Forum
»
Vaccines associated with reduced embolism and cardiovascular risks post-covid
03-13-2024, 08:49 AM
-
#1
Vaccines associated with reduced embolism and cardiovascular risks post-covid
The role of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing post-COVID-19 thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications
"The study included 10.17 million vaccinated and 10.39 million unvaccinated people."
"Conclusions
COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of post-COVID-19 cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes. These effects were more pronounced for acute COVID-19 outcomes, consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection."
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
"The study included 10.17 million vaccinated and 10.39 million unvaccinated people."
"Conclusions
COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of post-COVID-19 cardiac and thromboembolic outcomes. These effects were more pronounced for acute COVID-19 outcomes, consistent with known reductions in disease severity following breakthrough versus unvaccinated SARS-CoV-2 infection."
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
03-13-2024, 08:55 AM
-
#2
- ezmac31
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 20,160
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 247931
-
-
Ive been places you will never see or do. so shut the fuk up loser. cant even make an intelligent rebuttal because your a fat human waste of space subhuman filth. WTF said it was my greatest accomplishment? Maybe put the twinky down and go outside you might learn something. But the only place anyone even knows you is here so we all know your gonna die alone in your basement of filth. You gonna answer why we should have to pay to revive your fat ass for your fith heart attack or not? If not leave me the fuk alone.have another twinky and diet mountain do cause thats the only skill you have
03-13-2024, 08:56 AM
-
#3
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
-
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Posts: 24,727
- Rep Power: 349124
-
-
10 cents has been deposited into your Big Pharma schill account.
________
MFC
________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
03-13-2024, 08:56 AM
-
#4
- Pterodactyl314
- See you tomorrow
-
- Pterodactyl314
- See you tomorrow
- Join Date: Apr 2015
- Location: Dirty South
- Posts: 19,745
- Rep Power: 163712
-
-

See you tomorrow
03-13-2024, 09:00 AM
-
#5
- Duckliver
- Offal
-
- Duckliver
- Offal
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: Washington, United States
- Posts: 32,148
- Rep Power: 346618
-
-
I mean this was always the big question.
Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?
That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.
But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?
That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.
But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
03-13-2024, 09:03 AM
-
#6
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
03-13-2024, 09:10 AM
-
#7
- Duckliver
- Offal
-
- Duckliver
- Offal
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: Washington, United States
- Posts: 32,148
- Rep Power: 346618
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
But he didn’t anywhere in this thread.And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
He posted a scientific study and some findings.
You take it to mean he is promoting the jab.
Meanwhile the findings are specifically about investigating wether or not adverse events from Covid infections would have been higher then adverse events due to vaccine.
It isn’t even denying the vaccine causes adverse events and is trying to see if it’s doing more harm than if Covid infected everyone.
You can still digest the information and find less risk with covid then vaccine simply because overall risk is so minuscule and I would rather jump of a 100ft cliff with skiis then play Russian roulette (poor analogy but I hope it gets the point across even if not to scale)
Regardless, this is how he gets you guys all riled up. He’s just posting data and asking questions and drawing out peoples projections.
03-13-2024, 09:14 AM
-
#8
Originally Posted By Duckliver⏩
The authors designed the study to investigate post-COVID complications on vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals.I mean this was always the big question.
Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?
That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.
But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
Good study, good data, still not going to have second thoughts about not getting vaxxed. Is there anywhere in the study that could point to whether the vaccine could trigger a heart event in a healthy person more easily then the odds of a healthy person developing an event from the infection?
That would be my last cope hanging onto my current reasoning before I would have to reevaluate.
But new reasoning would just be Covid doesn’t matter anymore so, we good.
To answer your (different) question, you could compare the odds of thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications in vaccinated and uninfected people against infected but unvaccinated people.
03-13-2024, 09:20 AM
-
#9
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
when you open and read the link, here are the cliff notes.
1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.
3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.
So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.
3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.
So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
03-13-2024, 09:41 AM
-
#10
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Yep, except 20 million people.when you open and read the link, here are the cliff notes.
1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.
3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.
So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
1. While COVID-19 vaccines were associated with increased risk for cardiac and thromboembolic events, such as myocarditis and thrombosis, the risk of complications was substantially higher due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
2. COVID-19 vaccination reduced the risk of heart failure, venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis/thromboembolism in the acute (30 days) and post-acute (31 to 365 days) phase following SARS-CoV-2 infection. This effect was stronger in the acute phase.
3.COVID-19 vaccines proved to be highly effective in reducing the risk of post-COVID cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications.
So using about 11 million subjects, this is what we know, now.
https://heart.bmj.com/content/early/...nl-2023-323483
However, according to some on the misc uninfected people don't exist.
03-13-2024, 09:47 AM
-
#11
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Probably had it two to three times, will I make it? Do I have long term complications?Yep, except 20 million people.
However, according to some on the misc uninfected people don't exist.
However, according to some on the misc uninfected people don't exist.
03-13-2024, 09:50 AM
-
#12
03-13-2024, 09:50 AM
-
#13
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
03-13-2024, 09:52 AM
-
#14
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
What do the "experts" say?How would I know?
03-13-2024, 09:58 AM
-
#15
03-13-2024, 09:59 AM
-
#16
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
I trust you, bro.Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
Do you think it's safe to assume all 20 million people in this study were vitamin D deficient?
The demonstrated effects in this study are pretty large.
03-13-2024, 10:05 AM
-
#17
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
-
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,536
- Rep Power: 29697
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
He'll respond with "where? when?"And then months from now, this ****ing retard will deny creating threads that promoted the jab.....
03-13-2024, 10:42 AM
-
#18
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
-
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Posts: 24,727
- Rep Power: 349124
-
-
Out of the 2 things that (might) be harmful, I'll take my chances with the one I have no control over.
________
MFC
________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
03-13-2024, 10:45 AM
-
#19
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
-
- frankdtank20
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2020
- Posts: 27,464
- Rep Power: 171374
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.I trust you, bro.
Do you think it's safe to assume all 20 million people in this study were vitamin D deficient?
The demonstrated effects in this study are pretty large.
Do you think it's safe to assume all 20 million people in this study were vitamin D deficient?
The demonstrated effects in this study are pretty large.
Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
03-13-2024, 10:48 AM
-
#20
- OpenSociety
- Banned
-
- OpenSociety
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 56
- Posts: 77
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
Vit C is just as powerful.Vit D reks all the pharma jabs. Compared to having sufficient Vit D levels the jabs may as well be saline.
Humans are the only mammal that do not naturally produce Vitamin C.
Oddly enough, we do not take any dewormers or antiparasitic drugs like cats, dogs and horses that do naturally produce vitamin C.
Also viruses do not even exist. Germ theory is a hoax.
We are being poisoned by any means necessary. Killing us softly.
If you are vaccinated, you will die in the next 10 year following your jabs.
A large list of potential diseases will kill you. It was on purpose to make it harder to link it to your jabs.
That was also the reason for the 10 year immunity. Killing you softly.
03-13-2024, 10:50 AM
-
#21
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
I'll trust the effect size.Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.
Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
But still, I don't see how that negates (nor relates to) these results. All 20 million were infected.
03-13-2024, 10:52 AM
-
#22
Originally Posted By OpenSociety⏩
damn first alt in the history of history I am not going to neg. 👍Vit C is just as powerful. Same for ivermectin, fenbendazole, NAC.
Also viruses do not even exist. Germ theory is a hoax.
We are being poisoned by any means necesseray. Killing us softly.
Also viruses do not even exist. Germ theory is a hoax.
We are being poisoned by any means necesseray. Killing us softly.
03-13-2024, 10:55 AM
-
#23
- twovalvekid
- N3rd Op3rator
-
- twovalvekid
- N3rd Op3rator
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Location: Saratoga Springs, New York, United States
- Posts: 36,172
- Rep Power: 436322
-
-
Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
MFC
Misc Cologne Crew | **BBC** | Aventus Friday Crew
RIP YGST
03-13-2024, 10:58 AM
-
#24
- gmenfan40
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Fuck Israel
- Posts: 37,490
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 156637
-
-
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
I'm no scientist, but I'm pretty sure covid in itself depletes vitamin d levels. When I had covid I had bloodwork immediately after and my vitamin d levels were super low, but a few months before they were at an upper normal level. Also, my heart felt a little strange when I was ill, it lasted for about two weeks. This is a non-biased view from actual experience. I believe the virus is manmade and the "vaccine" in itself mimics the entire illness. Both arguments that I see are highly biased to one side. Either the illness or vaccine is horrible for the body IMO. (Super Ded fkn Srs)Having sufficient Vit D levels = 60% lower chance of getting infected in the first place. Unlike repeated jabs which place the people at higher infection risk of this common cold virus. Increasing a person's Nitric Oxide levels (easy) is quite effective at preventing epithelial damage in the few susceptible population.
Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
Besides, the jabs have had contamination issues since they're not produced the same way for mass production as in the small batches for clinical trials. Process 1 vs Process 2. Double stranded RNA, DNA fragment contamination has been quite common. Haste makes waste.
03-13-2024, 11:02 AM
-
#25
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
-
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,536
- Rep Power: 29697
-
-
Originally Posted By twovalvekid⏩
It's almost like he's a (((Shill)))Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
03-13-2024, 11:11 AM
-
#26
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
Real Talk,
all around the world experts made educated guesses on this thing while many speculated on what would or would not happen.
it is interesting to read, NOW, what was right, what was wrong, and what needs more study...... now that the virus is weaker and we are in the clear.
JLC provided the link, but the link info is not about him at all.
all around the world experts made educated guesses on this thing while many speculated on what would or would not happen.
it is interesting to read, NOW, what was right, what was wrong, and what needs more study...... now that the virus is weaker and we are in the clear.
JLC provided the link, but the link info is not about him at all.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
03-13-2024, 12:04 PM
-
#27
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By twovalvekid⏩
He still makes excuses for people masking up.Such a weird hill to continue to die on and make countless threads/posts about....
03-13-2024, 12:05 PM
-
#28
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By gmenfan40⏩
I'm sure the above happened......I'm no scientist, but I'm pretty sure covid in itself depletes vitamin d levels. When I had covid I had bloodwork immediately after and my vitamin d levels were super low, but a few months before they were at an upper normal level. Also, my heart felt a little strange when I was ill, it lasted for about two weeks. This is a non-biased view from actual experience. I believe the virus is manmade and the "vaccine" in itself mimics the entire illness. Both arguments that I see are highly biased to one side. Either the illness or vaccine is horrible for the body IMO. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
03-13-2024, 02:58 PM
-
#29
03-14-2024, 01:00 PM
-
#30
- chicagopizzaboy
- Registered User
-
- chicagopizzaboy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 4,036
- Rep Power: 17641
-
-
"Editor of The Lancet Says “Half” of Science Studies "Untrue," Cites Corruption"
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184895073
/thread
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=184895073
/thread
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as editor of The New England Journal of Medicine”https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...b1-cvj_10_1011
Professor Leemon McHenry, The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine, The corruption of Science by Big PharmaWho is J6 "Scaffold Commander," the key to the J6 Fedsurrection? https://rumble.com/v45y4z6-why-is-the-king-pin-of-j6-scaffold-commander-not-wanted-nor-identified-by-t.html
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts