If corporate media is writing hit pieces about somebody and then you go to their Wikipedia and see they promote “conspiracy theories” and “Pseudoscience” you should know exactly what is happening.

because every man wants to have the experiences that come from a hard background but nobody actually wants to life that life, that's why.

The reason why is simply, it's that a hard background connotes that the person has infused a large amount of masculinity into their whole personality.

Peronally I would expect an overall correlation in people that are mirin' antisocial qualities in others and are seriously dik ridin' Trump tbh so imo your point is moot. I think Trump is funny as fark and I kinda like him from an entertainment perspective, but I dont take him seriously. I dont take ANY politicians seriously and find it fascinating that so many people do.

Dude is a 48 year old nerd that found fame, success and muscle and managed to game 5 women at the same time.


If that aint evidence for all of his protocol/theory as being effective, I don't know what else is. My respect for dude has gone up 10X.

Tbh if he can juggle 5 women and do what he does, good for him…obviously he couldn't keep up and got caught

The fact he fukd around with his boys too and treated them like chit is another issue, which is behavioral issues

If you never put these guys on a pedestal in the first place then this kind of stuff really doesn't matter. A guy with money playing women and being a douchebag? That pretty much described every guy with money. If he says something that is interesting and helpful to people on his podcast, great. If not, cool too.

Exactly. Nothing wrong with maintaining a harem. Be straight up with them? That's ideal. Telling them all you're exclusive, constantly lying etc? Seems like a whole lot of hassle and for what gain? I mean can you imagine going out to dinner and being scared someone might snap a pic with you? Bad enough as a normie let alone a famous guy.

Granted the article is obviously one sided but it speaks to a broad and long standing pattern of manipulation, exaggerration and deception of both men and women. None of us is perfect and I damn sure wouldn't want my every move and past scrutinized, but the problem is Huberman has held himself out as an objective evidence-based scientist seeking the truth. An apparent lack of integrity would seem to cast doubt or at least raise questions about his work and claims.

If you're wealthy and have some level of fame you can tell women that you're seeing other people and a lot of them are actually cool with it, or at least accept it. Being deceptive always backfires in the end. Even in my own life, as long as I'm straight with women they're pretty cool and they don't look to fuk you over later. It's nice being able to run into exes and have no animosity but that only happens if you're not a piece of chit.

If in fact , was being deceptive , pretty stupid thing for a smart guy.

Why is his personal life discussed at all?

You still manage to bring Trump into this. People like you are so pathetic.

Media hit jobs always make me assume the dude must really be based.