.The article specifically mentions risk-reward and mentions young rural people skipping the vaccination because they weren't going to get sick anyways, yet here you are telling me I'm an idiot for not waiting for longer term information to satisfy that balance.
I knew you'd miss the link, thanks for falling into the trap again. How are you so preposterously delusional yet so impulsive and retarded?
Oh yeah we have another individual who is M E N T A L L Y I L L yet is parading around as a bastion of intelligence as enabled by leftist rhetoric and when a study comes out conflicting your behavior from your own side you shut down.
AYE LMAO
I knew you'd miss the link, thanks for falling into the trap again. How are you so preposterously delusional yet so impulsive and retarded?
Oh yeah we have another individual who is M E N T A L L Y I L L yet is parading around as a bastion of intelligence as enabled by leftist rhetoric and when a study comes out conflicting your behavior from your own side you shut down.
AYE LMAO
And as far as the study, it is showing exactly what I have said all along -- that rational argument and data does not suffice to convince stupid people. Instead, science must be defended at gunpoint, and the stupid people have to be forced to comply. The opposition has to be eradicated. Sooner or later, it's going to happen because any group of people who willingly reject science and math are not capable of reason. And I'm not sorry if it isn't PC or kind to say it. Get educated or get the fuk out of the way. Thanks.

The current thinking in the medical and scientific community is mandates and censorship might be appropriate. Expect great things, motherfker. America is going to bring the fking hammer down on the propaganda machine.
07-18-2021, 09:51 AM
-
#87
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
I hate reading research studies and papers when they write statements like this, "A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected."
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
07-18-2021, 09:52 AM
-
#88
Originally Posted By x-trainer
We all know the holistic approach.I hate reading research studies and papers and they write statements like this, "A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected."
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
You know what needs to be done. Everyone knows. They're just scared.
07-18-2021, 09:52 AM
-
#89
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
-
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 55,496
- Rep Power: 57514
-
-
Originally Posted By x-trainer
They don't want to tell you - forced vaccinations - because you know... that is wrong.I hate reading research studies and papers and they write statements like this, "A more holistic approach to vaccine skepticism is needed if we are to get everyone who needs to be vaccinated protected."
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
Then...... they don't say how, they just say more research and studies needs to be done for future answers.
07-18-2021, 09:53 AM
-
#90
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
-
- tk217
- Methodological Naturalism
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 55,496
- Rep Power: 57514
-
-
Originally Posted By rectifryer⏩
Peer review doesn't invite corruption when scientifically based and actually re-performed.brb executing everyone that disagrees with the results from a corporately funded study on whether or not product (A) causes cancer
the "peer review" process is not only susceptible to corruption, it down right invites it. Academia often boards professors who get the most funding from industry....
the "peer review" process is not only susceptible to corruption, it down right invites it. Academia often boards professors who get the most funding from industry....
The problem is the people granting the "reward" to the paper. These people have to be thoroughly vetted.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts