don't pretend you wouldn't have slobbered all over his dong 10 years ago when you were more naive and he was a sex symbol

Clown world trying to cancel him with the same antics that he would openly tell and made him famous, just lulz.

Trying to clickbait the age "16 year old" like thats not the legal age of consent where it happen.

Glad to know that some people aren't headline-reading sheep. Maybe take a moment, take a breath, and catch up on things before running to post your regurgitated headline as an "opinion" on a message board.

OMG I didn't like him in that movie -- he's an actor, he played a character
OMG his dad brought him a hooker at 16, he seems rapey -- paying for sex is the exact opposite of rape
OMG he had left-wing views before he woke up -- at least he DID wake up, unlike you.

Stop judging people based off a mainstream media headline with zero evidence. You are a pawn doing exactly what they intended you to do when they published the article.

I know his face and name, but never saw him act in anything or do stand up. I live under 1000 rocks and I love it.

Negged for your dumbass take on what I said.

If you come forward 10 years later about anything I am gonna be sceptical.
If you go to his management at the time and not the police I am sceptical.

If you go to the police right after it happens then I will consider it very credible BUT also not just assume you are truthful or they are innocent until an investigation takes place.

Also LOL at not thinking there isn't a grand conspiracy involving blackmailing people using sexual assault when we know Jeffery Epstein had an island in which social figures were invited to for this exact reason.

I seen that and all the articles are talking about things from 10 years ago. They also keep calling him an actor and comedian but he really doesnt do either of that anymore, they show old pictures of him and completely leave out his current podcast or current statements.... you can see how its an intentional hitpiece because they are looking to destroy and bury the guy and they wont link or mention his current world views or statements since that would promote more people to see it, they ignore it completely.

So any normie running across it just sees the old pics of him, him called an actor/comedian and may not even realize the link between his current content and the hit pieces.

He left hollywood like 10 years ago they stopped casting him and he left katy perry she wanted to party and do coke and all that and he had to get 100 percent clean.

they were sloots back then that wanted to be railed by a celeb. they were young and naïve and either didn't realise or didn't care that they were being used for pleasure. and no doubt under the influence of booze and drugs. but that doesn't mean they weren't up for it.

now they look back much older and think they were victims when in reality they enjoyed every minute of whatever shenanigans went on.

they want to feel important, possibly get paid by the MSM for a story or get him to settle. for them they aren't losing anything coming out now with their accusations with zero evidence to prove their story

you are retarded to think differently ~ this is all the "matrix/elite or whoever is pushing the narrative" can attack him with. it is well known already he is a recovered degenerate

He was britains version of paulie shore. C level celebrity.

LOL

I'm pro RB because he's against the elites, the guy has enough fame/money/poon to just sit back and live the life. He's taking heat for what he believes and that deserves respect. The people that say he deserves it because he's annoying are top tier Ph4gg0ts.

I’m on your side dumb fhaggit

going by his videos it looks like he lives a pretty simple life on his own patch of land and grows his own food. i don't think he burns through money like he used to. the YT earnings probably paid for staff, though he said once it doesn't take much to do what he does.

You’d have to be an idiot to believe he raped these women.

Now were he AND they involved in a filthy lifestyle? No doubt. He used to be a disgusting druggie left winger. However I doubt he truly harmed anyone ever other than his own soul.


Also what’s with this “Jane Doe” crap? If they accuse him then they need to reveal their names.

Thank you for your useless clarification that still starts from a place of skepticism of the victim and their behaviors. Sexual assault is extremely difficult to prove, and in most cases going to the police is a completely fruitless exercise. Who cares what behaviors you personally think are credible? You don't even understand the context in which a woman who was just assaulted by a person in power has to contend with. Most have valid reasons to fear retaliation and its far from a guarantee the police will do anything, much less protect you from further abuse (see link below). You're starting from a place of punching down on a potential victim and telling them what they did is not enough to convince YOU that they were indeed a victim.

https://www.rainn.org/statistics/cri...justice-system

also LOL and not thinking its totally possible Russell Brand is just a scumbag. Again, totally convinced you're correct far before any sane justice process has taken place. It's not even like your take is particularly refreshing, its getting echoed by 3 pages of miscers all saying the same brainrot. How brave of you.

Not surprised at all. You go against the grain of the left. This is what happens like clock work. He might be guilty but the timing is perfect.

The left doesn't care if you rape people as long as you stick together.

My favorite part is he has not even been charged with anything. His whole life is cancelled already.

Gets "sexually assaulted"
continues to have sex with guy over the next several months.

Comes forward 10+ years ago with a group of girls all at the same time at the same time he is going hard against main stream narrative and the Bidens.

Seems legit...Lol at posting those BS rape and sexual assault statistics that include stats where they themselves later slept with the person again and also include stats where the person raped/assaulted didn't consider it as such.

Sane justice process? There CANNOT be one 10+ years later.... Any and all potential evidence of wrong doing is gone.

At least 3 of the 4 hooked up with him repeatedly after "the event". From what I have heard there is exactly one allegation that has any merit and it sounds like a drugged up (both parties) consensual sex encounter where she later was worried about an STD, regretted doing it, and didn't have sex with him again.

However, again all of the details of the night are gone because it was 10 years ago. There can be no justice and 4 coming at once just while he is attacking powerful people. Sure...

feelings over facts boyo in 2023

he started talking about things he shouldn't of been talking about. So he's going to be disciplined now.

He's an annoying kunt but he's a clever kunt.

Oh, thanks for providing better stats that adjust for the problem you think totally discredits what the stats from the Department of Justice are showing. Even if we could adjust for those issues, do you think the stats would be in women's favor? Nah, probably not. But, feelings over facts, right boyo?

There will absolutely be a justice process, and one that begins from the presumption of innocence, might I add. There are also credible witnesses, text messages and notations from crisis centers. Nah, lets dimiss all that - better to just defend him in the court of public opinion before all of the relevant facts are known. No cognitive dissonance at all when you guys lament men being "canceled" based only on public perception regardless of guilt or innocence, and then turn around and engage in same behavior - presenting only information that paints him in a positive light, tearing down victim attestations, spreading more conspiracy theories as more plausible and preferable. Nice moral high ground.

Speaking of conspiracies, let's play a little "what if". What if he suddenly decided to attack the "establishment" once he got wind of a potential sexual assault accusations coming to light? Wouldn't that be a great cover for discrediting the system once news got out? How is this less believable than him getting targeted only after the fact? It also could all just be unrelated entirely, he's been bouncing around for years trying to remain relevant by adjusting his tack and trying to find a new audience to appeal to. Finally he stumbled on the all-to-famous ring wing anti-establishment grift that Trump already laid the groundwork for. Why does it seem like every time someone y'all like gets accused of something its chalked up to an establishment witch hunt? Does nothing ever happen?

Damn the misc can be so dumb sometimes. Just touting the mainstream media smear campaign about a guy that had legal sex with a 16yo, which most of the misc wishes they could do. Can't make this chit up.

He even got her picked up from school with a car sent by the BBC.

British taxpayers delivered prime cunny to his door.

No what's hilarious is the misc caping for a degenerate libtard just because he's been grifting you losers for adbucks for a couple years.

Make no mistake he would have never had a word said if he wasnt rabble rousing for the anti woke side. He seems rapey so im not surprised, but all the hollywierd types seem like kiddie diddlers to me.

Epstein was too big to ignore, and the powers that be have been intentionally mum about the details of his client list etc. Completely different story than Russell Brand, who has been running an anti-establishment podcast for the past several years.

The pwoers that be do not like popular podcasts because they no longer have control over what people are saying.... this is their new method of shutting up people they don't like.

They tried it with Joe Rogan, Andrew Tate and now Russel Brand.

one woman has come out on video (similar to Tate - defending brand) that worked on him on the TV show Lorraine and said in June the BBC contacted her to try and get a "story" on Brand but she said it didn't fit their narrative so it wasn't used