These.

Rona hysteria has exposed a reeeeeeally dark side of humanity. Calls for death camps, trying to deny health care to the un-vaxxedUntermensch, family and friends turning on one another, etc. And on and on.. Ad Nauseum.

What kind of viruses and illnesses could be contracted by coming into contact with smeared feces on the walls?

Ah yes and the scapegoating begins.

Once you have served your usefulness you are tossed out when the brainwashed masses need a whipping boy. White women, take notes, you are coming soon.

Love this for him.

Notice wincel won't post in this thread?

When is Bodhybot going to surrender to the lab leak reality?

Um....when there's actually enough tangible evidence to support it, and the evidence for natural origins overturned?



Unlike you, I don't believe in things simply because I want to believe them. I need to see tangible evidence.

If Fauci cited an academic study that said wearing adult diapers would significantly stop the spread of COVID-19, would you have worn them?

When I sit and ponder what wincel is like irl, this is as close as I can get. In fact, unless wincel can come by and prove that this is not him...it's him.

Great post bro. ^Yeah it is a hypothetical indeed. But, if you watch the full clip, what he does is says something like "every scientist and intelligence agency agrees this isn't a bioweapon." So, what he's trying to say is if it's not a deliberately engineered bioweapon, this is the other case for lab leak, which he then claims would be a natural occurrence. It would absolutely be a lab-related incident, and he is trying to muddy the distinction between the two. He's a weasel.

Edit: here is the original post I made about this a few weeks ago. The twitter link has the video.

Important to distinguish between the two scenarios Fauci describes, though.


The first one I've already discussed and I don't care what Fauci says, that's not a lab leak since it hasn'tleakedfrom the lab. It's a wild-type virus that's brought in by accident and leaves in an infected human regardless of the safety protocols of the lab, and without their knowledge the virus is even in there.

You can't call it aleak, since you can't make the case that an outbreak wouldn't have happened if not for lax biosecurity measures. Those aren't relevant in this scenario.



The second is a lab leak. It's a wild type virus without the potential for pandemics in humans, but it's brought back to the lab, intentionally manipulated to make it pandemic potential, and leaked out due to lax biosecurity measures.


So no chit, the second is a lab leak, but both of these scenarios are not only simple speculation and hypothetical, but Sars-Cov-2 is demonstrablynotengineered like this.

^^Wrong fаggot.

It fits under lab leak theory because it is a lab-related incident. If a lab researcher never went into a bat cave to deliberately retrieve bat viruses, would the outbreak have occurred?

Dr. Embarek was on the WHO team for Covid-19 origins investigations:

No it's not.

Fauci had his 15 minutes of fame and now it's time for him to GTFO.

True.

Again, if they went out into a cave and got it, then they would know EXACTLY where to return in order to find the original animal source. Yet for some reason we still haven’t managed to find it. Why do you think that is??


I’d also be interested to hear your thoughts on these questions…


Chinese scientists led the effort to find the original source of the SARS virus. In early 2020, they were very involved in similar efforts to find the source of Sars-Cov-2. Then they stopped. Why?


Did researchers have this much trouble finding the animal host for the original SARS, or were they able to nail down the transmission chain within a year?



How many times have raccoon dogs been found to be naturally infected with Sars-Cov-2 since the virus was invented? How many times have raccoon dogs been found to transmit Sars-Cov-2 outside of a laboratory? (Zero. And zero again!)


Did any sample from any animal at the Wuhan market that is supposedly the original home of animal-to-human coronavirus transmission ever test positive for Sars-Cov-2?


Furin cleavage sites make it much easier for viruses to infect humans. Sars-Cov-2 has such a site. Other, similar coronaviruses do not. Weird, huh?


Did a New York-based nonprofit connected with the Wuhan Institute of Virology ask for Pentagon funding in 2018 to pay for research adding furin cleavage sites to coronaviruses? Did the Pentagon - yes, the Pentagon! - reject the proposal as too risky?


Did a University of North Carolina professor named Ralph Baric work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2015 to create an artificial “chimeric” virus that included the spike protein from a newly discovered bat coronavirus? Did Baric and his Wuhan Institute co-authors write that their new virus could “infect human airway cells”?


Is the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan? Wait, isn’t Wuhan where Covid started?


Did Dr. Robert Redfield, the former director of the Centers for Disease Control, just testify to a Congressional committee about the Wuhan Institute? Is this what he said?
In September 2019, three things happened in that lab. One, they deleted the [genetic] sequences [from bat viruses they had studied]. That is highly irregular—researchers don’t usually like to do that. Second, they commanded the command and control of the lab from civilian control to military control. Highly unusual. And the third thing they did, which I think is really telling, is they let a contractor re-do the ventilation system in that laboratory. There is strong evidence there was a significant event in that laboratory in September 2019.


A three-parter: Did an American virologist privately warn Dr. Anthony Fauci only weeks after seeing the genetic code for Sars-Cov-2 that he and his colleagues believed it appeared to be “engineered”? Did those virologists then have a secret conference call with Dr. Fauci and suddenly decide to insist publicly that the virus probably wasn’t engineered at all? Did some of these virologists then get multi-million grants from Fauci’s division at the National Institutes of Health?

The hardest part about being a right winger is being correct all the time.

Here's the thing though... I don't think Fauci did anything wrong.

Yeah, he knew the virus likely came out of a Wuhan weapons lab. But are you going to say that chit publicly, and antagonize our #1 trading partner at the same time our economy went to hell in a handbasket? It's way simpler to go "¯\_(ツ)_/¯ no one's to blame", rather than go "yeah you, that $17T nuclear-armed superpower over there, you guys fukked up and killed millions." Cause the only appropriate response to THAT is either sanctions or war.

The real problem, along with most of the COVID stuff, is the bootlickers who just uncritically swallow everything their government authority figures tell them. "Fauci said it, so it must be right!" Like biiiish. Our government's got its own agenda.

GWG obsessing over Fauci now since his Hunter Biden nonsense went nowhere?






















Sad.

I personally don't give AF where it came from. My biggest issue with Fauci and this whole black death zombie apocalypse of DOOM is.... perspective. Sure, there was something going around making people sick - but was it really that bad? The CDC itself says it has something like a 99.9999998% chance of survival, and that's even IF you get it.

So why was it blown out of proportion then?

My opinion is that Fauci wanted to leave a legacy. To be remembered as THE infectious disease GOD who saw the world through a global pandemic. So this thing from China was just what the doctor ordered for him and he milked it for all it was fuking worth.