Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Academic journals are the dumbest things I've ever read
  1. Results 31 to 55 of 55
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
post 1655404693 02-01-2022, 09:30 AM
-
#31
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
while research papers kinda have to be like that by design. at the same time in university when writing a paper they teach you how to be concise and efficient with your wording. brb having 20 sentences to explain something that can be explained in 4. obviously some papers do a better job than others. motherfukers don't have time to read all of that chit and want you to get straight to the point. however to be fair sometimes chit is a bit too complex it becomes hard to do so.

But papers come in all sort of styles, i.e: critiques, analyses, research, etc.

this had me actually looking back to some of the papers I wrote in 3rd/4th year university. one was an analysis of:

"Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. "

lol, had to remind myself how dry and boring these papers are to read with their language.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1655404953 02-01-2022, 09:36 AM
-
#32
  1. ymer
  1. ymer
  2. Join Date: Feb 2005
  3. Posts: 24,422
  4. Rep Power: 85485
Post deleted by user
post 1655405163 02-01-2022, 09:39 AM
-
#33
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,588
  6. Rep Power: 50203
But if you can be published 2 times a year for a certain number of years a professor can achieve tenure.
post 1655407263 02-01-2022, 10:12 AM
-
#34
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By sooby
while research papers kinda have to be like that by design. at the same time in university when writing a paper they teach you how to be concise and efficient with your wording. brb having 20 sentences to explain something that can be explained in 4. obviously some papers do a better job than others. motherfukers don't have time to read all of that chit and want you to get straight to the point. however to be fair sometimes chit is a bit too complex it becomes hard to do so.

But papers come in all sort of styles, i.e: critiques, analyses, research, etc.

this had me actually looking back to some of the papers I wrote in 3rd/4th year university. one was an analysis of:

"Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. "

lol, had to remind myself how dry and boring these papers are to read with their language.
Papers for courses =/= academic/scientific journal articles. The goal of an be paper for a class doesn't usually include fostering reproduction or contributing to meta analyses.
post 1655407353 02-01-2022, 10:14 AM
-
#35
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By ParsleyTea
But if you can be published 2 times a year for a certain number of years a professor can achieve tenure.
Not really. The bar for tenure is quite high. The system is rather abusive at the probationary level
post 1655407523 02-01-2022, 10:16 AM
-
#36
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Essays for courses =/= academic/scientific journal articles. The goal of an be essay for a class doesn't usually include fostering reproduction or contributing to meta analyses.
I'm not talking about essays.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1655407563 02-01-2022, 10:16 AM
-
#37
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By ymer
So what do you mean by "Not written for the general public" if you don't mean that the general public is not able to make an accurate summary?
I said summaries provided by media are often inaccurate.

Those inaccuracies may be due to misunderstanding, either accidental or intentional.
post 1655407613 02-01-2022, 10:17 AM
-
#38
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By sooby
I'm not talking about essays.
Which classes have you submitting articles for publication in a peer-reviewed journal?
post 1655407783 02-01-2022, 10:20 AM
-
#39
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Which classes have you submitting articles for publication in a peer-reviewed journal?
They don't teach you how to read, write, critique or analyze scientific papers at universities? Damn, post secondary education must have gone to chit in the past decade.
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1655407813 02-01-2022, 10:20 AM
-
#40
  1. ymer
  1. ymer
  2. Join Date: Feb 2005
  3. Posts: 24,422
  4. Rep Power: 85485
Post deleted by user
post 1655408153 02-01-2022, 10:25 AM
-
#41
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By sooby
They don't teach you how to read, write, critique or analyze scientific papers at universities? Damn, post secondary education must have gone to chit in the past decade.
You are thinking of undergraduate research papers and he is talking about graduate level students (doctoral program) and working academics writing articles for blind review at official journals (or writing a book). Very different.
post 1655408233 02-01-2022, 10:27 AM
-
#42
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By sooby
They don't teach you how to read, write, critique or analyze scientific papers at universities? Damn, post secondary education must have gone to chit in the past decade.
Not following.

This thread declared academic journals as "dumb".

Some of the arguments appear to be that they are dumb because they are too detailed.

You argued that you were taught to write concise papers for publication and thus others publishing are doing it wrong.

I asked which courses have you submitting those concise papers.
post 1655408333 02-01-2022, 10:29 AM
-
#43
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By ymer
You're not squirming your way out of this, you also said that they are not meant for the general public; what do you mean by that?
They are not written in lay language and assume prerequisite knowledge of the field.
post 1655408383 02-01-2022, 10:29 AM
-
#44
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Not following.

This thread declared academic journals as "dumb".

Some of the arguments appear to be that they are dumb because they are too detailed.

You argued that you were taught to write concise papers for publication and thus others publishing are doing it wrong.

I asked which courses have you submitting those concise papers.
The closest thing that I can think of, that he might be referring to, are undergraduate journals that some department puts together every year. Those are not academic or scholarly journals but a lot schools/departments do them as practice for their students.
post 1655408513 02-01-2022, 10:31 AM
-
#45
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  1. sooby
  2. WOATbrah of peace :)
  3. Join Date: Feb 2015
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 43,319
  6. Rep Power: 219409
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Not following.

This thread declared academic journals as "dumb".

Some of the arguments appear to be that they are dumb because they are too detailed.

You argued that you were taught to write concise papers for publication and thus others publishing are doing it wrong.

I asked which courses have you submitting those concise papers.
quite the leap don't you think? you called them "essays"
positivity brah crew
dont take my posts too srs crew srs
JFL @ everything crew
lol @ tradies srs crew
BIG LOL @ sky tradies srs crew (RealAesthetic)
indian crew
living in clown world crew so screw it crew
anti-degen crew
post 1655408543 02-01-2022, 10:31 AM
-
#46
  1. SuperHercules
  1. SuperHercules
  2. Join Date: Jun 2014
  3. Height: 6'5"
  4. Posts: 32,588
  5. Subscribers: 6
  6. Rep Power: 573726
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN
and then msm cancels the people who present the data to a general audience lmao.
Funny but true
post 1655408653 02-01-2022, 10:33 AM
-
#47
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By sooby
quite the leap don't you think? you called them "essays"
Fair point. I've edited to "papers"
post 1655408853 02-01-2022, 10:36 AM
-
#48
  1. ymer
  1. ymer
  2. Join Date: Feb 2005
  3. Posts: 24,422
  4. Rep Power: 85485
Post deleted by user
post 1655409093 02-01-2022, 10:39 AM
-
#49
  1. bartosh
  2. Registered Nerd
  1. bartosh
  2. Registered Nerd
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 11,559
  5. Rep Power: 77338
brb having a reading comprehension of an 8th grader
brb upset at not understanding something that is written for adults to read
MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions
post 1655409623 02-01-2022, 10:47 AM
-
#50
  1. DrewDarden
  1. DrewDarden
  2. Join Date: Nov 2016
  3. Posts: 23,059
  4. Subscribers: 5
  5. Rep Power: 510742
Originally Posted By ymer
So please post papers that had inaccurate summaries and post a summary that is accurate.
There are hundreds of thousands of papers in all different fields. The vast majority of summaries are accurate.

Here's a random one I picked out of my last research paper that I wrote for graduate school.

Hodge, E. M. (2016). School Desegregation and Federal Inducement: Lessons From the Emergency School Aid Act of 1972. Educational Policy, 32(1), 86–116.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816632608
Abstract
This study uses the example of the Emergency School Aid Act of 1972, a federal desegregation incentive program, to discuss the benefits and challenges of equity-oriented incentives. This study applies theories of policy instruments and the social construction of target populations to congressional records, archival program materials, and other historical sources to trace the origin and evolution of the incentives and mandates built into the Emergency School Aid Act.The study ultimately concludes that the program’s combination of a financial incentive with rigorous oversight offers lessons for how to incorporate equity-oriented incentives into current education policy.
The bottom line is that you're talking about (blasting) something you don't really understand.

My guess is that you want to believe that all academic-types are full of chit so you can justify your position on some political topic (based on where we are - the Misc - I'd bet my next paycheck that it's vaccines lol). Just let it go. You're talking about stuff you don't understand.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)

Summer 2026 Q&A Series:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=1000018276&f=1001
post 1655411313 02-01-2022, 11:09 AM
-
#51
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By DrewDarden
There are hundreds of thousands of papers in all different fields. The vast majority of summaries are accurate.

Here's a random one I picked out of my last research paper that I wrote for graduate school.

Hodge, E. M. (2016). School Desegregation and Federal Inducement: Lessons From the Emergency School Aid Act of 1972. Educational Policy, 32(1), 86–116.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816632608



The bottom line is that you're talking about (blasting) something you don't really understand.

My guess is that you want to believe that all academic-types are full of chit so you can justify your position on some political topic (based on where we are - the Misc - I'd bet my next paycheck that it's vaccines lol). Just let it go. You're talking about stuff you don't understand.
Your abstract is an accurate summary of your paper (I assume!).

I was referring to what we're seeing more and more with politicized topics, where media reports "A new study finds..." and presents a summary with more more certainty than present in the actual article, or sometimes presenting inconclusive results as though they are conclusive.
post 1655411423 02-01-2022, 11:11 AM
-
#52
  1. DrewDarden
  1. DrewDarden
  2. Join Date: Nov 2016
  3. Posts: 23,059
  4. Subscribers: 5
  5. Rep Power: 510742
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
I was referring to what we're seeing more and more with politicized topics
I know you were. I'm on your side for the most part.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)

Summer 2026 Q&A Series:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=1000018276&f=1001
post 1655411923 02-01-2022, 11:19 AM
-
#53
  1. ymer
  1. ymer
  2. Join Date: Feb 2005
  3. Posts: 24,422
  4. Rep Power: 85485
Post deleted by user
post 1655412183 02-01-2022, 11:23 AM
-
#54
  1. DrewDarden
  1. DrewDarden
  2. Join Date: Nov 2016
  3. Posts: 23,059
  4. Subscribers: 5
  5. Rep Power: 510742
Originally Posted By ymer
So no link?
Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)

Summer 2026 Q&A Series:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=1000018276&f=1001
post 1655413413 02-01-2022, 11:41 AM
-
#55
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By DrewDarden
I know you were. I'm on your side for the most part.
Just clarifying for others.

You don't wanna stand too close to me, the shrapnel and flak are epic!
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts