Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
  1. Results 3241 to 3270 of 3464
  2. Page 109 of 116
  3. First
  5. 106
  6. 107
  7. 108
  8. 109
  9. 110
  10. 111
  12. Last

Thread: Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"

  1. Rate This Thread
11-14-2021, 08:15 PM
#3241
been getting acclimated with some of the local birders in my area

learned about a cool spot for short eared owls, which I didn't even know existed



taken with the 600mm f4 basically at dusk. SUPER happy with how it turned out.

I was shooting with 3 other guys who had 400mm f2.8s and I was really wishing I had that wider aperture

currently trying to figure out how to fit $13k into my budget for an RF 400mm now
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
11-19-2021, 01:23 PM
#3242
Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. friesbruhs avatar
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 9,034
  7. Rep Power: 162,705
Quote
11-28-2021, 08:21 PM
#3243
since I got that expensive 600mm, I got a Personal Property Policy from State Farm. About $50/mo and allegedly they fully replace any gear stolen, dropped, damaged by water, etc. no questions asked. will let everyone know if I end up making any claims. certainly gives peace of mind.

haven't been out shooting much lately, but looking forward to when we get some consistent snow on the ground

I also used Canvas on Demand to buy a bunch of large prints (10 x 8 up to 36 x 24) for some Christmas presents for people as well as one for my own wall
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-12-2021, 12:35 PM
#3244
During Black Friday I swapped from using Lightroom + Photoshop with the Topaz Suite (Denoise, Gigapixel, and Sharpen) over to DXO PhotoLab Elite 5. What a world of change. I love it.

Here are some shots with the R5 + RF 600mm F4, edited in DXO.







I also bought an EF 400mm F2.8 last night for about $5,000. if I like it, I may go get a new 0% APR credit card and purchase the RF version instead. At 8.5lbs the EF II isn't terrible, but the 6.3lbs of the RF version would be noticeably nicer.

I don't know that I need $25k in RF wildlife primes, so I'll probably see which I like better (400 f2.8 or 600 f4) and then sell one.

also looking for a good EF 200mm F2 for portraiture and close wildlife. will probably sell my RF 70-200 f2.8 to get it.

my first photo print came back too, 36" x 24" of a Grizzly Bear I got in Yellowstone this year



I'm blown away by the quality. gives me a ton of motivation to get out there and take more pics
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-15-2021, 02:25 PM
#3245
R5 Master Race

There was a pretty decent building fire near me so I went out with the R5 and the Sigma 150-600.

Conditions were getting dark, overcast, and smoky. Really tested my skills in bad lighting and I do need improvement. The majority of my shots were completely unusable/not sharp. Out of 170 pics I ended up with 3. Mostly burst shots too

I need a steadier hand for darker conditions, I found myself cranking the ISO here, but here are the 3 I ended up with after Lightroom.

Click to make bigger



  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Skeptical_Hippos avatar
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 23,128
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
12-16-2021, 02:17 AM
#3246
Originally Posted By Skeptical_Hippo⏩



These 3 came out perfect. Especially the last photo with the rain in the background and his expression, great stuff. The darker tone editing style works well here. I'm not a usual fan as its become very overused in all scenarios, but it works here in the gritty environment.

What's the lowest aperture on the Sigma 150-600 at this focal length? Long focal lengths at night is always difficult as the aperture is usually higher, unless of course you have a fixed low f-stop zoom lens at all ranges. Were the rest unusable due to blur?
  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Porridgemonsters avatar
  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 1,031
  5. Rep Power: 13,217
Quote
12-16-2021, 02:36 AM
#3247
Edited these shots a few months back, getting motivation to go through the backlog:




  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Porridgemonsters avatar
  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 1,031
  5. Rep Power: 13,217
Quote
12-16-2021, 09:02 AM
#3248
Originally Posted By Skeptical_Hippo⏩
R5 Master Race

There was a pretty decent building fire near me so I went out with the R5 and the Sigma 150-600.

Conditions were getting dark, overcast, and smoky. Really tested my skills in bad lighting and I do need improvement. The majority of my shots were completely unusable/not sharp. Out of 170 pics I ended up with 3. Mostly burst shots too

I need a steadier hand for darker conditions, I found myself cranking the ISO here, but here are the 3 I ended up with after Lightroom.

Click to make bigger

Love this 2nd pic. Also it seems odd to me that you had so many shots that weren't usable/sharp. How do you have autofocus setup? I have like a 95% keeper rate with the R5 no matter what I shoot.

Unless it was just so dark, and with such a "slow" lens, you couldn't get the shutter speed where you needed it to be to capture action or something..

Editing style on point.

Something I really need to do is invest more time into learning and perfecting editing. I had a pretty humbling experience on FB this week with another wildlife photographer.

Here I am using like $20k worth of gear, and he has barely $2k invested and his shots were far superior to mine. All came down to editing.
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-16-2021, 10:04 AM
#3249
i thought it turned out OK (cept for the b*tch ass noise)

didnt know how much of a reach id need so this is on the 60-600

ended up shooting at 196mm, iso 2000, ss 1/1600, f7.1

will be using the 70-200 2.8 next time

XP174 on short-final

Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. friesbruhs avatar
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 9,034
  7. Rep Power: 162,705
Quote
12-16-2021, 10:40 AM
#3250
Originally Posted By Porridgemonster⏩
These 3 came out perfect. Especially the last photo with the rain in the background and his expression, great stuff. The darker tone editing style works well here. I'm not a usual fan as its become very overused in all scenarios, but it works here in the gritty environment.

What's the lowest aperture on the Sigma 150-600 at this focal length? Long focal lengths at night is always difficult as the aperture is usually higher, unless of course you have a fixed low f-stop zoom lens at all ranges. Were the rest unusable due to blur?
.
Thanks bro. The lens tops out at F5, but at this length was probably closer to 7. The aperature was slow enough that I just wasn't steady enough with it, the lens is absolutely huge too so I was kinda shaky with it. They were unusable due to a combination of bad composition, blur, and not being sharp. The environment got dark fast, I probably had 30 minutes to do what i wanted. I cant wait to go out with it again in some better conditions though

Originally Posted By PositiveCrew⏩
Love this 2nd pic. Also it seems odd to me that you had so many shots that weren't usable/sharp. How do you have autofocus setup? I have like a 95% keeper rate with the R5 no matter what I shoot.

Unless it was just so dark, and with such a "slow" lens, you couldn't get the shutter speed where you needed it to be to capture action or something..

Editing style on point.

Something I really need to do is invest more time into learning and perfecting editing. I had a pretty humbling experience on FB this week with another wildlife photographer.

Here I am using like $20k worth of gear, and he has barely $2k invested and his shots were far superior to mine. All came down to editing.
Thanks appreciate that bro. And yeah my AF is set up, I just think the combination of aperture and shutter speed along with the sun going down was too much for my skill level but I do want to go and practice some more because I do see some people shooting at night no problem. Lightroom really fixed these pics a bit too.

If you're looking for free lightroom presets

https://freepreset.net/free-lightroom-presets
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Skeptical_Hippos avatar
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 23,128
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
12-16-2021, 10:52 AM
#3251
Originally Posted By friesbruh⏩
i thought it turned out OK (cept for the b*tch ass noise)

didnt know how much of a reach id need so this is on the 60-600

ended up shooting at 196mm, iso 2000, ss 1/1600, f7.1

will be using the 70-200 2.8 next time

XP174 on short-final

this pic is cool af! I take it you're a pilot in the plane flying parallel?
Great MAGA King status

Bing Chilling
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Smithers115s avatar
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
  5. Posts: 19,913
  6. Rep Power: 81,884
Quote
12-16-2021, 11:59 AM
#3252
Originally Posted By Smithers115⏩
this pic is cool af! I take it you're a pilot in the plane flying parallel?
chit i wish

i was at a spot about 200ft above the runway

nice to know it looks cooler than it actually is
Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. friesbruhs avatar
  1. friesbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2017
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 9,034
  7. Rep Power: 162,705
Quote
12-16-2021, 12:25 PM
#3253
Originally Posted By friesbruh⏩
chit i wish

i was at a spot about 200ft above the runway

nice to know it looks cooler than it actually is

ahhh gotcha

That was my first though was you were on top of a mountain but the aviation crew sig threw me for a loop
Great MAGA King status

Bing Chilling
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Smithers115s avatar
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
  5. Posts: 19,913
  6. Rep Power: 81,884
Quote
12-17-2021, 09:48 AM
#3254
can confirm that plane pic is wicked

I went to the local airport looking for Snowy Owls / Short Eared, saw none and only had my 600mm so I was too close to even get any plane pics lol
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-17-2021, 09:52 AM
#3255
in

forgot this crew existed

love the ff pics especially the third one
  1. Kay4Kool
  2. Censored
  3. Kay4Kools avatar
  1. Kay4Kool
  2. Censored
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Posts: 6,598
  5. Rep Power: 74,712
Quote
12-19-2021, 06:59 AM
#3256
Full Moon shot I took


  1. Kay4Kool
  2. Censored
  3. Kay4Kools avatar
  1. Kay4Kool
  2. Censored
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Posts: 6,598
  5. Rep Power: 74,712
Quote
12-21-2021, 08:22 PM
#3257
I finally understand how people get in so much credit card debt

I bought a 200 f2, 400 f2.8, and just purchased an R3…





sure hope I did my math right and my year end bonus comes to fruition
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-21-2021, 08:26 PM
#3258
holy sh*t, i thought the R5 was the most expensive camera they had?
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Skeptical_Hippos avatar
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 23,128
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
12-21-2021, 09:04 PM
#3259
Originally Posted By Skeptical_Hippo⏩
holy sh*t, i thought the R5 was the most expensive camera they had?
The R3 was just released in September, and started shipping at the end of November I believe.

I have some ******** friends (professional wildlife photographers) who bought it and swear by it.

I'm pretty nervous, since the R5 is 45 MP and I'm used to that, which gives a TON of room for cropping. Moving to a "measly" 24.1MP is scary as hell.

The main draw was 30 FPS (up from 20 FPS), and then it has active eye tracking that looks at your retina, and can tell where in the frame you are looking. So basically its autofocus so advanced that it is actively looking where you are looking.

Worst case scenario if I don't like it, I should be able to sell it for more than I paid.
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-22-2021, 05:43 AM
#3260
Originally Posted By PositiveCrew⏩
I'm pretty nervous, since the R5 is 45 MP and I'm used to that, which gives a TON of room for cropping. Moving to a "measly" 24.1MP is scary as hell.
Jody Melanson who used to post incredible wildlife shots in here used a 10mp 1D Mk3 and later a 20mp 1DX Mk2. I just looked him up and he's since switched to an R5 but certainly doesn't need it to capture great images.

Having the latest technology is nice but skill, timing, planning, knowledge of conditions and the species he's photographing, tactical shoulder mount, camouflage, and the right lenses all combined to play a greater role in getting those images than the camera itself.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
12-22-2021, 11:34 AM
#3261
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Jody Melanson who used to post incredible wildlife shots in here used a 10mp 1D Mk3 and later a 20mp 1DX Mk2. I just looked him up and he's since switched to an R5 but certainly doesn't need it to capture great images.

Having the latest technology is nice but skill, timing, planning, knowledge of conditions and the species he's photographing, tactical shoulder mount, camouflage, and the right lenses all combined to play a greater role in getting those images than the camera itself.
100%. But as a newbie who is still trying to find good spots for wildlife, often times I catch the animals in passing and I'm quite a distance away

the MP helps bridge that gap when you just can't get as close to a subject as you'd like
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-27-2021, 09:47 AM
#3262
went to Wisconsin for the in-laws Christmas and got a chance to shoot 4,000 photos of Eagles on Christmas Eve morning

even with the 600mm + 1.4x (840mm f5.6) I was still too far away. I should've put on the 2x since light wasn't really an issue. Ohwell, live and learn. Hope to be back up that way as soon as next weekend



+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-28-2021, 03:20 AM
#3263
out shooting Shorties last night and wouldn't you know it, they kept landing right in front of my truck… while I wasn't there

+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-29-2021, 09:43 PM
#3264
got my first real test of the R3 today and it is incredible.

the only downside I found - as expected, the MP count.

however, using Topaz Gigapixel AI I was able to mainly overcome that. 95% chance I end up selling my R5 now



before (left) after (right)

+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
12-29-2021, 09:45 PM
#3265
Originally Posted By PositiveCrew⏩
out shooting Shorties last night and wouldn't you know it, they kept landing right in front of my truck… while I wasn't there

R5 AND Tahoe crew? Are you my brother
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Skeptical_Hippos avatar
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 23,128
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
12-30-2021, 06:34 AM
#3266
Originally Posted By Skeptical_Hippo⏩
R5 AND Tahoe crew? Are you my brother
R3 and 3/4ton Suburban crew! aha.

+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
01-02-2022, 02:30 AM
#3267
Originally Posted By PositiveCrew⏩

before (left) after (right)

Damn didn't even know this software existed, so useful.

Is the left image the RAW? Doesn't look like a typical RAW image.
  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Porridgemonsters avatar
  1. Porridgemonster
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 1,031
  5. Rep Power: 13,217
Quote
01-02-2022, 03:38 AM
#3268
How important is shutter clicks on a DSLR when shopping used?

Ive been looking at used d810's to upgrade from my d7100 because they've come down to around 1000 dollars canadian and its hard to justify spending 2-3k on a new mirrorless when i can get one of the best dslr's of the decade for like 1/3rd its msrp. The other option would potentially be the a7r2 for around the same used.

How many clicks am i looking at before its maybe going to be affecting performance or just not worth my time. Ive seen cameras with anywhere from 10k-100k clicks
Great MAGA King status

Bing Chilling
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Smithers115s avatar
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
  5. Posts: 19,913
  6. Rep Power: 81,884
Quote
01-02-2022, 05:53 PM
#3269
Originally Posted By Porridgemonster⏩
Damn didn't even know this software existed, so useful.

Is the left image the RAW? Doesn't look like a typical RAW image.
yeah it's Canon Craw (.cr3)

Originally Posted By Smithers115⏩
How important is shutter clicks on a DSLR when shopping used?

Ive been looking at used d810's to upgrade from my d7100 because they've come down to around 1000 dollars canadian and its hard to justify spending 2-3k on a new mirrorless when i can get one of the best dslr's of the decade for like 1/3rd its msrp. The other option would potentially be the a7r2 for around the same used.

How many clicks am i looking at before its maybe going to be affecting performance or just not worth my time. Ive seen cameras with anywhere from 10k-100k clicks
I've never used DSLR, but I think shutter clicks are important since everyone lists it when selling a body.

IIRC most DSLR go like 200k - 500k before needing replaced.

the nice thing for mirrorless now is that shutter doesn't matter, since all the best mirrorless you shoot in electronic 100% of the time. so in theory they'd go forever.

FWIW I got my R5 in 07/2021 and had shot 52,000 images before I just sold it today
+++ Positive Crew +++
♬♫♪ Music crew ♪♫♬
**** PC Master Race Crew****
Misc Photography Crew
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. PositiveCrews avatar
  1. PositiveCrew
  2. Longtime Lurker
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 26
  6. Posts: 3,807
  7. Rep Power: 137,172
Quote
01-04-2022, 06:57 AM
#3270
Originally Posted By PositiveCrew⏩
yeah it's Canon Craw (.cr3)



I've never used DSLR, but I think shutter clicks are important since everyone lists it when selling a body.

IIRC most DSLR go like 200k - 500k before needing replaced.

the nice thing for mirrorless now is that shutter doesn't matter, since all the best mirrorless you shoot in electronic 100% of the time. so in theory they'd go forever.

FWIW I got my R5 in 07/2021 and had shot 52,000 images before I just sold it today
ya I was looking at nikons site and it said the d810 is good for 500k clicks, just not sure when things start to go funky. like if there's a difference between 50k vs 150k clicks other than life expectancy
Great MAGA King status

Bing Chilling
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Smithers115s avatar
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
  5. Posts: 19,913
  6. Rep Power: 81,884
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts