Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Bodhy Is A Pathological Liar
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 92
  2. Page 3 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Bodhy Is A Pathological Liar

post 1682279473 05-08-2023, 05:21 AM
-
#61
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
What a revelation!

I guess we will also learn that water is wet.
Check this guy for a pubeless vagina, too.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682279753 05-08-2023, 05:29 AM
-
#62
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
What a revelation!

I guess we will also learn that water is wet.
true but it is nice to have an official thread/judgement on the R&P history books
post 1682280723 05-08-2023, 05:51 AM
-
#63
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  1. goody1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Minnesota, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 10,204
  7. Rep Power: 96536
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
1. How is intentionally mislabeling macadamia nuts for item at a lower price match with "I made every effort to do things the proper way but I had somewhere I absolutely needed to be, but I needed those things too"

Or "but I always, always,
flog those plastic bags they charge 15c for.
Never pay for them."
In for response
post 1682349243 05-09-2023, 07:10 AM
-
#64
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I wonder why this thread was abandoned by the chitsmearer.
Actually, that is very telling. It seems you take my word when it's about chit smearing, or tranny fukking, or shop-lifting.


So it seems like I'm not a pathological liar at all. I'm only lying when you need me to be. Is that about right?
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682349513 05-09-2023, 07:13 AM
-
#65
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I wonder why this thread was abandoned by the chitsmearer.
more importantly - who is going to be the one that finally puts Bodhy in the red? On his recent trajectory it should happen this summer
post 1682349533 05-09-2023, 07:13 AM
-
#66
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Posts: 8,063
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Actually, that is very telling. It seems you take my word when it's about chit smearing, or tranny fukking, or shop-lifting.


So it seems like I'm not a pathological liar at all. I'm only lying when you need me to be. Is that about right?
ethered lol
post 1682349593 05-09-2023, 07:14 AM
-
#67
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Actually, that is very telling. It seems you take my word when it's about chit smearing, or tranny fukking, or shop-lifting.


So it seems like I'm not a pathological liar at all. I'm only lying when you need me to be. Is that about right?
how does that work when you accuse us of lying that you said you did all those things?
post 1682349693 05-09-2023, 07:16 AM
-
#68
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Banderistan⏩
ethered lol
Yeah, it's pretty lulzy. The thing about someone who's borderline mentally disabled (and there are far worse than him) is that it's very easy to get him to tie his shoelaces together and fall flat on his face.


Very easy to catch them in contradictions.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682349793 05-09-2023, 07:18 AM
-
#69
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I wonder if we'll ever get a reply to this post, instead of the incessant squealing we are getting from the chitsmearer.
I've actually replied to him extensively in the discord and for some reason, he still isn't happy. More to the point, I'm showing you that this is flatly contradictory from you and your ilk.


I can't be a pathological liar and also telling the truth about chit smearing or tranny fukking or shop lifting. It seems to me that you only call what I say into question when it's something cool/positive. Which means I'm not a pathological liar, I'm only a liar when you need me to be.


That's right, isn't it?
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682349893 05-09-2023, 07:20 AM
-
#70
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Wincel's current alt has almost double the reps as chitsmearer.

That alone says a lot.
I stopped bothering to neg wincel since he just keeps getting banned and starting over
post 1682349913 05-09-2023, 07:21 AM
-
#71
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
I've actually replied to him extensively in the discord and for some reason, he still isn't happy. More to the point, I'm showing you that this is flatly contradictory from you and your ilk.


I can't be a pathological liar and also telling the truth about chit smearing or tranny fukking or shop lifting. It seems to me that you only call what I say into question when it's something cool/positive. Which means I'm not a pathological liar, I'm only a liar when you need me to be.


That's right, isn't it?
when you claim you didn't say that you smeared chit on the wall - that is a lie that you repeat enough to make it pathological.
post 1682349963 05-09-2023, 07:22 AM
-
#72
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Posts: 8,063
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
when you claim you didn't say that you smeared chit on the wall - that is a lie that you repeat enough to make it pathological.
How do you know? What if he's lying about smearing chit on the wall? How could you be sure?
post 1682350033 05-09-2023, 07:23 AM
-
#73
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals and their "logical" arguments.
It's a perfectly logical argument. If you're going to be a condescending twit, outline the logical fallacy in the argument:


1. If Bodhy is telling the truth about chit smearing, tranny fukking or shoplifting, then he isn't a pathological liar.

2. Bodhy is telling the truth about chit smearing, tranny fukking and shoplifting.

Conclusion: Bodhy isn't a pathological liar.


That's a perfectly logically valid and IYO, a sound, argument. It follows the form If A, then B. A, therefore B. The rule of inference is modus ponens.



If the argument is faulty, be my guest.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682350093 05-09-2023, 07:24 AM
-
#74
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 20,548
  6. Subscribers: 19
  7. Rep Power: 1102238
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
What am I supposed to see here? What's the discrepancy?

Looks like the same story told slightly differently each time. Bodhy is walking around, gets jumped by two douches. Gets in a stoush, phone is stolen.


Why didn't you just ask him about this and to explain, rather than run in here and make a thread about it?
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
I'm just asking you why not simply ask him about it because this doesn't really seem like a big deal. Not worth making a thread over and pretty weird, actually.
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
Well I don't know, I don't see the big deal and there could be another way of interpreting the words. Just sayin', maybe you should actually ask the guy because this really wasn't worth running in here and making a thread about it.

Later.
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
I say just ask the guy. The only deal is the knife is in one telling, and not the other. Maybe the douches approached him, he stood his ground until the knife was produced, then wisely decided it's not worth dying over or something. Just one other way of looking at it.

Like I said, need more detail and probably not even worth making a thread about.
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
Whatever. All I'm saying is that there is no problem here that couldn't be resolved by simply asking the dude mentioned in the OP about it, instead of this unnecessary thread.
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
Banderistan and I offered versions of the story which differ. There's not enough information there, really, which is why I said, just ask the guy to elaborate rather than come in here and make a thread about it. Why not just ask him instead of instantly going for accusations of lying?
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
You still haven't explained why you just didn't simply ask the guy? Was this thread even necessary?

"Oh, look. There's a guy with two tellings of his story in the misc and I think they're inconsistent. Should I just simply ask him about it? No. I'll go and make a thread in the R/P about it."
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
Because there are sides to every story and it's the proper thing to do before you make accusations. It could have settled it without the need for this strange thread. In addition, there are a thousand worthless and bullchit accusations thrown around here every single day. Accusations on here aren't worth chit.

Just ask the guy, and if he then makes an explanation which still doesn't make sense, maybe you'll have something. I still don't even see what the discrepancy is now.
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
If it's a lie, there won't be the possibility of a sensible elaboration. But there are interpretations of the words in the OP which make sense. I've given one myself off the top of my head. But I don't know nor do you since you didn't even bother to simply ask the guy.

That's the point. The fact the guy wasn't just casually asked first suggests this is meant to just bully or piss on someone. Which is cringe, and I'll just restate that you could have asked him and left it at that. Not a big deal at all.
^^Bodhy needed an alt account to defend himself in this thread.

Proof NaziCucker is Bodhy's alt account:


Thread Title: Is there too much rep system abuse/[color=red]continuous negging[color] here??
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Originally Posted By NaziCucker⏩
There's too much rep abuse andcontinuous negging around here, me thinks.


It seems like rep power doesn't indicate a good poster, but rather who's a part of the popular clique or willing to do silly rep trading or begging. It's pretty childish to justcontinuously negsomeone over and over because they've got someopposing opinion.Ain't it against the rules?



Yeah, I get complaining about negs just nets more negs, but I don't care.
^^NaziCucker is Bodhy's alt account. He rather make this thread under his red alt account, so his main Bodhy account doesn't get negged even further for crying about negs.

His Bodhy account has also repeatedly made this same complaint about getting"continuously negged"for opposing opinions. It's not that he gets negged for opposing opinions, it's just that he is the most insufferable poster on this forum.


If you want to neg OP for crying about negs ITT, neg his main Bodhy account instead.


Edit:
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
And this need for a safe space, reinforced with bullying andcontinuous negging. Imagine being so fragile that you're literally incapable of posting somewhere unless every single person there already agrees with you and you never have to face anopposing opinion.
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Not missing him TBH. Hiscontinuous and pointlessnegging was stupid, and his only ever response to anything I said was "chit smearing tranny cawksucker plz".


Hopefully he found a sense of meaning and purpose beyond trolling around here.
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Good. Hope it's permanent. Dude wascontinuous negging bitch.
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Yus, but do you think there's rep abuse too? Seems like a lot of people engage incontinuous neggingand isn't that against the rules?
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
There's a user called ExPatriot who negged me for this post for no reason and just left a . in my CP. What is with the hateful morons on here and theircontinuous and pointless negging?
post 1682350173 05-09-2023, 07:25 AM
-
#75
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Btw fellas, don't mind OP, the middle aged non-lifting fraud.


About a year ago I nailed him for being a middle-aged non- lifting fraud:https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=181339423

A total loser whose entire life revolves around a bodybuilding forum even though he doesn't lift or bodybuild. I moved into his head rent-free that day.

The funniest thing is that even after such a brutal call out he hasn't addressed the situation by picking up a weight. He just waits until he thinks he's got some goss on me and makes a thread about it.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682350293 05-09-2023, 07:27 AM
-
#76
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals and their "logical" arguments srs.
I hope you know the "pseudo-intellectual" call is a bitch-made move, breh. It just signals you've got nothing intelligent to say.


You know I've got you here. The argument is airtight, so is your failure to address it an admission that I'm not a pathological liar? Are you willing to accept that to hang onto your beloved chit-smearer insults?
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682350513 05-09-2023, 07:31 AM
-
#77
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 20,548
  6. Subscribers: 19
  7. Rep Power: 1102238
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I wonder if we'll ever get a reply to this post, instead of the incessant squealing we are getting from the chitsmearer.
Probably not. Still waiting on how a school ranked 1,007 is somehow really globally ranked in the top 40.

Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Amended. And I did attend the University of Newcastle for my undergrad work, but it's not where I'm doing my PhD.


Whilst Newcastle is ranked around 197 in the world,where I'm at now is in the top 40 and much closer to Cornell in the world rankings.
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Global Rankings:


Cornell University: #22

U. of Newcastle: #230
Charles Darwin: #1,007








https://www.usnews.com/education/bes...ities/rankings



Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
And even more, the claim about being at the better uni is not actually a lie. There's a perfectly sensible explanation for that, unique to how things in Australia have unfolded over the last two years. That's an explanation you'll receive as soon as we see your public apologyAnd even more, the claim about being at the better uni is not actually a lie. There's a perfectly sensible explanation for that, unique to how things in Australia have unfolded over the last two years. That's an explanation you'll receive as soon as we see your public apology
post 1682350623 05-09-2023, 07:35 AM
-
#78
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By BigNik78⏩
All the libs in here are absolute lying pieces of chit that nobody else wants and whom should be launched to sea. Fkng garbage ****gits srs.
That is completely unfair to the majority of libs here.

Bodhy is in a league of his own, his lies and frauds and mental instability do not represent anyone but himself.

Now, one thing - they could do a much better job of disavowing him, which I just do not see often at all, if ever to be honest.

Never mind his idiotic lying - his overt racism, something a lot of the forum libs pretend they care about, none of them call him out on it.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1682350703 05-09-2023, 07:37 AM
-
#79
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Interesting "logic".



I wonder if we'll ever get a reply to this post, instead of the incessant squealing we are getting from the chitsmearer.
What do you want me to say? I've already addressed Chase in the discord. I mislabelled macadamia nuts because the supermarket disgustingly overpriced them and I wanted to test the exploitability of the self-service checkouts. Not because I had evil intentions, but simply because when they were implemented, I thought this technology must be easily exploitable.


Plus, there's the few times I absolutely needed to be somewhere and took some non-paid for items when I made every effort to do it the right way.

All of which is moot, since I donated back to the store at least triple the value of what I took. So using that as an attack against me is very lame.




Holy chit, too. Does anyone need some free accommodation? You can move into the space I've cleared out in the middle-aged non-lifting fraud's head.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682351123 05-09-2023, 07:44 AM
-
#80
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Thanks for providing the proof that you are in fact a pathological liar.
If I'm lying, then I didn't shoplift and I'm lying about it. What are you even saying?


I'm admitting I did it, but I'm offering an explanation which makes the whole affair far more innocuous than you are portraying. Because in Commonwealth law, the charge of theft actually requires the intention of 'permanent deprivation'. You need to intend to deprive the business of that value forever.


Since I didn't, it's not within the letter of the law where I am, so whilst I still took chit from the store, I incurred a net loss in money doing so.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682351253 05-09-2023, 07:47 AM
-
#81
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
It's a perfectly logical argument. If you're going to be a condescending twit, outline the logical fallacy in the argument:


1. If Bodhy is telling the truth about chit smearing, tranny fukking or shoplifting, then he isn't a pathological liar.

2. Bodhy is telling the truth about chit smearing, tranny fukking and shoplifting.

Conclusion: Bodhy isn't a pathological liar.

That's a perfectly logically valid and IYO, a sound, argument. It follows the form If A, then B. A, therefore B. The rule of inference is modus ponens.

If the argument is faulty, be my guest.
Your argument does not address that you lie, like you did when you made up being in a relationship with a random tinder slut, but you lie to prop yourself up.

So, when you make up stories and lies about being in a doctoral program in a top 20 school - you are doing this to try and impress people.

Nobody is impressed by anyone smearing poop on walls, though. So that story does not fit the criteria of being one of the things you (or anyone) would lie about.

You could argue you were trying to impress people with the tranny ladyboy fuking, as that was a degenerate misc thread full of scum into sickening sexual deviancy, and you saying you were also into it was just you trying to "fit in", that at least might have some credibility.

Were you lying and "trying to impress people" when you said you shoplifted, nearly beat a man to death for no reason with your mastery of BJJ or any other of the many ridiculous things you've said? I don't know - maybe, sure.

The only thing I take for sure is:
- You are a massive liar
- You had a mental break down, smeared chit on walls, then later deleted the thread

You deleting that thread, that is another sign it was truthful, one of the few things you've deleted. You deleted it because it was one of the few truthful and embarassing things you've posted.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1682351403 05-09-2023, 07:50 AM
-
#82
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Your argument does not address that you lie, like you did when you made up being in a relationship with a random tinder slut, but you lie to prop yourself up.

So, when you make up stories and lies about being in a doctoral program in a top 20 school - you are doing this to try and impress people.

Nobody is impressed by anyone smearing poop on walls, though. So that story does not fit the criteria of being one of the things you (or anyone) would lie about.

You could argue you were trying to impress people with the tranny ladyboy fuking, as that was a degenerate misc thread full of scum into sickening sexual deviancy, and you saying you were also into it was just you trying to "fit in", that at least might have some credibility.
see, he's too good at sucking us in with his lies to be ignored en masse
post 1682351563 05-09-2023, 07:53 AM
-
#83
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Your argument does not address that you lie, like you did when you made up being in a relationship with a random tinder slut, but you lie to prop yourself up.

So, when you make up stories and lies about being in a doctoral program in a top 20 school - you are doing this to try and impress people.
That "relationship" thing has been addressed a million times, and LogicalLifts was sent my transcript, so the claim of a lie about being in a doctoral program isrefuted.The only remaining question on that front is whether you will ever see the transcript, which looks doubtful right now.

Irrelevant JUSA is irrelevant.
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals performing mental gymnastics.

Riddle me this- if you got caught in the act on the spot... what would it be considered?
There's no mental gymnastics here. I'm just unpacking what you're saying, which is quite ridiculous. I'm not lying about it because I admit I did it. But your portrayal is disingenuous.



For it to actually count as "getting caught", I would have had to have left the businesses grounds. Hypothetically, say a security guard caught me and detained me, I would have missed the bus going to where I needed to be, so the whole rationale for leaving with the goods without paying would actually have been moot. I'd simply go back to the store and pay for them and be pissed off that I was late, and explain to the store the situation.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682351623 05-09-2023, 07:54 AM
-
#84
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
That "relationship" thing has been addressed a million times, and LogicalLifts was sent my transcript, so the claim of a lie about being in a doctoral program isrefuted.The only remaining question on that front is whether you will ever see the transcript, which looks doubtful right now.

Irrelevant JUSA is irrelevant.






There's no mental gymnastics here. I'm just unpacking what you're saying, which is quite ridiculous. I'm not lying about it because I admit I did it. But your portrayal is disingenuous.



For it to actually count as "getting caught", I would have had to have left the businesses grounds. Hypothetically, say a security guard caught me and detained me, I would have missed the bus going to where I needed to be, so the whole rationale for leaving with the goods without paying would actually have been moot. I'd simply go back to the store and pay for them and be pissed off that I was late, and explain to the store the situation.
everything in this post is a lie
post 1682352063 05-09-2023, 08:02 AM
-
#85
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
That "relationship" thing has been addressed a million times, and LogicalLifts was sent my transcript, so the claim of a lie about being in a doctoral program isrefuted.The only remaining question on that front is whether you will ever see the transcript, which looks doubtful right now.

Irrelevant JUSA is irrelevant.
You have not addressed chit. You goal-post shifted, as always. Pretended that you never said what you said, as if making a thread, "HOLD ME MISC, I FOUND THE ONE!" and posting some poor random single mother's tinder photos, you saying you had been with her for 6 months, that you then later want us to believe wasn't you saying you were in a relationship with her? Fuk right off. I may not care enough about the PHD stuff or have enough personal know-how to call you out there, but I saw that tinder thread play out and know better than to accept your broken word when you lie and say it has been addressed a million times.

Any motherfuker so desperate and pathetic that they'd lie about that woman, they'd lie about anything.

And: LL has not reported back and confirmed he received anything, he has only said he has gotten nothing. So, more lies.

As to me being "irrelevant"... I am only irrelevant in that: I am not a huge chitposting loser everyone hate-posts over, I can not make threads that disgust and anger people enough to flock around like flies around chit and post over and over in -- I give you this, in that regard you have me beat a dozen times over.

Now, where I do have relevance, it is in a modest way that people generally respect or engage in actual conversation with me -- this is something you do not have. You have wincel, that is about it. And, honestly, I do not know why you have even him.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1682352123 05-09-2023, 08:03 AM
-
#86
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Just LOL, more mental gymnastics.

How does your hypothetical scenario account for the macadamia nuts?

Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals srs.
I already explained the macadamia nuts. They were disgustingly overpriced and even more so than what macadamia nuts should cost. Doesn't mean I should have done it, but the store shouldn't have deliberately overpriced them either.


I still paid for them albeit at a lower price.



LOL @ being angry over the macadamia nuts. Let me know when you're gonna get angry at Bannon and Trump for defrauding literally hundreds of millions.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682352243 05-09-2023, 08:06 AM
-
#87
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
You have not addressed chit. You goal-post shifted, as always. Pretended that you never said what you said, as if making a thread, "HOLD ME MISC, I FOUND THE ONE!" and posting some poor random single mother's tinder photos, you saying you had been with her for 6 months, that you then later want us to believe wasn't you saying you were in a relationship with her? Fuk right off. I may not care enough about the PHD stuff or have enough personal know-how to call you out there, but I saw that tinder thread play out and know better than to accept your broken word when you lie and say it has been addressed a million times.

Any motherfuker so desperate and pathetic that they'd lie about that woman, they'd lie about anything.

And: LL has not reported back and confirmed he received anything, he has only said he has gotten nothing. So, more lies.
.
No, Logical didn't say he has "gotten nothing": Check his wording. He said he received the email, he saidimageswere attached to the email, just that he didn't open them. If you are claiming he said he didn't receive even an email, you are lying about what he said.



And the tinder thing was completely addressed in that Gwg, DYEL? thread.



Irrelevant JUSA is still irrelevant.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682352723 05-09-2023, 08:14 AM
-
#88
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I'm not "angry over academia nuts", I am merely pointing out your mental gymnastics.

I see you didn't apply your hypothetical scenario, one doesn't even have to wonder why....

And also thanks for resorting to whataboutism like the pseudointellectual you are.
This really can't keep going on, but there's no gymnastics here. I admitted I did it. There's more gymnastics involved in your contriving a reason to be mad over this than there is in me simply explaining why I did it.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1682353163 05-09-2023, 08:21 AM
-
#89
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Think I'm going to stop being one of the flies circling this pile of chit here, but before I Nope-Out -- Anyone notice how Bodhy knows how to properly quote people? Quoting them in a way you can tap the arrow and view the post. He does it quite often - yet, other times, he does not.

It's almost as if he wants to quote himself or someoneout of context, so he quotes them but selectively does not include the hyperlink back to the actual post.

... but who cares.

Yesterday, I made a plea to everyone toignore this lying moron, and here I am today posting in this ridiculous thread (sorry, gwg, but why?). I need to say this again, obviously, and maybe say it out loud or something so that at least I myself hear it this time:Ignore this buffoon. Do not give this fool the attention he so desperately craves.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1682353413 05-09-2023, 08:25 AM
-
#90
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Think I'm going to stop being one of the flies circling this pile of chit here, but before I Nope-Out -- Anyone notice how Bodhy knows how to properly quote people? Quoting them in a way you can tape the arrow and view the post. He does it quite often - yet, other times, he does not.

It's almost as if he wants to quote himself or someoneout of context, so he quotes them but selectively does not include the hyperlink back to the actual post.

... but who cares.

Yesterday, I made a plea to everyone toignore this lying moron, and here I am today posting in this ridiculous thread (sorry, gwg, but why?). I need to say this again, obviously, and maybe say it out loud or something so that at least I myself hear it this time:Ignore this buffoon. Do not give this fool the attention he so desperately craves.
All I did was edit out the superflous JUSA blah blah, to get to the meat of what I wanted to respond to. It's very simply and I'll let this rest after:

Logical got everything he was promised, and his own words state he received an email with images attached that he admittedly, didn't open. My deal with him is done and so are the PhD fraud claims.

Nor am I seeking attention. I'm just dealing with your farcical claims, don't misattribute evil intentions where there are none.


Irrelevant JUSA is irrelevant. Good night.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts