03-02-2024, 08:09 AM
#61
Originally Posted By Islandboyo⏩
bro you were 11b. You have a room temp IQ tops. And the sad part is 11b was your peak LOL.
LOL
@ the the thought of a non-white multi cultural army (America) being able to defeat and all-white European military… yeah the people who have conquered the entire world and created the greatest inventions are going to be beaten by a bunch of rednecks, blacks, and hispanics who don't even like each other.
like 40% or the American military is non-white by now, and a good chunk of them are not going to their deaths to fight for America. You're a delusional cuck if you think America can defeat Europe in war. Europeans are also much more smart, fit, healthier, and actually have a common culture/heritage to fight for unlike the Americuck.
The average height in Europe is 5'11
Average height in America is 5'9
LOL
@ the the thought of a non-white multi cultural army (America) being able to defeat and all-white European military… yeah the people who have conquered the entire world and created the greatest inventions are going to be beaten by a bunch of rednecks, blacks, and hispanics who don't even like each other.
like 40% or the American military is non-white by now, and a good chunk of them are not going to their deaths to fight for America. You're a delusional cuck if you think America can defeat Europe in war. Europeans are also much more smart, fit, healthier, and actually have a common culture/heritage to fight for unlike the Americuck.
The average height in Europe is 5'11
Average height in America is 5'9
LOL
That's the last second of time you ever get from me soy boy.
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,998
- Rep Power: 40,379
-
Quote
03-02-2024, 08:17 AM
#62
Originally Posted By EireGunner⏩
Says the drunken kunt
Why don't u fukk off you **** roblox kunt
- MinisterOfLust
- ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ
-
- MinisterOfLust
- ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 51,453
- Rep Power: 688,208
-
03-02-2024, 08:17 AM
#63
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
Lol at pretending a 13 year old girl wouldn't break your ph@ggot nose. The only fights you ever been in took place in your imagination while wanking under the shower. Fukk outta here pussy
lol'd hard.
whatever you say twink.
here's a great analogy…
europe = you
murica = me
I'd fold your dumbass within seconds LOL
enjoy your weekend twinky, go lift some weights you have the figure of a 13 year old girl.
whatever you say twink.
here's a great analogy…
europe = you
murica = me
I'd fold your dumbass within seconds LOL
enjoy your weekend twinky, go lift some weights you have the figure of a 13 year old girl.
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions
AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
-
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,247
- Rep Power: 17,847
-
03-02-2024, 08:18 AM
#64
Originally Posted By Islandboyo⏩
You're the biggest retard on the misc and that deserves a medal of honor
LOL
@ the the thought of a non-white multi cultural army (America) being able to defeat and all-white European military… yeah the people who have conquered the entire world and created the greatest inventions are going to be beaten by a bunch of rednecks, blacks, and hispanics who don't even like each other.
like 40% or the American military is non-white by now, and a good chunk of them are not going to their deaths to fight for America. You're a delusional cuck if you think America can defeat Europe in war. Europeans are also much more smart, fit, healthier, and actually have a common culture/heritage to fight for unlike the Americuck.
The average height in Europe is 5'11
Average height in America is 5'9
LOL
@ the the thought of a non-white multi cultural army (America) being able to defeat and all-white European military… yeah the people who have conquered the entire world and created the greatest inventions are going to be beaten by a bunch of rednecks, blacks, and hispanics who don't even like each other.
like 40% or the American military is non-white by now, and a good chunk of them are not going to their deaths to fight for America. You're a delusional cuck if you think America can defeat Europe in war. Europeans are also much more smart, fit, healthier, and actually have a common culture/heritage to fight for unlike the Americuck.
The average height in Europe is 5'11
Average height in America is 5'9
LOL
03-02-2024, 08:20 AM
#65
Originally Posted By EireGunner⏩
Low IQ detected.
eXcusr me
I'm hate europe and I'm not soy
Anyway, let's be cereal
Thr afghan a$$ whooping was an entirely US enterprise
Europe was there to say 'hey America, we like you'
I'm hate europe and I'm not soy
Anyway, let's be cereal
Thr afghan a$$ whooping was an entirely US enterprise
Europe was there to say 'hey America, we like you'
- MinisterOfLust
- ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ
-
- MinisterOfLust
- ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ฝ
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 51,453
- Rep Power: 688,208
-
03-02-2024, 08:22 AM
#66
Originally Posted By Vrykul⏩
is he wrong here tho? the muslim refugees that invaded already hate US. i'm sure they'd be more willing to fight than your illegals who have no problem with EU in recent years
You're the biggest retard on the misc and that deserves a medal of honor
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 08:34 AM
#67
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
You realize that the US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as well don't you? In some of the cases, for the ones inside of Europe, those bases could probably simultaneously launch their own missions in cooperation with incoming air support, making the job even easier.
people need to refuel too. the base argument is irrelavant as they'd be gone v soon
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
03-02-2024, 08:41 AM
#68
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
okay so went from us v eu to alliances. i'll my make own hypothetical too. who do you think majority of asia, ME & russia favour? you cant make up your own scenarios and go based on that. in reality both end in 0 with nukes as no one is letting china or russia takeover
You realize that the US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as well don't you? In some of the cases, for the ones inside of Europe, those bases could probably simultaneously launch their own missions in cooperation with incoming air support, making the job even easier.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 08:42 AM
#69
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
Your last argument is literally wunderwaffe chit. If the US supposedly keeps superweapons secret how tf do you and every other American miscer knows about them? And what makes you think that Germany, the UK and France don't have secret super duper weapons?
You realize that the US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as well don't you? In some of the cases, for the ones inside of Europe, those bases could probably simultaneously launch their own missions in cooperation with incoming air support, making the job even easier.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
I'm not being an anti-Yank dick mind you, obviously the US has the strongest military in the world and would destroy any country 1v1 in a conventional war. But a whole fkin continent full of superb economies? Cmon mang
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions
AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
-
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,247
- Rep Power: 17,847
-
03-02-2024, 08:53 AM
#70
Originally Posted By teodorkanev1⏩
Iraq and Afghanistan, the US controlled their territory for many years and defeated any army they had. Eventually they just gave up trying to police and rebuild the country because insurgents and corruption. Sure, maybe Europe could eventually kick the US out, but the initial battles, USA would win and take over the European countries.
You couldn't do chit in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan against homo habilis with AK 47s but you're going to destroy a whole continent with modern militaries and nuclear warheads? OK, Bubba.
Originally Posted By Vrykul⏩
The EU hasn't militarized enough though. Germany, France, and England, the major powers of western Europe, all admitted they don't have stockpiles of anything, and could not fight a war that extended beyond a few weeks before they are running out of supplies of everything. The situation is only worse for Spain and Italy and the others.
Currently yeah, if EU decides to militarize fully then no, EU is 1/6th the global economy, 100 million more manpower and has some of the most advanced military tech companies on the planet, if EU was as united as the US itd be all over
Any by itd be all over I mean it would be a stalemate, US cant invade EU and EU cant invade US
Any by itd be all over I mean it would be a stalemate, US cant invade EU and EU cant invade US
France, Germany, and UK have a combined 700 tanks, 1,300 military aircrafts, and 275 military ships.
US has 5,500 tanks, 13,300 military aircrafts, and 484 military ships.
the EU has let their militaries dwindle to extremely low numbers and in their current state wouldn't be able to fight a conventional war.
- Contribution05
- Registered User
-
- Contribution05
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Age: 36
- Posts: 4,677
- Rep Power: 31,626
-
03-02-2024, 08:59 AM
#71
The EU hasn't militarized enough though. Germany, France, and England, the major powers of western Europe, all admitted they don't have stockpiles of anything, and could not fight a war that extended beyond a few weeks before they are running out of supplies of everything. The situation is only worse for Spain and Italy and the others.
France, Germany, and UK have a combined 700 tanks, 1,300 military aircrafts, and 275 military ships.
US has 5,500 tanks, 13,300 military aircrafts, and 484 military ships.
the EU has let their militaries dwindle to extremely low numbers and in their current state wouldn't be able to fight a conventional war.
France, Germany, and UK have a combined 700 tanks, 1,300 military aircrafts, and 275 military ships.
US has 5,500 tanks, 13,300 military aircrafts, and 484 military ships.
the EU has let their militaries dwindle to extremely low numbers and in their current state wouldn't be able to fight a conventional war.
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 09:01 AM
#72
You cucks cant even take vietnam, lmfao stfu kid
- pandaboy89
- Registered User
-
- pandaboy89
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,603
- Rep Power: 3,402
-
03-02-2024, 09:01 AM
#73
- EireGunner
- Registered User
-
- EireGunner
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 2,389
- Rep Power: 72,702
-
03-02-2024, 09:02 AM
#74
And water is wet.
03-02-2024, 09:05 AM
#75
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
BLAH BLAH BLAH BASES
You realize that the US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as well don't you? In some of the cases, for the ones inside of Europe, those bases could probably simultaneously launch their own missions in cooperation with incoming air support, making the job even easier.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
BLAH BLHA BLAH ALLIANCES
BLAH B;AH BLAH NUC subs
mate, a buncha farmers growing heroin kicked your a$$ after ten years beacuse biden is all bout gender and trannies in the military
- EireGunner
- Registered User
-
- EireGunner
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 2,389
- Rep Power: 72,702
-
03-02-2024, 09:07 AM
#76
Both are getting rekt in ukraine so I wouldn't be on either doing much
You're a phะฐggot
- SuperHercules
- Six Foot Five Inches
-
- SuperHercules
- Six Foot Five Inches
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Posts: 15,257
- Rep Power: 420,428
-
03-02-2024, 09:10 AM
#77
Originally Posted By pandaboy89⏩
Even Canada beat the Americans in 1812 . Fkn Canada lmao
You cucks cant even take vietnam, lmfao stfu kid
Most recently some goat herders in Afghanistan gave them all that they could handle, and Russia is mopping the floor with them in ukraine
You're a phะฐggot
- SuperHercules
- Six Foot Five Inches
-
- SuperHercules
- Six Foot Five Inches
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Posts: 15,257
- Rep Power: 420,428
-
03-02-2024, 09:11 AM
#78
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
I said that would make it easier, but not necessary. And I was talking about European allies, not worldwide. A country keeps SOME anatomy, while allowing us full access to their water and airspace, that type of deal. Again, not needed as the US could bomb any shore or waterway defenses and land and setup temp bases and strips and quickly move inland at will.
okay so went from us v eu to alliances. i'll my make own hypothetical too. who do you think majority of asia, ME & russia favour? you cant make up your own scenarios and go based on that. in reality both end in 0 with nukes as no one is letting china or russia takeover
Originally Posted By teodorkanev1⏩
The misc knows about things like the subs because they are 20 year old tech, that is probably still more advanced than most of the world's tech. None of us know the current, top of the line abilities. Look at total military spending. Plus we started from a much more advanced place after WWII. Countries are hyping themselves up because they can now do things that the US did 50 years ago.
Your last argument is literally wunderwaffe chit. If the US supposedly keeps superweapons secret how tf do you and every other American miscer knows about them? And what makes you think that Germany, the UK and France don't have secret super duper weapons?
I'm not being an anti-Yank dick mind you, obviously the US has the strongest military in the world and would destroy any country 1v1 in a conventional war. But a whole fkin continent full of superb economies? Cmon mang
I'm not being an anti-Yank dick mind you, obviously the US has the strongest military in the world and would destroy any country 1v1 in a conventional war. But a whole fkin continent full of superb economies? Cmon mang
03-02-2024, 09:14 AM
#79
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
High IQ response here from Constable Penis.
lol go fist yourself retard and make sure to never reproduce.
Originally Posted By AlfBundy⏩
Depends on how you define countries.
At what point in time were those countries beacons of prosperity?
Somewhere in the bowels of deepest hell, Satan is assessing the potential of this shyte as the permanent soundtrack to an eternity of being hosed down with Bernard Manning's diarrhea.
- Trillhouse
- Registered User
-
- Trillhouse
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2012
- Location: Turkey
- Posts: 5,124
- Rep Power: 5,164
-
03-02-2024, 09:23 AM
#80
Originally Posted By teodorkanev1⏩
I'd wear you out and dispose of you like a used condom. And with any luck, your father is around so I can slap him for failing miserably.
Lol at pretending a 13 year old girl wouldn't break your ph@ggot nose. The only fights you ever been in took place in your imagination while wanking under the shower. Fukk outta here pussy
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
Nobody knew about the F117-A until the Gulf War. Skunk Works (top secret Lockheed program), unleashed it and it almost single handedly ended the Gulf War. Same program that developed the U-2 spy plane that MOGGED the Soviets the entirety of the Cold War. We literally flew over the Soviet Union and there was nothing they could do about it. And to the end, they had years and years and never found a counter for flying at that altitude. We humiliated them and that's not an argument.
You realize that the US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as well don't you? In some of the cases, for the ones inside of Europe, those bases could probably simultaneously launch their own missions in cooperation with incoming air support, making the job even easier.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
Why do you think that NATO still exists, because most of these NATO countries barely have active militaries. The US would be taking over European countries as fast as they destroyed the initial Iraqi army, literal hours and days. I stipulated the fact that these victories would require not caring about civilian casualties or rebuilding after the fact, but pure military victory.
If the US wanted to make it even easier, they would have a few strategic alliances with countries that wanted to keep some of their own autonomy, in exchange for helping our effort.
What people always forget is that every other country in the world hypes up and over exaggerates their military prowess, while the US downplays theirs. Countries like China and Russia show off their latest tech the second it is built, even if it's not fully operational yet, to try to show how strong we are. The US government hides everything as long as possible and is probably decades further advance than people realize.
Those program still exist. Skunk Works is a 10/10 read. Unfortunately, big business bureaucracy has partially hindered what made a program like that so great. Same program that engineered the SR-71 blackbird in the SIXTIES!
There is absolutely sh*t we have no clue about. But even removing the unknown variable… it's still an easy win for Merica. Poor eurotrash filth mad. We've humiliated them in every conflict dating back to the revolution.
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,998
- Rep Power: 40,379
-
03-02-2024, 09:24 AM
#81
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
"US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as" those are allies.
I said that would make it easier, but not necessary. And I was talking about European allies, not worldwide. A country keeps SOME anatomy, while allowing us full access to their water and airspace, that type of deal. Again, not needed as the US could bomb any shore or waterway defenses and land and setup temp bases and strips and quickly move inland at will.
eu are not letting you keep your military bases which youve to somehow supply was my point so they're a standing duck unless you think Us bases are superior to the whole continent. right now the supply is more than likely done by the country they're based in (talking about human supplies not millitary) . they'd be dealt with in a min. it's easier to throw people at them from a few hundred miles than it would be for US to resupply and wage war that way
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 09:27 AM
#82
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
You're an idiot. Just stop replying. The international bases are irrelevant. We have 11 aircraft carriers that will park on the coasts and there would be absolutely NOTHING Europe could do about it. Again, air and water superiority reign supreme in conventional conflict.
"US has not only bases within Europe but surrounding it as" those are allies.
eu are not letting you keep your military bases which youve to somehow supply was my point so they're a standing duck unless you think Us bases are superior to the whole continent. right now the supply is more than likely done by the country they're based in (talking about human supplies not millitary) . they'd be dealt with in a min. it's easier to throw people at them from a few hundred miles than it would be for US to resupply and wage war that way
eu are not letting you keep your military bases which youve to somehow supply was my point so they're a standing duck unless you think Us bases are superior to the whole continent. right now the supply is more than likely done by the country they're based in (talking about human supplies not millitary) . they'd be dealt with in a min. it's easier to throw people at them from a few hundred miles than it would be for US to resupply and wage war that way
Still waiting on Europoors to outline a path to victory.
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,998
- Rep Power: 40,379
-
03-02-2024, 09:27 AM
#83
right now youve got people like ministerofchildlust, phil9, NYpat, supposed to defend ya….all obvious **** lib peeeedos……america is fukked lmao
- EireGunner
- Registered User
-
- EireGunner
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 2,389
- Rep Power: 72,702
-
03-02-2024, 09:30 AM
#84
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
why bring them up then? make a dumb point then call someone dumb for replying to it. bring up alliences than claim they're irrelavant. love the logic. discussions work in read, comprahend, form an opinion & respond. clear youre not a fan of 3/4
You're an idiot. Just stop replying. The international bases are irrelevant. We have 11 aircraft carriers that will park on the coasts and there would be absolutely NOTHING Europe could do about it. Again, air and water superiority reign supreme in conventional conflict.
Still waiting on Europoors to outline a path to victory.
Still waiting on Europoors to outline a path to victory.
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 09:40 AM
#85
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
you can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
why bring them up then? make a dumb point then call someone dumb for replying to it. bring up alliences than claim they're irrelavant. love the logic. discussions work in read, comprahend, form an opinion & respond. clear youre not a fan of 3/4
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,998
- Rep Power: 40,379
-
03-02-2024, 09:40 AM
#86
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
The US has those bases, so why pretend they don't currently exist? Trying to take away some of the US's pieces before it even starts? That's admitting that Europe needs a handicap. We are saying that even without them, the US destroys Europe. With them, its even easier. Half of those current bases inside the EU probably would stay in US hands because of superior air and sea power to defend them. Again, not necessary but obviously helpful. You realize that most of them are in strategic spots, that the US probably already secretly defends, right?
why bring them up then? make a dumb point then call someone dumb for replying to it. bring up alliences than claim they're irrelavant. love the logic. discussions work in read, comprahend, form an opinion & respond. clear youre not a fan of 3/4
03-02-2024, 09:43 AM
#87
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
My dad at 65 would fold you like a lawn chair with his weak hand.
I'd wear you out and dispose of you like a used condom. And with any luck, your father is around so I can slap him for failing miserably.
Those program still exist. Skunk Works is a 10/10 read.
Those program still exist. Skunk Works is a 10/10 read.
Skunk Works is indeed a 10/10 read, but you're still a pussy.
And lol at calling Europeans soyboys when this cancerous culture was imported from the States where it was born and raised.
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions
AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
-
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Age: 30
- Posts: 1,247
- Rep Power: 17,847
-
03-02-2024, 09:43 AM
#88
Originally Posted By DeputyDong5⏩
i can hence why your point was irrelavant as i was speaking to someone else lay off the drink
you can't even keep track of who you are replying to.
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 09:45 AM
#89
Originally Posted By TomPaine⏩
so it's not eu vs usa. it's usa with their tactical militery advantage as that's what their politicians are paid for the most to bring to the country. eu has more threats if you dont think there would be more agreements to let eu have those bribary militery contracts with russia in their background then you're just wrong. eu and us are allies so the tactical advantages atm are silly to even bring up as that's not what would happen in a real war
The US has those bases, so why pretend they don't currently exist? Trying to take away some of the US's pieces before it even starts? That's admitting that Europe needs a handicap. We are saying that even without them, the US destroys Europe. With them, its even easier. Half of those current bases inside the EU probably would stay in US hands because of superior air and sea power to defend them. Again, not necessary but obviously helpful. You realize that most of them are in strategic spots, that the US probably already secretly defends, right?
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 1,434
- Rep Power: 12,578
-
03-02-2024, 09:46 AM
#90
Originally Posted By ithappenss⏩
We have bases all over Germany and England. You can't just pretend they don't exist. And they will be no cake walk to take. Lots of US special operations abroad… entire fighter and bombers wings etc.
so it's not eu vs usa. it's usa with their tactical militery advantage as that's what their politicians are paid for the most
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
-
- DeputyDong5
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,998
- Rep Power: 40,379
-
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts