Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Why are rates for some cancers getting so much worse in Japan??
  1. Results 1 to 13 of 13
post 1699481573 03-20-2024, 06:00 PM
-
#1
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,186
  5. Rep Power: 441972

Why are rates for some cancers getting so much worse in Japan??

https://zenodo.org/records/8352450


Abstract

Purpose:
Excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic have become an issue in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population, and we conducted this study to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates for individual cancers shifted during the pandemic.

Methods:
Using published national data, we compared age-adjusted mortality rates for each cancer type between the first 3 years of the pandemic (2020-2022) and the 3 years before the pandemic (2017-2019), and also compared mortality rates in 2022 after nationwide mRNA-LNP vaccination to rates in 2020 before vaccination began. In addition, we identified trends in mortality from 2012 to 2019 to assess excess/deficit mortality during the pandemic.

Results:
Age-adjusted mortality rates decreased from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period for stomach, liver, lung, gallbladder/biliary tract, colon, and eso****eal cancers, which account for a large proportion of cancer deaths in Japan, but this decreasing trend slowed from 2021 to 2022.Age-adjusted mortality rates for breast, pancreatic, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancers and leukemia increased significantly in 2022 after much of the Japanese population had received the third mRNA-LNP vaccine dose, compared to 2020, the first year of the pandemic when no vaccinations were administered. There were also marginally significant increases for ovarian and uterine cancers between 2020 and 2022.

Data interpretations:
As previously described in a molecular biological study, the increased mortality rates for these cancers might be caused by cell proliferation mediated by binding of spike protein to estrogen receptors, and the spike protein might originate from mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself. The significance of this possibility warrants further studies








Somewhat related

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10054610/


We reported the first case of Ph-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurring after a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine inoculation. The otherwise healthy 43-year-old female patient had a total of six spike antigen exposures in the past 1.5 years. Informative pre-vaccine tests and bone marrow study results were provided. Although the causal relationship between bivalent vaccinations and the subsequent development of Ph–positive B-cell ALL cannot be determined in the case report, we propose that anti-spike protein immune responses could be a trigger for leukemia. Clinicians must investigate the hematopoietic adverse events closely after COVID-19 vaccinations. Further pre-clinical studies to investigate the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are required.
post 1699481713 03-20-2024, 06:04 PM
-
#2
  1. EireGunner
  2. Hue hue hue
  1. EireGunner
  2. Hue hue hue
  3. Join Date: Jul 2022
  4. Posts: 3,631
  5. Rep Power: 34832
They should have just smeared chit on a wall and be done with it all
:)
post 1699482683 03-20-2024, 06:34 PM
-
#3
  1. BespokenBrah
  2. Banned
  1. BespokenBrah
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 6,099
  6. Rep Power: 0
https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RKTRcpQbGO/
post 1699482803 03-20-2024, 06:40 PM
-
#4
  1. Darkius
  2. Registered User
  1. Darkius
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Age: 42
  5. Posts: 4,496
  6. Rep Power: 12304
The problem was all the boosters. They told the immune system to only look for covid. It did, and it failed to look for all the other stuff. The only beneficial vax was the first one early on. The rest did the damage.
post 1699482843 03-20-2024, 06:41 PM
-
#5
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
post 1699483203 03-20-2024, 06:50 PM
-
#6
  1. GreatOldOne
  2. Cthulhu fhtagn
  1. GreatOldOne
  2. Cthulhu fhtagn
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 39,712
  5. Rep Power: 210947
Originally Posted By gachase21
Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
Was wondering about the tsunami. A lot of radioactive water got out there...making a lot of radioactive food I would think.
post 1699483263 03-20-2024, 06:51 PM
-
#7
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  2. Join Date: Dec 2010
  3. Location: Georgia, United States
  4. Posts: 31,767
  5. Subscribers: 4
  6. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By GreatOldOne
Was wondering about the tsunami. A lot of radioactive water got out there...making a lot of radioactive food I would think.
That would be my guess
post 1699483693 03-20-2024, 07:01 PM
-
#8
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Posts: 15,594
  5. Rep Power: 201320
I don't know enough about Japan to know whether this is the case or not, but I would guess at testing being partly behind the figures.

Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.

UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.

If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.

If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!

The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.

They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
post 1699484383 03-20-2024, 07:19 PM
-
#9
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,186
  5. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By gachase21
Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
Possibly/probably played a role, though I’d imagine if it was a big driver then stomach cancer and others involved with digestion would’ve gone up a lot more.



“Age-adjusted mortalityrates decreased from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period for stomach, liver, lung, gallbladder/biliary tract, colon, and eso****eal cancers, which account for a large proportion of cancer deaths in Japan, but this decreasing trend slowed from 2021 to 2022”
post 1699497973 03-21-2024, 04:06 AM
-
#10
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,186
  5. Rep Power: 441972
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny
I don't know enough about Japan to know whether this is the case or not, but I would guess at testing being partly behind the figures.

Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.

UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.

If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.

If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
If it was from missed screenings then it seems it would apply somewhat evenly to all cancer types. But as noted above, that isn’t the case.


Also, with regards to the Fukushima disaster….seems kinda odd that the rates would decrease for a decade after meltdown, then about 10 years later the rates for some types would up at a time that just so happens to coincide with the time frame when practically the entire population was injected with mRNA injections.
post 1699506603 03-21-2024, 09:01 AM
-
#11
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Posts: 15,594
  5. Rep Power: 201320
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
If it was from missed screenings then it seems it would apply somewhat evenly to all cancer types. But as noted above, that isn’t the case.
It would be a distribution based on speed of onset, average life expectancy after diagnosis etc. It wouldn't be even.

Do I believe that a jab with no long term testing could potentially result in all sorts of cancers? Absolutely. I agree with the statement by the authors that it warrants further study.

The problem is that there are a lot of factors that could potentially cause increases in cancer figures and we can't just compare rates of increase with rates of vaccination, because the most vaccinated countries also tend to be the ones who most shut down non emergency medical services.

It is going to be difficult to ascribe specific increases to specific causes, when there are multiple variables in play, but when everything is added up, will we discover that the treatment + non-treatment killed more than the virus? Very likely.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!

The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.

They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
post 1699506713 03-21-2024, 09:02 AM
-
#12
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By gachase21
Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
First thing that sprang to my mind. The waters are contaminated, no?

(But then I thought, it'd have spiked and stayed or something -- if it dipped down only to go up around the time of covid/mRNA vaccines, as I read here in this thread, well that's not off the table either)
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699507483 03-21-2024, 09:15 AM
-
#13
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  2. Join Date: Feb 2006
  3. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 132,830
  5. Subscribers: 8
  6. Rep Power: 1753489
prolly something to do with Godzilla awakening
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts