In before...














"Pointing out doctors were 'incentivized/bribed' to push vaccines means you are an anti-vaxxer & anti-science and it's okay for people to hope you die."

Wincel on suicide watch.

The biggest champions of mUh ScIeNcE have done by far the most damage to the public opinion and mistrust of science

If you said this in the past, you were a conspiracy theorist......

LOL

OP has gone completely off the deep end.

I hope you wore your swimmies before you took the leap boyo.

Maybe step away from the alt right media for a bit.

calm down, bro!


Spoiler!

As a healthcare employee doctors are literally bribed and paid to push all kinds of new pharma medicine like flu and covid vaccines.

Many of the same people who will bitch about the issues with "capitalism" (cronyism, greed, etc) and the like, seem to think Big Pharma and "The Science" somehow are magically immune to those things.

It's lulzy how details don't matter to those who subscribe to the narrative

Yeah, we love big pharma!!!!

And Big Pharma love you Sillie, and your whole family, and your extended family.

Nah.

But I do try to understand why miscers support their narrative overtly and I guess also why others choose to do so by proxy

We avoided the doctors and dentists back then; the decision was made by individuals *unless you were sickly* and getting constant treatment/ advice.

Based

You mean like providing statistics where you intentionally misplace decimal point positions by 2 in order to support your narrative?

Adults make their own decisions, especially when they are homeowners 4 hours away and older.
SO how many times are you gonna repeat that BIG FUKKKEN LIE!?
YOU ARE AT 100 NOW!

Or watching people froth at the mouth over made up stuff to vilify anyone who dares question the narrative

Last time you did this, I explained my position and invited you to converse -- not sure if you saw it, you made no other posts in that thread.

Odd when challenged you tuck tail and run. I guess it's easier to make obnoxious blanket statements you are intellectually unable and unwilling to back up, huh?

So, you can voice your opinion but the fact you are not going to actually back it up -- how much should anyone really care? I know my thoughts on that: Not much.

Call me when you're willing to back up your bark, until then you're just a little doggie yipping, not someone to be concerned with.

Why would JLC be on suicide watch? This is his job.

He also attended a Thanksgiving with a mask on, stood at the entrance for fifteen minutes, became according to the science, 15 minutes is some magical number, grabbed a plate and left......

He also believes that mandates are laws.

So, is Delta more or less severe than the Omicron variant? And should we be at all concerned over the latest variant?

He sure gets bitchy every time he's reminded of his ignorance.

Didn't see that post boyo. All I do see is you grasping onto any story with even a potential to somehow reflect negatively on vaccines and the medical profession.

It's a bad look friend. You were shown to be wrong with the first few, yet you keep on posting new CT stuff.

Y'all should do whatever y'all want and be concerned with whatever y'all want.We've done the intention component many times. Kinda weird this is still all you have after years.

ANOVA is good for everything.

But, regression is bad.

We'll pretend they're different


Support the cause

how many more things need to unravel first

Regression is bad, thus we should all still be wearing masks, and only going out when absolutely necessary......

How is linear regression different from ANOVA?

You do know there are those in the medical community that spoke out against the jab, or refused to get it?

This isn't a CT, though. Nobody really disputes it, although one poster came in to counter this narrative (and said they were in the industry) saying that big Pharm pays off doctors to peddle pretty much everything. I believe it and them, too.

See, this is a discussion. People presenting things, talking about it and taking the issue and delving deeper.

Now, as for me "being wrong" - not quite, although in one thread (to refresh your memory): A young semi-famous person had a stroke. I made the thread. I did not directly blame the vaccine. Then, even before bb.com could register that I made an edit, I had googled the individual, noticed she suffered from lupus since 6 and quickly edited the OP in the thread to reflect that. You can assign motive to me all you want, that maybe I was sitting at my keyboard laughing and gloating at some person suffering, but I can assure you it was more muted than that. Prior to knowing she had lupus, I found it odd. Nothing more, because even if she did not have lupus -- there is still a lot more distance to go before you can jump and directly blame anything over it.

And, more reminder: I am not one of these people who think the vaccines are poison. While I do think they carry some inherent risk, I also believe it's a handful out of thousands or tens of thousands, with varying degrees of harm. Everyone I know vaccinated personally has been fine, aside from one person who has had some issues post-vaccine and issues of a nature where it's hard to say what is the cause.

My constant main complaint: The environment created in the day. The one where truth was suppressed, free speech was taken over by censorship, where big money was used to silence and coerce hundreds of millions.

I don't think it makes me "anti vaccine" or what you called me, "off the deep end" to want actual open scientific discussion protected and for us to remember how for a time it was censored by greed. The vaccines to me are simply the embodiment of this, while I do not think they are particularly great and many do not need them, I'm not calling them clotshots or people who took them mudbloods or anything like that.

I simply think: We were lied to as how effective they were and how thoroughly they were tested. The dangers, as rare as they are, were covered up and dissenting opinions were censored - not just quackery or conspiratorial ones, either, but also in the cases of people making reasonable speculation or saying things we now know to be truthful.

The narrative was: They are 100% effective and absolutely necessary for everyone, that anyone not taking them was causing others to die, everyone must take them and no person is allowed to say otherwise.

If you think my disagreeing with that narrative makes me off the deep end or crazy, let's hear why.

Nope, I'm convinced, we all should mask up, and avoid social gatherings......

Also, we need to go back to zoom learning.