Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Solve this logic puzzle
  1. Results 61 to 80 of 80
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
post 1643701933 07-27-2021, 10:19 AM
-
#61
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By Azrairc
ive got a better one

you have a women who always lies
a tranny
and a knight that can't lie

One says he has a penis
One says he enjoyed looking at her penis
One said transexual can't be a women

whos lying?
Not a precise problem lol, cant really give a "true" answer.

Here's a casual answer. Surely the woman (women?) wouldnt be the first two, as the individual is being referenced as "he". Thus the third person- "One said transexual cant be a women"- is the woman. Since in the given info the woman always lies, this at least must be a lie.

But again this is all an imprecise problem and ambiguous.


No one gonna answer any of the above? Thought misc was all about IQ and all that (smh at IQ in general!)
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644209793 08-03-2021, 05:36 PM
-
#62
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Bumping for answers to the above Planet Misc problems. With all the flat earth threads rampant on the misc, seems like some exercises in basic logic might not be a bad thing.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644210973 08-03-2021, 06:02 PM
-
#63
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By backinthegymbro
Green southerner? I'm retarded but felt like replying since no one else is. Most likely wrong answer though.
How did you arrive at this?

Correct btw, gjdm. I'd rep but on spread.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644211503 08-03-2021, 06:10 PM
-
#64
  1. ShakeBrah
  2. Rampaging
  1. ShakeBrah
  2. Rampaging
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Location: Commiefornia
  5. Age: 36
  6. Weight: 175 lbs
  7. Posts: 14,119
  8. Subscribers: 1
  9. Rep Power: 93671
Originally Posted By Azrairc
ive got a better one

you have a women who always lies
a tranny
and a knight that can't lie

One says he has a penis
One says he enjoyed looking at her penis
One said transexual can't be a women

whos lying?
the man that said 'her penis', like a phaggot
See SuperHercules' sig
post 1644215603 08-03-2021, 07:27 PM
-
#65
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By backinthegymbro
green northerner says the truth. so if he says he's north red and spoke the truth, then green north is disqualified.
A north red always lies. So a north red saying he's north red is impossible, he also is disqualified.
South red speaks the truth. So like with the green north, if the person really is a north red, the south red is disqualified.
Finally south green. A south green lies. if a south green says he's from north red, it's possible. Because it's a lie.

Not sure if this is how you're supposed to do it.
Great solution. So you eliminated the other 3 possibilities and were left with green southerner, which turns out to be compatible with saying that quote. So he must be a green southerner.

This general idea would make a great springboard to solving some of the rest of the problems. Problem 1 is solved!
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644299583 08-05-2021, 03:38 AM
-
#66
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
1. Green southerner
2. Chad -No. Timmy - Green Northerner
3. Are you a northerner?
4. Yes -> Williams. No -> Thomas
5. RN/GS since that’s a false logical statement?!
6. Brian -> GS. Karl -> RN if the second line is evaluated expression by expression and not by its final value
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644319313 08-05-2021, 10:15 AM
-
#67
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By brosapiens
1. Green southerner
2. Chad -No. Timmy - Green Northerner
3. Are you a northerner?
4. Yes -> Williams. No -> Thomas
5. RN/GS since that’s a false logical statement?!
6. Brian -> GS. Karl -> RN if the second line is evaluated expression by expression and not by its final value
I agree with #1, 2 and 3. Would rep but on spread.

#2 is great because both Chad and Timmy are essentially saying they are green northerners, but the answer is different between the two.

You'd have to explain what you did for #4. There should be one thief, and he is known.

In #5, it can only be a false logical statement when the status of the person speaking is given. If the person actually is red and a northerner, is it false? In other words, if it's the case X is true and Y is true, is the logical statement X->Y true or false?

In #6, as with all statements given on planet misc, it is the whole uttered statement that is true/false based on the status of the person giving it.

Problems #1-3 have now been solved, gjdm
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644319903 08-05-2021, 10:24 AM
-
#68
  1. TuskV
  2. Registered User
  1. TuskV
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 4,373
  6. Rep Power: 19256
mind exploded
Trump 2024

Adopt Don't Shop
post 1644321793 08-05-2021, 10:49 AM
-
#69
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
For question 4 we know the following:

John is telling the truth.
The thief is a liar.
William's status is irrelevant.

If Thomas is a liar then:
- if he is the thief -> answer is NO incorrectly incriminating Williams
- if he is not the thief -> answer is YES incorrectly incriminating himself.
If Thomas is not a liar then:
- he cannot be the thief -> answer is NO correctly incriminating Williams.

My first answer was wrong but based on this I don't see how the judge cancorrectlyevaluate who's the thief.
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644326123 08-05-2021, 11:42 AM
-
#70
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By brosapiens
For question 4 we know the following:

John is telling the truth.
The thief is a liar.
William's status is irrelevant.

If Thomas is a liar then:
- if he is the thief -> answer is NO incorrectly incriminating Williams
- if he is not the thief -> answer is YES incorrectly incriminating himself.
If Thomas is not a liar then:
- he cannot be the thief -> answer is NO correctly incriminating Williams.

My first answer was wrong but based on this I don't see how the judge cancorrectlyevaluate who's the thief.
Agreed that John must be telling the truth (and since he says the thief is a red northerner, that the thief must be liar).

I like the approach here in terms of listing the possibilities. I assure you, the question has an answer and it can be determined who the thief is!
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644326443 08-05-2021, 11:47 AM
-
#71
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
Originally Posted By numberguy12
Agreed that John must be telling the truth (and since he says the thief is a red northerner, that the thief must be liar).

I like the approach here in terms of listing the possibilities. I assure you, the question has an answer and it can be determined who the thief is!
OP is a turd burglar, therefore, OP is the thief.
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1644329143 08-05-2021, 12:25 PM
-
#72
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
to brosapiens, all we know is that Thomas said yes or no, we dont know which. Flip your possibilities around. What happens if Thomas says yes? What about no?
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644331713 08-05-2021, 12:59 PM
-
#73
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
Originally Posted By numberguy12
to brosapiens, all we know is that Thomas said yes or no, we dont know which. Flip your possibilities around. What happens if Thomas says yes? What about no?
If Thomas says yes then Williams is the thief.
If Thomas says no then he might be the thief ( otherwise it's Williams ) depending on whether he's a liar or not.
Same thing unless there are some constraints not included in the question.
Point being that both Williams and Thomas can be liars at the same time.
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644335153 08-05-2021, 01:49 PM
-
#74
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By brosapiens
If Thomas says yes then Williams is the thief.
If Thomas says no then he might be the thief ( otherwise it's Williams ) depending on whether he's a liar or not.
Same thing unless there are some constraints not included in the question.
Point being that both Williams and Thomas can be liars at the same time.
The question has an answer as posed, no extra constraints needed. Surprisingly, I also agree with your analysis of yes/no. Did Thomas answer yes or no?
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644335473 08-05-2021, 01:53 PM
-
#75
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
Originally Posted By numberguy12
The question has an answer as posed, no extra constraints needed. Surprisingly, I also agree with your analysis of yes/no. Did Thomas answer yes or no?
Impossible to tell. Send me a message with your solution.
unless the judge is a miscer too lol
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644338253 08-05-2021, 02:37 PM
-
#76
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
All right so for 6, Karl is RS and Brian is RN and hey are not brothers.
The trick here is that all brothers are the same color but all of the same color are not necessarily brothers I presume.

Edit: and for 5 I guess;
GN - he might say that. Not a false statement since he’s not red and that’s not a statement per se.
RN - he wouldn’t say that since that would be a true statement.
RS - he wouldn’t say that since that would be a false statement
GS - he might say that since that is a false statement.
So he is Green (the fact that in all other cases the ask for color and/or location is specific and here it is not might also be a tip?!) ?
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644557583 08-09-2021, 03:39 AM
-
#77
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  1. brosapiens
  2. darkness into Light
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 4,189
  5. Rep Power: 17927
****uette op MIA
Golden hands
Illuminated miscers: ScottTil
Agents of chaos, disorder and hate: Bodhy, Ironmanlet, ViolentZ, ItsWhatIDo, jeffl1980, BrosefMengele
post 1644570623 08-09-2021, 09:15 AM
-
#78
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By brosapiens
All right so for 6, Karl is RS and Brian is RN and hey are not brothers.
The trick here is that all brothers are the same color but all of the same color are not necessarily brothers I presume.

Edit: and for 5 I guess;
GN - he might say that. Not a false statement since he’s not red and that’s not a statement per se.
RN - he wouldn’t say that since that would be a true statement.
RS - he wouldn’t say that since that would be a false statement
GS - he might say that since that is a false statement.
So he is Green (the fact that in all other cases the ask for color and/or location is specific and here it is not might also be a tip?!) ?
#6 is correct. A lot of people get confused on that point you mentioned. Just because brothers are always same color doesnt mean two non-brothers cant be the same color.

So #1,2,3,6 have been solved ITT

This is not what I have for 5. To be fair, it does require information about what logical implication is- how its truth table is defined.

The following statement: "if a triangle has 4 sides, then a square has 7 sides" is, for example, true in logic.

The casual justification for this is as follows. Say John utters "if it rains today, then I will give you $100". Say it doesnt rain, and that he doesnt give you the $100. No one should come back at John and say he lied, he only specified what would happen if it does rain. The only time his statement would be false is if it did rain, but he didnt fork over the $100. The truth table of the logical implication X->Y is the same as that of not(X) or Y. So what would the answer to #5 be now?
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1644571153 08-09-2021, 09:23 AM
-
#79
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  3. Join Date: May 2020
  4. Posts: 17,953
  5. Rep Power: 44402
[QUOTE=numberguy12;1643675593]Ok, one last batch of questions. Anyone want to give them a shot? Not necessarily all of them, just any of them.

[b][size=15]Journey to Planet Misc[/size][/b]

Here are the rules. On planet misc, everyone is either a green or a red. Each person is also either from the northern hemisphere or the southern hemisphere. If from the northern hemisphere, a green always tells the truth, and a red always says a false statement [the way it should be right? green- truths, red- false nonsense]. But if they are from the southern hemisphere.....everything is reversed! Greens from the southern hemisphere always tell a falsehood, and reds from the southern hemisphere always tell a truth [something we are not used to here on earthly misc]. So there are 4 total types here: green northerner, green southerner, red northerner, and red southerner. So for example, if the person says 2+2=4, then they could be either a green northerner, or a red southerner, but you dont know which. If someone says a triangle has 4 sides, they are either a red northerner or green southerner, but you dont know which. You take a journey to this strange planet, and here's what happens.....


[b]Question 5[/b]

You meet an incel relaxing on the beach (by himself, of course). He says to you, "If I am a red, then I'm a northerner".

Can it be figured out what he is? If so, what is he?

/QUOTE]

Truth teller:
He cannot be red. Green northern is possible.
Liar:
He cannot be red. [Red south is not a liar. Red north makes him tell a true statement.] Green southern is NOT possible because the statement still counts as true.

GN
post 1644571823 08-09-2021, 09:32 AM
-
#80
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
[QUOTE=mesobuild;1644571153][QUOTE=numberguy12 post_id=1643675593]Ok, one last batch of questions. Anyone want to give them a shot? Not necessarily all of them, just any of them.

[b][size=15]Journey to Planet Misc[/size][/b]

Here are the rules. On planet misc, everyone is either a green or a red. Each person is also either from the northern hemisphere or the southern hemisphere. If from the northern hemisphere, a green always tells the truth, and a red always says a false statement [the way it should be right? green- truths, red- false nonsense]. But if they are from the southern hemisphere.....everything is reversed! Greens from the southern hemisphere always tell a falsehood, and reds from the southern hemisphere always tell a truth [something we are not used to here on earthly misc]. So there are 4 total types here: green northerner, green southerner, red northerner, and red southerner. So for example, if the person says 2+2=4, then they could be either a green northerner, or a red southerner, but you dont know which. If someone says a triangle has 4 sides, they are either a red northerner or green southerner, but you dont know which. You take a journey to this strange planet, and here's what happens.....


[b]Question 5[/b]

You meet an incel relaxing on the beach (by himself, of course). He says to you, "If I am a red, then I'm a northerner".

Can it be figured out what he is? If so, what is he?

/QUOTE]

Truth teller:
He cannot be red. Green northern is possible.
Liar:
He cannot be red. [Red south is not a liar. Red north makes him tell a true statement.] Green southern is NOT possible because the statement still counts as true.

GN[/QUOTE]This is correct. He must be GN. So now each but #4 has been solved ITT, nice input from all above.

Another way to go about 5 is to see that his statement is equivalent to "I am either green or a northerner". GS clearly couldnt say this, as he'd be telling a truth (he's green). RN couldnt say it, as it's a truth (he's a northerner). RS couldnt say it, since it's false. GN could say it since it's obviously true.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts