Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Well, the verdict is in. Ghostbusters 2016 is legitimately a chitty chitty movie
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 126
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Last
post 1452121023 07-10-2016, 06:52 PM
-
#91
  1. CrimsonSteel
  1. CrimsonSteel
  2. Join Date: Oct 2005
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 23,808
  5. Rep Power: 162304
Originally Posted By onaed
Why is it only the critic review score showing, not theaudiencerating?
The movie isn't out yet. All the reviews right now are from people who were invited for pre-screenings. Wonder how carefully those reviewers were hand selected...

I don't think a "passing the torch to an all-female Ghostbusters team" would have been a bad idea. But this whole thing is such a transparent cash grab wrapped up with a lovely dose of pandering to SJWs and feminist propaganda, it seems 100% unlikely the movie will be even moderately entertaining to most Miscers. Unless they just wanna watch it and talk sh!t about all the over the top acting and jokes falling flat over beers with other people who have moderate to good taste and above.
post 1452161793 07-11-2016, 12:31 AM
-
#92
  1. Discworlder
  2. Registered User
  1. Discworlder
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 2,060
  6. Rep Power: 4000
Sadly this won't be a complete bomb. Enough clueless middle aged people will see it just because they see Melissa McCarthy on the poster even though they were never big Ghostbusters fans. You know, the kind of people who paid to watch Tammy, Identity Thief, and whatever dreck she's been in and turned out mildly successful.
post 1452162283 07-11-2016, 12:39 AM
-
#93
  1. meteoraniac
  2. *Platinum Account*
  1. meteoraniac
  2. *Platinum Account*
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: North Carolina, Singapore
  5. Posts: 12,171
  6. Rep Power: 29521
will probably watch it when its on stream

not gonna pay a single cent to watch this dross though
Sloots come and go but moms are forever

Get to know your parents: you never know when they'll be gone for good.
Be nice to your siblings: they're your best link to your past and the people most likely to stick with you in the future.
Enjoy your body: use it every way you can. Don't be afraid of it or of what other people think of it: it's the greatest instrument you'll ever own.
post 1452162303 07-11-2016, 12:39 AM
-
#94
  1. ib6ub90210
  2. Banned
  1. ib6ub90210
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 1,835
  6. Rep Power: 0
Never watch a movie directed by Paul Feig
post 1452162633 07-11-2016, 12:43 AM
-
#95
  1. Bar182
  2. Registered User
  1. Bar182
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Posts: 8,047
  5. Rep Power: 30681
Just watch how all the reviews rate it positively and all the audience ratings at 0%.

One critic labelled it "the movie of the summer".

Journalistic ethics, pushing agendas etc all came out during Gamergate and nothing has changed. You cannot believe any media whatsoever because they are either all bought or pushing their own agendas.
post 1452162793 07-11-2016, 12:46 AM
-
#96
  1. pWally
  2. Glow Connoisseur
  1. pWally
  2. Glow Connoisseur
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 21,063
  6. Rep Power: 177182
Lol @ liberal cuck movie reviewers giving this movie a "Fresh" rating on rottentomatoes.com

pathetic.
Youthful Glow Connoisseur Crew - Founder and Chief Glow Advisor
Chloe Grace Moretz Appreciation Crew - Founder and Former CEO (Retired)

Always strive to be Inb4 pWally

Witness the beginning. http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=171335301&pagenumber=
post 1452164173 07-11-2016, 01:10 AM
-
#97
  1. kneeonbelly
  2. Registered User
  1. kneeonbelly
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 16,171
  5. Rep Power: 30431
Originally Posted By bigdogfarmhand
Tbh the old movies were not even that good

I think as time goes on and our lives and not as magical we try to convince ourselves the past was better

Like we have controls


I was fuking there and the ghost busters movies weren't that great


I was there too and i loved everything ghostbusters that was in the 80's. The movie legit scared me as a kid, then i grew into seeing it when i was abit older and i favored peter venkman. i could not get enough of him or the guys, who seemed like real friends that worked and hung out together. ego, winston ray were also awesome

then came the cartoons


this was my chit. i had all the toys, the tie in cereals and even the ecto cooler with slimer on it



I literally fell in love with this franchise as a kid. dont get me started on the fukin toys.

the ghostbusting was cool as was the characters that filled out the team. that , essentially , is why it worked then. I'm sure if they had a frame by frame remake with 4 other guys , it would fall flat because theres only 1 bill murray for example

this chit here that is being forced into theaters by sjw's hasnt got the same feel over all and is being used as propaganda for political reasons.
the film makers went out and said guys like me, the man babies who loved the movie, are haters for not loving this movie. They alienated the people that made it possible for this to even be a franchise then goaded people into thinking that if they dont support it they are sexist.

i hope it fails so this never comes back again. lets all agree to leave ghostbusters in the past, where fans like myself can rewatch on dvd privately and not see it bastardized for some social agenda
post 1452165203 07-11-2016, 01:29 AM
-
#98
  1. WSG1
  2. Registered User
  1. WSG1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 16,232
  7. Rep Power: 35364
I hope the movie absolutely fails but watch, itll be #1 despite everyone saying its a joke.
I like the tuna here.
post 1452165863 07-11-2016, 01:45 AM
-
#99
  1. breandano1
  2. Message Board King
  1. breandano1
  2. Message Board King
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 1,293
  6. Rep Power: 596
Just saw that the director's name is Feig......


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Explains a lot
post 1452166153 07-11-2016, 01:53 AM
-
#100
  1. CuckSage
  2. Banned
  1. CuckSage
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 1,419
  6. Rep Power: 0
Sux not being white...cant check my privilege mayne :/

can you save some for a black brah guys?
post 1452167713 07-11-2016, 02:28 AM
-
#101
  1. kneeonbelly
  2. Registered User
  1. kneeonbelly
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 16,171
  5. Rep Power: 30431
Originally Posted By WSG1
I hope the movie absolutely fails but watch, itll be #1 despite everyone saying its a joke.
the movie cost like 165 million to make

i'd be surprised if it made its money back. i hope it doesnt make its money back
post 1452168863 07-11-2016, 03:01 AM
-
#102
  1. TheGattingBall
  2. Registered User
  1. TheGattingBall
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 3,235
  7. Rep Power: 6537
yeah it got 900,000 dislikes on YouTube, but it still got 260,000 likes. It will easily make its money back, but it won't make anywhere near as much as it should have. It should be pulling in Star Wars 7 and Jurassic World type figures, but it won't get near that.
post 1452172003 07-11-2016, 04:22 AM
-
#103
  1. DeerKcin
  2. Banned
  1. DeerKcin
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Age: 31
  5. Posts: 449
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Bar182
Just watch how all the reviews rate it positively and all the audience ratings at 0%.

One critic labelled it "the movie of the summer".

Journalistic ethics, pushing agendas etc all came out during Gamergate and nothing has changed. You cannot believe any media whatsoever because they are either all bought or pushing their own agendas.
This 100 ****ING PERCENT. They are media and social media whores and the fact they disparage critics and call them mysognistic is spit in the face. They should be publicly ousted, shamed and humiliated, the wormy hermit crone socially-rejected degenerate filth they are.
post 1452196343 07-11-2016, 08:59 AM
-
#104
  1. MrGreenTea
  2. Registered User
  1. MrGreenTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 6,893
  5. Rep Power: 19029
So which one is correct? The 79% tomato meter or the general hate?https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
post 1452198703 07-11-2016, 09:18 AM
-
#105
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 48,650
  6. Rep Power: 150567
is it funny that when they had a black man in the 80s he was nowhere near stereotypical and now they use one straight out of a blacksploitation sitcom?
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
post 1452199023 07-11-2016, 09:20 AM
-
#106
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 48,650
  6. Rep Power: 150567
Originally Posted By bigdogfarmhand
Tbh the old movies were not even that good

I think as time goes on and our lives and not as magical we try to convince ourselves the past was better

Like we have controls


I was fuking there and the ghost busters movies weren't that great
even if you didnt like the originals, they were at least... original.. seems like very little these days is anything but a reboot/sequel
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
post 1452199223 07-11-2016, 09:22 AM
-
#107
  1. ineedadrink
  2. Banned
  1. ineedadrink
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,877
  6. Rep Power: 0
So is every male critic who gives it a bad review going to be called sexist?
post 1452199733 07-11-2016, 09:25 AM
-
#108
  1. FannySkelper
  2. Banned
  1. FannySkelper
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Posts: 15,479
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TheGattingBall
yeah it got 900,000 dislikes on YouTube, but it still got 260,000 likes. It will easily make its money back, but it won't make anywhere near as much as it should have. It should be pulling in Star Wars 7 and Jurassic World type figures, but it won't get near that.
The dislikes would be higher but somehow Sony managed to remove a lot of them (serious, check the comments)
post 1452200453 07-11-2016, 09:30 AM
-
#109
  1. JDizleSwoleizle
  2. Crohns Bro
  1. JDizleSwoleizle
  2. Crohns Bro
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Posts: 10,857
  5. Rep Power: 49007
Currently 79% on RT? Dafuq manes

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
Internet Muscle Squad

MISC Raw Dog Crew

Make MISC Great Again 2016 Crew
post 1452200973 07-11-2016, 09:33 AM
-
#110
  1. lmnopotts
  2. Amat victoria curam!
  1. lmnopotts
  2. Amat victoria curam!
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 3,878
  7. Rep Power: 33723
Rotten Tomatoes 79% with 58 reviews in.

I sort by Top Critics (14) and only 2 of them are reviewers I read weekly or see pop as what the industry trusts (I run a movie theatre).


Peter Debruge - Variety
Whereas Feig has previously managed to cross genre streams successfully, here he succumbs to the familiar curse of the digital-effects era: When there's almost nothing the computer can't conjure, it falls to the director to know when to stop.

David Rooney - The Hollywood Reporter
It's all busy-ness, noise and chaos, with zero thrills and very little sustainable comic buoyancy.
Domestic box office forecast is $45 mill for the weekend with an overall take of $130 mill... with a $150 mill budget.

Sony's email leak brought light to the fact that they know every other major studio has multiple franchises where each movie touches half a billion in sales, and they can't even get their 1 franchise Spider-Man to deliver. This will leave them to scramble back costs with home video sales (no wonder there's articles already mentioning "oh, but there's an extended cut dvd coming!")

Considering Pets just did $100+ mill with a bad story (from the people who last year made a movie about walking twinkies wearing overalls speaking french gibberish for 90 minutes) this will be a flash in the pan.

I am curious to see if Collider's Matt Goldberg will review this. He's hyper critical in his reviews, but at least he's honest.
MFC

My most recent log with past links: SuperPump 3.0 http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=160083011
post 1452202173 07-11-2016, 09:43 AM
-
#111
  1. TommyTuffGuy
  2. You fibro'd my algia!
  1. TommyTuffGuy
  2. You fibro'd my algia!
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Indian Rocks Beach, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 6,262
  6. Rep Power: 10576
I went to RT to look at the reviews and every one that's positive is a female. lol! It looks like this movie was seriously pre-screened for a mostly female review audience or they are being paid off to post positive reviews.
 God of POF Crew
Butt Officer...I fed her to the chainsaw and HE ate her!!

Current Stack:
Sparta Nutrition Kraken
Animal Whey
Horny Goat Weed Bulk Powder
CEL M-Test
Swanson Olive Leaf Extract (look onto this)
Probiotics
post 1452202483 07-11-2016, 09:44 AM
-
#112
  1. batspoof
  2. ♕ King Rotter ♕
  1. batspoof
  2. ♕ King Rotter ♕
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Posts: 3,385
  5. Rep Power: 3735
Originally Posted By MrGreenTea
So which one is correct? The 79% tomato meter or the general hate?https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ghostbusters_2016/
It's sitting on 3.7/10 on IMDB after just 2,400 user reviews. That score will keep dropping. Sounds like legitimately one of the worst films ever made.
post 1452202753 07-11-2016, 09:46 AM
-
#113
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Everyone knows RT is a chit website full to the brim with leftist SJW *******ry. Why anyone would pay attention to their film reviews is beyond me.

post 1452203013 07-11-2016, 09:48 AM
-
#114
  1. MrGreenTea
  2. Registered User
  1. MrGreenTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 6,893
  5. Rep Power: 19029
Originally Posted By batspoof
It's sitting on 3.7/10 on IMDB after just 2,400 user reviews. That score will keep dropping. Sounds like legitimately one of the worst films ever made.
well these summer blockbusters will usually make enough money overseas regardless

brb blasting the stay puft marshmallow man in the dick
post 1452203683 07-11-2016, 09:54 AM
-
#115
  1. jakeeck
  2. Banned
  1. jakeeck
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: 6 Foot 180 lbs, Yemen
  5. Posts: 9,921
  6. Rep Power: 0
From IMDB forums



Would rep this kid in real life.. would buy him a beer and book his favorite prostitute.
post 1452204233 07-11-2016, 09:57 AM
-
#116
  1. Avalanche3319
  2. Brotege
  1. Avalanche3319
  2. Brotege
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,596
  6. Rep Power: 170404
Originally Posted By ib6ub90210
Never watch a movie directed by Paul Feig
This. I tried watching bridesmaids. Shut it off when Melissa McCarthy started ****ting in a sink. This is what passes for comedy these days?
Movie Man
Book Brah
Game Guy
Bike Boyo
post 1452204433 07-11-2016, 09:59 AM
-
#117
  1. Humungus
  2. Lord of Ruin
  1. Humungus
  2. Lord of Ruin
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 8,065
  5. Rep Power: 50189
It's like they did everything possible to make this movie as chitty as possible.

Hope it bombs hard.

post 1452205503 07-11-2016, 10:05 AM
-
#118
  1. testbug
  2. on dat dere Wacky Tobaccy
  1. testbug
  2. on dat dere Wacky Tobaccy
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 1,959
  6. Rep Power: 1680
Originally Posted By seanb1979
even if you didnt like the originals, they were at least... original.. seems like very little these days is anything but a reboot/sequel
this, everything wrong with movie industry in one movie.
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo
Everyone knows RT is a chit website full to the brim with leftist SJW *******ry. Why anyone would pay attention to their film reviews is beyond me.

and this, imdb(real aggregate)>>>>>all review sites
post 1452205623 07-11-2016, 10:06 AM
-
#119
  1. BrahZ781
  2. Professional Goof
  1. BrahZ781
  2. Professional Goof
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Age: 27
  5. Posts: 37
  6. Rep Power: 0
All this movie is trying to do is try to be as "2016" as possible. It fails to be funny, the cast members are all female, so it appeals to the SJWs either way. I swear to god our society is going down the ****hole as time goes by and this is irrefutable proof when movies like this come out.
“I believe that one defines oneself by reinvention. To not be like your parents. To not be like your friends. To be yourself. To cut yourself out of stone.”
― Henry Rollins
post 1452206903 07-11-2016, 10:14 AM
-
#120
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
Watched the classic GB this weekend. Never seeing the new one. The original cast didn't have to try to be funny, they just were. The new cast has to try so damn hard to be funny that it's not funny in the least bit.
𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω ₅₀/₁₉₅
𝕬𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝕮𝖚𝖙 𝕸𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝕽𝖆𝖈𝖊 ®
ᗪIᔕᑕᖇIᗰIᑎᗩTIOᑎ E᙭ᑕᒪᑌᔕIOᑎ IᑎᗪOᑕTᖇIᑎᗩTIOᑎ
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts