Earlier this thread you said you'd want Dems to be held accountable to. I just wanted to show that you were full of crap and it worked beautifully. You don't want Dems "held accountable."

This is a partisan attack against Trump and you know it.

Now do you understand why I speak about you with such high confidence?

No. Unless I'm to make the assumption that you do not know the difference between a political campaign and a do gooding charity.

What is illegal about donating to a political campaign Mr. Stalin?

You mixed up your quotes.

But feel free to provide proof for your claims. Clinton on her death bed, Clinton killing opponents (you should check Trump's boy Putin).

And if Clinton colluded with foreign govs, present the proof.

Really? Just really?

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-...ot-contribute/

Foreign nationals
Campaigns may not solicit or accept contributions from foreign nationals. Federal law prohibits contributions, donations, expenditures and disbursements solicited, directed, received or made directly or indirectly by or from foreign nationals in connection with any election — federal, state or local. This prohibition includes contributions or donations made to political committees and building funds and to make electioneering communications. Furthermore, it is a violation of federal law to knowingly provide substantial assistance in the making, acceptance or receipt of contributions or donations in connection with federal and nonfederal elections to a political committee, or for the purchase or construction of an office building. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, acting as a conduit or intermediary for foreign national contributions and donations.

A person acts knowingly for the purposes of this section when he or she has:

Actual knowledge that the funds have come from a foreign national;
Awareness of certain facts that would lead a reasonable person to believe that there is a substantial probability that the money is from a foreign national; or
Awareness of facts that should have prompted a reasonable inquiry into whether the source of funds is a foreign national.
Pertinent facts that satisfy the “knowing” requirement include knowledge of:

Use of a foreign passport or passport number;
Use of a foreign address;
A check or other written instrument drawn on an account or wire transfer from a foreign bank; or
Contributor or donor living abroad.
Definition of foreign national
A foreign national is:

An individual who is not a citizen of the United States, and not lawfully admitted for permanent residence (as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(20)); or
A foreign principal, as defined in 22 U.S.C. § 611(b). Section 611 defines a foreign principal as a group organized under the laws of a foreign country or having its principal place of business in a foreign country. The statute specifically mentions foreign governments, political parties, partnerships, associations and corporations.
“Green card” exception
An individual who is not a citizen of the United States is eligible to make a contribution if he or she has a “green card” indicating that he or she is lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States.

Domestic subsidiaries of foreign corporations
In advisory opinions, the Commission has said that a United States corporation that is a subsidiary of a foreign corporation may sponsor a separate segregated fund which can in turn make contributions to federal candidates as long as:

The foreign parent does not finance election related contributions or expenditures either directly or through the subsidiary.
No foreign national (including the foreign parent) participates in the operations of the separate segregated fund or in its administration (such as by appointing officers) or in any decision to make donations, contributions, disbursements or expenditures in connection with any federal or nonfederal election.
Determining nationality of contributor
The Commission stated, in AO 1998-14, that the use of any surname on a contribution check (or similar instrument) would not, by itself, give any reason to inquire as to the person’s nationality. Nonetheless, the Commission advised the committee to take the following minimally intrusive steps to ensure that the contributions it received did not come from foreign nationals:









I'm mean... just really?

LOL @ people actually arguing with NoLibs

LOL @ Roger Stone meaning anything

LOL @ liberal cope

[QUOTE=JediRN post_id=1556299691]Really? Just really?

[url]https://www.fec.gov/help-ca

I'm mean... just really?[/QUOTE]What Vekelsberg did wasn't illegal by the way. It was perfectly legal to donate to his inaugural committee (not the campaign).

So why isn't Clinton being investigated for her ties with Vekelsberg?

How?

Whatchu talkin bout Willis?

Not sure what Vekelsberg and the inaugural committee has to do with the topic. Make a thread about it.

Can we get back to Russia having a complex apparatus in place to influence and American election?

or not.


I'm obviously bored.

Why is the Trump campaign getting investigated for a legal $100,000 donation to the Trump inauguration (not campaign, my bad) but Clinton isn't getting investigated for her accepting legal donations from them?

I am winning the debates. Got many of them shook.

In fact NYPat is about to fall into a trap, just watch.

I'm not aware on this, but maybe it has something to do with the donations being legal?

....maybe?

Do you believe Putin assassinates journalists/political opponents?

http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/20...ial-town-hall/- Hillary Clinton

We don't care what the WaPo and NYT put on their front page, chief

Stop trying to meme, you’re not original and you’re not clever.

For the 100th time, tell us how the hack helped Trump win...

The donations to the Trump campaign were also legal, yet they were asked about it.Should the Clintons also be investigated?

Brb stone colluded with Russia
Brb their proof is a hacker asking stone what he thinks of some emails he found



Can't make this up....

The clinton foundation has never been audited. You have no idea what its used for

.. and somehow we are back to Clinton? That's some CDS, right there?

If someone gave money to the foundation and the money is reported, then what is there to investigate? I'll wait, because I'm sure you'll have some BS reason.

So you've totally given up in trying to defend your position on the investigation and the russian involvement on our election, right?

cds

Should Clinton be investigated for taking money from the same guy Cohen took money from?

I get the feeling everytime she farts she should be investigated.

cds

and in conclusion, The Meuller investigation is obviously worthwhile and our elections will be more secure because of it.

I win, you lose and I didn't even have to cheat. (Sorry not sorry Tears)

lol just grasping at straws now, holy fuk this funny how desperate the left is getting.

All charities get audited because otherwise charity fraud is very easy. In fact a congresswoman got arrested for exactly that not too long ago, and the fraud was only discovered because of an audit. So if you want to say for a fact that the charity is receiving six figure deposits from other politicians because they all just love the children there needs to be an audit. Otherwise you just come off as extremely ignorant.

You realize you are over a year late with this "news", right?

Stone is def aware that his life is about to get spicy.

fine audit it, what do I care.

... and this has what to do with the investigation that is bearing the fruit of understanding to the extent of the Russian interference operation? One that even today the Golden Calf and his Trumpkins will only tacitly admit even happened.

You mean the investigation that's been going for for 18 months and has yet to show even a shred of evidence of "muh Russian collusion"?

cot dayum shut the fuk up already

are you just trying to be another annoying tool? how many times do these "big stories" come up and nothing happens? at least this time, wait.