Forum
»
Unconditional cash transfers reduce homelessness
09-05-2023, 12:29 PM
-
#271
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Oh look, anti-capitalist propaganda from Wikipedia. Lol
How many private companies are at the top of the wealth "pyramid"?
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 12:39 PM
-
#272
09-05-2023, 01:12 PM
-
#273
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The retard is dodging another objection to his retard claims!Hierarchy is fundamental to both capitalism and conservatism.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 01:13 PM
-
#274
09-05-2023, 01:19 PM
-
#275
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Your tactics of strawman arguments and projections makes you a retard. Intellectually bankrupt. You know little to nothing, so you have to make up arguments to win.You suggested capitalism is individual and not hierarchical.
Then did the name calling thing.
Then did the name calling thing.
You’re low IQ. You’re a literal retard. It’s a truth too unbearable for you to accept.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 01:22 PM
-
#276
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Great points!Your tactics of strawman arguments and projections makes you a retard. Intellectually bankrupt. You know little to nothing, so you have to make up arguments to win.
You’re low IQ. You’re a literal retard. It’s a truth too unbearable for you to accept.
You’re low IQ. You’re a literal retard. It’s a truth too unbearable for you to accept.
But, maintenance of hierarchies is still fundamental to both capitalism and conservatism.
09-05-2023, 01:34 PM
-
#277
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So you can't back your post, or any post you make. Your track record is building for being the biggest retard. That's quite an accomplishmentGreat points!
But, maintenance of hierarchies is still fundamental to both capitalism and conservatism.
But, maintenance of hierarchies is still fundamental to both capitalism and conservatism.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 01:35 PM
-
#278
09-05-2023, 02:55 PM
-
#279
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Leftists….help usher in an environment that drastically exacerbates problem. Throw tons of money at it(various tactics carried out in leftist areas), only to make it worse(current surge of homelessness). Conduct a study that spends a lot more money and solves a tiny fraction of the problem. Claim “hey look guys we’re getting somewhere”. Such is the mindset of someone who worships the state. That’s why he absolutely SEETHES at anyone daring to question his god, and instantly starts mocking traditional values which actually do way more to address the issue than whatever his side comes up with.We get it, you are a far left statist. But do you get that yet?
If you don't like the filthy rich, then get rid of everything that creates them; publicly traded companies, unions, regulations... that would make you a moderate. What makes you far left, is that you are for the hierarchy that puts politics first. Capitalism is when the individual is put first, it makes them priority over the public sector and the government. The public sector is collectivist, and the government is totalitarianism.
You still don't get it though. You are even farther left than the collectivists.
If you don't like the filthy rich, then get rid of everything that creates them; publicly traded companies, unions, regulations... that would make you a moderate. What makes you far left, is that you are for the hierarchy that puts politics first. Capitalism is when the individual is put first, it makes them priority over the public sector and the government. The public sector is collectivist, and the government is totalitarianism.
You still don't get it though. You are even farther left than the collectivists.
09-05-2023, 03:06 PM
-
#280
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
At the risk of seeming egotistical, I'll assume "he" is me.Leftists….help usher in an environment that drastically exacerbates problem. Throw tons of money at it(various tactics carried out in leftist areas), only to make it worse(current surge of homelessness). Conduct a study that spends a lot more money and solves a tiny fraction of the problem. Claim “hey look guys we’re getting somewhere”. Such is the mindset of someone who worships the state. That’s why he absolutely SEETHES at anyone daring to question his god, and instantly starts mocking traditional values which actually do way more to address the issue than whatever his side comes up with.
But, but do you reconcile Kraken calling me a communist and you suggesting I worship the state?
I do mock the hypocrisy of social conservatism. I also mock lamenting the loss of a time that never existed. Guilty as charged.
09-05-2023, 03:30 PM
-
#281
- swoleyo
- Registered User
-
- swoleyo
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 10,948
- Rep Power: 48507
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
The study is retarded. It doesn't say how much it reduced homelessness by and how many went back to drugs/being homeless after receiving the payment.I get why you don't like the results
"Study counters public perception that cash would just be spent on drugs and booze"

"Study counters public perception that cash would just be spent on drugs and booze"
Mod neg Cry-Baby Crew
NEG ONLYFANS THREADS CREW
EPSTEIN DIDN'T KILL HIMSELF CREW
RAW DOG CREW - PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY
09-05-2023, 03:46 PM
-
#282
Originally Posted By swoleyo⏩
Nobody went back to drugs because they screened out addicts. They were followed for a year.The study is retarded. It doesn't say how much it reduced homelessness by and how many went back to drugs/being homeless after receiving the payment.
