Whoops

B-b-but the resident misc chitlib jabbies and chit smearers assured us the vaccines were safe long term!

trust the science


the same science they want 78 years to show you

You’re about to be fact checked

Didn't read, but I got Moderna only so hopefully I'm safe.

You are both safe and effective

I'm never gonna dance again
Guillain-Barre killed my rhythm
Though it's Astra Zeneca
I know I'm still a fool
Should've known better than to take the jab
And waste this brain that I've been given

**** man...

May finally have to get it cuz this stupid fukn country doesnt let you leave without it

gf wants to go on vacation

I'm sure you'll have a safe and effective time, don't worry

This.

Great idea, depends on what part of cucknada he's in though that could be a long ass drive

Follow the science and then different science later which is equally true.

Yeah and?

At one point it was mandatory to have here in Canada

Haven't even read the full article yet, let alone follow up on the claims for scientific accuracy or feasibility, but this is definitely worth highlighting:
This doesn't apply at all to Pfizer or Moderna which are mRNA vaccines, which definitely do have a solid safety profile with literally hundreds of millions of cases serving as evidence. And the long-term effects from mRNA vaccines are not a serious worry as I've argued extensively.


Also, increased risk of Bell's palsy, encephalomyelitis,andGuillain Barre syndrome is seen in Covid infection. Whatever the vaccine can do, the virus can do, and worse. This, again, is a no-brainer. There is ararerisk of GB syndrome in one vaccine, and you can easily avoid it and get an mRNA vaccine instead. FWIW, here is a study involving more than 8 million people which showed no increased risk of rare neurological events after vaccination:https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj-2021-068373



I rate this one 3 chicken nuggets:

Imagine taking a jab for chimps lol

I mean the guy literally said pfizer and moderna are safe. Even these companies know it isn't, yet he is defending them.

Sheep will be sheep.

negged lol

There are literally hundreds of millions of vaccinations backing up the claim those vaccines are safe. Hundreds of millions. I've posted all of this before and all of the scientific argument against the anti-vaxx lunacy.


Why I don't really bother anymore, is because the anti-vaxxers never have a scientifically literate conversation. They can't. The second they are contradicted, they start squealing like autistic children, throw insults, neg in anger, then leave. Literally every thread plays out like this and it's a waste of time and shame on me for even responding in this one.


Look at the post above mine. No attempt at all to create a counter-argument, no evidence of scientific literacy or even intelligence. Just gets angry and negs.

And what happens down the line if adverse reactions appear?

You're basing all of this on "here and now" and not what could potentially come down the line - you're trusting people w/ your life who may not have even taken the vaccine themselves.

Heck, even the CEO of Pfizer refused to get the vaccine openly when it was being mandated to people.

You'd get taken a lot more seriously if you didn't come off as some sort of vaccine shill for Big Pharma and just admitted you don't have any clue, like they do, of what could happen down the road.

your government has you brainwashed kiddo

You do realize the meta analysis of mask wearing en masse, I studied this in college as well, was that it was ineffective and useless for public use, correct? As soon as it became a topic of discussion for them to use as a symbol of covid and slavery, they buried and redacted all the past studies and flooded the internet with new studies they just so happened to do that founded mask wearing for public safety as "effective."

Anyone that bases their arguments on purely mainstream science has zero logical discernment, which is you.

Also, if the vaccine was so safe, then why didn't pfizer submit the vaccine they gave to the public for FDA approval (which opens them up to lawsuits)? You know they didn't get the actual vaccine passed by the FDA, right? They purposely used a lab "replica" or similar vaccine to push through that has zero data feedback to get passed, therefore not allowing them to be sued for damages because it technically isn't the same vaccine. Yet here you are trusting the science!

I have literally hundreds of millions of data and research beyond what you believe you have that is over a century old in which continuously is proven wrong or is changed and amended over time, and tons of research to show that it was paid off by companies for a desired outcome.

It's called, science. Your falsified argumentation based on abundance of studies mean absolutely fuk all. It is not an argument. You have no argument. You can't even comprehend the idea of scientific literacy because you don't even acknowledge the inherent flaws of it, nor demonstrate any capacity of basic discernment of it in your comments. You read mainstream studies pushed by big pharma and give them the authority to protect your feeble mind's attempt to seem superior in intelligence for being an agreeable beta.

just keep trusting the 'new' science. basically whatever is on the news that day should be trusted. have a safe and effective day!

Of course you didn't read it, luls.

AstraZeneca was the main vaccine offered in Australia on the initial roll out. Millions of people got it. It was promised to be *safe and effective*. Now we see it is indeednotsafe. But all is peachy because you say so?

I think there might be some walls that need smearing with chit, run along.

I didn't need to read the entire thing (although I since have), since I noticed an early short-circuit in the argument. Since the vaccines I champion aren't adenovirus vectors, using this as a broadbrush argument for vaccine hesitancy is just disingenuous.


Since the anti-vaxxers just started squealing and going "but you go doody on the walls, DURRRR"--as if that has any bearing on what we're talking about--not much point going on with the conversation.

And chicken nuggetsarerelevant to the conversation though huh?

You smearing your own chit on somebody elses walls shows that you are mentally ill, a screw loose, batchit insane if you will. It's relevant because you "champion" experimental vaccines because mainstream media told you they were safe and effective even though there is evidence to the contrary. Something somebody who is mentally ill would do.

Cope

No, even if your made-up chit smearing allegations were true--and my own words show they aren't, and your obsession with it is just downright autistic--it wouldn't be more than an ad hominem. That's the fallacy where you denounce someone's argument based on their personal characteristics rather than the merits of their argument.


That fact alone invalidates your counter to my points since it's just a fallacy. If you make personal attacks instead of dealing with the science of the case it's pretty obvious you're here to not only vindicate your conspiracies, rather than reach a scientifically sound conclusion, but also that you really don't intend on much more than squealing like a child at the slightest hint of disagreement.


I can have a discussion without personal attacks and behaving like a child, why can't you?

I'm not a anti vaxer but I beat Covid twice and I didn't even know I had it the second time besides a cough for literwllt a day n a half.

I don't know why I need a shot and why I should ever been smeared for questioning it

Just let my body produce antibodies endlessly from all cells. What are you, republican?

Whatever the legacy media says literally the exact opposite is true in almost every situation

Every time new information develops about the vaccines not being quite assafe and effectiveas we were initially told, you go into an inane ramble about why the new information is untrue.

Everything you say is based on some "because I said so" mentality, which only a mentally ill person could believe is a legitimate argument. Sitting back and watching a crazy person over the internet who takes selfies in front of public urinals with a pout face, telling stories about how they fk ladyboys and smear chit on walls, as he raves about the efficacy of an experimental vaccines which has shown to be not only unsafe, but also extremely ineffective, now that's amusing.

You probably expected everyone here to find your chit smearing tale an amusing story, because your mind is so twisted. Any personal attack against me, including some chit about "chicken nuggets" doesn't bother me. The only reason you are so against being called a chit smearer is because you know it's true and regret admitting to it.