Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Adding fire to an animal makes the food more delicious and last longer in your body
  1. Results 1 to 19 of 19
  1. Rate This Thread
04-24-2024, 01:26 PM
#1

Adding fire to an animal makes the food more delicious and last longer in your body

That is why mariomiami's raw food and eating philosophy is retarded

Agree or disagree?
  1. Kormo
  2. ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
  3. Kormos avatar
  1. Kormo
  2. ⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠ ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Posts: 15,436
  5. Rep Power: 162,346
Quote
04-24-2024, 01:28 PM
#2
I do believe that cooking food destroys a lot of the nutrients.
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 01:59 PM
#3
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I do believe that cooking food destroys a lot of the nutrients.
No sire, it does not destroy the nutrients.

It breaks down the proteins.

Those 2 phrases have the same technical meaning but 2 different practical meanings.

To destroy means to lose or not be able to use

To break down is to make into smaller more usable prices.


When you eat foods the digestion process is specifically to break down the proteins into small usable parts.

Would be cool if there was a way to begin that process before we eat the food right? There is….you cook it
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-24-2024, 02:43 PM
#4
(((cooking)))
neglect lifting acquire tendons
uses hook grip to jerk off crew
would cuck Rippetoe (respectfully)
  1. legbroke
  2. leg #2 also broke
  3. legbrokes avatar
  1. legbroke
  2. leg #2 also broke
  3. Join Date: Jan 2020
  4. Posts: 4,384
  5. Rep Power: 94,356
Quote
04-24-2024, 02:53 PM
#5
Originally Posted By Condo41
No sire, it does not destroy the nutrients.

It breaks down the proteins.

Those 2 phrases have the same technical meaning but 2 different practical meanings.

To destroy means to lose or not be able to use

To break down is to make into smaller more usable prices.


When you eat foods the digestion process is specifically to break down the proteins into small usable parts.

Would be cool if there was a way to begin that process before we eat the food right? There is….you cook it
You're saying cooked food retains 100% of the nutrients. Fuk outta here.
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 02:53 PM
#6
If man never learned how to cook meat, we would still be swinging from the trees and flinging poo on each other.
*Simplicity is the key to life*

Thanks ZBlacktt for the mod rep!
Thanks ForumSentinel for the admin rep!
Thanks Gxp23 for the mod rep!
Thanks 400LB Gorilla for the mod rep!
Thanks CountryMike for admin rep!
Thanks Nics1246 for mod rep!

I got married on August 24, 2013!!
ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  3. Shortfuzes avatar
  1. Shortfuze
  2. "Your one f*ck fantasy"
  3. Join Date: Feb 2004
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,535
  6. Rep Power: 182,041
Quote
04-24-2024, 02:57 PM
#7
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
You're saying cooked food retains 100% of the nutrients. Fuk outta here.
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:06 PM
#8
Originally Posted By Condo41
I'm not sure what this image is supposed to mean. Are any nutrients destroyed in the cooking process? Yes or no
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:21 PM
#9
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I'm not sure what this image is supposed to mean. Are any nutrients destroyed in the cooking process? Yes or no
It's a semi-famous interview where Jordan peterson gave a simple response and the chick constantly, after everything he said, would go "so you're saying…" and then proceed to HEAVILY change what he had said to be more septic.

Anyway…

"Does ANY nutrients get destroyed in the cooking process?"

Since we're going on a 100% or 0% spectrum with nothing in between and no room for nuance. Then you got me cornered. Yes, there are nutrients that get lost during the cooking process.

Now if you plan on stomping on the brakes at this moment and not go further into it and choose to run around saying that cooking food destroys the food's nutrients implying that the food should not be cooked, you'll be doing so in error.

So, would you like to know more or are you gonna form your own conclusion converse to the truth based on a fraction of the information required to understand the subject
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:28 PM
#10
Originally Posted By Condo41
It's a semi-famous interview where Jordan peterson gave a simple response and the chick constantly, after everything he said, would go "so you're saying…" and then proceed to HEAVILY change what he had said to be more septic.

Anyway…

"Does ANY nutrients get destroyed in the cooking process?"

Since we're going on a 100% or 0% spectrum with nothing in between and no room for nuance. Then you got me cornered. Yes, there are nutrients that get lost during the cooking process.

Now if you plan on stomping on the brakes at this moment and not go further into it and choose to run around saying that cooking food destroys the food's nutrients implying that the food should not be cooked, you'll be doing so in error.

So, would you like to know more or are you gonna form your own conclusion converse to the truth based on a fraction of the information required to understand the subject
I'm not saying its 100% or 0% it depends how much you cook it. You could potentially lose all the nutrtients if you burn everything. I don't eat raw food mainly cause the quality of food in America is so sheeit and the animals are likely sick and fed a chit diet.
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:29 PM
#11
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I'm not saying its 100% or 0% it depends how much you cook it. You could potentially lose all the nutrtients if you burn everything. I don't eat raw food mainly cause the quality of food in America is so sheeit and the animals are likely sick and fed a chit diet.
I dont think when we evolved to Homo Sapiens that we were ever really supposed to eat raw animal meat.
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
  1. BullittEV
  2. Registered User
  3. BullittEVs avatar
  1. BullittEV
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: San Diego, California, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 21,686
  7. Rep Power: 259,281
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:39 PM
#12
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I'm not saying its 100% or 0% it depends how much you cook it. You could potentially lose all the nutrtients if you burn everything. I don't eat raw food mainly cause the quality of food in America is so sheeit and the animals are likely sick and fed a chit diet.
Yeah see you did it again, you dont see it in yourself. The all or nothing fallacy you're addicted to it and you for sure will deny it even though it's right there for everyone to see.

You MUST be smart enough to realize no one is suggesting you burn it to the point there is no nutritional value.

Any reasonable adult understands the OP isbsuggesting normal cooking of food.
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:41 PM
#13
Originally Posted By Condo41
Yeah see you did it again, you dont see it in yourself. The all or nothing fallacy you're addicted to it and you for sure will deny it even though it's right there for everyone to see.

You MUST be smart enough to realize no one is suggesting you burn it to the point there is no nutritional value.

Any reasonable adult understands the OP isbsuggesting normal cooking of food.
I said it depends how much you cook it. The less you cook it the less you lose from it. What would normal cooking of a steak be?
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:47 PM
#14
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I said it depends how much you cook it. The less you cook it the less you lose from it. What would normal cooking of a steak be?
Normal cooking of a steak is obviously medium rare to medium well. Any regular person would be able to know thi

But your brain is funky. You have redditor brain. You split hairs and go to full extremes to make points.

You use confusing terms like "nutrients" wtf are you talking about? Water is a nutrient under strict circumstances. Micro nutrients get lost when cooking. Macro nutrients CAN be lost if fat drips off of bacon. PROTEIN may be lost if it's burnt but overall it's broken down with heat and ADDS to the builavailability during absorption.

So. The nuances are too vast to adopt a blanket statement "nutrients are lost when cooking"

Ya…nutrients are lost on the drive home from the grocery store, wtf are you trying to say?
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-24-2024, 03:53 PM
#15
Originally Posted By Condo41
Normal cooking of a steak is obviously medium rare to medium well. Any regular person would be able to know thi

But your brain is funky. You have redditor brain. You split hairs and go to full extremes to make points.

You use confusing terms like "nutrients" wtf are you talking about? Water is a nutrient under strict circumstances. Micro nutrients get lost when cooking. Macro nutrients CAN be lost if fat drips off of bacon. PROTEIN may be lost if it's burnt but overall it's broken down with heat and ADDS to the builavailability during absorption.

So. The nuances are too vast to adopt a blanket statement "nutrients are lost when cooking"

Ya…nutrients are lost on the drive home from the grocery store, wtf are you trying to say?
I'm saying I disagree. I think minimal or no cooking is better. Provided the animal is not sick.
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. GaryRidgways avatar
  1. GaryRidgway
  2. 16oz King
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 25,866
  5. Rep Power: 311,620
Quote
04-24-2024, 04:08 PM
#16
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I'm saying I disagree. I think minimal or no cooking is better. Provided the animal is not sick.
And I'm saying there is no disagreement or agreement available to be had. It is a measured science with numbers attached to it.

You can't agree that 2+2=4, it is no matter what.

Cooking will remove certain vitamins. It will allow certain minerals to become more available. It will denatured protein chains so they are available - and if overdone it will destroy the proteins (burnt) - it will make fat more available except for the parts that liquify and drip off.

In the end, cooking makes nutrients more available and the losses from cooking are an acceptable tradeoff.
[My wife drank 9 Adios MFers in one night on a business trip with her boss]
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Condo41s avatar
  1. Condo41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 7,111
  6. Rep Power: 80,918
Quote
04-25-2024, 07:57 AM
#17
Originally Posted By GaryRidgway
I'm not sure what this image is supposed to mean. Are any nutrients destroyed in the cooking process? Yes or no
Sure, it’s to remind you of ***gotry and it’s evils.
5'10
  1. swordplay76
  2. Registered User
  3. swordplay76s avatar
  1. swordplay76
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2023
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 2,737
  6. Rep Power: 18,237
Quote
04-25-2024, 07:58 AM
#18
It helps the food breakdown faster. So it can be digested faster. Are you are wrong in saying "it stays longer in your body".
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Childish Goblino
  3. Godfrd824s avatar
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Childish Goblino
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Falls Church, Virginia, United States
  5. Posts: 38,309
  6. Rep Power: 313,143
Quote
04-25-2024, 11:36 AM
#19
Originally Posted By monster0ultra
Godfrd is the fattest active miscer so he is the authority on maxxing how many calories and nutrients make it into the body.
Imagine being on a technology cycle for 3 months and only seeing 10% gains on your lifts and having your resting heart rate double.
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Childish Goblino
  3. Godfrd824s avatar
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Childish Goblino
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Falls Church, Virginia, United States
  5. Posts: 38,309
  6. Rep Power: 313,143
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts