both rely on each other though. that is the biological imperative. either rejecting one or the other is not good; it's basically covering it up (thinking you solved something while the real motivation is burgeoning underneath)

both are needed to continue on the species

women don't rely on men now tho. they rely on themselves or the government. people just go by instinct and it's a woman's instinct to avoid and get away from certain dudes. they don't give a fuk about no biological imperative.

so when these women are 35 and single (and have been taught they don't need no man). and realizemen don't really care about 35 year old women.they're gonna be miserable

Agreed, we will see an epidemic of depressed harpies raging 24/7 because they'll finally understand feminism fcked them over.

Different old post I made:

Suicide rates rising faster for women than men

https://www.npr.org/sections/health-...=1603537006722

Especially for older women.

Their glow eventually disappears and they finally get treated as men but they can't handle it.

Women are also getting unhappier with life:

https://www.nber.org/papers/w14969

The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness

By many objective measures the lives of women in the United States have improved over the past 35 years, yet we show that measures of subjective well-being indicate thatwomen's happiness has declined both absolutely and relative to men.


Men are happier in life than women

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...ppearance.html

Women also taking more SSRI's than ever to cope with life

Women are twice as likely to use antidepressants compared to men

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...sants-men.html




But muh feminism and liberalism was supposed to make women happier?!!!!!!


Message to feminists:

women don't rely on men now tho. they rely on themselves or the government. people just go by instinct and it's a woman's instinct to avoid and get away from certain dudes. they don't give a fuk about no biological imperative.

I don't see how you could draw that conclusion when looking at those numbers in the op tbh

numbers of what? apparently both south korean men and women aren't having sex

doesn't say too much about the deleterious effects. some of us are pontificating on the deleterious effects

would be interesting to know "why men can't find a partner" and why "women aren't interested in sex"

i'm not sure they have to do with each other. if those 2 have to do with each other. then what you said has credence. but i'd still contend that reality is going to come crashing down at some point

women are interested in sex. just not with 95% of dudes they come across.

How are they not digging deeper into this statement? That chit aint healthy

see, i knew thats what you thought. but that's not what the article states

the article states there are just as many women not having sex as men. this does not say women are having lots of sex and a big pool of men aren't. it says its equitable.

see, i knew thats what you thought. but that's not what the article states

the article states there are just as many women not having sex as men. this does not say women are having lots of sex and a big pool of men aren't. it says its equitable

but again, the reality is neither sex can do without each other.

the difference is older men can have sex because it doesn't require much else. but women want security and emotional closeness and contentment and they're not gonna get that. so they're gonna lose out. men are getting what they want, but women are not

Lol what. The men are incels that isn't what they want.

Women are programmed to get chad or just be happy alone because child birth isn't worth the risks for inferior genes

you sound like you're repeating silencespeaks lol

the latter portion of what i just said was me pontificating again.

the article directly states there are just as many men as women not having sex. that's it

you sound like you're repeating silencespeaks lol

the latter portion of what i just said was me pontificating again.

the article directly states there are just as many men as women not having sex. that's it

what is your point then lol

Yes but the women are choosing to not have sex because they can't get who they want. That's much different than being an incel.

Silencespeaks isn't wrong about women only wanting elite men. She's just willing to say it bluntly out loud

the article doesn't state that though. it doesn't state the reasons why men can't find a partner either. i would more readily believe what you wrote if women were having lots of sex. cause that would mean "chad" theory is more apt. they're having lots of sex but only with a small amount of guys

silencespeaks is a weirdo for a lot of reasons. and i just know your frame of reference is solely that. get some more experience with other women and come back

and no im not trying to say you can't get women. i think you can. youre just a *******

Women just hate conservative men. The leftie Brazilians and Africans aren't struggling with this.

The article doesn't have to say it, you can use your brain to understand the different possible explanations and there's a pretty obvious one that lines up with what's happening in many other places

Of course they're depressed. Imagine living a life where you have an hour of housework a day then are free to pursue whatever hobbies you want. If you have kids they can be demanding for the first couple of years then they can tag along on your hobbies, and at 5 they go away for 7 hours a day so again you're free to pursue whatever hobbies you have without having to worry about earning enough to support a family, you can even work a job if you want the sense of accomplishment from that but only if you want it.

Then imagine a life where you have to commute to work 5 days a week to perform some likely repetitive task you don't enjoy for 8 hours straight, and if you don't do it well enough you'll be fired and your family will be living in the streets. Imagine that sometimes you have to work 10 hours a day or a weekend to pull overtime because you need the money. Then when you get home you have to spend time with your kids so they develop well. Then maybe you get 3 hours on Saturday to enjoy a hobby, but probably don't have the money.

Which life would you rather live? Of course there are people who enjoy their 9-5 (like myself) but for the vast majority it seems they don't. Even as someone who enjoys their job I'd drop it in a second if I could stay home with the kiddo and take him fishing, hiking, do yardwork with him, teach him my OK carpentry skills, maybe smoke a brisket for dinner, make some banana bread, etc... and these were my responsibilities for the day. Imagine someone telling you option 2 is better and you believing it.

My wife recently went back to work because we've got the little man in preschool (gotta foster that social interaction and social skills) and she got bored at home because their is not enough tasks in a day. Her job is low stress though and her money is all thrown into our spending budget. I can't imagine how stressed she would be if she had to pay our bills for a month.

the article doesn't state that though. it doesn't state the reasons why men can't find a partner either. i would more readily believe what you wrote if women were having lots of sex. cause that would mean "chad" theory is more apt. they're having lots of sex but only with a small amount of guys

silencespeaks is a weirdo for a lot of reasons. and i just know your frame of reference is solely that. get some more experience with other women and come back

and no im not trying to say you can't get women. i think you can. youre just a *******

imagine arguing the minutia of a couple words in the article when its clearly evident that inceldom in feminized countries is a global phenomenon

yes, different possible explanations. as in multiple

how hard is it for women to have sex? not very. at the very least they could easily pull the best available. but this says they're not interested in sex plainly

i would think if they were interested in sex and "chad" weren't available (i'm just giving your idea credence. i dont actually believe it) that they could dip down to the 7's and 8's. stiil leaving a higher number of women getting laid than men

but reality from the article looks like both are lonely. and i think men's solution for it is more attainable than for women. women might like to get fuked, but they like feeling closer even more. it's harder for them to get that closeness and harder to go without it

and that's what some of us are pontificating on

So you think women are passing up sex with attractive and elite men too? Lol I got a bridge to sell you.

The ones that can get those men are. You're delusional