Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» First Do No Harm(except when it comes to transgendered people)
03-26-2024, 04:06 AM
#61
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You said you will wait for actual doctors to weigh in instead of "journalists with an agenda", then proceeded to link a "fact check" article from a "Transgender Journalist reporting on LGBTQ+ legislation, news, and life every day."
At least your username to post content correlation is on point.
At least your username to post content correlation is on point.
Lmao…you should definitely read it though. It’s a great way to start your day with some laughs.
+positiv crew+
-we all gona make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all thigs in modertion, even politica views crew
-support local fams crew
-try to do at last on good ded/day crew
-less cursing the dakness and more lighting candes crew
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
-
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 25,592
- Rep Power: 440,157
-
Quote
03-26-2024, 04:07 AM
#62
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Yeah there seemed to be more substantial stuff further down like studies contradicting some things. The author of the article is biased and lay so it isn't worth much, but the studies are legit. Like I said, I'd rather see what the medical community as a whole says.
Lold at “right-wing activist” and “anti-trans” labels getting immediately thrown around. I’ll look over it, but the bias is already BLATANTLY apparent within the first few lines.
Also…lold at this being the first deboonking they list
Omg, they said many of the people who signed it are healthcare professionals, but we found a significant chunk are not healthcare professionals at all!!. BUSTED!!
I’ll continue reading, but that is a perfect example of the hilariously biased “fact-checking” that is so prominent these days. Hopefully the rest is just as funny. Thanks for sharing!
Also…lold at this being the first deboonking they list
Omg, they said many of the people who signed it are healthcare professionals, but we found a significant chunk are not healthcare professionals at all!!. BUSTED!!
I’ll continue reading, but that is a perfect example of the hilariously biased “fact-checking” that is so prominent these days. Hopefully the rest is just as funny. Thanks for sharing!
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:11 AM
#63
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
So you countered a "journalist with an agenda", by linking a "fact check article" written by a "journalist with a clear agenda" in the opposite direction, and you are gaslighting people to "care about the truth".
I said I'd wait to form an opinion. I linked you all something you might be interested in if you care about truth since they claim to rebut what he linked. Don't take it personally.
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals srs.
03-26-2024, 04:12 AM
#64
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I didn't counter anything. I linked an opposing view I found for anyone who cares.
So you countered a "journalist with an agenda", by linking a "fact check article" written by a "journalist with a clear agenda" in the opposite direction, and are gaslighting people to "care about the truth".
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals srs.
Just LOL @ pseudointellectuals srs.
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:15 AM
#65
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
Elliot Page seems happy to you???
Nope. I've seen climate advocates also misunderstand the science too. It bothers me when people forget these are atmospheric physics questions. They aren't about feelings.
Regarding the trans chit, I realize some of those emails make things look bad, but to ultimately determine whether gender affirming care works, you need a lot more data. Most of the studies I have seen suggest it is working better, on average, than not. But I'm not a reproductive medicine doctor so I will defer to their rebuttal, if they make one.
Here is a lay rebuttal I found that at least links some studies contradicting some of the claims presented in your post.
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/f...dRedirect=true
Regarding the trans chit, I realize some of those emails make things look bad, but to ultimately determine whether gender affirming care works, you need a lot more data. Most of the studies I have seen suggest it is working better, on average, than not. But I'm not a reproductive medicine doctor so I will defer to their rebuttal, if they make one.
Here is a lay rebuttal I found that at least links some studies contradicting some of the claims presented in your post.
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/f...dRedirect=true
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
03-26-2024, 04:17 AM
#66
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
You linked an opposing view from a "journalist with an agenda", after you said you will wait for actual doctors to weigh in, on the previous page of this thread.
I didn't counter anything. I linked an opposing view I found for anyone who cares.
I guess as long as the journalist has the same agenda as you do, you don't need to wait for those actual doctors.
03-26-2024, 04:18 AM
#67
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I said I'd wait to form an opinion, not to link alternate views. My personal view is to go with whatever has the best scientific evidence.
You linked an opposing view from a "journalist with an agenda", after you said you will wait for actual doctors to weigh in, on the previous page of this thread.
I guess as long as the journalist has the same agenda as you do, you don't need to wait for those actual doctors.
I guess as long as the journalist has the same agenda as you do, you don't need to wait for those actual doctors.
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:22 AM
#68
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
Nope.
I said I'd wait to form an opinion, not to link alternate views. My personal view is to go with whatever has the best scientific evidence.
" I'll wait and see how actual doctors address this rather than some journalist with an agenda."
I guess as long as the journalist has the same agenda as you do, you don't need to wait for those actual doctors.
Or maybe you think that the "journalist with an agenda" has the best scientific evidence.
03-26-2024, 04:29 AM
#69
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Well ok then.
Nope.
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:32 AM
#70
I still think there should be repercussions for those administering treatment without consent
03-26-2024, 04:35 AM
#71
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Drunk already?
I still think there should be repercussions guy those administration treatment without consent
It's too early for that.
Edit : Just LOL at the ghost edit above.
03-26-2024, 04:37 AM
#72
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Absolutely.
I still think there should be repercussions for those administering treatment without consent
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:37 AM
#73
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
How about this medical community:
Yeah there seemed to be more substantial stuff further down like studies contradicting some things. The author of the article is biased and lay so it isn't worth much, but the studies are legit. Like I said, I'd rather see what the medical community as a whole says.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/u...ldren-intl-gbr
England’s National Health Service (NHS) has stopped prescribing puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence, saying there is “not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness” of puberty-suppressing hormones.
NHS England said it made the decision, which was widely condemned by LGBTQ groups, after it “carefully considered” an evidence review it commissioned in 2020. It also reviewed evidence published since then, it said in a policy document published Tuesday.
Puberty blockers will now only be available to young people in clinical research trials and some private clinics, UK’s PA Media reported Tuesday. Fewer than 100 young people are currently on puberty blockers via the NHS and they will be able to continue the treatment, it added.
+positiv crew+
-we all gona make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all thigs in modertion, even politica views crew
-support local fams crew
-try to do at last on good ded/day crew
-less cursing the dakness and more lighting candes crew
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
-
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 25,592
- Rep Power: 440,157
-
03-26-2024, 04:40 AM
#74
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Yeah that certainly weighs in. But American standards have been different from British ones. I'd like to see what they think.
How about this medical community:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/u...ldren-intl-gbr
England’s National Health Service (NHS) has stopped prescribing puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence, saying there is “not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness” of puberty-suppressing hormones.
NHS England said it made the decision, which was widely condemned by LGBTQ groups, after it “carefully considered” an evidence review it commissioned in 2020. It also reviewed evidence published since then, it said in a policy document published Tuesday.
Puberty blockers will now only be available to young people in clinical research trials and some private clinics, UK’s PA Media reported Tuesday. Fewer than 100 young people are currently on puberty blockers via the NHS and they will be able to continue the treatment, it added.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/u...ldren-intl-gbr
England’s National Health Service (NHS) has stopped prescribing puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence, saying there is “not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness” of puberty-suppressing hormones.
NHS England said it made the decision, which was widely condemned by LGBTQ groups, after it “carefully considered” an evidence review it commissioned in 2020. It also reviewed evidence published since then, it said in a policy document published Tuesday.
Puberty blockers will now only be available to young people in clinical research trials and some private clinics, UK’s PA Media reported Tuesday. Fewer than 100 young people are currently on puberty blockers via the NHS and they will be able to continue the treatment, it added.
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:43 AM
#75
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
The British healthcare system is more in line with what you think we should move to, correct? They are less likely to be corrupted by drug companies and other profitable entities. And that’s a big reason they don’t tell people to boost their babies with yearly mRNA injections.
Yeah that certainly weighs in. But American standards have been different from British ones. I'd like to see what they think.
+positiv crew+
-we all gona make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all thigs in modertion, even politica views crew
-support local fams crew
-try to do at last on good ded/day crew
-less cursing the dakness and more lighting candes crew
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
-
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 25,592
- Rep Power: 440,157
-
03-26-2024, 04:44 AM
#76
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Yeah, but the best doctors and scientists on the planet are here in America so that doesn't mean the NHS' evaluation is the final word.
The British healthcare system is more in line with what you think we should move to, correct? They are less likely to be corrupted by drug companies and other profitable entities. And that’s a big reason they don’t tell people to boost their babies with yearly mRNA injections.
- uneducated
- Banned
-
- uneducated
- Banned
- Join Date: Mar 2024
- Age: 54
- Posts: 618
- Rep Power: 0
-
03-26-2024, 04:50 AM
#77
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Fewer than 100?
How about this medical community:
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/u...ldren-intl-gbr
England’s National Health Service (NHS) has stopped prescribing puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence, saying there is “not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness” of puberty-suppressing hormones.
NHS England said it made the decision, which was widely condemned by LGBTQ groups, after it “carefully considered” an evidence review it commissioned in 2020. It also reviewed evidence published since then, it said in a policy document published Tuesday.
Puberty blockers will now only be available to young people in clinical research trials and some private clinics, UK’s PA Media reported Tuesday. Fewer than 100 young people are currently on puberty blockers via the NHS and they will be able to continue the treatment, it added.
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/03/13/u...ldren-intl-gbr
England’s National Health Service (NHS) has stopped prescribing puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria or gender incongruence, saying there is “not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness” of puberty-suppressing hormones.
NHS England said it made the decision, which was widely condemned by LGBTQ groups, after it “carefully considered” an evidence review it commissioned in 2020. It also reviewed evidence published since then, it said in a policy document published Tuesday.
Puberty blockers will now only be available to young people in clinical research trials and some private clinics, UK’s PA Media reported Tuesday. Fewer than 100 young people are currently on puberty blockers via the NHS and they will be able to continue the treatment, it added.
03-26-2024, 04:51 AM
#78
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
The British healthcare system is more in line with what you think we should move to, correct? They are less likely to be corrupted by drug companies and other profitable entities. And that’s a big reason they don’t tell people to boost their babies with yearly mRNA injections.
Do you think costs weigh in to decisions for a publicly funded system?
03-26-2024, 04:54 AM
#79
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It is…..probably a good reason UK and other countries are starting to ban it.
Are the professionals who are not obtaining consent inexperienced and/or untrained?
This should end up being a huge case!
This should end up being a huge case!
03-26-2024, 04:57 AM
#80
Originally Posted By ThePD⏩
They should also crack down, immediately, on untrained people administering any kind of care. No regulatory colleges needed, that's just criminal.
It is…..probably a good reason UK and other countries are starting to ban it.
03-26-2024, 05:18 AM
#81
Originally Posted By ThePD⏩
They understand this, but are just reluctant to move from their previously stated position(as everyone is, though some are more reluctant than others…and there are good habits people should employ to maintain an open mind that is able to change to a more sound position).
It is…..probably a good reason UK and other countries are starting to ban it.
The fact that we even got to this point(hormones and gender mutilation for kids and teens) is absolutely absurd, but I am somewhat optimistic that at least there seems to be a move away from that approach. Others will catch up eventually, they just need to do so in their own time. I mean, we’re talking about someone who spent three years claiming that omicron is as severe as the delta variant(and ftr not taking about Wincel there because he is more open-minded and reasonable than that).
+positiv crew+
-we all gona make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all thigs in modertion, even politica views crew
-support local fams crew
-try to do at last on good ded/day crew
-less cursing the dakness and more lighting candes crew
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
-
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 25,592
- Rep Power: 440,157
-
03-26-2024, 05:18 AM
#82
So the new motto is to trust the experts, just not the experts throughout the rest of the world?
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
03-26-2024, 05:28 AM
#83
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
I think professionals should be held to the existing regulatory standards.
So the new motto is to trust the experts, just not the experts throughout the rest of the world?
03-26-2024, 06:01 AM
#84
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Basically….but a more accurate motto would be “trust the experts that I agree with”.
So the new motto is to trust the experts, just not the experts throughout the rest of the world?
+positiv crew+
-we all gona make it, but what it is is up to you crew
-all thigs in modertion, even politica views crew
-support local fams crew
-try to do at last on good ded/day crew
-less cursing the dakness and more lighting candes crew
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
-
- jtaylor2010
- based on actual events
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 25,592
- Rep Power: 440,157
-
03-26-2024, 06:16 AM
#85
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Basically….but a more accurate motto would be “trust the experts that I agree with”.
03-26-2024, 06:17 AM
#86
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Strong words from the one saying the CDC was wrong a couple of weeks ago.
I think professionals should be held to the existing regulatory standards.
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
03-26-2024, 06:19 AM
#87
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Why/how so?
Strong words from the one saying the CDC was wrong a couple of weeks ago.
03-26-2024, 06:19 AM
#88
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So like on people like yourself, who claimed to have been administering covid vaccines with only "hands on" training and being completely unaware of the manufacturer's fact sheet which includes information about how to administer said vaccines?
They should also crack down, immediately, on untrained people administering any kind of care. No regulatory colleges needed, that's just criminal.
03-26-2024, 07:05 AM
#89
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
No, not really.
So like on people like yourself, who claimed to have been administering covid vaccines with only "hands on" training and being completely unaware of the manufacturer's fact sheet which includes information about how to administer said vaccines?
JTaylor claimed people administering GAC are "winging it" and not obtaining consent.
03-26-2024, 07:08 AM
#90
Originally Posted By uneducated⏩
Regarding the trans chit, I realize some of those emails make things look bad, but to ultimately determine whether gender affirming care works, you need a lot more data. Most of the studies I have seen suggest it is working better, on average, than not. But I'm not a reproductive medicine doctor
LMFAO
LMFAO
Regarding the trans chit, I realize some of those emails make things look bad, but to ultimately determine whether gender affirming care works, you need a lot more data. Most of the studies I have seen suggest it is working better, on average, than not. But I'm not a reproductive medicine doctor
No **** you're not a " reproductive medicine doctor", because if you were, you'd know that destroying your hormonal system and mutilating your genitalia would be antithetical to genetic reproduction. You also don't need to be any kind of doctor to know that.
You absolute ****ing moron.
“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” – Thomas Hobbes, 1588 – 1679
*Never Respond To RSM3 Threads crew*
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
-
- TheFornicator1
- Wall Investor & Developer
- Join Date: Feb 2015
- Posts: 9,022
- Rep Power: 72,985
-
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts