Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Married Gays are allowed to adopt children now? Wtf
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 145
  2. Page 2 of 5
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Married Gays are allowed to adopt children now? Wtf

post 1544083331 02-17-2018, 04:49 AM
-
#31
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 5,501
  6. Rep Power: 5165
Originally Posted By BOZZ⏩
A child needs a woman figure.

You're a bigot that doesn't like the idea of two men raising a child.


Pick one
If a baby is up for adoption, then YES, do what is BEST for the Child FIRST.

How is depriving them of a 'normal' childhood/parenthood best for them?

If a situation occurs like in your case, its unfortunate but its NOT the same situation.
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
post 1544083351 02-17-2018, 04:50 AM
-
#32
  1. white_pele
  2. Woody Plowski
  1. white_pele
  2. Woody Plowski
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Poland
  5. Posts: 6,170
  6. Rep Power: 13982
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Because if your sister adopted a boy, he would not have a role model to develop into a man, do sports with, go hunting/fishing. The boy/girl would also be lacking a protector

Lets say the house get broken into by a violent criminal or Parents and Child get Mugged(Non US without guns) the child would stand a much better chance of avoiding injuries if a male is there to protect
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
A single man can adopt a child, really? I don't agree with that.

I guess

single man/ gay couple adopting single boy is probably OK but adopting a female would not be fair on a girl
lol never go full potato
6'2", 198
post 1544083381 02-17-2018, 04:52 AM
-
#33
  1. RoxyFoxy22
  2. Registered User
  1. RoxyFoxy22
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Posts: 6,893
  5. Rep Power: 14125
Much better than orphanage, kids' chances to be adopted are lower since nowadays lots of people hire surrogate mothers, so they have less and less chances to have a family, especially if they are a bit older.
I don't know how fosters are in US, but in Romania kids have no direction and they are kicked out when being 18, usually end up as street kids and addicts.
~~Cardio Bunny ~~ Eastern European ~~
post 1544083461 02-17-2018, 04:55 AM
-
#34
  1. GotNext
  2. Sole Collector
  1. GotNext
  2. Sole Collector
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Posts: 3,986
  5. Rep Power: 17322
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Thats a completely different situation so don't even try and compare.
OP on that single-digit-IQ time. Hilarious thread backfire, came in looking for people to support his retarded views, realizing his arguments make no sense at all.
Banging in Hong Kong 2017, Europe Roadtrip 2018, planned: Mt. Kilimanjaro 2019. <- never happened, broke my leg, fml

~ Los Angeles Lakers ~ Eintracht Frankfurt ~ PhD crew ~ PrettyHugeDick crew as well ~ Philosophy crew ~
post 1544083481 02-17-2018, 04:56 AM
-
#35
  1. MichelleLnne
  2. Troll Patrol
  1. MichelleLnne
  2. Troll Patrol
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Nunya, Bizness USA
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 20,902
  7. Subscribers: 3
  8. Rep Power: 312836
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Because that situation has already happened, separating a Dad from their child is obviously wrong

If a child is up for adoption, its needs come first, and what is best for a child is to have both a Mum and Dad (In the majority of cases)
Well once a baby is in the adoption stage, I would probably say that that situation had also already happened. For sure the ideal situation slipped through its little fingers.. so what’s best is for the child is to be loved and taken care of by anyone or any type of family

Edit- find me a study that shows real evidence that a child is better off being raised by a mf couple over any homosexual couple
Ignore list:

Johnvee73
post 1544083541 02-17-2018, 04:59 AM
-
#36
  1. Jimmy5bellies
  2. down to 2 bellies
  1. Jimmy5bellies
  2. down to 2 bellies
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 791
  5. Rep Power: 989
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Because if your sister adopted a boy, he would not have a role model to develop into a man, do sports with, go hunting/fishing. The boy/girl would also be lacking a protector
You think they've got all this when they're in an orphanage then?

There's plenty of places to develop role models if that is what is required - sports coaches at school, boy scouts, military cadets (if you have that in the USA?)

My wife can ride a horse, ski, play sports, strip and clean my shotguns, shoot a moving target with them, gut and prep a fresh pheasant ready for the pot... She can't be a role model?

But I'm pretty sure an orphan would just take sitting on the sofa with an adult who loves and wants them over anything else in the world.
post 1544083581 02-17-2018, 05:00 AM
-
#37
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 5,501
  6. Rep Power: 5165
Originally Posted By GotNext⏩
OP on that single-digit-IQ time. Hilarious thread backfire, came in looking for people to support his retarded views, realizing his arguments make no sense at all.
Damn this LGBT movement has brainwashed everyone

How is this the same situation

1) Mother and Father have a child, child bonds with father already , Mom dies, Child already bonded with Dad so would be unfair to seperate

2) Married Gay Couple hope to adopt a baby. Baby dosen't have a choice in the matter .Baby could go to to M and F couple. The child could face bullying and being made fun in school for having gay parents.

Of course is its orphanage Vs M + M couple. Then M + M couple would probably be better for the child.
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
post 1544083621 02-17-2018, 05:01 AM
-
#38
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
  5. Posts: 45,691
  6. Rep Power: 126658
Op is dumb af...stay potato bro.
678/424/700 - USPA Raw International Elite 220
post 1544083711 02-17-2018, 05:05 AM
-
#39
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 5,501
  6. Rep Power: 5165
People getting so triggered by this conversation

It likes debating or disagreeing about islam to a muslim.

LGBT Hollywood has brainwashed you MoFos.

M + F vs M + M for Child: Child should have M + F
Orphanage vs M + M: Child should have M + M probably
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
post 1544083791 02-17-2018, 05:07 AM
-
#40
  1. TitusVI
  2. Registered User
  1. TitusVI
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2017
  4. Location: Germany
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,684
  7. Rep Power: 21254
If two gays are gay then both like dick. So if they adopt a son then chance is higher of sexual abuse instead if at least one parent doesn't like dick. If that makes sense.
Everything I post is trash.
post 1544083831 02-17-2018, 05:07 AM
-
#41
  1. RonaldMcflurry
  2. I woke up like dis
  1. RonaldMcflurry
  2. I woke up like dis
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Posts: 14,495
  5. Rep Power: 80496
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
I'm not homophobic but how is it fair for a baby child to be adopted by two men?

A Mothers love and female parental figure I would say is a childs need

LGBT idiots, It is selfish for gays to do this

Maybe it would be ok if the child was say nearly a teenager and lost their parents.
I'm torn on this issue. I see what you are saying, but it has to be better than being raised by the state/foster care/etc.
Nuggets of Wisdom
post 1544083911 02-17-2018, 05:11 AM
-
#42
  1. Jimmy5bellies
  2. down to 2 bellies
  1. Jimmy5bellies
  2. down to 2 bellies
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Posts: 791
  5. Rep Power: 989
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
If two gays are gay then both like dick. So if they adopt a son then chance is higher of sexual abuse instead if at least one parent doesn't like dick. If that makes sense.
Not in the slightest you horrible kunt.
post 1544083981 02-17-2018, 05:13 AM
-
#43
  1. Rdubbb
  2. Registered User
  1. Rdubbb
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 1,776
  6. Rep Power: 2225
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
If two gays are gay then both like dick. So if they adopt a son then chance is higher of sexual abuse instead if at least one parent doesn't like dick. If that makes sense.
please explain
post 1544084071 02-17-2018, 05:15 AM
-
#44
  1. nkiritsis13
  2. [_]Living [X]Living Dead
  1. nkiritsis13
  2. [_]Living [X]Living Dead
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 8,312
  6. Rep Power: 331479
Someone has to take care of the offspring produced by people who couldn't figure out how to operate a condom.

Seriously though, one dad, two dads, one mom , two moms - really doesn't matter if they're good parents at the end of the day who love their child and have the means to support them.

As for "LGBT brainwashing," I'd be shocked if it wasn't mostlystraightcouples doing anything remotely close to that after doing a keg stand on the self-identity, unlimited genders, far-left kool-aid on the statistics alone (there are way more straight couples).
I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die

If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
post 1544084081 02-17-2018, 05:15 AM
-
#45
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
  5. Posts: 45,691
  6. Rep Power: 126658
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
If two gays are gay then both like dick. So if they adopt a son then chance is higher of sexual abuse instead if at least one parent doesn't like dick. If that makes sense.
You can’t be serious...

You think because two grown people are predisposed to having sexual attraction to men it will result in them molesting the child?

Do you have a job and are capable of feeding yourself?
678/424/700 - USPA Raw International Elite 220
post 1544084201 02-17-2018, 05:19 AM
-
#46
  1. Gxp23
  2. Good day Felicia
  1. Gxp23
  2. Good day Felicia
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 39,133
  6. Rep Power: 1592468
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Because if your sister adopted a boy, he would not have a role model to develop into a man, do sports with, go hunting/fishing. The boy/girl would also be lacking a protector

Lets say the house get broken into by a violent criminal or Parents and Child get Mugged(Non US without guns) the child would stand a much better chance of avoiding injuries if a male is there to protect
Are you ****ing retarded?
Eat the damn yolk.
post 1544084281 02-17-2018, 05:20 AM
-
#47
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 5,501
  6. Rep Power: 5165
Originally Posted By Gxp23⏩
Are you ****ing retarded?
Its a very low chance hypothetical situation but how can you disagree than its not true?
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
post 1544084351 02-17-2018, 05:22 AM
-
#48
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  1. hydraides
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 5,501
  6. Rep Power: 5165
Negged into oblivion lol

Everyone on here SO SO triggered, its worse than debating islam to a muslim ffs
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
post 1544084421 02-17-2018, 05:24 AM
-
#49
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
  5. Posts: 45,691
  6. Rep Power: 126658
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Negged into oblivion lol

Everyone on here SO SO triggered, its worse than debating islam to a muslim ffs
Makes thread with a potato topic.
Talks about being raised to be a man.
Cries and chits his pants over losing green squares.
Ok.
678/424/700 - USPA Raw International Elite 220
post 1544084521 02-17-2018, 05:28 AM
-
#50
  1. TitusVI
  2. Registered User
  1. TitusVI
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2017
  4. Location: Germany
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 6,684
  7. Rep Power: 21254
Originally Posted By bobbydigitaloa⏩
You can’t be serious...

You think because two grown people are predisposed to having sexual attraction to men it will result in them molesting the child?

Do you have a job and are capable of feeding yourself?
Statistically two gay men have a higher chance of abusing a male kid then two lesbian women would have with a male child.
And in general you will find that homosexuals are statistically more predatory to younger men then lesbians would. Anyway if I could choose between two women as my parents or two men I would certainly choose the women.
Everything I post is trash.
post 1544084591 02-17-2018, 05:34 AM
-
#51
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  1. bobbydigitaloa
  2. Registered Rep
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
  5. Posts: 45,691
  6. Rep Power: 126658
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
Statistically two gay men have a higher chance of abusing a male kid then two lesbian women would have with a male child.
And in general you will find that homosexuals are statistically more predatory to younger men then lesbians would. Anyway if I could choose between two women as my parents or two men I would certainly choose the women.
Because saying things online make them real.

Link to articles (That's multiple)...now.
678/424/700 - USPA Raw International Elite 220
post 1544084601 02-17-2018, 05:34 AM
-
#52
  1. white_pele
  2. Woody Plowski
  1. white_pele
  2. Woody Plowski
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Poland
  5. Posts: 6,170
  6. Rep Power: 13982
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Damn this LGBT movement has brainwashed everyone

How is this the same situation

1) Mother and Father have a child, child bonds with father already , Mom dies,Child already bonded with Dad so would be unfair to seperate

2) Married Gay Couple hope to adopt a baby. Baby dosen't have a choice in the matter .Baby could go to to M and F couple. The child could face bullying and being made fun in school for having gay parents.

Of course is its orphanage Vs M + M couple. Then M + M couple would probably be better for the child.
wtf, we have a real gem here, 28 as well, fukkin lol
6'2", 198
post 1544084711 02-17-2018, 05:39 AM
-
#53
  1. Kiop
  2. ™gif me so i can gif you©
  1. Kiop
  2. ™gif me so i can gif you©
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 55,724
  5. Rep Power: 222392
post 1544084831 02-17-2018, 05:42 AM
-
#54
  1. BrightonBomber
  2. Registered User
  1. BrightonBomber
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 4,897
  6. Rep Power: 10505
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
Statistically two gay men have a higher chance of abusing a male kid then two lesbian women would have with a male child.
And in general you will find that homosexuals are statistically more predatory to younger men then lesbians would. Anyway if I could choose between two women as my parents or two men I would certainly choose the women.
Dude you just went full potato. Of course statistically 2 gay men would abuse a male child more than 2 lesbians, they are lesbians they like girls not boys. You've basically said men who are attracted sexually to men are more likely to be attracted to men then women who are attracted to women.

Also most ****philes abuse girls not boys, so heterosexual men are more likely to be ****philes than gays. So what's safer 2 gay men who are less likely to be ****philes or a man and woman where the man is more likely to be a ****phile.
Bench -216lbs
Squat - 268lbs
Deadlift - 375lbs
OHP - 134lbs
post 1544084901 02-17-2018, 05:45 AM
-
#55
  1. BOZZ
  2. Banned
  1. BOZZ
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2001
  4. Posts: 4,396
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TitusVI⏩
Statistically two gay men have a higher chance of abusing a male kid then two lesbian women would have with a male child.
And in general you will find that homosexuals are statistically more predatory to younger men then lesbians would. Anyway if I could choose between two women as my parents or two men I would certainly choose the women.
You going to post a link to back that up or just get banned for being a bigot?
post 1544085181 02-17-2018, 05:54 AM
-
#56
  1. GravityLee
  2. Curls for the girls
  1. GravityLee
  2. Curls for the girls
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Posts: 21,444
  5. Rep Power: 146473
Originally Posted By StoliFun⏩

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9QoK8L1YWo
Everybody should watch this video.

Lets talk about the elephant in the room. Anytime you have two people adopting children some of those kids will get molested and raped. It should never happen but its gonna happen. Im not necessarily sold on the idea its more likely to happen with two gay parents. I personally know quite a few gay men since my brother is gay. The ones that would adopt are kind gentle people. There will always be monsters but again strictly off the statistics I doubt its a higher chance of molestation with gay parents.
post 1544085301 02-17-2018, 05:58 AM
-
#57
  1. Gayle1
  2. Banned
  1. Gayle1
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Posts: 5,576
  5. Rep Power: 0
What's the alternative? No parents?
post 1544085351 02-17-2018, 06:00 AM
-
#58
  1. Gxp23
  2. Good day Felicia
  1. Gxp23
  2. Good day Felicia
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 39,133
  6. Rep Power: 1592468
Originally Posted By hydraides⏩
Its a very low chance hypothetical situation but how can you disagree than its not true?
More for the first part of your statement...you realise parents are not the only role models in children's lives right?

Your last statement, yes, while it is a low chance hypothetical situation, you are making it seem like 2 female parents would not protect their children to the death if necessary.
Eat the damn yolk.
post 1544085411 02-17-2018, 06:03 AM
-
#59
  1. GreekyBeth
  2. I yam what I yam
  1. GreekyBeth
  2. I yam what I yam
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 7,611
  6. Rep Power: 110497
I think giving a child a loving home is much greater than the alternative.
FSU "Go Noles!"
post 1544085741 02-17-2018, 06:12 AM
-
#60
  1. twiceasnice
  2. like clockwork
  1. twiceasnice
  2. like clockwork
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 4,719
  6. Rep Power: 40377
So single dads that no longer have contact with their exes are bad parents too? How are you green
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts