That's barely enough for 1-2 normies to get by with no other income.

Now imagine an A lister celeb who splurged throughout their career and is only left with low 7 figures.

I get it tho, I used to think anything above 1 mill was a lot of money... Until it became a reality and not a dream.

Once a mil becomes reality and you start doing the math... it's barely any money srs.

Send me 1 million. It's barely anything. You won't even notice it being gone

Amazing.

All that money: and yet you train at a public gym instead of buying gym equipment and training at home.

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184711673

post ur penor on the misc and i'll send u 30 BTC

u can't afford a decent home gym with low 7 figure NW

i just told u it's not a lot of money u dumb fuk ******

Whatever you say honky.

that's what the average nfl player makes in their short careers

the vast majority all blow it in a couple years srs

the older i get, the more i realize how chit it must be one of these "barely made it" athletes

everyone knows how much money u signed for because that's public

the people around u are brokies and think 3 million means unlimited money

you give them nothing, they hate you. you give them something, it's not enough

Antoine Walker made $108 million in the NBA and blew it all giving away couple g's here and there. Now think of the guy who made $10million in the league.

I'd much rather be a business owner on the low low

You going to provide some evidence for your claims of being a millionaire, or isn't that a thing on the misc anymore?

If you don't have at least 8 figures, are you even trying?

Basically, if you aren't Vladimir Putin aka Vlad the Chad just rope because you will always be a poorcel. Do you even have your own nuclear arsenal bro?

That would be a violation of forum rules.

At a measly 6% return, $2m-$4m would bring an income of $120k-$240k. That's enough to live in most areas of USA, srs.

S&P 500 has a +23% 1 year, so if left in that beginning a year ago, $2m-$4m would've brought $460k-$920k. Obviously that would be optimal timing/lucky, but just saying.

It is a weird amount of money to have. Used and invested intelligently you can make a decent living not touching the principle, but you really aren't able to make big purchases or moneymogg like most people think you'd be able to.

Imagine ur Kat Williams and trying to live off 120k

ur the biggest star in ur circle

always expected to foot the bill

need to stay in the fashion game

the math doesnt work

yup, it was in response to retarded miscers saying 2-4 mill is enough to live an a-list celeb's life

ofc it's enough for a normie who lives a minimalistic lifestyle

You make an excellent case for purging the elite by showcasing how pointlessly extravagant and wasteful their lives are.

my boy kat has to lower his lifestyle if he wants to live off of what he has in the bank then.

you said 2-3M is not a lot of money which means you're not being frugal and spending on unnecessary expenses.

you said you can't afford a house with a 7 figure NW

who is the brokie?

with that mind set/ set of conditions, then essentially anyone could go broke. no amount short of a billion+ would be enough. its a rigged scenario. and based on Kat's longevity/success in show business, combined with just hearing him speak, I think he has enough intelligence to not "foot the bill" or stay in the "fashion game" till the point of going broke.

but he's 52.. why does he need to stay in the "fashion game"? why does he need to foot the bill for everyone? these are simple problems, easily resolved.

in any case, Katt Williams net worth is likely 4x that minimum and hes still earning money today.



but lets just assume he only has 4M and will never earn another dollar. or do anything with his money now.
again, he's 52, lets say he plans to live until 80, he could spend ~$140k per year until death.

now lets just say he's getting a 6% return on his money, which is average. He could spend ~$300k per year comfortably before running out of money at 80.

you dont think he can live off of $300k per year? come on... if hes in a low COL area he could do this easily, and still even stay in the "Fashion game"

4 million dollars is plenty of money for pretty much anyone, especially someone age 50+

and again, he likely has way more money than $4M. and even if he didn't, He could easily see more than a 6% return annually and likely wont live till 80 anyway, all increasing his potential spending amount in these hypothetical scenarios

50s now is not the 50s of the past. 50 year olds want clout these days too.

When you've been footing bills and helping ur surroundings for decades, it just becomes expected of you. Stop paying and u immediately turn into an enemy. Healthy boundaries need to be set very early on and let the people who want to walk, walk. But many celebs cannot do this. They start to make a bunch of money and want to become "the man."

at 300k a year, I bet he makes up thousands of excuses to stay away from the leeches he fed throughout his career

If I had 4 m right now my working days would be over.

u are a nobody, not a celeb

OP is a celeb, guys.

sup

Point? Do you have 2-4 m? If not stfu

exceeded that a while ago

You won't be mogging and no one will think you're rich based on lifestyle but it's enough for a comfortable lifestyle without having to work and that is thre ultimate freedom.

subjectively no, objectively yes. depends on your level of cope.

You can actually retire on 1 million. I forgot the post, but if you pull 6% interest you can do it. 4% is for 70 year olds.

28 yr old millionaire making daily alts on a gay and dying Indian forum...



Why are Indians like this? Srs?