Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » More General Categories » Religion and Politics » mindblown at how anyone can blindly believe this thing has been to the moon and back!
  1. Results 91 to 109 of 109
  2. Page 4 of 4
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4

Thread: mindblown at how anyone can blindly believe this thing has been to the moon and back!

post 1542617341 02-02-2018, 01:16 PM
-
#91
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By PlanoLifter⏩
I agree it makes no sense. But then we have destroyed the technology and know-how to make a lot of historical machines and equipment. It's what we humans seem to do.
Did we "destroy" the technology to make 1964 Pontiac GTO? No. Do we currently have the equipment all set up to build one now? No. No car manufacturer would put the time and investment in building what's totally out of date tech and would - and do - focus on R&D for new cars based on new tech. That's all they are saying regarding the moon tech. It's really not that complicated
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1542617501 02-02-2018, 01:17 PM
-
#92
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 14,613
  5. Rep Power: 136737
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
Did we "destroy" the technology to make 1964 Pontiac GTO? No. Do we currently have the equipment all set up to build one now? No. No car manufacturer would put the time and investment in building what's totally out of date tech and would - and do - focus on R&D for new cars based on new tech. That's all they are saying regarding the moon tech. It's really not that complicated
yet another poster receiving funding from the men in black.

HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING YOU TO LIE ON BODYBUILDING.COM YOU BASTAAARD??!
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
post 1542617671 02-02-2018, 01:19 PM
-
#93
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
The time it took to type that you could have googled it answered it for yourself. Per usual, the plebs don't understand what they read, and narrow it down to simplistic derpa derp like we "destroyed" the technology, which of course is not true. The truth, it's been so long and tech changed so much, we'd be essentially starting from zero at this point, and some scientists ask if it's really worth the cost and time to develop the tech at this point to return:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2.../#5ce13c6c1f48
There's even more to it than that - the blueprints themselves might not exist any longer. They were physical copies. I still have to deal with that occasionally at work when we need a spare part for something that is still in service but no longer in production - there was no rush to digitize the engineering drawings. So here we have something that is no longer in production AND no longer in service. Even when the physical copies of drawings still exist and are in readable shape, the terminology and nomenclature has changed so much that it can be difficult for engineers to ascertain. To the point, my employer has had to bring guys out of retirement for projects just to help the new team understand notations.
AND now we're talking about engineers having to reverse engineer punch cards to modern computers - it is a pretty large task.
post 1542618261 02-02-2018, 01:24 PM
-
#94
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
Did we "destroy" the technology to make 1964 Pontiac GTO? No. Do we currently have the equipment all set up to build one now? No. No car manufacturer would put the time and investment in building what's totally out of date tech and would - and do - focus on R&D for new cars based on new tech. That's all they are saying regarding the moon tech. It's really not that complicated
if you listen in the video starting at 50-55 seconds, he said he would love to go to the moon but we don't have that technology anymore

He's not saying we have more advanced technology so we destroyed it, because then he wouldn't say getting to the moon is a problem
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1542619521 02-02-2018, 01:34 PM
-
#95
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  1. AltarOfPlagues
  2. yerrrrrrrr meh?
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 14,613
  5. Rep Power: 136737
Originally Posted By 5x10⏩
if you listen in the video starting at 50-55 seconds, he said he would love to go to the moon but we don't have that technology anymore

He's not saying we have more advanced technology so we destroyed it, because then he wouldn't say getting to the moon is a problem
maybe he just used the term destroyed because he's still butthurt about apollo getting defunded. OR maybe he is a loose end in a part of a vast government conspiracy and in his senility he has leaked damning information such that youtubers are able to unearth said conspiracy from the comforts of their (wat sounds like sparsely furnished) basements.

its def either one of these things, no way to know which for sure.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
post 1542620131 02-02-2018, 01:41 PM
-
#96
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By AltarOfPlagues⏩
yet another poster receiving funding from the men in black.

HOW MUCH ARE THEY PAYING YOU TO LIE ON BODYBUILDING.COM YOU BASTAAARD??!
Not enough I assure you!
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
There's even more to it than that - the blueprints themselves might not exist any longer. They were physical copies. I still have to deal with that occasionally at work when we need a spare part for something that is still in service but no longer in production - there was no rush to digitize the engineering drawings. So here we have something that is no longer in production AND no longer in service. Even when the physical copies of drawings still exist and are in readable shape, the terminology and nomenclature has changed so much that it can be difficult for engineers to ascertain. To the point, my employer has had to bring guys out of retirement for projects just to help the new team understand notations.
AND now we're talking about engineers having to reverse engineer punch cards to modern computers - it is a pretty large task.
I'd say you're probably right about that too, but end of the day, sorta of irrelevant and not some dark plot to cover something up. The tech is so out dated, what real use would the blueprints be anyway at this point? None. At this point, we'd be starting from scratch anyway.
Originally Posted By 5x10⏩
if you listen in the video starting at 50-55 seconds, he said he would love to go to the moon but we don't have that technology anymore

He's not saying we have more advanced technology so we destroyed it, because then he wouldn't say getting to the moon is a problem
Ugh....it's really not that complicated dude. I posted a link if you wanna get learned on the topic vs some stupid vid taken out of context by another moronic conspiracy derpa derp on YT looking for clicks.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1542631361 02-02-2018, 03:31 PM
-
#97
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 7,684
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Aircommander91⏩
this.

just LMAO at atheists dismissing the fact that the apollo 11 "landing module" is made of cardboard and aluminum sheets and trying to derail it to a christian bashing thread.


the desperation is real!


they be reachin' for straws!
most of you are talking about are gold foil for numerous reasons one being it helps with the radiation exposure. but the fact you are saying its completely made out of cardboard and foil is amazingly stupid and you must be butt hurt by losing an argument to someone recently. probably looked like a fool in front of your friends or something similar.
post 1542642971 02-02-2018, 05:50 PM
-
#98
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 43,261
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
There's even more to it than that - the blueprints themselves might not exist any longer. They were physical copies. I still have to deal with that occasionally at work when we need a spare part for something that is still in service but no longer in production - there was no rush to digitize the engineering drawings. So here we have something that is no longer in production AND no longer in service. Even when the physical copies of drawings still exist and are in readable shape, the terminology and nomenclature has changed so much that it can be difficult for engineers to ascertain. To the point, my employer has had to bring guys out of retirement for projects just to help the new team understand notations.
AND now we're talking about engineers having to reverse engineer punch cards to modern computers - it is a pretty large task.
You need to be turak in order to find some dinosaurs who still know how punch cards work.
There are a few out there who tell stories about them.
They are retired.
post 1542648321 02-02-2018, 06:53 PM
-
#99
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Location: BC, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,341
  6. Rep Power: 354666
Originally Posted By SerbianSickKant⏩
"Sometimes when I'm faced with an atheist, I am tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we have finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook."
im christian but that is the most retarded thing i ever heard lmao
I'm an atheist and I actually find that funny, made me think lol
post 1542651711 02-02-2018, 07:30 PM
-
#100
  1. Weightaholic
  1. Weightaholic
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 54
  6. Posts: 34,904
  7. Rep Power: 82209
Landing on the moon? Implausible!

A god who impregnates his own mother so she can give birth to him so he can get nailed to a tree as a young man specifically in order to allow him to forgive us all for a bunch of things he arbitrarily decided were sins in the first place, plus he came back as a zombie? Totally logical!
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
post 1542652121 02-02-2018, 07:34 PM
-
#101
  1. Weightaholic
  1. Weightaholic
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 54
  6. Posts: 34,904
  7. Rep Power: 82209
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
This is what we broke the sound barrier with, flown by a 24 year old farm boy:
A 24 year old farm boy with broken ribs, no less!

What a man. Truly alpha.
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
post 1542652351 02-02-2018, 07:38 PM
-
#102
  1. djfuzzy
  2. ┬─┬ ︵ /(.□. \）
  1. djfuzzy
  2. ┬─┬ ︵ /(.□. \）
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 18,282
  6. Rep Power: 54389
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
There's even more to it than that - the blueprints themselves might not exist any longer. They were physical copies. I still have to deal with that occasionally at work when we need a spare part for something that is still in service but no longer in production - there was no rush to digitize the engineering drawings. So here we have something that is no longer in production AND no longer in service. Even when the physical copies of drawings still exist and are in readable shape, the terminology and nomenclature has changed so much that it can be difficult for engineers to ascertain. To the point, my employer has had to bring guys out of retirement for projects just to help the new team understand notations.
AND now we're talking about engineers having to reverse engineer punch cards to modern computers - it is a pretty large task.
This really isn’t a difficult concept. We have a family friend who has made a career of restoring classic GM vehicles; he hired retired GM engineers and designers to help him custom craft parts as close to their original likeness with as much authenticity as possible. GM was not interested in manufacturing a particular type of knob or button for a particular model of vehicle after they used them to exhaustion, nor were they interested in keeping blueprints, presses, etc. It would make no sense for them to do so.
O|||||||O Official Jeep Brah Crew O|||||||O -creator-

USMC
★cVc★
post 1542653161 02-02-2018, 07:47 PM
-
#103
  1. Weightaholic
  1. Weightaholic
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 54
  6. Posts: 34,904
  7. Rep Power: 82209
Originally Posted By djfuzzy⏩
This really isn’t a difficult concept. We have a family friend who has made a career of restoring classic GM vehicles; he hired retired GM engineers and designers to help him custom craft parts as close to their original likeness with as much authenticity as possible. GM was not interested in manufacturing a particular type of knob or button for a particular model of vehicle after they used them to exhaustion, nor were they interested in keeping blueprints, presses, etc. It would make no sense for them to do so.
Same reason there are very few Ferrari F1 cars from the 50s and 60s floating around. Enzo Ferrari simply saw no use for old cars, and junked them.
My personal pronouns are: Don't talk to me/Fck off
post 1542656031 02-02-2018, 08:18 PM
-
#104
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
There's even more to it than that - the blueprints themselves might not exist any longer. They were physical copies. I still have to deal with that occasionally at work when we need a spare part for something that is still in service but no longer in production - there was no rush to digitize the engineering drawings. So here we have something that is no longer in production AND no longer in service. Even when the physical copies of drawings still exist and are in readable shape, the terminology and nomenclature has changed so much that it can be difficult for engineers to ascertain. To the point, my employer has had to bring guys out of retirement for projects just to help the new team understand notations.
AND now we're talking about engineers having to reverse engineer punch cards to modern computers - it is a pretty large task.
to me, it sounds more like they had a 60s Camaro but destroyed the blue prints to the combustion engine
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1542662491 02-02-2018, 09:34 PM
-
#105
  1. pUniCepts
  2. not considered normal
  1. pUniCepts
  2. not considered normal
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 4,225
  6. Rep Power: 2147654
Originally Posted By AltarOfPlagues⏩
in on retard thread. do yall think that there is somethin fishy about how we can only see one side of the moon? like, wtf is on the back of it?
It's shaped like a frisbee (how else would it keep flying?) and says "STOP" in alien language. That's why none, or few, have ever visited Earth.
☆ MissChill Appreciation Crew ☆ Owner ☆ Σ ☆
post 1542683851 02-03-2018, 06:07 AM
-
#106
  1. Brozef
  2. ‎ ‎ ‎
  1. Brozef
  2. ‎ ‎ ‎
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Maine, United States
  5. Posts: 17,033
  6. Rep Power: 210050
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
I'm an atheist and I actually find that funny, made me think lol
I think it's a poor analogy myself.
post 1542713161 02-03-2018, 01:16 PM
-
#107
  1. Mr Beer
  2. Here's beer
  1. Mr Beer
  2. Here's beer
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: In the bar
  5. Posts: 40,965
  6. Rep Power: 141991
Humans didn't go to the moon but there's a bearded dude living in the sky who is angry about us masturbating. Religiotards always have an interesting standard for scepticism.
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
post 1542713521 02-03-2018, 01:20 PM
-
#108
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095


Why is the horizon like 50 feet away, does the moon have a circumference of one mile? Just lol @ sheep in 2017 who still believe man landed on the moon.
post 1542714421 02-03-2018, 01:32 PM
-
#109
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
NASA claims they "lost" hundreds of thousands of tapes containing the telemetry data of the moon landings, as well as the original footage.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts