Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Religion and Politics
»
Trump Considering Immediately Pulling Out of Afghanistan
12-21-2018, 02:19 PM
-
#211
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
Originally Posted By iifymbro⏩
I guess you don't read stuff, never mind!What's happening just this week that's so terrible? inb4 you list regularly timed position rollovers
inb4 you pretend all is great in utopian world.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
12-21-2018, 02:20 PM
-
#212
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
On that basis, you should be negged for the majority of your posts.Lmao so VoxExMachina negged me for this post. I wonder which of the forum rules this post violated lol.
"Negative reputation should be given if the person is posting something that detracts from the conversation. If the post is rude, inappropriate, breaks forum rules, is not gracious, etc; these are all good reasons to give negative reputation.If you have a personal grudge with someone, their team, etc, is it not appropriate to give them negative reputation for no reason. Giving negative reputation because you don't agree with what was said is not an appropraite use of the reputation system. People are entitled to their own opinions, and just because you don't agree doesn't mean the user was wrong or not contributing to the conversation."
"Negative reputation should be given if the person is posting something that detracts from the conversation. If the post is rude, inappropriate, breaks forum rules, is not gracious, etc; these are all good reasons to give negative reputation.If you have a personal grudge with someone, their team, etc, is it not appropriate to give them negative reputation for no reason. Giving negative reputation because you don't agree with what was said is not an appropraite use of the reputation system. People are entitled to their own opinions, and just because you don't agree doesn't mean the user was wrong or not contributing to the conversation."
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
12-21-2018, 02:24 PM
-
#213
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
This.On that basis, you should be negged for the majority of your posts.
He contributes zero to most discussions, and starts personally attacking people once backed into a corner.
12-21-2018, 02:25 PM
-
#214
Originally Posted By Dorich⏩
Who's complaining? I'm asking what part of the forum rules for negging applied to my post? Which btw, only asked simple, thread related questions.Your post clearly violated something or else he wouldn't have negged you.
But since when is complaining about a mod neg allowed? Last time I did that I was negged a second time by a different mod.
But since when is complaining about a mod neg allowed? Last time I did that I was negged a second time by a different mod.
12-21-2018, 02:26 PM
-
#215
- topperstyle
- 720 Crew
-
- topperstyle
- 720 Crew
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Posts: 13,303
- Rep Power: 137905
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
that’s just a long version of the word complainingWho's complaining? I'm asking what part of the forum rules for negging applied to my post? Which btw, only asked simple, thread related questions.
Stop being a lil bitch man
12-21-2018, 02:26 PM
-
#216
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
The irony. I don't attack users or call them names. I'm actually part of a short list of posters on this forum that don't.On that basis, you should be negged for the majority of your posts.
If people are going to neg, they should at least be honest why they are lol.
12-21-2018, 02:27 PM
-
#217
Originally Posted By Dorich⏩
Back up your claim.This.
He contributes zero to most discussions, and starts personally attacking people once backed into a corner.
He contributes zero to most discussions, and starts personally attacking people once backed into a corner.
Sounds like someone's butthurt over something lol..
12-21-2018, 03:04 PM
-
#218
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
You attacked me regarding my hair color at least twice, and you constantly attack other people on a personal level.Back up your claim.
Sounds like someone's butthurt over something lol..
Sounds like someone's butthurt over something lol..
It has nothing to do with butt-hurt, I'm just pointing out facts.
12-21-2018, 03:16 PM
-
#219
Originally Posted By Dorich⏩
I referred to you as "red". You asked me what I meant. I told you, you complained, I apologized and promised not to call you that again.You attacked me regarding my hair color at least twice, and you constantly attack other people on a personal level.
It has nothing to do with butt-hurt, I'm just pointing out facts.
It has nothing to do with butt-hurt, I'm just pointing out facts.
And no, I never attack people on a personal level. I may call people out for being hypocrites based on their post history, but I don't personally attack posters.
12-21-2018, 03:26 PM
-
#220
12-21-2018, 04:47 PM
-
#221
- Thelonebadwolf
- Registered User
-
- Thelonebadwolf
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Age: 33
- Posts: 3,239
- Rep Power: 12420
-
-
Originally Posted By Boxman⏩
On spreadMoron. How uninformed you are. It isn't Iranian backed forces that threaten US security, it's those Sunni jihadists backed by our ally Saudi Arabia. All those terror attacks in Europe? 9/11? The handful of terror attacks in the US since 9/11? Most of the US soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq? That's right - all thanks to Sunni militants backed by US allies Saudi and Pakistan mostly. Shia militants have never attacked the US, and only fought intermittently with US troops during the Iraq occupation.
Nope, the global Islamic threat is almost entirely a Sunni muslim phenonemon. Al-Queda? Hardcore Sunnis. Taliban? Same thing? ISIS? Sunnis again. Who are the primary backers of Sunni terrorists worldwide? Saudi and the other Sunni Gulf kingdoms. Saudi\Gulf money and Pakistani safe havens. A potent threat coming not from Iran or Syria, but from our allies.
Nope, the global Islamic threat is almost entirely a Sunni muslim phenonemon. Al-Queda? Hardcore Sunnis. Taliban? Same thing? ISIS? Sunnis again. Who are the primary backers of Sunni terrorists worldwide? Saudi and the other Sunni Gulf kingdoms. Saudi\Gulf money and Pakistani safe havens. A potent threat coming not from Iran or Syria, but from our allies.
12-21-2018, 04:55 PM
-
#222
Originally Posted By Boxman⏩
Just because most Muslim terrorists are Saudis doesn't mean that the Saudi government is financing / ordering them carry out those attacks.Moron. How uninformed you are. It isn't Iranian backed forces that threaten US security, it's those Sunni jihadists backed by our ally Saudi Arabia. All those terror attacks in Europe? 9/11? The handful of terror attacks in the US since 9/11? Most of the US soldiers killed in Afghanistan and Iraq? That's right - all thanks to Sunni militants backed by US allies Saudi and Pakistan mostly. Shia militants have never attacked the US, and only fought intermittently with US troops during the Iraq occupation.
Nope, the global Islamic threat is almost entirely a Sunni muslim phenonemon. Al-Queda? Hardcore Sunnis. Taliban? Same thing? ISIS? Sunnis again. Who are the primary backers of Sunni terrorists worldwide? Saudi and the other Sunni Gulf kingdoms. Saudi\Gulf money and Pakistani safe havens. A potent threat coming not from Iran or Syria, but from our allies.
Nope, the global Islamic threat is almost entirely a Sunni muslim phenonemon. Al-Queda? Hardcore Sunnis. Taliban? Same thing? ISIS? Sunnis again. Who are the primary backers of Sunni terrorists worldwide? Saudi and the other Sunni Gulf kingdoms. Saudi\Gulf money and Pakistani safe havens. A potent threat coming not from Iran or Syria, but from our allies.
The Saudis have done a lot to prevent terror throughout the world. They have also actively spoken out against terrorism plenty of times. On the other hand you libs are sympathetic to countries like Iran that have rockets which literally have "death to Israel" written on them.
Iran is the BIGGEST threat, NOT Saudi Arabia.
12-21-2018, 04:56 PM
-
#223
- Mercworx
- Registered User
-
- Mercworx
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 17,083
- Rep Power: 125830
-
-
Originally Posted By WrestlingFan123⏩
This.lol how many more decades do you want to stay in Afghanistan?
Took western civilization thousands of years to develop. That part of the world isn’t improving anytime soon.
We killed almost all of the original bad guys. Let’s go home.
12-21-2018, 05:35 PM
-
#224
12-21-2018, 05:46 PM
-
#225
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
-
- dabbmw2002
- Trolling the trolls.....
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Location: Maryland, United States
- Posts: 73,334
- Rep Power: 713784
-
-
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
12-21-2018, 06:01 PM
-
#226
Originally Posted By dabbmw2002⏩
He send you a message to explain that to you or are you posting from experience? lolMost negs have nothing to do with a specific post. He's been reading your drivel and randomly selected that post to let you know how he felt about it. That's life son!
And honestly I find it more funny than anything else. Not sure if you remember but we just had a discussion a few days ago here about negs. I should go back and bump them lol.
12-21-2018, 06:04 PM
-
#227
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
I've been mod and admin negged plenty of times.He send you a message to explain that to you or are you posting from experience? lol
And honestly I find it more funny than anything else. Not sure if you remember but we just had a discussion a few days ago here about negs. I should go back and bump them lol.
And honestly I find it more funny than anything else. Not sure if you remember but we just had a discussion a few days ago here about negs. I should go back and bump them lol.
Just get over it.
12-21-2018, 06:07 PM
-
#228
12-21-2018, 06:39 PM
-
#229
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
I guess they have a set of ideals and when a person aligns with said ideals, they agree with that person. Woah, imagine that.CNN is now a fan of Lindz Graham, jesus lol.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
12-21-2018, 06:48 PM
-
#230
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Dorich⏩
Trolling big time here.Just because most Muslim terrorists are Saudis doesn't mean that the Saudi government is financing / ordering them carry out those attacks.
The Saudis have done a lot to prevent terror throughout the world. They have also actively spoken out against terrorism plenty of times. On the other hand you libs are sympathetic to countries like Iran that have rockets which literally have "death to Israel" written on them.
Iran is the BIGGEST threat, NOT Saudi Arabia.
The Saudis have done a lot to prevent terror throughout the world. They have also actively spoken out against terrorism plenty of times. On the other hand you libs are sympathetic to countries like Iran that have rockets which literally have "death to Israel" written on them.
Iran is the BIGGEST threat, NOT Saudi Arabia.
12-21-2018, 07:04 PM
-
#231
12-21-2018, 07:06 PM
-
#232
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
-
- ohiostate124
- Pure-blood
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Virginia, United States
- Posts: 31,403
- Rep Power: 325469
-
-
12-21-2018, 07:25 PM
-
#233
- drLihp
- Registered User
-
- drLihp
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Age: 34
- Posts: 4,746
- Rep Power: 13729
-
-
Originally Posted By ohiostate124⏩
lol saudis dont give a **** about the kurds, they have been arming groups in syria against assad that most here consider terrorist groups. and what the hell are they gonna do against the turks? they have been getting their asses handed to them in yemen from the houthis
12-21-2018, 07:28 PM
-
#234
Originally Posted By drLihp⏩
A sunni invading army in Syrian territory sounds like possibly the worst option out of every terrible idea.lol saudis dont give a **** about the kurds, they have been arming groups in syria against assad that most here consider terrorist groups. and what the hell are they gonna do against the turks? they have been getting their asses handed to them in yemen from the houthis
They could just let the Syrian people reunite their country but obviously Israel and Saudi dont want that
12-21-2018, 07:28 PM
-
#235
- EmmaW4tson
- Banned
-
- EmmaW4tson
- Banned
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 14,340
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Dorich⏩
"Solve" the Muslim problem? Don't you mean the Islamic problem? The Islamic problem being that it is Islam and it is a supremecy religion built on war, economics, politics and servitude of Allah?They obviously can't do miracles but at least they're trying to solve the Muslim problem, unlike Iran which liberals love.
So you reckon these guys are trying their hardest as Islamic followers to make Islam more pallatable to Western countries so they get more $$? Do you think these followers of Islam give a damn about the slave workers they use to build their cities, highways and perform house keeping?
Do you believe a rat would tell you how to stop a rat infestation?
12-21-2018, 07:32 PM
-
#236
- S0Jack3d
- Registered User
-
- S0Jack3d
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 4,943
- Rep Power: 85520
-
-
Liberals are showing themselves as the biggest hypocrites of all time with their support for war in Afghanistan and Syria now
Disclaimer: All of my posts are for ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. All opinions expressed by the the poster known as "s0jack3d" are the fictional opinions of a fictional character. All opinions expressed by "s0jack3d" are pure hyperbole & satire. My posts should not be misconstrued to be the personal beleifs of any individual in any way, shape, or form. These posts are not meant to be taken literally. s0jack3d is a fictional character created for the purpose of writing a future novel.
12-21-2018, 08:08 PM
-
#237
- US_Ranger
- Registered User
-
- US_Ranger
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 32,182
- Rep Power: 120822
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Oh no, you're only down to 119k reps. All the rep whoring you've been doing over the last 8 years was set back by a month. Go **** yourself.Who's complaining? I'm asking what part of the forum rules for negging applied to my post? Which btw, only asked simple, thread related questions.
12-21-2018, 08:10 PM
-
#238
- US_Ranger
- Registered User
-
- US_Ranger
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2005
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 44
- Posts: 32,182
- Rep Power: 120822
-
-
Originally Posted By S0Jack3d⏩
The worst part is that they've been called out non stop the last couple days over it and are STILL raging and pretending they aren't moral cowards and hypocrites.Liberals are showing themselves as the biggest hypocrites of all time with their support for war in Afghanistan and Syria now
DRUMPF was going to start WW3 and now he's going to start WW3 by pulling troops out of the middle east? You can't make this **** up. Deranged, psychotic, over-medicated lunatics.
12-21-2018, 08:17 PM
-
#239
Originally Posted By US_Ranger⏩
Never thought I'd agree with you on anything just several weeks ago.The worst part is that they've been called out non stop the last couple days over it and are STILL raging and pretending they aren't moral cowards and hypocrites.
DRUMPF was going to start WW3 and now he's going to start WW3 by pulling troops out of the middle east? You can't make this **** up. Deranged, psychotic, over-medicated lunatics.
DRUMPF was going to start WW3 and now he's going to start WW3 by pulling troops out of the middle east? You can't make this **** up. Deranged, psychotic, over-medicated lunatics.
12-21-2018, 08:36 PM
-
#240
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
-
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
- Posts: 8,312
- Rep Power: 331479
-
-
Let me guess, we need to stay until 2020, barring reelection?
We could babysit the Middle East until we have flying cars and colonize space, but if the overwhelming years of history have shown, it won't make a lick of difference other than continuing to put American lives at risk and flushing money down a veritable black hole of a toilet.
How did we go from, "never should have been involved," and, "the United States can't be the world police," spin into the US needing to stay firmly seated in the Middle East until the sun explodes? Only these lunatics could conflate a movement to withdraw from the Middle East and Crossing the Rhine to be one in the same in their narrative. After the dust clears, we're going to be hearing about withdrawal being "3D chess" to instigate WW3.
We could babysit the Middle East until we have flying cars and colonize space, but if the overwhelming years of history have shown, it won't make a lick of difference other than continuing to put American lives at risk and flushing money down a veritable black hole of a toilet.
Originally Posted By US_Ranger⏩
My mind is seriously spinning right now because this hypocritical insanity is hitting a level I simply never thought was possible across an entire swathe of people who apparently reside in Bizzaro World. Of course, these are also the same people who were 100% behind preemptively giving Obama the Nobel Peace Prize, drone strikes or not.The worst part is that they've been called out non stop the last couple days over it and are STILL raging and pretending they aren't moral cowards and hypocrites.
DRUMPF was going to start WW3 and now he's going to start WW3 by pulling troops out of the middle east? You can't make this **** up. Deranged, psychotic, over-medicated lunatics.
DRUMPF was going to start WW3 and now he's going to start WW3 by pulling troops out of the middle east? You can't make this **** up. Deranged, psychotic, over-medicated lunatics.
How did we go from, "never should have been involved," and, "the United States can't be the world police," spin into the US needing to stay firmly seated in the Middle East until the sun explodes? Only these lunatics could conflate a movement to withdraw from the Middle East and Crossing the Rhine to be one in the same in their narrative. After the dust clears, we're going to be hearing about withdrawal being "3D chess" to instigate WW3.
I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die
If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts