Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Religion and Politics
»
fkin LMFAO @ Atheism, only retards think it’s a logical worldview.
01-13-2018, 07:53 PM
-
#211
- TranceNRG
- Rafidhi (رافضي)
-
- TranceNRG
- Rafidhi (رافضي)
- Join Date: May 2002
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 27,570
- Rep Power: 30173
-
-
I haven't read any of the posts here, but just for the context, I thought I should add the following.
Based on my personal observation, those who are genuinely atheists, have thought more about God and religion than those who are religious.
Today's atheists, and I'm talking about people over the age of 30, had to swim against the stream, to cognitively reach their positions. That alone should be rewarded and appreciated. Most religious people, like dead fish, go with the flow and don't question fundamental questions that may deeply shake their baseless convictions.
So, I, personally, believe that it is more likely for an atheist to be a critical thinker than for a religious person.
That being said, nowadays, tables are turning. It's easier, more fashionable, and trendy to be against religion, specially organized religions, and God. So, unlike a few decades ago, it doesn't take much cognitive struggle to fit in with others if one holds atheistic views. Young adults, who are atheists, nowadays, are probably just as uncritical about their beliefs as their religious counterparts.
In a few decades, the direction of the flow will be completely towards atheism. Consequently, it'll be much harder, it'll take much cognitive work, to convince oneself to believe in God and a religion. In a few decades, it's more likely for a religious person to be more of a critical thinker than an atheist. The latter will be the dead fish going with the flow.
Based on my personal observation, those who are genuinely atheists, have thought more about God and religion than those who are religious.
Today's atheists, and I'm talking about people over the age of 30, had to swim against the stream, to cognitively reach their positions. That alone should be rewarded and appreciated. Most religious people, like dead fish, go with the flow and don't question fundamental questions that may deeply shake their baseless convictions.
So, I, personally, believe that it is more likely for an atheist to be a critical thinker than for a religious person.
That being said, nowadays, tables are turning. It's easier, more fashionable, and trendy to be against religion, specially organized religions, and God. So, unlike a few decades ago, it doesn't take much cognitive struggle to fit in with others if one holds atheistic views. Young adults, who are atheists, nowadays, are probably just as uncritical about their beliefs as their religious counterparts.
In a few decades, the direction of the flow will be completely towards atheism. Consequently, it'll be much harder, it'll take much cognitive work, to convince oneself to believe in God and a religion. In a few decades, it's more likely for a religious person to be more of a critical thinker than an atheist. The latter will be the dead fish going with the flow.
And David said, "The Lord who delivered me from the paw of the lion and from the paw of the bear, He will deliver me from the hand of this Philistine." And Saul said to David, "Go, and may the Lord be with you." (1 Samuel 17:37)
Thus David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and he struck the Philistine and killed him; but there was no sword in David’s hand. (1 Samuel 17:50)
01-13-2018, 09:13 PM
-
#212
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
I don't have enough faith to be an Atheist
As
01-13-2018, 11:58 PM
-
#213
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
-
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: In the bar
- Posts: 40,965
- Rep Power: 141991
-
-
Originally Posted By Jh1479⏩
It's a big claim that it's impossible for reality to either be infinitely old or arisen from nothing. We simply don't know enough to make that statement. Prove it and claim your Nobel in physics and universal acclaim from every church, mosque and synagogue in the world while you are at it.Its more than unlikely though, its fundamentally unsolvable, which is why you need to default to something divine. (non religious BTW).
Further, if it's impossible, what's the solution? Some kind of prime mover? How long has the prime mover been around, infinitely or did they arise from nothing? You simply move the problem back one step.
Lastly, what is the prime mover, why does it have to be omnipotent or concerned with human morality? Maybe it's only magical powers are existing forever and creating universes.
Your argument fails on a) making a claim which is not demonstrated, b) it's not a solution to the problem and c) prime mover =/= god except in the vaguest possible sense, it says nothing about "god's" relevance to humanity.
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
01-14-2018, 01:35 AM
-
#214
- Austanian
- IDDQD
-
- Austanian
- IDDQD
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 22,120
- Rep Power: 89692
-
-
Originally Posted By Jh1479⏩
The answer is we don't know how it came into existence.So before there was something there was nothing and that something came into existence spontaneously all by itself for no reason?
However we do ask the questions instead of finding a way to break all the rules and do make up an invisible entity that the rules don't apply to. Giant invisible space unicorns poop out planets and create matter. They always existed though so Checkmate atheists.
Some how you have managed to convince yourself that your religion is right and all others are wrong.
01-14-2018, 01:39 AM
-
#215
01-14-2018, 08:10 AM
-
#216
01-14-2018, 10:08 AM
-
#217
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By tng83⏩
BRB gonna go create life with a big bangfacepalm.jpg
#4 on the list of stupid shiit theists say
#4 on the list of stupid shiit theists say
As
01-14-2018, 10:43 AM
-
#218
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By Jh1479⏩
Person A: NOTHING can have always existed and NOTHING can have come from nothing.Either something came from nothing or something always existed, both don't make sense and theres no other possibilities.
So there has to be a God thats not subject to this contradiction.
So there has to be a God thats not subject to this contradiction.
Person B: Well then by that logic, God, if even exists, cannot have come from nothing or have always existed. So God must have come from something. You are left with a "higher up" entity, let's call it God2, that created God. Then, similarly, we have a God3, and so on with no end. All we are left with is an infinite chain of gods, at best. To further complicate things, if each god creation act takes nonzero time, then overall reality must in some sense have existed forever, to allow the infinite creations, contradicting your statement about nothing always existing.
Person A: Well.....uh.....God either came from nothing or existed forever.
Person B: Nope. Not according to your first statement.
I hope you can see why the argument fails. And if you are allowing God to break the rules of not existing forever, not created from nothing....then I'll respond, may as well just let the universe break those rules then.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
01-14-2018, 11:57 AM
-
#219
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
-
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: In the bar
- Posts: 40,965
- Rep Power: 141991
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Cringe.I don't have enough faith to be an Atheist
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Atheism says nothing about the origins of life or the big bang. Also the Big Bang is not hypothesised to be the origin of life.BRB gonna go create life with a big bang
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
01-14-2018, 01:43 PM
-
#220
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By Mr
BRB gonna go deny the creatorCringe.
Atheism says nothing about the origins of life or the big bang. Also the Big Bang is not hypothesised to be the origin of life.
Atheism says nothing about the origins of life or the big bang. Also the Big Bang is not hypothesised to be the origin of life.
As
01-14-2018, 03:07 PM
-
#221
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
-
- Mr Beer
- Here's beer
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: In the bar
- Posts: 40,965
- Rep Power: 141991
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
Wow it was that easy to break your faith in god, seems like you weren't really that into it.BRB gonna go deny the creator
"A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand."
01-14-2018, 04:24 PM
-
#222
01-14-2018, 09:29 PM
-
#223
01-14-2018, 09:39 PM
-
#224
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
01-14-2018, 10:18 PM
-
#225
01-14-2018, 11:02 PM
-
#226
- Tha big kahoona
- Great Reset General
-
- Tha big kahoona
- Great Reset General
- Join Date: Aug 2004
- Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Posts: 16,332
- Rep Power: 96542
-
-
Originally Posted By TranceNRG⏩
I haven't put much thought at all into it. To me, atheism is the path of least reaistence. The default setting. It's the lack of belief, so unless you started your life being force-fed religious dogma, and many have, it's the easier side to gravitate towards.I haven't read any of the posts here, but just for the context, I thought I should add the following.
Based on my personal observation, those who are genuinely atheists, have thought more about God and religion than those who are religious.
Today's atheists, and I'm talking about people over the age of 30, had to swim against the stream, to cognitively reach their positions. That alone should be rewarded and appreciated. Most religious people, like dead fish, go with the flow and don't question fundamental questions that may deeply shake their baseless convictions.
So, I, personally, believe that it is more likely for an atheist to be a critical thinker than for a religious person.
That being said, nowadays, tables are turning. It's easier, more fashionable, and trendy to be against religion, specially organized religions, and God. So, unlike a few decades ago, it doesn't take much cognitive struggle to fit in with others if one holds atheistic views. Young adults, who are atheists, nowadays, are probably just as uncritical about their beliefs as their religious counterparts.
In a few decades, the direction of the flow will be completely towards atheism. Consequently, it'll be much harder, it'll take much cognitive work, to convince oneself to believe in God and a religion. In a few decades, it's more likely for a religious person to be more of a critical thinker than an atheist. The latter will be the dead fish going with the flow.
Based on my personal observation, those who are genuinely atheists, have thought more about God and religion than those who are religious.
Today's atheists, and I'm talking about people over the age of 30, had to swim against the stream, to cognitively reach their positions. That alone should be rewarded and appreciated. Most religious people, like dead fish, go with the flow and don't question fundamental questions that may deeply shake their baseless convictions.
So, I, personally, believe that it is more likely for an atheist to be a critical thinker than for a religious person.
That being said, nowadays, tables are turning. It's easier, more fashionable, and trendy to be against religion, specially organized religions, and God. So, unlike a few decades ago, it doesn't take much cognitive struggle to fit in with others if one holds atheistic views. Young adults, who are atheists, nowadays, are probably just as uncritical about their beliefs as their religious counterparts.
In a few decades, the direction of the flow will be completely towards atheism. Consequently, it'll be much harder, it'll take much cognitive work, to convince oneself to believe in God and a religion. In a few decades, it's more likely for a religious person to be more of a critical thinker than an atheist. The latter will be the dead fish going with the flow.
Your analogy is suspect. I get that swimming against the stream means going against public opinion and peer pressure. It's misleading though because people like myself did go against public opinion, but it felt effortless. It felt like everyone else was putting in all the work having to justify the existence of a creator. So there are opposite forces that represent the stream's flow really, public opinion and effort.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity"
Atheist Lebanese
BDS: Boycott - Divestment - Sanctions
01-14-2018, 11:32 PM
-
#227
- wings_unhinged
- Registered User
-
- wings_unhinged
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: Alaska, United States
- Posts: 18,758
- Rep Power: 44400
-
-
Originally Posted By Alchem⏩
You're right Egypt brah. I now believe in Anubis, Ra, and Amun!They’re usually the type of people that say chit like “I ****ING LOVE SCIENCE!”
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
01-14-2018, 11:40 PM
-
#228
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
-
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 29,617
- Rep Power: 146835
-
-
I don't know if a God exists or not.
But I 100% know that if one does exist.. It isn't a good or benevolent being. It is without a doubt something evil.
But I 100% know that if one does exist.. It isn't a good or benevolent being. It is without a doubt something evil.
Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.
01-15-2018, 02:24 AM
-
#229
- elterrible987
- Banned
-
- elterrible987
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 51,859
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Alchem⏩
How arrogant do you have to be to say "out of the 100 different religions, MINE is the right one"?They’re usually the type of people that say chit like “I ****ING LOVE SCIENCE!”
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
Atheist are saying they are all wrong and religion is man made. Which view is more arrogant?
01-15-2018, 02:30 AM
-
#230
Originally Posted By Alchem⏩
lmao @ religious fuks like you who believe that religion rules the world, go to church on Sundays, yet forget about it the rest of the week. I don't have a problem with people who are religious...I have a problem with people likeYOUwho want to put their religion above everything else and want everybody else to do the same.They’re usually the type of people that say chit like “I ****ING LOVE SCIENCE!”
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
Like how can you even arrive at that position? the world and existence itself don’t even make sense, why is there even existence rather than non-existence? “OOO THERE WAS NOTHING, THEN THE WORLD JUST POPPED” “OOOO THE WORLD IS ACTUALLY INFINITE” even though infinite regress is obviously logically unsound.
Cmon I respect people that say “I don’t know”, these are the intelligent people. But Atheists are just rebellious morons that don’t like religion, so they go the opposite way. They’re emotional and not rational.
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano
If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
01-15-2018, 10:36 AM
-
#231
- Austanian
- IDDQD
-
- Austanian
- IDDQD
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 22,120
- Rep Power: 89692
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
So basically you need to believe because you are worried if you don't your soul will be fuked?I don't have enough faith to be an Atheist
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
That would only be evidence if there were no other alternate explanations.I am right here
To include other deities not included under your God.
You are almost as much an atheist as me. You simply disbelieve in one less god than I do.
01-15-2018, 10:53 AM
-
#232
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
You simple do not believe because you don't understand the translation of language being used. I understand your lack of belief I wish I was better at explaining the miracles, but I simple can not explain the unexplainable experiences I have had.
As
01-15-2018, 11:53 AM
-
#233
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
-
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 14,613
- Rep Power: 136737
-
-
im agnostic because im too lazy to study all the shiit.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
01-15-2018, 12:52 PM
-
#234
- Austanian
- IDDQD
-
- Austanian
- IDDQD
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 22,120
- Rep Power: 89692
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
What do you mean by "translation of language"?You simple do not believe because you don't understand the translation of language being used. I understand your lack of belief I wish I was better at explaining the miracles, but I simple can not explain the unexplainable experiences I have had.
It is not that I don't believe in miracles. I just choose not to attribute them to an invisible entity. Nor do I feel the need to attribute "anti-miracles" to an invisible entity.
I define miracles as low probability positive events of such magnitude that they impact direction of a persons life.
Quite simply if I believe in God Miracles I would also feel the need to blame him for the Anti's in which case he is a kunt. (Or not Omnipotent in which case he shouldn't get credit for miracles either. )
01-15-2018, 01:59 PM
-
#235
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
i think people think we think God is some dude in heaven with a big white beard looking down on us, and if one was made to believe that I too would question that logic. The normal Christian considers my personal belief to be a bit blasphemous, if I was too pick one Religon that repesents me the best it would probably be some Buddhist like belief. Don't get me wrong I am also a follower of Jesus and his teachers, but most of the time the church says one thing and the teaching of Jesus says another.What do you mean by "translation of language"?
It is not that I don't believe in miracles. I just choose not to attribute them to an invisible entity. Nor do I feel the need to attribute "anti-miracles" to an invisible entity.
I define miracles as low probability positive events of such magnitude that they impact direction of a persons life.
Quite simply if I believe in God Miracles I would also feel the need to blame him for the Anti's in which case he is a kunt. (Or not Omnipotent in which case he shouldn't get credit for miracles either. )
It is not that I don't believe in miracles. I just choose not to attribute them to an invisible entity. Nor do I feel the need to attribute "anti-miracles" to an invisible entity.
I define miracles as low probability positive events of such magnitude that they impact direction of a persons life.
Quite simply if I believe in God Miracles I would also feel the need to blame him for the Anti's in which case he is a kunt. (Or not Omnipotent in which case he shouldn't get credit for miracles either. )
As
01-16-2018, 10:21 AM
-
#236
- sy2502
- Registered User
-
- sy2502
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 13,396
- Rep Power: 131822
-
-
Originally Posted By cman1787⏩
It's not an argument to refute god in and of itself, but you need to be able to define something before you even discuss its existence. Not to mention that believing in X when you can't even tell us what X is doesn't sound very well thought out, let's just put it that way. At least science has the good manners of defining things rigorously, that way they can be tested equally rigorously.sometimes i want to bang my head against a wall when atheist try to refute with the "but which god is the right one" argument
Follow my 2018 competition prep here:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=175566421&p=1547462721#post1547462721
01-16-2018, 10:57 AM
-
#237
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
-
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 14,613
- Rep Power: 136737
-
-
Originally Posted By sy2502⏩
it is still best to be skeptical of a metanarrative of empiricism. science is just a word for a bunch of specialty areas of study who are generally looking for answers within their own field using their own tools. it is a buncha hammer n nail bros.It's not an argument to refute god in and of itself, but you need to be able to define something before you even discuss its existence. Not to mention that believing in X when you can't even tell us what X is doesn't sound very well thought out, let's just put it that way. At least science has the good manners of defining things rigorously, that way they can be tested equally rigorously.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
01-16-2018, 11:16 AM
-
#238
01-16-2018, 11:34 AM
-
#239
- sy2502
- Registered User
-
- sy2502
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 13,396
- Rep Power: 131822
-
-
Originally Posted By AltarOfPlagues⏩
Science has its limits, but it's the reason why you and I can have this conversation online, know what I'm saying? Because somebody defined very precisely what electricity is and how it behaves, and someone else defined precisely what a transistor is and how it works, and someone else defined what an internet protocol is, etc etc. Had we stopped at "electricity is this thing we can't see, don't worry too much about it, take it on faith, don't get too empirical about it", we would still be lighting candles at night.it is still best to be skeptical of a metanarrative of empiricism. science is just a word for a bunch of specialty areas of study who are generally looking for answers within their own field using their own tools. it is a buncha hammer n nail bros.
Follow my 2018 competition prep here:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=175566421&p=1547462721#post1547462721
01-16-2018, 11:50 AM
-
#240
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
-
- AltarOfPlagues
- yerrrrrrrr meh?
- Join Date: Oct 2015
- Posts: 14,613
- Rep Power: 136737
-
-
Originally Posted By sy2502⏩
oh no doubt, no doubt. i just am always afraid of whats lost when we do away w mysticism. it was such a big part of our collective history. we definitely got that propensity for belief. like neils bohr "of course i don't believe in superstition but they say it works even if you do not believe in it."Science has its limits, but it's the reason why you and I can have this conversation online, know what I'm saying? Because somebody defined very precisely what electricity is and how it behaves, and someone else defined precisely what a transistor is and how it works, and someone else defined what an internet protocol is, etc etc. Had we stopped at "electricity is this thing we can't see, don't worry too much about it, take it on faith, don't get too empirical about it", we would still be lighting candles at night.
do not read my posts and weep, i am not there i do not sleep
i am the thousand greens that rep, i am the ban bet dutifully kept
of memes and trolls in toasted breads, i am not there, i am not dead.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts