i dont know shylock, you tell me?

those people were drugged up on prescriptions.

So, i could argue yes indirectly, because the pharmaceutical companies and political lobbys who's leaders are over represented with guess who?

however this thread is about 9/11

but what is the motivation behind this? to start the war on terror. the war did poorly. the neocons were thrust out of power in the GOP and cant win elections anymore.


what did they think they would gain from it?

It's funny reading your post because the post above/before yours 100% disproves your post.

building 7 with explosives

Yep. It is beyond strange.

I have a better chance of seeing a squatch then ever getting a straight answer. It makes no sense how that building fell.

I really want Tucker to make his own show and say this kind of chit daily. It would wake up all the boomers who watch fox news

Silverstein has said in interviews that he usually spent his mornings in breakfast meetings at Windows on the World on top of the World Trade Center North Tower, and with new tenants in the building. However, the morning of September 11, 2001, his wife insisted he attend a medical appointment, inadvertently saving him from certain death.

In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein Properties, made a $3.22 billion bid to lease-purchase the World Trade Center.[16] He was outbid by $30 million by Vornado Realty, with Boston Properties and Brookfield Properties also competing for the lease. However, Vornado withdrew in March, giving Silverstein 14 days to negotiate a new bid. His negotiated bid was finalized on April 26, 2001, in partnership with Westfield America, Inc.[17][18] and accepted on July 24, 2001.[19] It was the first time in the complex's 31-year history that it had changed management. After it withdrew, Vornado announced a deal with Bloomberg LP to finance Bloomberg's new headquarters at 731 Lexington Avenue.[20]

The lease agreement applied to One, Two, Four, and Five World Trade Center, and about 425,000 square feet (39,500 m2) of retail space. Silverstein put up $14 million of his own money to secure the deal.[21] The agreement gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the obligation to rebuild the structures if they were destroyed.[22]

Damn son.

Buy WTC 6 months before the attack.
Grab a "terrorist insurance" 2 months before the attack.
Put only 14 million of your own money for the multi-billion dollar deal
Tell your mates to call in sick and buy puts on AAL & United before 9/11
Go to a medical appointment exactly on the day of the attack.

Attack happens.

Collect 4.55 billion from insurance
Mates collect massive profits from put options
Everything went better than expected

Great Israel Project, bro.

Doesn't matter which political party "wins" in the JewSA, they all bend the knee to Israel and do its bidding. So it doesn't matter in the slightest that the GOP/Neocon never wins again, because the the mantle would be taken up by the next Democrat, anyway. It's all fkn political theater. Like people say, you have the illusion of choice in the JewSA.

Any war in the middle east, over any reason, will always be a good thing, as it destabilizes the region and allows Israel to expand its land/power grab and, most importantly, gives the jews more legitimate reason to promote mass migration from said war torn countries.

two birds with one stone: ruin Arab/Muslim countries so that Israel becomes more powerful, all the while filling European/White countries with immigrants from those places that you've just destroyed.

No one is going to do anything about it so having the information is meaningless.

Glad he's shedding light on how the media manipulation machine actually works

Disagree.

The more that is revealed of prior operations the more people may wake up to the rot in our power structure.


Also what happened to desktop misc? Is it gone? I have phone misc on my chromebook now and it sucks. Can't multiquote and have to click through links to see images in a different tab.

This is almost 22 years old.

None of this information is new.

Weren't allowed because something nefarious happened?

Or main stream media bosses didn't want to get lumped in with the Alex Joneses and all the other ridiculous conspiracy theorists who wouldn't shut up about it?

WTC 7 was controlled demo. They 'pulled it,' and it sank directly into its parking garage basement.

The implication is of course, if it was controlled demo (which takes weeks and months to set up), then potentially the other 2 towers were controlled demo (and planes).

Who has the BBC video of them saying Building 7 just dropped (it was still standing in their video background), and then 7 miutes later it actually dropped on video. So not only was it pulled, but someone fed talking points to news outlets before it was dropped. Sloppy sloppy ****. Sounds like classic CIA **** there.




Its this one, building is literally standing behind her still (though I don't know which one it is, there are other videos that call out which one it is) From comments "Tower 7 (Solomon Brothers building) is the taller building half behind the right side of the reporter's head when viewing the video. Behind her on the left side is the smoke from the twin towers. Behind her on the right, is Tower 7, which hasn't fallen yet."

EDIT: JFL at anyone that believes the 'official' story on any of this **** for 9/11. How gullible could you be.

Yes, but think about how many people were too young to follow the story at the time, or who have been born in the past 22 years.

A lot of stuff that may seem to be common knowledge to 30+ people can be novel or unknown to younger people.

My daughter has a fondness for the 80's. She bought a rotary dial phone [crap quality compared to the old ones] and would like to have a hardline so she can use it.

Whats funny is the glowies monitoring this site for the incel uprising probably never saw any of this footage either - they're likely younger than us. GLOWIES, time to understand you're working for a firm that actively covered up wrong doing to Americans by Americans. It was likely CYA for the CIA because of their incompetence handling their operatives. Read a ****ing book!

They murdered pat tillman too because he learned the truth and was about to go public with it.

IIRC there were 2 doods in WT7 moments before it fell and they reported hearing explosions throughout the building before they narrowly managed to exit. I believe they were both suicided after going public with their story (inconvenient deaths).

EDIT: Its these 2 guys:https://www.globalresearch.ca/barry-...worthy/5793432

"“Well, me and Hess, the Corporation Counsel, were on the 23rd floor. I told him, ‘We gotta get out of here.’ We started walking down the stairs. We made it to the eighth floor [later clarified to be the sixth floor, see here at the 3:50 mark]. Big explosion! Blew us back into the eighth floor. And I turned to Hess and I said, ‘This is it, we’re dead. We’re not gonna make it outta here…’”"

"Tellingly,despite his prominence on national TV, Jennings was never called to testify before the 9/11 Commission, and his account was not included in the 9/11 Commission Report or the NIST WTC Reports. Similarly, the 9/11 Commission also completely ignored the firefighters’ reports of explosions in the Twin Towers, as contained in the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) oral histories, while making “fairly extensive use of the oral histories” for other purposes, according to 9/11 researcher Graeme MacQueen (see page 9 of the PDF, page 55 of the Journal )."

One died at 53 years of age, the other at 43 years of age.

JFL!

They esploded tower 7 because they were jealous of our freedoms. Simple as.

This is especially bizarre because at this^ moment, there was absolutely no reason to think building 7 was going to implode on itself.

Large steel structures can have a raging fire on every floor and still be standing upright when the flames are put out.

So they either need to acknowledge the architect/construction of the building was absolute CHIT, or acknowledge that possibly something else was at play.

This is the equivalent of your engine falling out of your car onto the highway, and you saying that it was small bump that caused it.

Also:

"According to the 9/11 Commission, the passports of two of the Flight 93 hijackers were also found intact in the aircraft's debris field."

I mean.... Are we all retards?

Exactly, and it gets worse, the BBC actually addressed this clip around 2008 ish with a statement that said "we can't find our original video of this archived incident so we don't think it happened like our viewers are telling us. (paraphrased)" And though many people readily pointed them to the many you tube videos (like the one above), their official position is that they can't address it because they can't see it.

I wish to christ I was joking, let me see if I can find that link too. EDIT incoming.

Aww sheet, here it is:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...es/7434230.stm

Are the media part of a conspiracy?
It is alleged that it was not just the government, the police and the fire department that conspired to destroy Tower 7. People have also pointed the finger at the media.

Both CNN and the BBC reported that Tower 7 was about to collapse or had collapsed when in fact it was still standing. Some have even suggested this shows the media were handed scripts by the conspirators.

The BBC says this was simply an honest mistake on what was probably the fastest moving, most chaotic and most confusing story they had ever covered. After an investigation the head of BBC World News, Richard Porter, told The Conspiracy Files:
"The investigations we've carried out suggest very strongly that we were working on the basis of an incorrect news agency report."

The news agency Reuters have given this statement to the BBC:

"On September 11, 2001, Reuters incorrectly reported that one of the buildings at the New York World Trade Centre, 7WTC, had collapsed before it actually did. The report was picked up from a local news story and was withdrawn as soon as it emerged that the building had not fallen."

The BBC correspondent at the centre of the controversy, Jane Standley, has never talked about this before.

She told The Conspiracy Files that she had just arrived in New York. She had never heard of Tower 7, and did not recognise it in the New York skyline. On the day she had precious little information available.

"It's very unfortunate," she said "that this whole conspiracy kind of I think rather ridiculous situation has grown out of what's really a very small and very honest mistake."

So the official explanation is that Reuters was tipped off early about the collapse, and so the BBC didn't even bother to ask them who gave them the erroneous report - you know like reporters would typically ask to ensure their own incompetence isn't the issueYup, guess that solves it boys, no conspiracy here. JFL

I swear they think we're all born yesterday.

Except no debris of any of the 4 airplanes was ever found.

That building debris (not plane debris) from the impact on the twin towers fell into the building. It was roughly a 20ft by 10ft beam that smacked into two of the floors. This caused a fire, which spread to others floors. Of the 52 floors, less than a third were on fire by that afternoon. So you are asked to believe that a 52 story building was struck with a beam, 1/3 was burning for 6 hours or so and its collapsed into itself.Thats the big one. You are asked to belive that Hani Hanjur, a man who failed a single engine pilots exam that summer so bad that the school contacted the FBI and had one experience with a simulator for the wrong plane, got a hold of those controls and u turned the plane for the pentagon. He was pointed right at it, all he had to do was decline in elevation and land on the buiding. Well instead he decided to accelerate to the planes VMO, past the pentagon, make a 360 degree banking manuever that pilots claim isnt possible with his experience and then at over 400mph come screaming down to the pentagon lawn and glide into the one wall out of 5 that was reinforced for blast events just that summer. He was only several meters above the ground because he clipped telephone poles. The blue angles cant do that, but Hani did....The "pull it" comment came from Silverstein talking with cheif of fire over that walkies that afternoon. It can be possible he ment pull the firefighting operation as they had been putting it out for a matter of hours and perhaps silverstein just said cut the losses, keep the men safe. More likely he said exactly what he ment and told them to detonate. That is a juicy detail of that day, but better evidence for WTC 7 than that.The plane clipped telephone poles, which is how they hang their hat on the plane wings being real (missles dont have wings). The blast from impact created a fireball that punched through an extra wall all the way into the cental courtyard. The plane did break apart on impact, again unlike all other plane crash data we have, but the weird thing about the debris is that there is no large debris. It was all small debris that were quickly scooped up by FBI in minutes. They were on site in a minute and debris gone by the time cameras started rolling. Thats likely as their office was in sight, but whats not likley is that there is no record of two rolyce royce engines on site which 100% of the time survive crashes. The lack of royle royce engines in shanksville follows the same line of thinking.




-No footage of the 19 hijackers in an airport that day
-No rolls royce engines
-all 3 impact speeds exceeding VMO by a lot
-only 1 hijacker with a shred of flying experience
-Wont release black box audio data to public
-Silversteins "medical oppoinment" that day
-No steel frame building ever collapsing to fire, yet happened 3x that day
-Jet fuel that visually blew up on impact apparently dripped down 100+ floors of an elevator shaft and exploded (see lobby explosions)
-Multiple explosions from eyewitness right before towers go
-A 1 hour long fire of desks and printers melts steel beams???

The list goes on and on and thats not even including the polotical/economical insentives. Once you understand 9/11, you understand the lengths the US gov't will go to have their way. So to everyone saying "its 22 years ago" "they wont do anytthing" "who cares"...you got a lot of research to do.

9/11 the new pearl harbor...hard to find, great to watch. 5 hours long FYI and will turn you schizo, semi srs.

This type of video makes it so abundantly clear the degree to which FOX is simply controlled opposition. This guy gets invited on, tells the objective truth about what's going on, and Hannity does nothing but critique him as a nutjob (without ever making any contrary claim or offering anything to meaningfully dispute what the guy is saying - feminine means of argumentation), all while the chirons at the bottom blast that guy for old corruption charges and being removed from the House (none of which bears at all upon what they are discussing).

Golden Rule to understanding American politics: If they don't name the jews, you can rest assure it's controlled opposition.

That's it. That's the blackpill.

Russian CGI

jesus christ another one of these threads?