Forum
»
Natural immunity found to be as effective as COVID vaccine
02-27-2023, 09:27 PM
-
#151
02-27-2023, 09:28 PM
-
#152
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
-
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Posts: 4,136
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
"T cells don't exist because dielectric and disorder and order and so it could not happen. Think?"They never developed antibodies or T cells?
02-27-2023, 09:34 PM
-
#153
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
3 of my wife's clients died, I know about 10 that were hospitalized, and everyone that received the jab has had covid at least twice that I know of. Meanwhile myself, my wife, my brother, my mother, and about 5 close friends caught Covid early 2020, and haven't been sick since..so I'm guessing natural infection is far better than being jabbed. But last I checked, Corna vaccines are notoriously problematic ( mostly due to rapid weakening) and have never been successful.They never developed antibodies or T cells?
02-27-2023, 09:36 PM
-
#154
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze⏩
Ubiquitous viruses are fought and defeated primarily by the T-Cell lymphocytes within our immune systems, Not from natural or artificially implanted antibodies."T cells don't exist because dielectric and disorder and order and so it could not happen. Think?"
But hey keep trying, maybe one day you'll post something intelligent
02-27-2023, 09:38 PM
-
#155
- goody1
- Registered User
-
- goody1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Minnesota, United States
- Age: 48
- Posts: 10,204
- Rep Power: 96536
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Are you comparing those vaccines to the Covid “vaccine?”Do you also take issue with measles, mumps, and rubella (and maybe varicella) vaccines?
02-27-2023, 09:38 PM
-
#156
Originally Posted By Paul
Sorry to hear that3 of my wife's clients died, I know about 10 that were hospitalized, and everyone that received the jab has had covid at least twice that I know of. Meanwhile myself, my wife, my brother, my mother, and about 5 close friends caught Covid early 2020, and haven't been sick since..so I'm guessing natural infection is far better than being jabbed. But last I checked, Corna vaccines are notoriously problematic ( mostly due to rapid weakening) and have never been successful.
But, acquired immunity refers to development of antibodies and t cells, which occurs following both infection and vaccination
02-27-2023, 09:39 PM
-
#157
02-27-2023, 09:46 PM
-
#158
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
yea, so far no one has immunity that took the jab thoughSorry to hear that
But, acquired immunity refers to development of antibodies and t cells, which occurs following both infection and vaccination
But, acquired immunity refers to development of antibodies and t cells, which occurs following both infection and vaccination
02-27-2023, 09:54 PM
-
#159
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
-
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Posts: 4,136
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
Do you even know what a T cell is? List some different types of T cells and their functions.Ubiquitous viruses are fought and defeated primarily by the T-Cell lymphocytes within our immune systems, Not from natural or artificially implanted antibodies.
But hey keep trying, maybe one day you'll post something intelligent
But hey keep trying, maybe one day you'll post something intelligent
02-27-2023, 09:54 PM
-
#160
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
This is a fallacy I've repeatedly addressed over the 2 years I've been around.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-27-2023, 09:58 PM
-
#161
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze⏩
sure, can you answer my question first that I asked you previously?Do you even know what a T cell is? List some different types of T cells and their functions.
Here it is again..
you had seen the prior Governor of NJ (Chris Christie)catch Covid before the jab was available. So if we all saw this middle aged, overweight, diabetic, whom had nothing but health issues the entire time he was in office beat Covid in less that a FUHKING WEEKEND…why the fuk would you think you needed to take the jab?
02-27-2023, 10:05 PM
-
#162
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Pretty sure the wife and I got Covid in Dec of 2019. We are both in constant contact with sick people as we both own our own businesses, neither one of us have been sick since Dec of 2019, same goes for friends and family that caught Covid early on, none of them had have Covid since, while everyone I know that has been jabbed has been sick continually. Care to explain that..?This is a fallacy I've repeatedly addressed over the 2 years I've been around.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
02-27-2023, 10:07 PM
-
#163
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
-
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Posts: 4,136
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
Nobody asked me that, but you should never base medical decisions on a single anecdote. Across large randomized double blinded controlled clinical trials, the vaccines were shown to be effective and reduce risk.sure, can you answer my question first that I asked you previously?
Here it is again..
you had seen the prior Governor of NJ (Chris Christie)catch Covid before the jab was available. So if we all saw this middle aged, overweight, diabetic, whom had nothing but health issues the entire time he was in office beat Covid in less that a FUHKING WEEKEND…why the fuk would you think you needed to take the jab?
Here it is again..
you had seen the prior Governor of NJ (Chris Christie)catch Covid before the jab was available. So if we all saw this middle aged, overweight, diabetic, whom had nothing but health issues the entire time he was in office beat Covid in less that a FUHKING WEEKEND…why the fuk would you think you needed to take the jab?
Now you answer my question. Bonus: do T cells evolve?
02-27-2023, 10:08 PM
-
#164
02-27-2023, 10:09 PM
-
#165
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
Bases his beliefs on personal anecdote instead of rigorous scientific data. There is a fallacy based on this, it's called Person Who reasoning.Pretty sure the wife and I got Covid in Dec of 2019. We are both in constant contact with sick people as we both own our own businesses, neither one of us have been sick since Dec of 2019, same goes for friends and family that caught Covid early on, none of them had have Covid since, while everyone I know that has been jabbed has been sick continually. Care to explain that..?
Paul Drool, not even once.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
02-27-2023, 10:15 PM
-
#166
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Why should anecdotal evidence be ignored, it's what all other evidence is based on dummyBases his beliefs on personal anecdote instead of rigorous scientific data. There is a fallacy based on this, it's called Person Who reasoning.
Paul Drool, not even once.
Paul Drool, not even once.
02-27-2023, 10:21 PM
-
#167
02-27-2023, 10:24 PM
-
#168
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze⏩
Again.Why should anecdotal evidence be ignored, it's what all other evidence is based on dummy?Nobody asked me that, but you should never base medical decisions on a single anecdote. Across large randomized double blinded controlled clinical trials, the vaccines were shown to be effective and reduce risk.
Now you answer my question. Bonus: do T cells evolve?
Now you answer my question. Bonus: do T cells evolve?
T-Cells are types of white blood cell in the immune system. 2 types. ..Cytotoxic T-cells, these destroy infected cells, and Helper T-cells these send signals that direct other immune cells to combat infection.
I don't see the vaccines waning infection whatsoever, I see the exact opposite actually. Weird because Ratfish is in the same city as you, and he reported the same..can you explain..?
02-27-2023, 10:25 PM
-
#169
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
02-28-2023, 12:25 AM
-
#170
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
-
- TaiMaiSchutze
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Posts: 4,136
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
lmao there are way more than 2 types but okAgain.Why should anecdotal evidence be ignored, it's what all other evidence is based on dummy?
T-Cells are types of white blood cell in the immune system. 2 types. ..Cytotoxic T-cells, these destroy infected cells, and Helper T-cells these send signals that direct other immune cells to combat infection.
I don't see the vaccines waning infection whatsoever, I see the exact opposite actually. Weird because Ratfish is in the same city as you, and he reported the same..can you explain..?
T-Cells are types of white blood cell in the immune system. 2 types. ..Cytotoxic T-cells, these destroy infected cells, and Helper T-cells these send signals that direct other immune cells to combat infection.
I don't see the vaccines waning infection whatsoever, I see the exact opposite actually. Weird because Ratfish is in the same city as you, and he reported the same..can you explain..?
Ratfish is a drunk nazi wtf does he know? No offense to Ratfish.
02-28-2023, 12:46 AM
-
#171
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze⏩
Umm..the dude is black, and you are the only Nazi.lmao there are way more than 2 types but ok
Ratfish is a drunk nazi wtf does he know? No offense to Ratfish.
Ratfish is a drunk nazi wtf does he know? No offense to Ratfish.
Stay mad EhRhab.
02-28-2023, 04:17 AM
-
#172
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
you tell us.Even measles and rubella?
02-28-2023, 05:26 AM
-
#173
02-28-2023, 05:31 AM
-
#174
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Only your vaccines aren't helping lol. You've got people who are totally vaxxed and boosted getting the sniffles still - AND you've got people who haven't had any of them who haven't gotten it at all.I don't think I do and certainly don't intend to do so.
What we have available suggests covid can and does impose many poor health outcomes beyond immediate death.
It also seems vaccines can help mitigate those poor outcomes.
The challenge is with binary thinking.
I would argue that it's possible to think Pharma companies are profit-driven, greedy corporations that continued to foster global health inequity; that all politicians are charlatans (regardless of party); and that vaccines can help- all at the same time.
What we have available suggests covid can and does impose many poor health outcomes beyond immediate death.
It also seems vaccines can help mitigate those poor outcomes.
The challenge is with binary thinking.
I would argue that it's possible to think Pharma companies are profit-driven, greedy corporations that continued to foster global health inequity; that all politicians are charlatans (regardless of party); and that vaccines can help- all at the same time.
And save me your standard Ronaholic party lines of "It was never meant to prevent it!" and "They would have been more sicker if it wasn't for their Fauci Fluid injections!"
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
02-28-2023, 05:38 AM
-
#175
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
I've had Covid twice, I'm unvaccinated, according to you I should either be in the hospital, suffering long term complications or dead.This is a fallacy I've repeatedly addressed over the 2 years I've been around.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
Infection can be solid--like 85%+ protection against reinfection--but vaccines are somewhat better and last longer than natural infection immunity. The problem with the natural infection argument is that it typically doesn't account for the extreme volatility of natural infections.
Even though the average antibody titre rivals that of a one vaccine dose, there is still a large degree of volatility. In infected people, some have high responses, some have low and some have no detectable at all. Vaccines, by contrast, give a stable high level response in their recipients. And IMO the severity of infection is not the only determinant of your antibody titre, there are likely other factors.
So with vaccines, there is no gamble apart from the minimal risk of side effects. With infection there is a small chance of matching the vaccinated response. There's a good chance of a moderate response, with a probability of non-protection at 9 months. And then there's the small chance of minimal protection.
So, it's downright stupid to assume an asymptomatic infection has given you great immunity. If you weren't hospitalised, don't count on your immunity. I haven't even started on all the other side effects and long term complications you're gambling with either.
There's no reason not to get the vaccine beyond the minimal risk of side effects. I can only write it off to laziness or conspiracy-thinking. Or, as I said the other day, it's a mistake in risk management reasoning where you think the known and more significant risk is safer than a trivial and unknown risk.
Now enlighten us, Mr wannabe intellectual, why should I get the jab?
02-28-2023, 05:41 AM
-
#176
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
None if them are mine, but they have helped and continue to do so.Only your vaccines aren't helping lol. You've got people who are totally vaxxed and boosted getting the sniffles still - AND you've got people who haven't had any of them who haven't gotten it at all.
And save me your standard Ronaholic party lines of "It was never meant to prevent it!" and "They would have been more sicker if it wasn't for their Fauci Fluid injections!"
And save me your standard Ronaholic party lines of "It was never meant to prevent it!" and "They would have been more sicker if it wasn't for their Fauci Fluid injections!"
02-28-2023, 05:41 AM
-
#177
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
He's an communist authoritarian wannabe, not a Nazi.Umm..the dude is black, and you are the only Nazi.
Stay mad EhRhab.
Stay mad EhRhab.
02-28-2023, 05:42 AM
-
#178
02-28-2023, 05:57 AM
-
#179
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Helped what?None if them are mine, but they have helped and continue to do so.
When your sacred Fauci Fluid vaccinations were first rolled out they were going to save the world, remember? "You won't get covid if you get vaxxed!" Then the vaxxed people ended up getting the sniffles anyway, and it was blamed it on the UN-vaxxed!
Now stop copy and pasting "science" for a moment, use your fuking head, and tell us how the hell that even works.
I'm telling you bro there's something completely rotten with your sacred Rona. And all you Ronaholics who keep defending the narrative after three years look dumb AF.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
02-28-2023, 06:12 AM
-
#180
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
