Forum
»
Why are rates for some cancers getting so much worse in Japan??
- Results 1 to 13 of 13
-
Page 1 of 1
03-20-2024, 06:00 PM
-
#1
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Why are rates for some cancers getting so much worse in Japan??
https://zenodo.org/records/8352450
Abstract
Purpose:
Excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic have become an issue in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population, and we conducted this study to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates for individual cancers shifted during the pandemic.
Methods:
Using published national data, we compared age-adjusted mortality rates for each cancer type between the first 3 years of the pandemic (2020-2022) and the 3 years before the pandemic (2017-2019), and also compared mortality rates in 2022 after nationwide mRNA-LNP vaccination to rates in 2020 before vaccination began. In addition, we identified trends in mortality from 2012 to 2019 to assess excess/deficit mortality during the pandemic.
Results:
Age-adjusted mortality rates decreased from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period for stomach, liver, lung, gallbladder/biliary tract, colon, and eso****eal cancers, which account for a large proportion of cancer deaths in Japan, but this decreasing trend slowed from 2021 to 2022.Age-adjusted mortality rates for breast, pancreatic, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancers and leukemia increased significantly in 2022 after much of the Japanese population had received the third mRNA-LNP vaccine dose, compared to 2020, the first year of the pandemic when no vaccinations were administered. There were also marginally significant increases for ovarian and uterine cancers between 2020 and 2022.
Data interpretations:
As previously described in a molecular biological study, the increased mortality rates for these cancers might be caused by cell proliferation mediated by binding of spike protein to estrogen receptors, and the spike protein might originate from mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself. The significance of this possibility warrants further studies
Somewhat related
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10054610/
We reported the first case of Ph-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurring after a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine inoculation. The otherwise healthy 43-year-old female patient had a total of six spike antigen exposures in the past 1.5 years. Informative pre-vaccine tests and bone marrow study results were provided. Although the causal relationship between bivalent vaccinations and the subsequent development of Ph–positive B-cell ALL cannot be determined in the case report, we propose that anti-spike protein immune responses could be a trigger for leukemia. Clinicians must investigate the hematopoietic adverse events closely after COVID-19 vaccinations. Further pre-clinical studies to investigate the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are required.
Abstract
Purpose:
Excess deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic have become an issue in Japan, which has a rapidly aging population, and we conducted this study to evaluate how age-adjusted mortality rates for individual cancers shifted during the pandemic.
Methods:
Using published national data, we compared age-adjusted mortality rates for each cancer type between the first 3 years of the pandemic (2020-2022) and the 3 years before the pandemic (2017-2019), and also compared mortality rates in 2022 after nationwide mRNA-LNP vaccination to rates in 2020 before vaccination began. In addition, we identified trends in mortality from 2012 to 2019 to assess excess/deficit mortality during the pandemic.
Results:
Age-adjusted mortality rates decreased from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period for stomach, liver, lung, gallbladder/biliary tract, colon, and eso****eal cancers, which account for a large proportion of cancer deaths in Japan, but this decreasing trend slowed from 2021 to 2022.Age-adjusted mortality rates for breast, pancreatic, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancers and leukemia increased significantly in 2022 after much of the Japanese population had received the third mRNA-LNP vaccine dose, compared to 2020, the first year of the pandemic when no vaccinations were administered. There were also marginally significant increases for ovarian and uterine cancers between 2020 and 2022.
Data interpretations:
As previously described in a molecular biological study, the increased mortality rates for these cancers might be caused by cell proliferation mediated by binding of spike protein to estrogen receptors, and the spike protein might originate from mRNA-LNP vaccination rather than COVID-19 infection itself. The significance of this possibility warrants further studies
Somewhat related
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10054610/
We reported the first case of Ph-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) occurring after a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine inoculation. The otherwise healthy 43-year-old female patient had a total of six spike antigen exposures in the past 1.5 years. Informative pre-vaccine tests and bone marrow study results were provided. Although the causal relationship between bivalent vaccinations and the subsequent development of Ph–positive B-cell ALL cannot be determined in the case report, we propose that anti-spike protein immune responses could be a trigger for leukemia. Clinicians must investigate the hematopoietic adverse events closely after COVID-19 vaccinations. Further pre-clinical studies to investigate the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine are required.
03-20-2024, 06:04 PM
-
#2
- EireGunner
- Hue hue hue
-
- EireGunner
- Hue hue hue
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 3,631
- Rep Power: 34832
-
-
They should have just smeared chit on a wall and be done with it all
:)
03-20-2024, 06:34 PM
-
#3
- BespokenBrah
- Banned
-
- BespokenBrah
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,099
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
03-20-2024, 06:40 PM
-
#4
- Darkius
- Registered User
-
- Darkius
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 4,496
- Rep Power: 12304
-
-
The problem was all the boosters. They told the immune system to only look for covid. It did, and it failed to look for all the other stuff. The only beneficial vax was the first one early on. The rest did the damage.
03-20-2024, 06:41 PM
-
#5
03-20-2024, 06:50 PM
-
#6
- GreatOldOne
- Cthulhu fhtagn
-
- GreatOldOne
- Cthulhu fhtagn
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Posts: 39,712
- Rep Power: 210947
-
-
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Was wondering about the tsunami. A lot of radioactive water got out there...making a lot of radioactive food I would think.Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
03-20-2024, 06:51 PM
-
#7
03-20-2024, 07:01 PM
-
#8
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
I don't know enough about Japan to know whether this is the case or not, but I would guess at testing being partly behind the figures.
Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.
UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.
If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.
If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.
UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.
If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.
If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
03-20-2024, 07:19 PM
-
#9
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Possibly/probably played a role, though I’d imagine if it was a big driver then stomach cancer and others involved with digestion would’ve gone up a lot more.Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
“Age-adjusted mortalityrates decreased from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period for stomach, liver, lung, gallbladder/biliary tract, colon, and eso****eal cancers, which account for a large proportion of cancer deaths in Japan, but this decreasing trend slowed from 2021 to 2022”
03-21-2024, 04:06 AM
-
#10
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
If it was from missed screenings then it seems it would apply somewhat evenly to all cancer types. But as noted above, that isn’t the case.I don't know enough about Japan to know whether this is the case or not, but I would guess at testing being partly behind the figures.
Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.
UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.
If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.
If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
Taking the UK as an example, during covid, far less cancer testing was done. The result is that cases were diagnosed at later stages post covid, resulting in higher mortality rates, even without more actual cases.
UK health authorities estimate that increased cancer deaths, due to lower testing rates during covid, will be equal to at least 50% of the number of deaths attributed to covid. When you factor in all of the other testing and treatments that were missed, the total number of deaths, due to lower treatment, will exceed covid deaths.
If cancer mortality rates start to fall in the next year or so, we will know that it is largely due to this effect.
If they don't start to fall, it's from another cause.
Also, with regards to the Fukushima disaster….seems kinda odd that the rates would decrease for a decade after meltdown, then about 10 years later the rates for some types would up at a time that just so happens to coincide with the time frame when practically the entire population was injected with mRNA injections.
03-21-2024, 09:01 AM
-
#11
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
-
- DuracellBunny
- Has new batteries!
- Join Date: Nov 2005
- Posts: 15,594
- Rep Power: 201320
-
-
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
It would be a distribution based on speed of onset, average life expectancy after diagnosis etc. It wouldn't be even.If it was from missed screenings then it seems it would apply somewhat evenly to all cancer types. But as noted above, that isn’t the case.
Do I believe that a jab with no long term testing could potentially result in all sorts of cancers? Absolutely. I agree with the statement by the authors that it warrants further study.
The problem is that there are a lot of factors that could potentially cause increases in cancer figures and we can't just compare rates of increase with rates of vaccination, because the most vaccinated countries also tend to be the ones who most shut down non emergency medical services.
It is going to be difficult to ascribe specific increases to specific causes, when there are multiple variables in play, but when everything is added up, will we discover that the treatment + non-treatment killed more than the virus? Very likely.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!
The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.
They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
03-21-2024, 09:02 AM
-
#12
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
First thing that sprang to my mind. The waters are contaminated, no?Maybe the nuclear meltdown thing
(But then I thought, it'd have spiked and stayed or something -- if it dipped down only to go up around the time of covid/mRNA vaccines, as I read here in this thread, well that's not off the table either)
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts