Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » More General Categories » Religion and Politics » Donald Trump will start regulating social media
  1. Results 121 to 150 of 177
  2. Page 5 of 6
  3. First
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. 6
  10. Last

Thread: Donald Trump will start regulating social media

post 1606024381 05-27-2020, 10:34 PM
-
#121
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
I would argue the narrative has been turned to himself because, as you mentioned, the media is biased and has been going out of their way to attack him. To then call him a narcissist for defending himself against the attacks is a little intellectually dishonest, or maybe not a fair representation of the situation.
I swear, it seems you guys only have a 4 year memory.

Do you remember when Bush was president? I do, I remember the monkey ears, the cowboy comics, the editorials bemoaning every single dangerous thing he did. They lambasted his intelligence and called him a coward. I remember it on all sides, CTers revved up big time over 9/11. In retrospect it's no surprise a guy like Trump won the R nom, after 9/11 and McCain/Romney the party was dead. Actually, the party wasn't dead, the conservatives didn't have someone worth following that wasn't milquetoast or compromised. I remember the dance around McCain as well. "Maverick" they loved to call him, such a rebel. But when he ran for the presidency-not anymore. Establishment Republican, good ol' boy, and dirty money. They loved him again after he was no longer a "threat" however. It's the same story, every election cycle. Most presidents take it in stride, this one wants to shut down the media tho. And that's disturbing.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606024481 05-27-2020, 10:36 PM
-
#122
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
IGNORED

LMFAOOOOOO
IMAGINE Muh SHAWK

THis is why u don't argue w libtard retards:
Ask them SIMPLE QUESTIONS
THEY REFUSE

Why are fat and old people allowed outside?

GG LMAOOOOOO
Oh so you think you're supposed to just come on here, ignore all the points I made while i was in arguments with multiple people, and direct all my focus on your boring ass question that doesn't really address anything that has been discussed thus far?

yeah...I ignored you. and why are you assuming I'm liberal? because I disagree with you?

how about stop thinking like a tribal ape, and think for yourself. that bipartisan concept only exists so people don't have to truly listen to eachother; and is likely desirable to a controlling govt, that doesn't want us to actually think critically andunify, but instead fight amongst eachother.

stop using those terms, and stop attaching yourself to those concepts. transcend.
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606024541 05-27-2020, 10:36 PM
-
#123
  1. tank2003
  1. tank2003
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: Mississippi, United States
  5. Posts: 41,636
  6. Rep Power: 371828
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
My point was that this has been going on literally since the printing press was invented. Maybe it wasn't your intention, but in the post I replied to it sounded like you just came to the conclusion that *gasp* the media has bias lol. None of the prior administrations were as paranoid and hyper aware of media as Trump, maybe Nixon.

I did a small research paper on pandemics for an English class last month. Combing through old newspaper clippings and it's amazing. Everything we are discussing now is EXACTLY what was discussed 100 years ago. Masks, economy, church, etc. Everything. For the same reasons. Using the same rhetoric. The same skepticism. The same worries. Everything. Nothing has changed. If I could copy/paste some of what I found and you'd have a hard time discerning which pandemic the articles were based off.

Trump has centered the narrative around himself. He's a narcissist. People don't realize it because they're too close to the forest. Step back tho and it's utterly ridiculous and obvious.
No its not a sudden revelation that the media is biased. They always have been. But the liberal MSM treated bush MUUUUUUUUCH better than they do trump. With trump, everything he says and does is absolutely wrong. At least with Bush, he occasionally got a few things right. With Obama, fox says he got it all wrong while CNN said he was the perfect potus. Obama leaked directly to them though. As much as Trump brought down the standards of the presidency, CNN and the rest of the liberal media brought down the standards of journalism. They no longer care about informing the people. They only care about fear mongering and pushing the agenda. Case in point: the pandemic. They spend most of their time blaming everything on trump and at the beginning, they FUELED the fire of panic buying. They didnt care about trying to keep people calm. They just wanted to panic people and influence the nov election

i believe you about the pandemics of the past vs today though. I read about the spanish flu and the honk kong flu and if you just substituted honk kong flu and spanish flu for covid, then it all could have been printed yesterday
“That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die.” - The Nameless City by HP Lovecraft
"The higher the prevalence of infectious diseases the higher the probability of totalitarian political attitudes."
-Dr. Jordan Peterson Sept 2017
"The search for a moral equivalent of war continues to define American Liberalism to this day."
post 1606024561 05-27-2020, 10:37 PM
-
#124
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
Don't bother, anyone trying to psychoanalyze people on the internet is an utterly unhinged retard.

1.Are they a clinical psychologist?
2.How much have they studied psychology?
3.Do they know how difficult it is to actually diagnose anyone with anything?

ZERO ANSWERS WILL BE COMING
ZERO ANSWERS WILL BE COMING
ZERO ANSWERS WILL BE COMING
ZERO ANSWERS WILL BE COMING
ZERO ANSWERS WILL BE COMING

They just wanna say "Drumpf bad" but they want to sound smart, so they use terms that also make them sound credible.
I'm not psychoanalyzing anything you fukking potato.

Go write on a chalkboard, you're "discussion" makes more sense there.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606024631 05-27-2020, 10:38 PM
-
#125
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 15,289
  5. Rep Power: 25168
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
I swear, it seems you guys only have a 4 year memory.

Do you remember when Bush was president? I do, I remember the monkey ears, the cowboy comics, the editorials bemoaning every single dangerous thing he did. They lambasted his intelligence and called him a coward. I remember it on all sides, CTers revved up big time over 9/11. In retrospect it's no surprise a guy like Trump won the R nom, after 9/11 and McCain/Romney the party was dead. Actually, the party wasn't dead, the conservatives didn't have someone worth following that wasn't milquetoast or compromised. I remember the dance around McCain as well. "Maverick" they loved to call him, such a rebel. But when he ran for the presidency-not anymore. Establishment Republican, good ol' boy, and dirty money. They loved him again after he was no longer a "threat" however. It's the same story, every election cycle. Most presidents take it in stride, this one wants to shut down the media tho. And that's disturbing.
I lived through both and there's no comparison. It's far worse now than during the Bush years.

Saying "hurr durr the media was mean before so why does it matter now" is ignorant
post 1606024941 05-27-2020, 10:42 PM
-
#126
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By tank2003⏩
No its not a sudden revelation that the media is biased. They always have been. But the liberal MSM treated bush MUUUUUUUUCH better than they do trump. With trump, everything he says and does is absolutely wrong. At least with Bush, he occasionally got a few things right. With Obama, fox says he got it all wrong while CNN said he was the perfect potus. Obama leaked directly to them though. As much as Trump brought down the standards of the presidency, CNN and the rest of the liberal media brought down the standards of journalism. They no longer care about informing the people. They only care about fear mongering and pushing the agenda. Case in point: the pandemic. They spend most of their time blaming everything on trump and at the beginning, they FUELED the fire of panic buying. They didnt care about trying to keep people calm. They just wanted to panic people and influence the nov election

i believe you about the pandemics of the past vs today though. I read about the spanish flu and the honk kong flu and if you just substituted honk kong flu and spanish flu for covid, then it all could have been printed yesterday
I see that, and raise you one Dan Rather story on Bush's service record. Nothing in this climate comes close to that. Some will say "Russia" investigation, but Rather came out with totally fake "proof." Everything today is just twisted, and could be seen through if there were more than 2 brain cells at work, but there are no actual fake documents.

With regards to the pandemic...lol. You have not been following from the beginning. I literally had to abandon any news media and Google if I wanted any information on the pandemic. In the beginning, everything was about impeachment, nobody cared about coronavirus. Media flipped out the day basketball was cancelled, until then it was damage control, and no big deal.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606025031 05-27-2020, 10:43 PM
-
#127
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 12,128
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 145296
Originally Posted By AngryBaby⏩
technically they only said "check the facts on mail-in ballots", which could have very well coincided with Trumps tweet...if he were using facts.

so there is no indication based from that alone whether they agreed or disagreed with his statements. Even if they did disagree secretly, they were smart enough to know that they dont have to say anything, they can just insert get the facts on mail-in ballots for more information!" and those facts, would likely play into their favor.

this argument just doesn't stand
You avoided the question again. Do you think censoring people based on political views is wrong? I answered yours.

The only reason I even asked this question initially is because rather than being open minded and acknowledging the point a conservative was making in the JRE clip about twitter censorship, you chose to ignore the evidence with character assassination by saying
Originally Posted By AngryBaby⏩
lol Tim Poole.
post 1606025531 05-27-2020, 10:50 PM
-
#128
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Posts: 23,424
  5. Rep Power: 87439
Simps, I know it's hard to find an alternative use for the vast amounts of free time you have, but stop looking at Social Media. It is rather simple.

I know it would be one less coping mechanism for you all, but I want you sheep to know that you are nothing and will always be nothing.

Just go away somewhere and do something productive with your lives.
Originally Posted By aleeboy⏩
They need to ship them off to some remote island/ location and restricted from society. Too many females are having their egos inflated due to their sickness - aka thirt, desperation, whiteknighting.

The solution

"The manlet is a savage beast that knows no moral bound. After falling in disgrace to a manmore, a ravaged manlet would not hesitate to come from behind and land a sucker punch/ swing with a rock to the back of a manmore's head. They are ruthless and you need to spend some more time in the gutter to even begin trying to comprehend what goes on in their minds."

Hurt by the aleeboy and need to cope? Go here for hugs: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178724011
post 1606025581 05-27-2020, 10:51 PM
-
#129
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
What do you think using the term narcissist means you ****ing retard.

Enjoy living in commiefornia
Enjoy NO RIGHTS
Enjoy your cuckhold left wing GODs

#StayInside you utter fruitcake *******
I may live in commiefornia, but you are a cucked snowflake, stuck WKing a dude who wouldn't even let you orbit him.

Lol@you.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606025641 05-27-2020, 10:51 PM
-
#130
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
You avoided the question again. Do you think censoring people based on political views is wrong? I answered yours.

The only reason I even asked this question initially is because rather than being open minded and acknowledging the point a conservative was making in the JRE clip about twitter censorship, you chose to ignore the evidence with character assassination by saying
I asked a question, because if the "opposing viewpoint" has misinformation in it, then that can easily be misconstrued as censoring the misinformation, as opposed to censoring an opposing view.

maybe you should provide a specific example of twitter censoring an opposing view, and ask me what i think about that particular circumstance. That's a better way to get an answer, because I have no idea what the context to your question is.

because if I say "of course" you likely wont provide me with a specific example of an instance where twitter did such. or i'm guessing the example wouldn't be definitive.

it's obvious that the "correct" answer would be to say "no jeepbruh, it's not right" it's obvious where you're trying to go. So I'm jumping ahead and asking, dude what example are we using here? where's the situation where twitter was doing this. and where they doing this in THIS instance.
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606025771 05-27-2020, 10:53 PM
-
#131
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 12,128
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 145296
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
I swear, it seems you guys only have a 4 year memory.

Do you remember when Bush was president? I do, I remember the monkey ears, the cowboy comics, the editorials bemoaning every single dangerous thing he did. They lambasted his intelligence and called him a coward. I remember it on all sides, CTers revved up big time over 9/11. In retrospect it's no surprise a guy like Trump won the R nom, after 9/11 and McCain/Romney the party was dead. Actually, the party wasn't dead, the conservatives didn't have someone worth following that wasn't milquetoast or compromised. I remember the dance around McCain as well. "Maverick" they loved to call him, such a rebel. But when he ran for the presidency-not anymore. Establishment Republican, good ol' boy, and dirty money. They loved him again after he was no longer a "threat" however. It's the same story, every election cycle. Most presidents take it in stride, this one wants to shut down the media tho. And that's disturbing.
Again, how is it fair to call him a narcissist when he is defending himself from an obviously biased media? If we are going to resort to name calling it would be more fair to call Bush a pussy for not defending himself.

I guess I disagree with your point that because Bush was a push over and let the media walk all over him that Trump should also just take it. And if he doesn't then he should then get another nasty label. Doesn't make sense to me is all.
post 1606025821 05-27-2020, 10:53 PM
-
#132
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  1. aleeboy
  2. It's over for you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Posts: 23,424
  5. Rep Power: 87439
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
You avoided the question again. Do you think censoring people based on political views is wrong? I answered yours.

The only reason I even asked this question initially is because rather than being open minded and acknowledging the point a conservative was making in the JRE clip about twitter censorship, you chose to ignore the evidence with character assassination by saying
People should be censored because they have normie brains with very little value to add/ contribute to any topic. They are sheep who ony blurt out the rhetoric that has been driven into their small minds via social mecdia platforms.

I advocate banning sheep from social media. This would result in the death of social media since all smart people are not even on it.
"The manlet is a savage beast that knows no moral bound. After falling in disgrace to a manmore, a ravaged manlet would not hesitate to come from behind and land a sucker punch/ swing with a rock to the back of a manmore's head. They are ruthless and you need to spend some more time in the gutter to even begin trying to comprehend what goes on in their minds."

Hurt by the aleeboy and need to cope? Go here for hugs: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178724011
post 1606025851 05-27-2020, 10:54 PM
-
#133
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
OKAY BOOMER

Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?
dude im not gonna lie to you...you sound crazy and I don't know wtf you're talking about.

maybe explain what you're trying to ask lmao
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606025921 05-27-2020, 10:54 PM
-
#134
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Location: Perth, WA, Australia
  5. Posts: 20,607
  6. Rep Power: 70397
Originally Posted By AngryBaby⏩
I'm sure Fox did it's thing on that one devils...

but if you expect me to trace down fox calling out that guy for being a lefty, that isn't going to happen lol.

however, regarding twitter and socialmedia, the subject at hand here. Trump is wrong here, as I proved. and his Executive order wont do **** accordingly...
foxnews.com/us/scalise-critical-shooter-idd-as-james-hodgkinson

he is NOT wrong. There is a huge monopoly on media platforms in America.
Almost all media is owned by the following conglomerates, Comcast, AT&T, Disney, News Corp. To say that these monopolies don't control speech on their platforms is naive.
post 1606026031 05-27-2020, 10:56 PM
-
#135
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
Again, how is it fair to call him a narcissist when he is defending himself from an obviously biased media? If we are going to resort to name calling it would be more fair to call Bush a pussy for not defending himself.

I guess I disagree with your point that because Bush was a push over and let the media walk all over him that Trump should also just take it. And if he doesn't then he should then get another nasty label. Doesn't make sense to me is all.
You guys...I can't stop laughing.

Ok I'll stop calling him a name if it hurts. Lol. It was a throwaway line anyway.

How about this-he's a spineless and self centered man baby who appears to think he's above criticism.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606026081 05-27-2020, 10:57 PM
-
#136
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?

Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?

Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?

Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?

WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
WHY CAN'T THEY ANSWER LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
lol alright. I just told you i don't know what you're talking about. so expand. but you're like...being all extra so...im done. lol
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606026151 05-27-2020, 10:58 PM
-
#137
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
I'm not


Should FB/Twitter be required to say they are a publisher or platform?
educate me on the difference hidden. learn me.
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606026261 05-27-2020, 11:00 PM
-
#138
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
How am I WKing trump by calling out your lack of psychological knowledge?

Oh that's right leftist retards have melted your mind so you can't do basic logic.

I don't live in the west, IDGAF about anything that happens there, my message ITT is for right wingers to dipset from the natin that is filled with brain dead retards like you.
I'd ask you to stop being a cuck but you appear terminal.

I'll send a bill in the morning.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606026551 05-27-2020, 11:04 PM
-
#139
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  1. JeepBruh
  2. Platinum
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 12,128
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 145296
Originally Posted By AngryBaby⏩
it's obvious that the "correct" answer would be to say "no jeepbruh, it's not right" it's obvious where you're trying to go. So I'm jumping ahead and asking, dude what example are we using here? where's the situation where twitter was doing this. and where they doing this in THIS instance.
That's all I wanted. I just wanted you to answer the question that censoring opposing political view points is wrong.

It was entertaining watching you do everything you could to avoid answering such a simple question and getting so defensive about it.
post 1606026851 05-27-2020, 11:06 PM
-
#140
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By HiddenAlchemist⏩
Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL
Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

Can you go outside yet?

ROFLLLLLLLL

#StayInside #CuckiforniaLifestyle #ROFLLLLLLLLLL
Yes Bart. I go outside errday.

Your freedoms are what you grab and take. Srs.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606027251 05-27-2020, 11:12 PM
-
#141
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 15,289
  5. Rep Power: 25168
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
You guys...I can't stop laughing.

Ok I'll stop calling him a name if it hurts. Lol. It was a throwaway line anyway.

How about this-he's a spineless and self centered man baby who appears to think he's above criticism.
Of course Trump is a narcissist. Why is that even being questioned?

It's not really relevant though. All politicians are.
post 1606028441 05-27-2020, 11:29 PM
-
#142
  1. roko79
  2. Eating Machine
  1. roko79
  2. Eating Machine
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Posts: 22,196
  6. Rep Power: 62546
Inb4 he bans google and amazon too
If you are not willing to risk the unusual, you will have to settle for the ordinary

**New Jersey Crew 908**
Upstream, Red Team
post 1606028901 05-27-2020, 11:34 PM
-
#143
  1. tank2003
  1. tank2003
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: Mississippi, United States
  5. Posts: 41,636
  6. Rep Power: 371828
Originally Posted By Johnez⏩
I see that, and raise you one Dan Rather story on Bush's service record. Nothing in this climate comes close to that. Some will say "Russia" investigation, but Rather came out with totally fake "proof." Everything today is just twisted, and could be seen through if there were more than 2 brain cells at work, but there are no actual fake documents.

With regards to the pandemic...lol. You have not been following from the beginning. I literally had to abandon any news media and Google if I wanted any information on the pandemic. In the beginning, everything was about impeachment, nobody cared about coronavirus. Media flipped out the day basketball was cancelled, until then it was damage control, and no big deal.
I dont know what you are talking about regarding dan rather

I dont use google if i need something regarding trump or modern politics and news unless i need to link an article i have already read. If i need to educate myself on a topic in those categories, i use duckduckgo.

And impeachment is all the MSM and dems care about. They dont give a chit about me or you or hell, even their voters. Which is why pelosi wants the earmark in the 2nd stimulus bill to make it legal for anyone to get an absentee bal;lot with no proof of identity. They cant maintain the house and win back the senate with their policies, ideas and their service record from the past two years. They have to cheat to get what they want and who is going to call them out? The MSM? The spineless pussy republicans? The dem constituents?
“That is not dead which can eternal lie, And with strange aeons even death may die.” - The Nameless City by HP Lovecraft
"The higher the prevalence of infectious diseases the higher the probability of totalitarian political attitudes."
-Dr. Jordan Peterson Sept 2017
"The search for a moral equivalent of war continues to define American Liberalism to this day."
post 1606029701 05-27-2020, 11:45 PM
-
#144
  1. roko79
  2. Eating Machine
  1. roko79
  2. Eating Machine
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Posts: 22,196
  6. Rep Power: 62546
Originally Posted By Leonydus⏩
lol'd at all the mad liberals in this thread, feeling personally attacked because trump may let the other side have a voice
You known you can be on the right and be against government overreach as well. Trump is not a conservative, he’s no different than all the things you accuse liberals of, he just has a support base fooled into believing it. Give me limited government, keep your hands off our markets, ensure individual liberty, and provide essential services. That’s it.
If you are not willing to risk the unusual, you will have to settle for the ordinary

**New Jersey Crew 908**
Upstream, Red Team
post 1606030391 05-27-2020, 11:55 PM
-
#145
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  1. AngryBaby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 5,037
  5. Rep Power: 8054
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
That's all I wanted. I just wanted you to answer the question that censoring opposing political view points is wrong.

It was entertaining watching you do everything you could to avoid answering such a simple question and getting so defensive about it.
no because this post right here is the pointless resolve that I anticipated lol it wasn't a gotcha moment at all.....so unless you had an example of twitter actually doing this, it's meaningless to ask me that question.

I thought you were gonna be like "we'll back in 2015 THIS happened" but nope...nothing. so i was kinda right in why asked that question initially.
Originally Posted By Polaris;1606964451
Sociology isn't a "science" btw.
lmao
post 1606031251 05-28-2020, 12:11 AM
-
#146
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By tank2003⏩
I dont know what you are talking about regarding dan rather

I dont use google if i need something regarding trump or modern politics and news unless i need to link an article i have already read. If i need to educate myself on a topic in those categories, i use duckduckgo.

And impeachment is all the MSM and dems care about. They dont give a chit about me or you or hell, even their voters. Which is why pelosi wants the earmark in the 2nd stimulus bill to make it legal for anyone to get an absentee bal;lot with no proof of identity. They cant maintain the house and win back the senate with their policies, ideas and their service record from the past two years. They have to cheat to get what they want and who is going to call them out? The MSM? The spineless pussy republicans? The dem constituents?
Then duckduckgo it. It's an interesting story show the desperation of the media in trying to bring down a president.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1606037481 05-28-2020, 02:46 AM
-
#147
  1. PowerD
  2. Teh big quads
  1. PowerD
  2. Teh big quads
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 3,742
  6. Rep Power: 7057
Just for fun, imagine if gov and msm are buddies and all on the same team. How would they keep people from all getting together and deciding they dont need a gov?
post 1606039441 05-28-2020, 03:54 AM
-
#148
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 22,267
  6. Rep Power: 86921
lmao liberals are literally so fukking retarded.

they sue trump arguing that twitter is public domain and now that it's public domain, they can't silence or manipulate Trumps free speech lmfao
post 1606039821 05-28-2020, 04:05 AM
-
#149
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 39,767
  5. Rep Power: 166638
AngryBaby I just wanna know for real- Did you have any really good statistics, polls, etc in 2016 showing Trump wouldn't be elected?

You just seem so sure about it but I bet if I searched your posts in 2016 you were also sure Trump wasn't gonna win.
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.

That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.
post 1606042021 05-28-2020, 05:08 AM
-
#150
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Location: Perth, WA, Australia
  5. Posts: 20,607
  6. Rep Power: 70397
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
Liberals: "Donald Trump is a dictator"

Also liberals: "please take our guns"

Logic. Not even once.
Liberals: "The government is oppressive and corrupt and only serves the lobbyists and mega donors! The police are agaisn't us!"
also Liberals : "Please protect us government! Give us free healthcare, free college, take away guns and please surveillance every part of our lives!"
Quick Navigation Top Misc
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts