Dude lol, youre like a triggered femmeboy that doesnt realize how hypocritical it is to cry about me out of the blue and then be triggered when I respond. Do you also complain about the jew threads? No? oh ok.

Running missions for the jidf, lol, you geek. Are you still Trump crew even though he backs jews? Simple yes or no if you are able to answer.

Dude lol, youre like a triggered femmeboy that doesnt realize how hypocritical it is to cry about me out of the blue and then be triggered when I respond. Do you also complain about the jew threads? No? oh ok.

Running missions for the jidf, lol, you geek. Are you still Trump crew even though he backs jews? Simple yes or no if you are able to answer.

How am I triggered if I'm laughing at you defending the joo every opportunity?

Of course I'm still Trump Crew - he doesn't appear in every thread on here to defend them

newsflash shlomo, all of our leaders have to back israel. kinda odd right? imagine if all of our leaders had to fly to china and kiss the great wall.

trump knows the score probably better than any of us do. washington is a sick place. atleast he isn't completely down with the kosher ****.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/donald...es-a-timeline/

Did you hear about Trump backing the jews in Israel?

"President Donald J Trump Crew"

lmao, dumbass jew lover.

You should really start actually reading what I am posting if youre going to start bringing me up out of the blue. Not only do you look like a triggered lil lady but you also are making it clear youre oblivious to the topic and its all just very personal for you.

Trump is doing way more for the jews than I am. So for you to sit around your basement/doritos/greasy shirt and say youre still Trump crew makes no sense. I bet you dont even understand what I'm saying due to the anger you are feeling right now lol

As R&P miscers know, I’ve criticized Israel’s government and their actions extensively. My criticisms do not extend to every member of Jewish faith. It’s purely a criticism of the current administration of the government of a nation. And I personally know Jews who express the same criticisms.

Miscers who criticize Jews as a whole-do you know any? Have you interacted with them regularly? I ask because I’m pretty close to a few, and some helped my father become successful in his business ventures, asking for nothing in return. My anecdotal experiences are largely positive with Jewish people.

It’s a subsection where half of the threads on main misc belong

That's the whole point. I don't have to read what you say - laughing my ass off as soon as a jew thread pops up and seeing you in it protecting them is all that matters. No triggering, just laughs.

Of course Trump is doing more - but he's not a JIDF stooge running around the Misc like Nutsy defending them, joo boy

Your fellow whites are cannibalizing themselves. That's a white problem.

If you read my posts you'd know I dont care much for Israel or what happens over there.

Youre not very good at noticing. And good on you for admitting its personal, most cant even do that.

“But sir, it’s an American ship — I can see the flag!’ To which the ground control responded, ‘Never mind; hit it!'” - Radio transmission from Israeli pilot during attack on USS Liberty, Chicago Tribune https://www.chicagotribune.com/2007/...ican-spy-ship/

US Naval Institute

https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval...-left-out-cold

The Spy Ship Left Out in the Cold


By James M. Scott

The 8th of June this year will mark the 50th anniversary of the attack on the USS Liberty (AGTR-5), a spy ship the Israelis repeatedly strafed, napalmed, and torpeaded during a ferocious hour-long assault that The Washington Post later described as “one of the most bloody and bizarre peacetime encounters in U.S. naval history.”1

In the five decades since that tragic afternoon on which 34 Americans were killed and another 171 wounded, the Liberty has become an albatross.

The long-standing pleas of surviving crew members—convinced Israel intentionally targeted the ship—for a congressional investigation have fallen on deaf ears. Lawmakers never have—nor likely ever will—pick up a cause that even a half-century later remains so politically fraught that midshipmen at the U.S. Naval Academy were barred from even asking questions about it during a 2012 visit by the Israeli ambassador.2

But the story of the unprovoked attack on a U.S. ship in international waters still ignites passions, not only among the survivors, whose numbers are dwindling, but also among authors, filmmakers, and the legions of online sleuths whose zealousness has prompted Wikipedia to lock down the editing page on the assault.

All this comes at a time when declassified documents in the United States and Israel, coupled with interviews of those involved, help illustrate what a sordid affair the Liberty was for both nations. Records show, for example, that U.S. leaders, anxious to protect Israel from the public-relations fallout, went so far as to contemplate sinking the ship at sea to prevent reporters from photographing the damage. Israeli diplomats meanwhile manipulated the media to downplay or kill stories about the attack and even silenced an angry President Lyndon Johnson by threatening to publicly accuse him of “blood libel” or anti-Semitism.


Senior naval officers, following the lead of U.S. politicians, refused to thoroughly investigate the attack. “The Navy was ordered to hush this up, say nothing, allow the sailors to say nothing,” said Rear Admiral Thomas Brooks, a former Director of Naval Intelligence. “The Navy rolled over and played dead.”3

None of this was known by the public at the time, a fact some senior leaders later regretted, recognizing that the lack of accountability served as the catalyst for the controversy that still haunts the Liberty decades after metal cutters reduced her to scrap in a Baltimore shipyard. “We failed to let it all come out publicly at the time,” recalled Lucius Battle, who served as the Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern and South Asian Affairs. “We ignored it for all practical purposes, and we shouldn’t have.”4

From Calm to Inferno

The Liberty was part of a secret program run by the U.S. Navy and the National Security Agency (NSA) in which the United States dispatched cargo ships outfitted as mobile listening platforms to eavesdrop on the world’s hot spots—places such as Cuba, North Korea, and the Middle East. Though the Liberty officially was classified as a technical research ship, her 45 towering antennas used to soak up communications of foreign nations made it obvious to any trained observer that she was a spy ship.

The vessel was armed with only four .50-caliber machine guns to repel boarders; her principal defense rested on the idea that no nation would dare attack a U.S.-flagged vessel in international waters.


At 0515 on 8 June—soon after the Liberty arrived off the coast of the Sinai Peninsula—the first Israeli reconnaissance plane circled the ship several times. That initial recon flight on the morning of the war’s fourth day began a steady pattern of observation that continued for hours. A State Department report later determined that recon planes buzzed the Liberty as many as eight times over a nine-hour period. Some planes flew so low that crewmen on deck could see the pilots. Sailors took confidence in the fact that the Liberty steamed in international waters and was clearly marked with freshly painted hull numbers on her bow and her name stenciled across the stern. Visibility was excellent. The U.S. flag fluttered from the mast.

But that calm was shattered at 1358 when Israeli fighters suddenly strafed the Liberty from bow to stern with rockets and cannon fire. Fighters crisscrossed the spy ship nearly every minute, targeting the machine-gun tubs, antennas, and the bridge. The aircraft also blasted the sides of the ship in an effort disable the engine room. Liberty radiomen, desperate to alert the 6th Fleet approximately 500 miles west near Crete, found their communications jammed. A second wave of fighter-bombers dropped napalm, turning the Liberty’s decks into a 3,000-degree inferno.

Three torpeado boats attacked at 1431, strafing the ship with cannon fire and .50-caliber machine guns firing armor-piercing rounds. In a cruel twist of fate, investigators later determined that some of the munitions were U.S.-made. At 1435, a torpeado hit the starboard side of the ship, killing more than two dozen men. The Liberty rolled nine degrees as water flooded her lower compartments. Generators shut down, power went out, and the steering failed as the ship became dead in the water. The torpeado boats then continued to strafe the ship. Armor-piercing bullets zinged through bulkheads, shattered coffee mugs, and lodged in navigation books. Others shredded several life rafts Liberty sailors had dropped in the water.

The brutal assault left 34 men dead and 171 wounded—two out of every three men on board were either killed or injured. In addition to the torpeado hole, which measured 24 feet tall by 39 feet wide, naval investigators later counted 821 shell holes, a figure that did not include machine-gun rounds and shrapnel holes, which were deemed simply “innumerable.” The 67-minute attack would prove to be the bloodiest assault on a U.S. ship since World War II, one best described by Patrick O’Malley, a Liberty ensign at the time. “There wasn’t any place that was safe,” he recalled. “If it was your day to get hit, you were going to get hit.”5


Accident? ‘Inconceivable’


Back in Washington, President Johnson and his advisers gathered in the Situation Room the morning of the attack. While relieved neither Egypt nor the Soviets were responsible, Johnson and his team realized that an attack by Israel—an ally with a loyal domestic following—raised a host of other complicated political issues for the administration. At the time, the United States was bogged down by the Vietnam War, where 26 men died each day in 1967. In May, that number spiked to 38 men a day. Johnson’s approval numbers simultaneously were plummeting from 61 percent in March 1966 to just 39 percent in August 1967. It all came down to Vietnam.


The Liberty—riddled with cannon blasts, her decks soaked in blood, her starboard side ripped open by a torpeado—evolved in a matter of hours from a top-secret intelligence asset to a domestic political liability. That was evident by one proposal. “Consideration was being given by some unnamed Washington authorities to sink the Liberty in order that newspaper men would be unable to photograph her and thus inflame public opinion against the Israelis,” NSA Deputy Director Louis Tordella wrote in memo for the record. “I made an impolite comment about that idea.”

The day after the attack, Johnson met with his Special Committee of the National Security Council. The Liberty discussion was heated, minutes show, as Johnson’s advisers spurned Israel’s claim that the attack was simply a tragic accident. Clark Clifford, head of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and one of Johnson’s most pro-Israel advisers, demanded the attackers be punished. “Inconceivable that it was an accident,”

Clifford’s strong comments—echoed by others in the meeting, including the President—reflected just how upset many in Washington were over the attack, a hostility that was never shared with the American public.


To senior officials, the idea that the attack on the Liberty was friendly fire defied logic. Friendly fire accidents often happen at night or in bad weather. Furthermore, such accidents tend to be over in a matter of seconds, maybe minutes.

In contrast, the attack on the Liberty occurred on a clear, sunny afternoon in international waters. No other ships were in the area. The attack involved two branches of Israel’s vaunted military and raged for approximately an hour.



But it wasn’t just politicians who disputed Israel’s explanation. Senior intelligence leaders also were convinced the attack was no accident. “It couldn’t be anything else but deliberate,” concluded NSA Director Marshall Carter. “I don’t think there can be any doubt that the Israelis knew exactly what they were doing,” recalled CIA Director Richard Helms. “We were all quite convinced the Israelis knew what they were doing,” added Thomas Hughes, director of the State Department’s intelligence bureau.10

Many senior Navy officers agreed. Vice Admiral Jerome King, senior aide to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Admiral David McDonald, challenged the claim of friendly fire. “It certainly was not mistaken identity,” he later said. “I don’t buy it. I never did. Nobody that I knew ever did either. It wasn’t as though it was at night or a rainy day or anything like that. There wasn’t any excuse for not knowing what that ship was. You could divine from just the apparatus on deck—all the antennae and so on—what its mission was.”11


‘Wonderful. She’s Burning!’

So how did Israeli pilots fail to identify the Liberty? How, over multiple strafing runs and often at low altitudes, had no pilot noticed the spy ship’s unique markings, particularly considering Egyptian ships are marked in Arabic script, not Western letters?

Transcripts of Israeli communications, which have become available in recent years, show that the case is not as simple as the Israeli government wanted the United States to believe in 1967. Two minutes before the strafing began, an Israeli weapons system officer in general headquarters blurted out: “What is it? Americans?”12

Despite the doubts raised about the ship’s identity, Israel’s chief air controller, Shmuel Kislev, neither halted the impending assault nor ordered pilots to inspect the ship for identifying markings or a flag as their fighters zeroed in on the Liberty.

“Great! Wonderful. She’s burning! She’s burning!” transcripts show one of the pilots exclaimed during the attack.


“Authorized to sink her?” one of the air controllers asked.

“You can sink her,” replied Kislev.

A pilot joked at one point during the strafing runs that hitting the defenseless ship was easier than shooting down MiGs. Another quipped that it would be a “mitzva”—a kind deed or blessing—to sink the Liberty before Israeli ships arrived.

“Is he screwing her?” Kislev asked at one point.

“He’s going down on her with napalm all the time,” replied another controller.

As R&P miscers know, I’ve criticized Israel’s government and their actions extensively. My criticisms do not extend to every member of Jewish faith. It’s purely a criticism of the current administration of the government of a nation. And I personally know Jews who express the same criticisms.

Miscers who criticize Jews as a whole-do you know any? Have you interacted with them regularly? I ask because I’m pretty close to a few, and some helped my father become successful in his business ventures, asking for nothing in return. My anecdotal experiences are largely positive with Jewish people.

I haven't read the thread but OP name any problem in society and I'll show you how the seed was planted and nurtured by Jews.

The actions of a few do not disbar the actions of an entire group

We all know blacks are low IQ animals, even the "good" ones will chimp out randomly




Stop making excuses, Jews are banned from 109 nations for a reason

human trafficking

Epstein, Transatlantic Slave Trade, etc etc

I actually believe that you think jews are the reason slavery/ht was created. Nobody else was involved.

All those African tribes catching each other, the English, the Romans, Americans, etc.. it was the jews that made them.

I'll ignore your Epstein comment and pretend youre trolling to give you the benefit of the doubt. Srs.

I would not bother brah, confirmation bias is really strong, especially on low IQ people. If you're looking for X pattern you can find it anywhere. I could make the same argument they make for jews, for english people instead, and it'd make as much or even more sense.

It's like the cheese pizza thing, present something in a way that sounds plausible and interesting and every moron in the world will latch onto it like a miscer onto third world ****hole strongman cawk (putin currently a miscer favorite)

obesity, homelessness, human trafficking

This is what makes Americans > world, IMO. We live in a justice system thats supposed to be based on innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It's almost like these people believe jews are human gods that are the only people possibly smart enough to think of a scam or anything nefarious. Even more ridiculous is turning around and calling them betas after expressing how they are able to manipulate everything and anything. It's the same exact mindset of a TDS sufferer.