Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Pfizer recalls ant-smoking drug Chantix due to cancer causing chemicals
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 30
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: Pfizer recalls ant-smoking drug Chantix due to cancer causing chemicals

post 1643399053 07-22-2021, 02:40 PM
-
#1
  1. JustiNtense
  1. JustiNtense
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 39,787
  6. Rep Power: 426532

Pfizer recalls ant-smoking drug Chantix due to cancer causing chemicals

Lmao

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost....-chemical/amp/

Trust big pharma 🥴

especially when it comes to rushed experimental vaccines that aren’t FDA approved and created by big pharma companies that have paid billions in criminal fines over decades.
post 1643399153 07-22-2021, 02:41 PM
-
#2
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,433
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 411438
op PLS trust the science


that was just a mistake!
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1643399523 07-22-2021, 02:47 PM
-
#3
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DrugsToGetBig⏩
op PLS trust the science


that was just a mistake!
What is the alternative to science?
post 1643399743 07-22-2021, 02:49 PM
-
#4
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  1. keyboardworkout
  2. ChatGPT4.5 Bot
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 36,953
  5. Rep Power: 416934
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
What is the alternative to science?
Common sense
▪█─────█▪ Equipment Crew #53 ▪█─────█▪
^^^^^^^ 6' 6" and Over Crew ^^^^^^^
------------- No Vax Crew ----------------
post 1643399753 07-22-2021, 02:49 PM
-
#5
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1643399903 07-22-2021, 02:52 PM
-
#6
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,433
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 411438
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
What is the alternative to science?
why does there have to be an alternative?

skepticism about the hastily pushed killer vax /=/ anti science
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1643400153 07-22-2021, 02:57 PM
-
#7
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 8,504
  6. Rep Power: 98512
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
What is the alternative to science?
I hope you get all the vaccines. Trust big pharma.
post 1643400333 07-22-2021, 02:59 PM
-
#8
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
Originally Posted By imbored205⏩
capitalism
Strong
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1643400543 07-22-2021, 03:01 PM
-
#9
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout⏩
Common sense
Suppose I have a bomb that has a very sensitive detonator that will explode if it interacts with even a single photon. Use common sense to design an experiment that would allow me to determine if the bomb works or is a dud with an arbitrarily small chance of a detonation.


Then use Quantum mechanics. Tell me which works better. Common sense would say it's impossible to test such a bomb. Quantum mechanics says I can make an apparatus not only to test if the bomb is a dud but make the chance of a detonation arbitrarily small.

BTW the analogous experimental apparatus has been constructed.

Your common sense may be common, but it isn't sensible.
Originally Posted By DrugsToGetBig⏩
why does there have to be an alternative?

skepticism about the hastily pushed killer vax /=/ anti science
You have the data to make an educated decision. You're choosing to allow your biases and fears to cloud your judgment.
post 1643400763 07-22-2021, 03:04 PM
-
#10
  1. BeanGainClovis
  2. Registered User
  1. BeanGainClovis
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10,696
  6. Rep Power: 58476
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
What is the alternative to science?
Thinking that you have a monopoly on rational thought because liberal media companies told you so.

That's the alternative to rational thought based on scientific evidence.
Beans. Cleans. Gasoline.
post 1643400923 07-22-2021, 03:07 PM
-
#11
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 8,504
  6. Rep Power: 98512
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Suppose I have a bomb that has a very sensitive detonator that will explode if it interacts with even a single photon. Use common sense to design an experiment that would allow me to determine if the bomb works or is a dud with an arbitrarily small chance of a detonation.


Then use Quantum mechanics. Tell me which works better. Common sense would say it's impossible to test such a bomb. Quantum mechanics says I can make an apparatus not only to test if the bomb is a dud but make the chance of a detonation arbitrarily small.

BTW the analogous experimental apparatus has been constructed.

Your common sense may be common, but it isn't sensible.



You have the data to make an educated decision. You're choosing to allow your biases and fears to cloud your judgment.
I would push your mother’s face into the bomb. Because science.
post 1643402123 07-22-2021, 03:27 PM
-
#12
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 14,890
  5. Rep Power: 81638
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Suppose I have a bomb that has a very sensitive detonator that will explode if it interacts with even a single photon. Use common sense to design an experiment that would allow me to determine if the bomb works or is a dud with an arbitrarily small chance of a detonation.


Then use Quantum mechanics. Tell me which works better. Common sense would say it's impossible to test such a bomb. Quantum mechanics says I can make an apparatus not only to test if the bomb is a dud but make the chance of a detonation arbitrarily small.

BTW the analogous experimental apparatus has been constructed.

Your common sense may be common, but it isn't sensible.



You have the data to make an educated decision. You're choosing to allow your biases and fears to cloud your judgment.
Typical liberal counter argument deflection

Using a totally unrelated abstract idea to try deflect from the issue at hand

“Hey guys you have to trust big pharma because we need scientists to work on space shuttles therefore all scientists are good”
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
post 1643402273 07-22-2021, 03:29 PM
-
#13
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 9,092
  6. Rep Power: 235009
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Suppose I have a bomb that has a very sensitive detonator that will explode if it interacts with even a single photon. Use common sense to design an experiment that would allow me to determine if the bomb works or is a dud with an arbitrarily small chance of a detonation.


Then use Quantum mechanics. Tell me which works better. Common sense would say it's impossible to test such a bomb. Quantum mechanics says I can make an apparatus not only to test if the bomb is a dud but make the chance of a detonation arbitrarily small.

BTW the analogous experimental apparatus has been constructed.

Your common sense may be common, but it isn't sensible.



You have the data to make an educated decision. You're choosing to allow your biases and fears to cloud your judgment.
LOL...so unrelated.

But, can still answer....common sense tells you stay the fukk away from bombs.
post 1643404693 07-22-2021, 04:09 PM
-
#14
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,421
  6. Rep Power: 44912
Originally Posted By DrugsToGetBig⏩
op PLS trust the science


that was just a mistake!
Lol at thinking there is one 'science' on these things
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
post 1643405563 07-22-2021, 04:23 PM
-
#15
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 8,174
  6. Rep Power: 47196
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
You have the data to make an educated decision. You're choosing to allow your biases and fears to cloud your judgment.
I accept science as I accept facts but what I generally do not accept is someone's interpretation of those facts.

Rejecting Fauci's characterization of data is not a rejection of science itself, it's a rejection of propaganda.

Fauci isn't science.

Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
Lol at thinking there is one 'science' on these things
The data or science is the same, what is different is the analysts interpretation of data.
I: Self, Lord and Master.

"I rub my hands when my palms itch."

"I call you Son not because you Shine but because you Mine."
post 1643406373 07-22-2021, 04:37 PM
-
#16
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
This is a prime example of why I don't trust the drug companies, medical system, FDA or any of it.
post 1643407083 07-22-2021, 04:50 PM
-
#17
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
But we were told it was safe and effective...
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1643407163 07-22-2021, 04:52 PM
-
#18
  1. SamIAm1892
  2. Future Mars Astronaut
  1. SamIAm1892
  2. Future Mars Astronaut
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Posts: 13,419
  5. Rep Power: 48445
All about the dollar signs no matter the consequences.
post 1643407193 07-22-2021, 04:52 PM
-
#19
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 26,131
  6. Rep Power: 219983
And Johnson and Johnson is being sued because their shampoos and chit have cancer causing chemicals or something along those lines.

And that’s on top of all the other fkd up chit they’ve done.
post 1643408543 07-22-2021, 05:17 PM
-
#20
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 15,289
  5. Rep Power: 25168
Sounds like it was just 1 batch

and even then still less dangerous than smoking
post 1643408603 07-22-2021, 05:18 PM
-
#21
  1. Critter5592
  2. That's the arm I fap with
  1. Critter5592
  2. That's the arm I fap with
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 33,809
  5. Rep Power: 354322
science has built a ton of good chit. yall act like just because of greedy big pharma that science is not to be trusted lol
Uncontrollable behavior with some psychopathic tendencies
post 1643409303 07-22-2021, 05:30 PM
-
#22
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
Originally Posted By TheJediBrah⏩
Sounds like it was just 1 batch

and even then still less dangerous than smoking
Chantix has been out for a long time now. If they can **** up something that should be on auto pilot do you really trust they did all their due diligence making a vaccine in less than a year?
post 1643409413 07-22-2021, 05:33 PM
-
#23
  1. RICHSTRONG
  2. Pa BITCHES
  1. RICHSTRONG
  2. Pa BITCHES
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Height: 6'2"
  6. Weight: 350 lbs
  7. Posts: 85,294
  8. Subscribers: 15
  9. Rep Power: 1662183
I loved chantix. Help me quit for over a year. I actually just asked for more. The fkn dreams were wild as fuk. Swear I had a few wet dreams. Srs.
See monster0ultra's sig
post 1643409923 07-22-2021, 05:39 PM
-
#24
  1. HarryfromCali
  2. Registered User
  1. HarryfromCali
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 5,816
  6. Rep Power: 26004
Yet they still want you to take their jab and also J&J can't even make talcum powder or even sunscreen without it causing cancer, go fist yourselves you ***got liberals
Sloots gonna sloot
RIP ZYZZ, Greg Plitt
Say no to lefty snowflakes crew
Meat-eating crew, leaf eaters GTFO
Pureblood Crew
post 1643409933 07-22-2021, 05:40 PM
-
#25
  1. LethalGunz34
  2. Registered User
  1. LethalGunz34
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2002
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 67,734
  7. Rep Power: 611918
Originally Posted By richstrong⏩
i loved chantix. Help me quit for over a year. I actually just asked for more. The fkn dreams were wild as fuk. Swear i had a few wet dreams. Srs.
groce.
post 1643410043 07-22-2021, 05:41 PM
-
#26
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  1. SmillironS
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: South Dakota
  5. Age: 41
  6. Height: 6'8"
  7. Weight: 350 lbs
  8. Posts: 11,296
  9. Subscribers: 2
  10. Rep Power: 189689
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
What is the alternative to science?
If you’re a democrat it’s anti science, the core of the belief system along with racism.
post 1643410113 07-22-2021, 05:42 PM
-
#27
  1. TonyNail
  2. Registered User
  1. TonyNail
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 1,721
  5. Rep Power: 11473
post 1643410243 07-22-2021, 05:44 PM
-
#28
  1. RICHSTRONG
  2. Pa BITCHES
  1. RICHSTRONG
  2. Pa BITCHES
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Height: 6'2"
  6. Weight: 350 lbs
  7. Posts: 85,294
  8. Subscribers: 15
  9. Rep Power: 1662183
Originally Posted By LethalGunz34⏩
groce.
I know...chewings a bad habit
See monster0ultra's sig
post 1643411113 07-22-2021, 05:57 PM
-
#29
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  1. TheJediBrah
  2. One with the Force
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 15,289
  5. Rep Power: 25168
Originally Posted By yabbayabba⏩
Chantix has been out for a long time now. If they can **** up something that should be on auto pilot do you really trust they did all their due diligence making a vaccine in less than a year?
They can **** all sorts of chit up. On balance though we are much better off with them. Health issues that would kill you at 25 fifty years ago are now cured thanks to "Big Pharma".

Throwing out the whole system and refusing to believe anything because it's not perfect is genuinely retarded.
post 1643411903 07-22-2021, 06:10 PM
-
#30
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By JustiNtense⏩
Lmao

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost....-chemical/amp/

Trust big pharma 🥴

especially when it comes to rushed experimental vaccines that aren’t FDA approved and created by big pharma companies that have paid billions in criminal fines over decades.
If you know anything about pharmaceutical manufacturing or at least read the article you'd realize its a recall of several BATCHES of the drug for potentially having a cancer causing agent. The cancer causing agent has not always existed in the drug.

Not really sure what the "gotcha" is suppose to be. Its just human error. You can go to a restaurant and get food poisoning. You can buy a bramd new car that has a recall on its fuel pump. Hell, you can buy a seemingly harmless drug like Ibuprofen and get deathly sick from a tainted excipient layer. I don't know anyone in the medical community saying the vaccine is "flawless" nor is this story proof that the vaccine is otherwise dangerous. If you believe that, you've fallen for the medias fear mongering.

FYI even with FDA approval no drug company guarantees 0 adverse reactions from a drug or vaccine. I think that even if Pfizer vaccine gets FDA approved this fall, you'd move the goal posts to some other excuse for not getting it.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts