Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Camaro crashes at 140 mph killing 3 people
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 154
  2. Page 2 of 6
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Camaro crashes at 140 mph killing 3 people

post 1632563003 02-28-2021, 08:21 AM
-
#31
  1. yeshli2nuts
  2. Registered User
  1. yeshli2nuts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 9,269
  7. Rep Power: 50332
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
It's not the same. Very few people who speed actually get in accidents where someone gets hurt. I literally know 40+ car guys who love to drive fast but none of them ever crashed in a way a innocent bystander was involved or someone got hurt/killed. You can actually speed safely if you can evaluate the situation (the guy in the video couldn't). It's one of a thousand who doesn't understand when it's relatively safe to speed and/or underestimates skill where chit like this actually happen. If I knew 40+ guys who shot at someone there would be a lot of deaths, it's not the same at all.
He's not talking about getting pulled over for speeding and being charged with murder. He's talking about speeding and getting into an accident and killing another driver. I know if the driver is drunk that case would usually be manslaughter, but sure about sober speeding, but I don't see why it shouldn't be manslaughter while the driver should go to prison for 10 years. If you break a law which directly causes the death of another person, that should at the very least be manslaughter.
Never neg first but always neg back crew
post 1632563033 02-28-2021, 08:22 AM
-
#32
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls⏩
Which is obviously not true. .
Just like when you are driving 140 MPH on a busy street (you can experience that thrill on a legal street just like you can shoot target practice at a gun range). Glad we can agree.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632563083 02-28-2021, 08:23 AM
-
#33
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  3. Join Date: Feb 2018
  4. Posts: 2,277
  5. Rep Power: 9810
Originally Posted By littlecaesars59⏩
im a chitty driver for not driving 120+ mph like a retarded fgt?

buy some rope
Ok you are retarded, it all makes sense now. I never said that driving 120+ mph makes you a good driver or vice versa. I'm saying there are plenty of people who can drive safer at 120+ mph than average person does at 40.
Lurking since 2009 (srs)
----- Happy 5th LHC CERN timeline! -----
post 1632563183 02-28-2021, 08:24 AM
-
#34
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
Ok you are retarded, it all makes sense now. I never said that driving 120+ mph makes you a good driver or vice versa. I'msaying there are plenty of people who can drive safer at 120+ mph than average person does at 40.
This is the "I drive just fine when I am a drunk!" bullchit huh lol
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632563223 02-28-2021, 08:25 AM
-
#35
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
Ok you are retarded, it all makes sense now. I never said that driving 120+ mph makes you a good driver or vice versa. I'm saying there are plenty of people who can drive safer at 120+ mph than average person does at 40.
Most people can't drive for ****. Absolutely pathetic... I've always said I'm a better driver 3-4 beers deep, easy. Young and stupid me showed up to a valet shift in college semi-hammered. Parked probably 2 dozen cars with ease.
post 1632563243 02-28-2021, 08:25 AM
-
#36
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  1. DizzySmalls
  2. Fast Misc
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 23,894
  6. Rep Power: 82068
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
This is the "I drive just fine when I am a drunk!" bullchit huh lol
Driving drunk is almost assuredly statistically safer than driving 140mph actually lol
post 1632563353 02-28-2021, 08:27 AM
-
#37
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,635
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 418882
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
If you drive 140 MPH on a busy street (or driving drunk), you are intending to kill. There is no other explanation.
You are not the authority on these definitions. Comparing your ideas to canon law shows you are incorrect.

You can say and think whatever you want man. However, it doesn’t mean anything.

It isn’t murder. That is not my opinion, it is the law.

Does this upset you very much?
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1632563413 02-28-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#38
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 35,083
  5. Rep Power: 160146
Culprit drivers surviving in many countries will barely spend any years in jail. Even repeat offender with DUIs, talking on the phone etc which slams the "Accident" argument. It's not an accident if it could have been avoided with normal care.

Some bitch I think in Canada not too long ago plowed into a kid doing like 100 in a 50 zone while texting. I think she got 3 years and was still able to claim insurance money.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
post 1632563423 02-28-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#39
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
You are not the authority on these definitions. Comparing your ideas to canon law shows you are incorrect.

You can say and think whatever you want man. However, it doesn’t mean anything.

It isn’t murder. That is not my opinion, it is the law.

Does this upset you very much?
I know legally it's not true, which is why I said we should change it.

Driving 140 MPH for "thrill" on a busy street is no different than a guy looking for a "thrill" and firing a gun on a busy highway killing people.

And you support the fact there are three people dead.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632563443 02-28-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#40
  1. SamIAm1892
  2. Future Mars Astronaut
  1. SamIAm1892
  2. Future Mars Astronaut
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Posts: 13,419
  5. Rep Power: 48445
ALways these *******s who think fast and the furious is real life. Bunch of small dik *******s.
post 1632563453 02-28-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#41
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
I am pretty sure it's well quantified by now that the Germany Autobahn is safer than U.S. highways despite no speed-limit. I also think Europeans are much better drivers.
post 1632563483 02-28-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#42
  1. Fang2
  1. Fang2
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 73,549
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 1102365
The driver survived
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano

If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
post 1632563573 02-28-2021, 08:30 AM
-
#43
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Fang2⏩
The driver survived
yup. The driver always survives and gets away with it.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632563613 02-28-2021, 08:30 AM
-
#44
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 8,772
  6. Rep Power: 37689
This thread is a great reminder that half of Americans have a double digit IQ. Lower your expectations of others and act accordingly.
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.

Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
post 1632563653 02-28-2021, 08:31 AM
-
#45
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 11,787
  6. Rep Power: 0
people still do this chit? its bad enough the pieces of chit that weave in and out of traffic only to get stuck at the next light but this groid deserves a bullet
post 1632563683 02-28-2021, 08:31 AM
-
#46
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,635
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 418882
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
I know legally it's not true, which is why I said we should change it.

Driving 140 MPH for "thrill" on a busy street is no different than a guy looking for a "thrill" and firing a gun on a busy highway killing people.

And you support the fact there are three people dead.
Your gun analogy is as potato as you are. They are not comparable.

A gun has no other function than to kill, or practice killing. Not comparable to a car or how we use cars at all.

Lol at “you support the fact there are three people dead”. The **** does that even mean?

Please tell me you are trolling. If you are not, delete your account.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1632563783 02-28-2021, 08:33 AM
-
#47
  1. littlecaesars59
  2. Banned
  1. littlecaesars59
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,267
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
Ok you are retarded, it all makes sense now. I never said that driving 120+ mph makes you a good driver or vice versa. I'm saying there are plenty of people who can drive safer at 120+ mph than average person does at 40.
the average driver is retarded.

sure there are some good drivers but all it takes is one retard to get in front of him to cause a crash.

no point in going 120+ in busy conditions besides being a stupid fgt\

buy some rope SRS
post 1632563813 02-28-2021, 08:33 AM
-
#48
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
A gun has no other function than to kill,
Target practice? Gun range? Collecting? Hunting (animals)?

And that's dumb. So if someone stabs a bunch of people he didn't intend to kill because knives are used to slice bread or cut rope? Lmao WTF.

Lmao "Judge I shouldn't get a murder charge for stabbing the guy with a knife because knives are used to cut Tri-Tip!"
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Lol at “you support the fact there are three people dead”. The **** does that even mean?
You are pro-criminal and are taking the side of the murderer.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632563843 02-28-2021, 08:34 AM
-
#49
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  3. Join Date: Feb 2018
  4. Posts: 2,277
  5. Rep Power: 9810
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
This is the "I drive just fine when I am a drunk!" bullchit huh lol
It's definitely not the same as alcohol impacts tracking and coordination ability as well other things.
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
I am pretty sure it's well quantified by now that the Germany Autobahn is safer than U.S. highways despite no speed-limit.
This lol. Per million miles driven no-limit autobahn has less accidents, injuries and fatalities than US highway. There's a fukton of guys who just drive 150+ mph every day to their work and back home and never get in accident.
Lurking since 2009 (srs)
----- Happy 5th LHC CERN timeline! -----
post 1632563873 02-28-2021, 08:34 AM
-
#50
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
Distracted driving actually is. But whatever, chitty drivers will have chitty beliefs. If you can't drive well you likely will never understand how there are people who drive at 120+ mph safer than you do at 40. Plenty of car guys have better car control driving sideways than average driver has driving straight. Goods drivers have the insight to see what's happening around and being able to predict what other drivers will do.
Agree, but the problem is people whothinkthey are able to speed safely and are wrong.

Murder is too far. But manslaughter for someone who pulls this in a situation where there are a lot of people around I can see.

I think there is some element of consent.

I think it would be good if areas where street racing is an issue would just have amateur tracks of some kind where the people who are participating are risking themselves voluntarily.

If you are speeding excessively and wrap yourself around a tree that's freedom.

If you are speeding excessively and smash into an occupied home or business injuring or killing people who didn't choose to participate in high speed racing there should be consequences.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1632563923 02-28-2021, 08:35 AM
-
#51
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 54,085
  5. Rep Power: 321216
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
If you're driving 140 MPH like this on a busy street, you are intending to kill.
Strong logic
Losers let it happen, winners make it happen.

Nonsense Army Crew.
post 1632563943 02-28-2021, 08:35 AM
-
#52
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
It's definitely not the same as alcohol impacts tracking and coordination ability as well other things.



This lol. Per million miles driven no-limit autobahn has less accidents, injuries and fatalities than US highway. There's a fukton of guys who just drive 150+ mph every day to their work and back home and never get in accident.
but I cannot emphasize enough how bad Americans are at driving. This is the likely differentiator.
post 1632563973 02-28-2021, 08:36 AM
-
#53
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By 2Chad4You⏩
It's definitely not the same as alcohol impacts tracking and coordination ability as well other things.
What I mean is that everyone that drives drunk thinks they are a good driver while drunk. Just like how people who drive 120 MPH+ think they are the only ones that can drive that fast.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632564013 02-28-2021, 08:36 AM
-
#54
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,635
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 418882
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
Target practice? Gun range? Collecting? Hunting (animals)?

And that's dumb. So if someone stabs a bunch of people he didn't intend to kill because knives are used to slice bread or cut rope? Lmao WTF.
You are pro-criminal and are taking the side of the murderer.
You intentionally left out part of my statement from the quote, then refuted my quote with questions that are clearly answered in the part of my statement you left out.

Please tell me how acknowledging the legal precedence in deciding the specific charges in this case makes me “pro-criminal”.

You are just making that up.


Are you 12? Because you are acting 12.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1632564053 02-28-2021, 08:37 AM
-
#55
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Nonsense916⏩
Strong logic
Well what was the intent?

If you drive 140 MPH+ on a busy street for a "thrill," you are a thrill killer.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632564103 02-28-2021, 08:37 AM
-
#56
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 54,085
  5. Rep Power: 321216
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
You intentionally left out part of my statement from the quote, then refuted my quote with questions that are clearly answered in the part of my quote you left out.

Please tell me how acknowledging the legal precedence in deciding the specific charges in this case makes me “pro-criminal”.

You are just making that up.


Are you 12. Because you are acting 12.
Pro criminal detected
Losers let it happen, winners make it happen.

Nonsense Army Crew.
post 1632564173 02-28-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#57
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  1. 2Chad4You
  2. Actually beta :/
  3. Join Date: Feb 2018
  4. Posts: 2,277
  5. Rep Power: 9810
Originally Posted By littlecaesars59⏩
the average driver is retarded.

sure there are some good drivers but all it takes is one retard to get in front of him to cause a crash.

no point in going 120+ in busy conditions besides being a stupid fgt\

buy some rope SRS
You are still retarded. I literally said on first page that driving that fast on such a busy road is not ok (unless left line is clear which is when crash shouldn't happen even if you drive fast. This is how they do it in germany and still have less crashes even with fuk ton of dudes doing 150+ mph daily. If someone merges from right line to left and causes crash they are at fault as they didn't check mirrors and evaluate situation.). What I'm trying to say you can drive very fast very safely in specific situations if you have adequate skill and situational awareness.
Lurking since 2009 (srs)
----- Happy 5th LHC CERN timeline! -----
post 1632564213 02-28-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#58
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
You intentionally left out part of my statement from the quote, then refuted my quote with questions that are clearly answered in the part of my quote you left out.
No, I did not. I understood fully what you were saying, and it doesn't make sense. Knives are not made with the intent to kill either (using your logic). So if a guy grabs a knife and starts stabbing random people he shouldn't be charged with murder?

Also, cars can be used to kill (see: Nice terrorist attack or Santa Monica terrorist attack back in 2003ish).
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Please tell me how acknowledging the legal precedence in deciding the specific charges in this case makes me “pro-criminal”.
Because you are taking this very personally. Acting very guilty.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1632564233 02-28-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#59
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  1. DeputyDong5
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 47124
Originally Posted By Noliberals4⏩
Well what was the intent?

If you drive 140 MPH+ on a busy street for a "thrill," you are a thrill killer.
you should pursue your Juris Doctor and make it your goal to prosecute speeders for murder. Report back.
post 1632564263 02-28-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#60
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
but I cannot emphasize enough how bad Americans are at driving. This is the likely differentiator.
Amen.

You just can't trust that other drivers are qualified or paying attention. And it is all the time.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts