Already destroyed you in that thread boyo. Not a single defense was found and I'm certainly not giving you another excuse to post more **** pics from your spankbank.

And you do know that Trump and Epstein raped some teen girls and paid them to go away right?

LMFAO at you cultist.

ROTFLMFAOOO!!!! Hoe-Lee-**** Ass Rot."B-b-b-b-b-but Trump!"

I'm glad you weren't defending him though.. Because that would be kinda cult-ish.

He already got picked up at Harry Reid International Airport in Nevada.

You're 100% right. That's why no one was defending him. Or can you show me where someone supported what he did?

Because that's what you need to defend something as I schooled you last time boyo.

And no, your vaginal screeching and screeching while ignorning actual real predators that are raping kids doesn't make it defending either.

No, you got me Ass Rot.. 250 outraged posts of you and chalup "not defending him." Hard to dispute the golden colostomy bag full of Sillie logic bro.

Trumpers in full cope mode over their hypocrisy. Too blinded to see it somehow.

Totally not a cult.

Certainly not the most important witness, the fact pattern had already been established. Along the way, however, they caught wind that the gbi already knew about these claims, had them documented in a non confidential document, but was keeping that document hidden. So the claims, documentation, and lack of govt action only furthered the “fbi cover up to protect Biden” narrative. Now the fbi arresting the CI only further supports the cover up narrative.

Put another way, if the FBI took these claims seriously when they received them and had already run a thorough investigation to see if there was any merit, then they knew years ago whether this information was true or not, and whether the CI was "lying" or not. So if it was a lie and they knew this for years... why are they only charging the CI now that the information has surfaced? Either they failed to ever investigate the claims, investigated and determined at that time that it wasn't a lie and wasn't worth prosecuting, or are now trying to change the narrative surrounding this information by charging the CI... none of which is a good look.

Again, contrast this to everyone from the russiagate investigation that knowingly pumped false info into the fbi. The fbi kept these people on their payroll even after they learned they had lied (danchenko) and even after they knew they had broken their contract obligations (Steele). Talk about an egregious double standard, I’m sure you are up in arms over it, right?


The CI claims are supported by actual events, the ci had no contact with republicans and wasn’t pushing a narrative to take out Biden. The opposite happened during russiagate.

A standard that you can never seem to live up to

I actually forgot that Dachenko was charged for lying to the FBI, but he was acquitted. My memory is trash. Was Steele also told by Dachenko that the information was just rumors? Did Fusion GPS also know Dachenko was just telling them rumors? I'm looking for a decent source on the breakdown again. Google doesn't really turn up great info.

It’s a long story.


It started with Clinton paying fusion, who had former intel contractors, to spy on the trump campaign using the fisa search query database. This was sniffed out by the nsa and contractor access was temporarily shut down. The next day, the wife of the owner of fusion gps met with Obama at the whitehouse, and a new spy operation using a “legal” avenue was hatched- using the fisa courts. But they needed to pretend someone in trumps orbit was a foreign spy. They picked page, an intel asset, weaved a fake narrative into some of the documents they had from their prior spying operation (hence why they says cohen traveled to Prague… they looked up the wrong cohen from nyc’s travel records…) and then put steeles name on it for credibility.

Steele had to claim sources, so they attributed most of it to danchenko. They claimed some came from milian because a message allegedly dounded like his voice (it was later found to be a clinton friend). they knew it wouldnt pass vetting, so they had it delivered to the top of the fbi, who were complicit.

danchrnko told the fbi it was all nonsense, bit thry kept presenting it to the courts as fact. steele knew it was fake, but he was paid to get the narrative out before the election, hence why he started leaking to the media and breaking his CI agreement.

At the same time, Clinton was paying Perkins coie to manufacture a fake link between trump tower and Alfa bank.

A whole bunch of Clinton people being paid to give fake info to the fbi, who willingly ran with it even when they knew it was fake to take out trump.

And nobody was ever punished besides 1 lawyer, who altered emails to lie to the diss court, who got probation and is still practicing law in dc.

I bet they will be arresting Christopher Steele any day now. I’m sure of it.

The fbi offered him money to prove the claims in the dossier, but it seems he didn't assert that he had proof and didn't give his sources up.

He's also British and the fbi interviewed him in Rome. Not sure an arrest was ever in the cards for him but the fbi themselves didn't appear to vet the information well. They did know at least some of the information would be false like Cohen and the Prague thing.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/09/u...e-dossier.html
Mr. Steele, for instance, told the agents at the Rome meeting that his reports were raw intelligence, not vetted information, and that a person passing some of the most important information to him was a “boaster” and “egotist” who might well “engage in some embellishment.”

So the farcical House Impeachment Inquiry is ending now that their star witness turned out to be a liar right?

We know the sources within the dossier. The main subsource is danchenko, a democrat working for a democrat think tank in DC. When Danchenko was interviewed, he said the info attributed to him was exaggerated and was bar talk at best. He couldn't prove any of it. The FBi then told the FISA court that the subsource was "truthful and honest," but failed to mention he was truthful in telling them that the info was all bogus. They continued to present that info, under threat of perjury, as verified fact. They renewed multiple spy warrants after they knew it was fake.

They also attributed info to Sergey Millian because a recording "sounded like his voice." Who was it actually? A clinton buddy.

They also used circular reporting in the media-- ie. the fbi would leak a story, the story would be published, the fbi would then use that article as an additional layer of proof/another source making the same claims. But the original claims were all from the same source-- clinton's camp.

Clinton also paid her law firm Perkin's Coie to work with Georgia tech folk to give the illusion of a link between alfa bank and trump tower. The person at Gerogia Tech was being promised a high level position in her admin. Her lawyer walked this info straight to the top of the FBI.

There was never any vetting. Steele didn't actually even know what was in his report. When he tried to discuss it with the state department ahead of the election, he got info wrong (ie there wasn't a russian consolate in miami, etc.). He was always just the avatar attached to the document to give it creidbility (the FBI had worked with him as a source in the past). Fusion GPS couldn't just walk it over to the FBI, they needed a pipeline to give some level of plausible deniability. They also couldn't walk it to a field office because it would be dismantled within a day as it was easily verifiably false. So Fusion GPS hired Nellie ohr, who handed it to her husband (bruce ohr was a top player in the DOJ) who handed it to Strzok.

Sure, Durham brought a few lying charges against those not politically linked, but they fell flat because the charges were too unbelievable. You mean to tell me that the FBI was really duped by some bogus claims and it took them years to figure it out? Nonsense. The FBI, DOJ and intel were in on it from the start. If there was a single conspiracy charge that included the entire story-- from manufacturing of the claims, to the handoff to intel, to the lack of vetting, to the spying, etc. then it would be impossible to explain away. But that would bring down a LOT of political and intel folk, and the goal was always to preserve their reputation.

And so the pretending continues to this day.

As i mentioned before, the impeachment inquiry is based on a known fact pattern. Biden's family received huge money from foreign govts. They provided nothing useful other than access to biden and his office. Biden specifcally changed US policy to make money overseas (he fired the prosecutor investigating the company his son was working for, and got paid handsomely for it). They hid the money through many shell corporations, they never paid taxes on it, etc.

Over time, whistelblowers came out saying they were stonewalling the cases. Even though they knew about the payments and lack of taxes, they let the statute of limitations run out on the Ukraine stuff to avoid any scrutiny of Biden and his involvement.

We also learned that the FBI had a CI specifically tell them about this as it unfolded... and they did nothing. They hid a non-confidential document to avoid any scrutiny. It only further enhances the cover up narrative.

Even if that CI was given false information, it changes nothing of the above. If the FBI actually investigated the claims years ago, and knew the CI was lying, then he would have been cut off or arrested them. If they never investigated the claims, then there was a cover up from the start. There is no world in which they only just now investigated the claims and found them to be false, warranting an arrest... other than a way to undercut the narrative and protect Biden.

No offense dude because you're being civil and clearly putting effort into your posts but.. you get your info from conservative treehouse. You were 100% dead wrong with the Durham investigation and you're wrong here. I'll just leave it at that.

I get my info from multiple sources, so including source documents, IG reports, etc. and if you could prove any of it wrong, you would. But you can’t, because it is all accurate. You knock one source as if that is a bad thing. CTH isn’t 100% accurate, but has a much better track record than any msm site and includes citations/proof.

I wasn’t wrong in Durham. I gave him the benefit of the doubt but said if there were no charges by the last election, then the fix was in and no politically tied people would ever face scrutiny. And I was right.

Comments like yours show how disconnected you are from reality and from what people like me actually think.

This what happens when you have a political party based on hoaxes, conspiracy theories, and lies.

Has Biden been impeached yet?

LMFAO

everyone in the orbit think they are going to be safe since the big man skates ... lol jakes on them

"Indicted ex-fbi informant told investigators he got Hunter Biden dirt from Russian Intel officers"

So the right wing conspiracy from folks like Hannity etc that "Biden crime family" taking bribes...and voiced enthusiastically by right wing law makers...

...comes from Putin.

Great.

Actually we are still waiting for proof that Tara Reade is a right wing hag.
Or are just just a little Biden cultis?

Reade defected to Russia last May.

Do you think she’s a right wing hag. I find it funny you cultists like Sillie will continue to call Kavanaugh a rapist yet immediately call Reade a right wing hag for accusing Biden. Seems like cultist behavior to me,

I don't think I'm in a position to understand her.

Because....

"A former staffer who accused Joe Biden of sexual assault has defected to Moscow, telling state media that she felt “safe” in Russia and would seek citizenship there.

Tara Reade, who drew headlines during the 2020 presidential race by accusing then-candidate Biden of sexually harassing and assaulting her, said she decided to go to Russia after receiving threats in the US."

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/31/polit...ntl/index.htmlCliffs: Rabid, batshiit insane libs threatened her life because she accused Biden of sexual assault 30yrs ago.

Time for your meds GOO.

In other words;
Woman accuses Kavanaugh of rape with zero evidence and no police report-OMG Kavanaugh is a rapist!!!
Woman accuses Biden of sexual assault with a police report-Oh well,she’s just an alt right hag

They are good little cultists defending Captain Mush Mouth

And also...

Woman accuses Kavanaugh with zero evidence and no police report-OMG Kavanaugh is a rapist and we have to kill him and his whole family!!!
Woman accuses Biden of sexual assault with a police report-Oh well,she’s just an alt right hag and we have to kill her!!!

Only in cultist world could some alt right hag throw out flimsy, completely unsubstantiated allegations against a POTUS candidate, then disappear for a few years and then move to Russia.

This is the level of cope that cultist swallow.

Meanwhile all the women that Trump raped and sexually assaulted have either been paid off or at least remained in the country and still maintain their claims that Trump assaulted them.

btw cultist, how's your star witness for Biden's corruption doing? Oh that's right he's locked up.

LMFAO at cultist.