The study demonstrated that those who rely on shelters after gaming on hard times ban be helped by giving them a financial boost.
It seems like a truism.
But, some require that truism to be demonstrated. It also seems that those who require that truism to be demonstrated get mad when it happens.
09-05-2023, 03:55 PM
-
#283
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It would all make sense if you watched the video I posted in the other thread. The history of western economics and capitalism.At the risk of seeming egotistical, I'll assume "he" is me.
But, but do you reconcile Kraken calling me a communist and you suggesting I worship the state?
I do mock the hypocrisy of social conservatism. I also mock lamenting the loss of a time that never existed. Guilty as charged.
But, but do you reconcile Kraken calling me a communist and you suggesting I worship the state?
I do mock the hypocrisy of social conservatism. I also mock lamenting the loss of a time that never existed. Guilty as charged.
Socialism/fascism/communism all fail because they are inefficient. They only survive because they are propped up by the government. The “public sector” always fails because it can’t know the wants needs of the individual. From the homeless to market prices, it fails at everything. It can’t know what to price to buy at. It can’t know what price to sell at. It can’t know what each individual homeless person needs, and in the process of getting it wrong, it makes things worse.
That’s where capitalism succeeds. Individuals meeting the wants and needs of other individuals.
“The term communism signifies just the same as Socialism. The use of these two words has repeatedly changed during the past decades, but always the question which separates socialists from communist was only political tactics. Both aimed to socialize the means of operation.” Mises
Process of Communism and socialism = individual (capitalism) —> group (Collectivism/Public sector) —> Government (Totalitarianism).
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 03:58 PM
-
#284
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
Communism arises from the root word commune/communal.It would all make sense if you watched the video I posted in the other thread. The history of western economics and capitalism.
Socialism/fascism/communism all fail because they are inefficient. They only survive because they are propped up by the government. The “public sector” always fails because it can’t know the wants needs of the individual. From the homeless to market prices, it fails at everything. It can’t know what to price to buy at. It can’t know what price to sell at. It can’t know what each individual homeless person needs, and in the process of getting it wrong, it makes things worse.
That’s where capitalism succeeds. Individuals meeting the wants and needs of other individuals.
“The term communism signifies just the same as Socialism. The use of these two words has repeatedly changed during the past decades, but always the question which separates socialists from communist was only political tactics. Both aimed to socialize the means of operation.” Mises
Process of Communism and socialism = individual (capitalism) —> group (Collectivism/Public sector) —> Government (Totalitarianism).
Socialism/fascism/communism all fail because they are inefficient. They only survive because they are propped up by the government. The “public sector” always fails because it can’t know the wants needs of the individual. From the homeless to market prices, it fails at everything. It can’t know what to price to buy at. It can’t know what price to sell at. It can’t know what each individual homeless person needs, and in the process of getting it wrong, it makes things worse.
That’s where capitalism succeeds. Individuals meeting the wants and needs of other individuals.
“The term communism signifies just the same as Socialism. The use of these two words has repeatedly changed during the past decades, but always the question which separates socialists from communist was only political tactics. Both aimed to socialize the means of operation.” Mises
Process of Communism and socialism = individual (capitalism) —> group (Collectivism/Public sector) —> Government (Totalitarianism).
Communism is anti-state.
In my opinion human nature makes it impossible; anarchy is also impossible for the same reason. The current state of human nature is self-interest.
Capitalism is not egalitarian. It requires class separation.
09-05-2023, 04:05 PM
-
#285
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So Anarcho capitalism is the goal? Lol This is why any knowledgeable person doesn’t take the Marxist seriously. It’s utter nonsense.Communism arises from the root word commune/communal.
Communism is anti-state.
In my opinion human nature makes it impossible; anarchy is also impossible for the same reason. The current state of human nature is self-interest.
Capitalism is not egalitarian. It requires class separation.
Communism is anti-state.
In my opinion human nature makes it impossible; anarchy is also impossible for the same reason. The current state of human nature is self-interest.
Capitalism is not egalitarian. It requires class separation.
“We are against capitalism! but for capitalism!” Lulz
This is why it always end with total government control/ownership.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 04:08 PM
-
#286
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
I think (small) government is a necessary evil due to the current (and past) state(s) of human nature.So Anarcho capitalism is the goal? Lol This is why any knowledgeable person doesn’t take the Marxist seriously. It’s utter nonsense.
“We are against capitalism! but for capitalism!” Lulz
This is why it always end with total government control/ownership.
“We are against capitalism! but for capitalism!” Lulz
This is why it always end with total government control/ownership.
What looks good on paper doesn't work in practice when actual people get involved.
09-05-2023, 04:10 PM
-
#287
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So government removes the "human element"? This would make government a god.I think (small) government is a necessary evil due to the current (and past) state(s) of human nature.
What looks good on paper doesn't work in practice when actual people get involved.
What looks good on paper doesn't work in practice when actual people get involved.
It sounds about right, considering Socialism is a religion.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 04:16 PM
-
#288
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
No.So government removes the "human element"? This would make government a god.
It sounds about right, considering Socialism is a religion.
It sounds about right, considering Socialism is a religion.
I'm not even sure how or why you want to make that leap.
I see government as dynamic.
Are there elections for deities?
09-05-2023, 04:28 PM
-
#289
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
90% of adolescent runaways are from single parent homes. And that’s not even getting into the education, violent crime, imprisonment, mental illness, suicide, drug addiction, and all of the other stats are much MUCH worse for people raised in single parent homes than in traditional households. There was a time when the percentage of single parent homes was much lower…..that time actually did exist. But if you want to continue to worship the stage and think they’ll fix the problems then by all means, go right ahead. But I’d say by looking around at society that hasn’t made things better overall….in lots of ways the god you worship has made things substantially worse.At the risk of seeming egotistical, I'll assume "he" is me.
But, but do you reconcile Kraken calling me a communist and you suggesting I worship the state?
I do mock the hypocrisy of social conservatism. I also mock lamenting the loss of a time that never existed. Guilty as charged.
But, but do you reconcile Kraken calling me a communist and you suggesting I worship the state?
I do mock the hypocrisy of social conservatism. I also mock lamenting the loss of a time that never existed. Guilty as charged.
09-05-2023, 04:30 PM
-
#290
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
I'll ask again.90% of adolescent runaways are from single parent homes. And that’s not even getting into the education, violent crime, imprisonment, mental illness, suicide, drug addiction, and all of the other stats are much MUCH worse for people raised in single parent homes than in traditional households. There was a time when the percentage of single parent homes was much lower…..that time actually did exist. But if you want to continue to worship the stage and think they’ll fix the problems then by all means, go right ahead. But I’d say by looking around at society that hasn’t made things better overall….in lots of ways the god you worship has made things substantially worse.
Is after controlling for household income?
The worship stuff seems unnecessary, but whatever.
I'd like to help, but your dad left so fu? Weird position to take, imo.
09-05-2023, 04:32 PM
-
#291
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
How does one keep government small, when you advocate for big government?No.
I'm not even sure how or why you want to make that leap.
I see government as dynamic.
Are there elections for deities?
I'm not even sure how or why you want to make that leap.
I see government as dynamic.
Are there elections for deities?
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 04:33 PM
-
#292
09-05-2023, 04:38 PM
-
#293
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
There's that lack of logic again.Where or when have I ever advocated for big government?
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 04:40 PM
-
#294
09-05-2023, 04:41 PM
-
#295
09-05-2023, 04:47 PM
-
#296
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Where or when have I ever advocated for big government?
I loathe politicians.
I loathe politicians.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
oof
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
09-05-2023, 04:49 PM
-
#297
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,186
- Rep Power: 441972
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
90% of welfare recipients are single mothers. It appears they receive tons of help and an incredibly disproportionate amount of aid. Yet for some reason the problem not only hasn’t gotten better, it’s gotten much worse.I'll ask again.
Is after controlling for household income?
The worship stuff seems unnecessary, but whatever.
I'd like to help, but your dad left so fu? Weird position to take, imo.
Is after controlling for household income?
The worship stuff seems unnecessary, but whatever.
I'd like to help, but your dad left so fu? Weird position to take, imo.
And ftr, I actually donate to local charities to help the needy while actually knowing a lot of it will go to single mothers. So no, I don’t say fukk you to them(nice strawman as usual from you though). But I also understand that having a lot more traditional families it’s much better for society overall. That’s some pretty basic stuff, regardless of how much that fact appears to upset you.
09-05-2023, 04:49 PM
-
#298
09-05-2023, 04:55 PM
-
#299
- ParsleyTea
- Registered User
-
- ParsleyTea
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,588
- Rep Power: 50203
-
-
Gavin Newsom blames progressive advocates and judges for California's homelessness crisis
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...s-blame-judges
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...s-blame-judges
09-05-2023, 04:59 PM
-
#300
Originally Posted By ParsleyTea⏩
If his strategists are correct, that'll get him some votesGavin Newsom blames progressive advocates and judges for California's homelessness crisis
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...s-blame-judges
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...s-blame-judges

Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts