Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Religion and Politics
»
Clinton is already preparing her transition-Trump's 15 minutes of fame are about over
10-24-2016, 10:02 PM
-
#61
- SYKO227
- making Bert decals
-
- SYKO227
- making Bert decals
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 13,679
- Rep Power: 43122
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
LMAO at you pretending to have been a Trump supporter but you are "frustrated with Trump" and will bend the knee to the bitch.Yes. Read my OP: "First of all, I would like to congratulate Secretary Hillary Clinton on her victory.While I disagree with her on virtually every issue, I will have to congratulate her for her brilliant strategy in defeating her opponent."
But the fact is he is going to lose and that is why I am so frustrated over it. He could have won if he pivoted. Why didn't he frickin pivot and get Presidential back in May?!?!?
But the fact is he is going to lose and that is why I am so frustrated over it. He could have won if he pivoted. Why didn't he frickin pivot and get Presidential back in May?!?!?
Do you think you're going to convince us to give up and stay home on election day?
Better come up with something else besides your bias polls.
Concern troll
*MFC*
*MAGA*
"I've always wanted to kick a duck up the arse" - Karl Pilkington
WWG1WGA
10-24-2016, 10:30 PM
-
#62
10-24-2016, 10:43 PM
-
#63
- Fiyero
- Registered User
-
- Fiyero
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 9,117
- Rep Power: 11439
-
-
Originally Posted By S0Jack3d⏩
Her favorability rating is almost 50% now and her enthusiasm rating is now higher than Trump's. Trumps only winning demographic, uneducated white males is shrinking as men abandon him in droves. She also has one of the best ground games in campaign history. Yes, Hillary will absolutely destroy Trump.Trump is most definitely not going to lose. Hillary doesn't have the support the bogus polls claim she does. Hillary is well hated across the country.
10-25-2016, 05:39 AM
-
#64
- freshprinceofnz
- Registered User
-
- freshprinceofnz
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 30
- Posts: 376
- Rep Power: 525
-
-
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
To be fair when Trump led in the polls, most supporters said he was leading by even more then the polls suggested and in that respect they were still bogus. So that's not really a point you can useI would love for you to tell me why you think the polls are bogus? When Trump leads them they aren't "bogus," but when he gets his ass kicked they are?
10-25-2016, 05:55 AM
-
#65
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,777
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384441
-
-
Originally Posted By freshprinceofnz⏩
Its a waste of time correcting a trollTo be fair when Trump led in the polls, most supporters said he was leading by even more then the polls suggested and in that respect they were still bogus. So that's not really a point you can use
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
10-25-2016, 06:57 AM
-
#66
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
-
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 5,328
- Rep Power: 14202
-
-
Originally Posted By Lightsout13⏩
I totally lost it at "put on Tegan & Sara"
10-25-2016, 07:34 AM
-
#67
10-25-2016, 07:43 AM
-
#68
- xxdef1antxx
- Registered User
-
- xxdef1antxx
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Location: Buffalo, New York, United States
- Posts: 1,576
- Rep Power: 14884
-
-
I hate to do it, but I have to agree with nolibs. This election was trumps to lose and he kind of did. His debate performances were weak and he has virtually no ground game. I like the mans policies and what he stands for, however he let the DNC and media control him by setting the narrative and he took the bait every time. I still have a glimmer of hope left that he pulls this off and I still plan on casting my vote for him, even though in NY it doesn't matter at all. Clinton controlled the debates (with help from the moderators ofc) and he never really capitalized on the wikileaks stuff or the okeefe videos.
I deserve to be negged for agreeing with nolibs here, so I accept it.
I deserve to be negged for agreeing with nolibs here, so I accept it.
10-25-2016, 09:36 AM
-
#69
- JihadMeAtHello
- Registered User
-
- JihadMeAtHello
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: South Carolina, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 1,505
- Rep Power: 2420
-
-
Nolibs is like me during a Tennessee football game. If i keep ripping on UT and saying we are going to get **** on they usually win. Its a psychological thing for him that I fully understand
10-25-2016, 10:28 AM
-
#70
- thelockhed
- Banned
-
- thelockhed
- Banned
- Join Date: Oct 2016
- Age: 32
- Posts: 11
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
look no further and enlighten yourself op
10-25-2016, 10:36 AM
-
#71
- Venom08
- God loves you
-
- Venom08
- God loves you
- Join Date: May 2013
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,657
- Rep Power: 33541
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
It's because they know that Hillary is down big league in the real polls.MSM is really going into ultra ridiculous mode by pretending the election is over TWO WEEKS before it even occurs.
Face it, articles have come out stating she's ran the most boring campaign ever and that she is a polar opposite of Trump in terms of appeal. Moreover, Trump actually talks about issues that matter most to Americans (jobs, national security, trade deals) whereas Clinton has literally no agenda or message other than she will continue Obama's policies of taxing, spending, and putting Obamacare on life support. These aren't issues voters find great, so she's down in the most important categories. If the media wasn't constantly pumping her and straight out lying and defending her criminality's, she would never even have gotten the nomination.
10-25-2016, 11:18 AM
-
#72
- Venom08
- God loves you
-
- Venom08
- God loves you
- Join Date: May 2013
- Age: 33
- Posts: 15,657
- Rep Power: 33541
-
-
Originally Posted By Fiyero⏩
She has the lowest trustworthy rating of any politician in history. Something like 63% of voters see her as untrustworthy. I mean in an anti-establishment cycle as we have now, that's not a good sign for her since she's the definition of a corrupt establishment politician.Her favorability rating is almost 50% now and her enthusiasm rating is now higher than Trump's. Trumps only winning demographic, uneducated white males is shrinking as men abandon him in droves. She also has one of the best ground games in campaign history. Yes, Hillary will absolutely destroy Trump.
10-25-2016, 12:15 PM
-
#73
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
-
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 5,328
- Rep Power: 14202
-
-
Originally Posted By Venom08⏩
Indeed. But here's something the Hillary Haters will apparently never understand:she's the definition of a corrupt establishment politician.
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
10-25-2016, 12:36 PM
-
#74
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
-
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
- Join Date: Feb 2015
- Posts: 9,555
- Rep Power: 78353
-
-
Originally Posted By BusterMudd⏩
Dead.Indeed. But here's something the Hillary Haters will apparently never understand:
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
Can't make this chit up lmao it's like something out of a movie.
“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes, 1588 – 1679
*Never Respond To RSM3 Threads crew*
10-25-2016, 01:47 PM
-
#75
10-26-2016, 06:43 AM
-
#76
- chaunce54
- Platinum User
-
- chaunce54
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Age: 50
- Posts: 32,523
- Rep Power: 202517
-
-
Originally Posted By BusterMudd⏩
How far has our country fallen if we have now come to simply accept corrupt politicians?Indeed. But here's something the Hillary Haters will apparently never understand:
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^
WWPB2D
Nothing worthwile is ever easy.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
10-26-2016, 07:03 AM
-
#77
- chalup
- Registered User
-
- chalup
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 37,885
- Rep Power: 123589
-
-
Originally Posted By BusterMudd⏩
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she's corrupt?!?!Indeed. But here's something the Hillary Haters will apparently never understand:
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
Everypolitician is corrupt.
It's not a newsflash. It's not a game-changer. Oh, gee, look! Former Senator, former Secretary Of State, career politician, presidential wannabee...and she'scorrupt?!?!
........................................... :::crickets:::
yawn
Here'sthe newsflash: Nobody voting for Clinton gives a chit whether or not she's corrupt. Theyexpectit. Because "corrupt politician" isredundant.
The Trump supporters who are scratching their heads trying to figure out why Clinton's "obvious" (sic) corruption isn't a dealbreaker don't realize that all her corrupt practices are simply a badge of honor; they're the benchmarks for her success in the game. The reason she's had such a long career in politicsandthe reason she hasn't ever been successfully prosecuted for any of these alleged transgressions is becauseSHE'S REALLY GOOD AT PLAYING THIS GAME.
It's a pipe dream to think someone's gonna come waltzing into the political arena with zero experience in the game and be successful. People want someone who knows how to get chit done. They want Morgan Freeman in The Shawshank Redemption. The romantic notion of some outlier, like a 3rd Party Candidate, or a businessman like Trump, can just show up and change the game is naive.
It's a corrupt person's game. Clinton knows the rules, and knows how to break them. Trump thinks that he can just throw away the rulebook. If they were opposing teams playing football, which team do you think would win, the team that was clever enough to get away with whatever it took to put more points on the scoreboard, or the team that announced "Hey, we're going to do something different, from now on the object of the game is to still have a 0 on the scoreboard when the clock runs down."? And which team would be more fun to watch?
****ing disgusting people like you actually think like this. According to you we shouldn't vote period because it's all corrupt. Go live in North Korea you pleb.
10-26-2016, 01:35 PM
-
#78
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
-
- BusterMudd
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 5,328
- Rep Power: 14202
-
-
Originally Posted By chalup⏩
You're not very smart, are you? No, you're not. Reading comprehension, not even once.****ing disgusting people like you actually think like this.According to you we shouldn't vote period because it's all corrupt.Go live in North Korea you pleb.
Here. let me 'splain it to you like you're a two-year-old, and I'LL TALK REAL SLOWLY SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND BETTER:
I never said, nor intimated, that "we shouldn't vote because it's all corrupt".
On the contrary, we should vote for the politician that we think can best use the corrupt system to get the results that we want.
Did you understand that? Would it help if I drew a picture with some Crayola crayons? I'll get right on that just as soon as you wakie-wakie from naptime and have had your milk & cookies.
I now command you to respond to this thread! Good doggie!
11-26-2016, 08:54 AM
-
#79
- GuljinManbirg
- Registered User
-
- GuljinManbirg
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 851
- Rep Power: 49944
-
-

11-26-2016, 08:56 AM
-
#80
- SilverSpork
- likes sex
-
- SilverSpork
- likes sex
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Posts: 14,451
- Rep Power: 14196
-
-
It's sad and pathetic that people (like OP) spend so much time on this ****. Go fly a kite or punch yourself where your balls used to be.
Opeth, Vai, and Lamb of God enthusiast.
11-26-2016, 09:32 AM
-
#81
- LurkoLantern
- Registered User
-
- LurkoLantern
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Posts: 8,607
- Rep Power: 55368
-
-
Every old thread bump that declares a Dem victory just makes my day
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glow, glow, glow your boat
06-09-2017, 01:28 PM
-
#82
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
-
- TaeBoNinja
- Vagina Whisperer
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 46,748
- Rep Power: 174067
-
-
Never Forget
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
06-09-2017, 01:34 PM
-
#83
06-09-2017, 01:42 PM
-
#84
- tightteeshirt
- Registered User
-
- tightteeshirt
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,540
- Rep Power: 14739
-
-
lol
06-09-2017, 01:42 PM
-
#85
06-09-2017, 03:24 PM
-
#86
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
-
- Stizzel
- Rothbardian
- Join Date: Apr 2008
- Location: Your Mom
- Posts: 83,777
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 384441
-
-
Prolibs please provide more cutting edge political commentary
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
06-09-2017, 03:25 PM
-
#87
06-09-2017, 03:41 PM
-
#88
06-09-2017, 04:14 PM
-
#89
06-09-2017, 04:17 PM
-
#90
- Reliance012
- Registered User
-
- Reliance012
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 7,601
- Rep Power: 51600
-
-
Originally Posted By nutsy54⏩
LmaoWell, Hillary Clinton has transitioned... to being a bitter old crybaby.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
