Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Vaccines associated with reduced embolism and cardiovascular risks post-covid
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 38
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Last
post 1699142513 03-13-2024, 08:49 AM
-
#1
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920

Vaccines associated with reduced embolism and cardiovascular risks post-covid

The role of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing post-COVID-19 thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications


"The study included 10.17 million vaccinated and 10.39 million unvaccinated people."

"Conclusions

COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of post-COVID-19 cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes. These effects were more pronounced for acute COVID-19 outcomes, consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection."

https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
post 1699142713 03-13-2024, 08:55 AM
-
#2
  1. ezmac31
  1. ezmac31
  2. Join Date: Jun 2009
  3. Location: Michigan, United States
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 20,160
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 247931
Ive been places you will never see or do. so shut the fuk up loser. cant even make an intelligent rebuttal because your a fat human waste of space subhuman filth. WTF said it was my greatest accomplishment? Maybe put the twinky down and go outside you might learn something. But the only place anyone even knows you is here so we all know your gonna die alone in your basement of filth. You gonna answer why we should have to pay to revive your fat ass for your fith heart attack or not? If not leave me the fuk alone.have another twinky and diet mountain do cause thats the only skill you have
post 1699142723 03-13-2024, 08:56 AM
-
#3
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
10 cents has been deposited into your Big Pharma schill account.
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1699142773 03-13-2024, 08:56 AM
-
#4
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  1. Pterodactyl314
  2. See you tomorrow
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Dirty South
  5. Posts: 19,745
  6. Rep Power: 163712
See you tomorrow
post 1699142893 03-13-2024, 09:00 AM
-
#5
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 32,148
  6. Rep Power: 346618
I mean this was always the big question.

Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?


That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.

But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
post 1699143103 03-13-2024, 09:03 AM
-
#6
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
post 1699143513 03-13-2024, 09:10 AM
-
#7
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  1. Duckliver
  2. Offal
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 32,148
  6. Rep Power: 346618
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
But he didn’t anywhere in this thread.

He posted a scientific study and some findings.

You take it to mean he is promoting the jab.

Meanwhile the findings are specifically about investigating wether or not adverse events from Covid infections would have been higher then adverse events due to vaccine.

It isn’t even denying the vaccine causes adverse events and is trying to see if it’s doing more harm than if Covid infected everyone.

You can still digest the information and find less risk with covid then vaccine simply because overall risk is so minuscule and I would rather jump of a 100ft cliff with skiis then play Russian roulette (poor analogy but I hope it gets the point across even if not to scale)





Regardless, this is how he gets you guys all riled up. He’s just posting data and asking questions and drawing out peoples projections.
post 1699143683 03-13-2024, 09:14 AM
-
#8
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Duckliver
I mean this was always the big question.

Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?


That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.

But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
The authors designed the study to investigate post-COVID complications on vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals.

To answer your (different) question, you could compare the odds of thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications in vaccinated and uninfected people against infected but unvaccinated people.
post 1699144063 03-13-2024, 09:20 AM
-
#9
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
when you open and read the link, here are the cliff notes.

1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.

3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.

So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1699145173 03-13-2024, 09:41 AM
-
#10
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By x-trainer
when you open and read the link, here are the cliff notes.

1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.

3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.

So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
Yep, except 20 million people.

However, according to some on the misc uninfected people don't exist.
post 1699145523 03-13-2024, 09:47 AM
-
#11
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Yep, except 20 million people.

However, according to some on the misc uninfected people don't exist.
Probably had it two to three times, will I make it? Do I have long term complications?
post 1699145693 03-13-2024, 09:50 AM
-
#12
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Probably had it two to three times, will I make it? Do I have long term complications?
How would I know?
post 1699145703 03-13-2024, 09:50 AM
-
#13
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1699145753 03-13-2024, 09:52 AM
-
#14
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
How would I know?
What do the "experts" say?
post 1699145973 03-13-2024, 09:58 AM
-
#15
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
What do the "experts" say?
If asked, I imagine they'd recommend developing some literacy regarding odds and risk.
post 1699146003 03-13-2024, 09:59 AM
-
#16
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
I trust you, bro.

Do you think it's safe to assume all 20 million people in this study were vitamin D deficient?

The demonstrated effects in this study are pretty large.
post 1699146253 03-13-2024, 10:05 AM
-
#17
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,536
  6. Rep Power: 29697
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
He'll respond with "where? when?"
post 1699147333 03-13-2024, 10:42 AM
-
#18
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
Out of the 2 things that (might) be harmful, I'll take my chances with the one I have no control over.
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1699147383 03-13-2024, 10:45 AM
-
#19
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
I trust you, bro.

Do you think it's safe to assume all 20 million people in this study were vitamin D deficient?

The demonstrated effects in this study are pretty large.
Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.

Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1699147493 03-13-2024, 10:48 AM
-
#20
  1. OpenSociety
  2. Banned
  1. OpenSociety
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2024
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 77
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
Vit C is just as powerful.
Humans are the only mammal that do not naturally produce Vitamin C.
Oddly enough, we do not take any dewormers or antiparasitic drugs like cats, dogs and horses that do naturally produce vitamin C.
Also viruses do not even exist. Germ theory is a hoax.
We are being poisoned by any means necessary. Killing us softly.
If you are vaccinated, you will die in the next 10 year following your jabs.
A large list of potential diseases will kill you. It was on purpose to make it harder to link it to your jabs.
That was also the reason for the 10 year immunity. Killing you softly.
post 1699147583 03-13-2024, 10:50 AM
-
#21
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.

Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
I'll trust the effect size.

But still, I don't see how that negates (nor relates to) these results. All 20 million were infected.
post 1699147623 03-13-2024, 10:52 AM
-
#22
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
Originally Posted By OpenSociety
Vit C is just as powerful. Same for ivermectin, fenbendazole, NAC.
Also viruses do not even exist. Germ theory is a hoax.
We are being poisoned by any means necesseray. Killing us softly.
damn first alt in the history of history I am not going to neg. 👍
post 1699147683 03-13-2024, 10:55 AM
-
#23
  1. twovalvekid
  2. N3rd Op3rator
  1. twovalvekid
  2. N3rd Op3rator
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: Saratoga Springs, New York, United States
  5. Posts: 36,172
  6. Rep Power: 436322
Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
MFC
Misc Cologne Crew | **BBC** | Aventus Friday Crew

RIP YGST
post 1699147773 03-13-2024, 10:58 AM
-
#24
  1. gmenfan40
  1. gmenfan40
  2. Join Date: Mar 2007
  3. Location: Fuck Israel
  4. Posts: 37,491
  5. Subscribers: 5
  6. Rep Power: 156637
Originally Posted By frankdtank20
Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.

Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
I'm no scientist, but I'm pretty sure covid in itself depletes vitamin d levels. When I had covid I had bloodwork immediately after and my vitamin d levels were super low, but a few months before they were at an upper normal level. Also, my heart felt a little strange when I was ill, it lasted for about two weeks. This is a non-biased view from actual experience. I believe the virus is manmade and the "vaccine" in itself mimics the entire illness. Both arguments that I see are highly biased to one side. Either the illness or vaccine is horrible for the body IMO. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
post 1699147913 03-13-2024, 11:02 AM
-
#25
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,536
  6. Rep Power: 29697
Originally Posted By twovalvekid
Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
It's almost like he's a (((Shill)))
post 1699148243 03-13-2024, 11:11 AM
-
#26
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Real Talk,
all around the world experts made educated guesses on this thing while many speculated on what would or would not happen.
it is interesting to read, NOW, what was right, what was wrong, and what needs more study...... now that the virus is weaker and we are in the clear.
JLC provided the link, but the link info is not about him at all.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1699150843 03-13-2024, 12:04 PM
-
#27
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By twovalvekid
Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
He still makes excuses for people masking up.
post 1699150913 03-13-2024, 12:05 PM
-
#28
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By gmenfan40
I'm no scientist, but I'm pretty sure covid in itself depletes vitamin d levels. When I had covid I had bloodwork immediately after and my vitamin d levels were super low, but a few months before they were at an upper normal level. Also, my heart felt a little strange when I was ill, it lasted for about two weeks. This is a non-biased view from actual experience. I believe the virus is manmade and the "vaccine" in itself mimics the entire illness. Both arguments that I see are highly biased to one side. Either the illness or vaccine is horrible for the body IMO. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
I'm sure the above happened......
post 1699157413 03-13-2024, 02:58 PM
-
#29
  1. gmenfan40
  1. gmenfan40
  2. Join Date: Mar 2007
  3. Location: Fuck Israel
  4. Posts: 37,491
  5. Subscribers: 5
  6. Rep Power: 156637
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
I'm sure the above happened......
What's so hard to believe a non-biased opinion that doesn't side with any side? Wake up and stop being dumb. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
post 1699196513 03-14-2024, 01:00 PM
-
#30
  1. chicagopizzaboy
  2. Registered User
  1. chicagopizzaboy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,036
  6. Rep Power: 17641
"Editor of The Lancet Says “Half” of Science Studies "Untrue," Cites Corruption"
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184895073

/thread
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...b1-cvj_10_1011
Professor Leemon McHenry, The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine, The corruption of Science by Big Pharma
Who is J6 "Scaffold Commander," the key to the J6 Fedsurrection? https://rumble.com/v45y4z6-why-is-the-king-pin-of-j6-scaffold-commander-not-wanted-nor-identified-by-t.html
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts