MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Reminder : This guy called out someone who made a mistake by one decimal point against the narrative, but completely closed his eyes when the same thing happened by two decimal points - but was in favour of the narrative.

Remember this: I’ve made you look like a fool more times than I can count. Yet you continue to yearn for my attention. The best you have is brining up a mistake another poster made? Yikes. That’s all the attention you get today, though.

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Interesting development, bolded literally means "it doesn't".

It literally doesn’t

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Bigger sample size than the 8 mice used in the bivalent booster trial.

Love me some whataboutism

Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩

don't worry mate the latest version of the vax is based on 8 fckn mice! goodluck with that NPC

Find the post where I said people should take it. You’re just another side of the same coin buddy

MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Interesting to see how you called me out for it, but not the vaxcuck that the same thing ITT.

Or the fact that I don't remember you calling out the study with the 8 mice either.

Didn’t see the mice study and didn’t read the thread. Just saw the OP, looked at the video source, then replying to the person who replied to me (you)



Pro tip: a study using 8 mice only is equally as stupid

MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Sorry then brah.

Although I would say 8 mice is just a bit more stupid than 11 people.

I’d say studies are either valid or not, both fall under not valid


Cheers

MS, Computer Science
Feel free to PM me CS questions

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

I distinctly remember statements such as "does not enter the blood stream" and "the protein is displayed on the cell's surface". Are you saying those statements were lies?

I've bolded the blatant backpedals in your post - there was nothing of the sort at the time. It didn't "mostly stay local", it "stayed local". It didn't "in large part quickly degrade", it "degraded quickly".

Keep up shilling for free for big pharma, and thanks for your contributions to the largest ever trial of an experimental gene therapy.

Cool. Well dig up the statement sources. Let’s see who said it; was it an agency or an individual? Let’s see what exactly was said. “No evidence” means, no evidence. And let’s see the context under which it was said. Then we can determine lies.

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

Originally Posted By Reliance012⏩

After batting 0-500 you’d think anti vaxxers would tuck their tails at some point. But nope, continued desperation.

Antivaxxers: omg trace amounts of mRNA made it into breast milk!

Same anti vaxxers when a million times more RNA is present in multiple tissues during infection of an infant: it’s harmless!

I loe e.

Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

Thanks for confirming that you're perfectly good with pretending to forget anything from the past two years that doesn't align with the current narrative.

However, I thought you weren't going to respond to me anymore?



It's interesting to see how anyone who questions an experimental gene therapy is considered an anti-vaxxer nowadays.

You seemed interested in defending a claim. Unusual for you.

I’m not pretending anything. I simply asked for a source (rather than your memory) so we can evaluate the details and determine whether the sci community or health agencies were lying. That’s why I called it a strawman. It seems to me your argument is attacking something that was never said, at least not by the majority health agencies.

"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."

#

There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!