Forum
ยป
Arguement with my GF regarding "class divide" issues, who's right?
02-02-2017, 02:47 AM
-
#91
- Tangential
- Banned
-
- Tangential
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2016
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By DrFeeIGood⏩
arent u the loser who makes endless threads about salaryMoney is everything, I dont care what anyone says.
Yes people are, but you cant do anything fun with those people without $$$$, and the more the better
Yes people are, but you cant do anything fun with those people without $$$$, and the more the better
its amusing seeing who is posting in this thread because quite a lot of you are broke as all fukk
02-02-2017, 03:20 AM
-
#92
- madBrahhh
- Registered User
-
- madBrahhh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Age: 37
- Posts: 546
- Rep Power: 676
-
-
You know that this is a program for young professionals making under $40000/year right?
They still have to pay 2/3 rent. In my building the reduced rate units are all PhD students at
the nearby university. I think it is retarded to make those tenants go through the side door.
From a business standpoint, the company is taking the deal because they find it financially
advantageous. They are not forced. What they re doing is probably illegal on grounds of
discrimination.
They still have to pay 2/3 rent. In my building the reduced rate units are all PhD students at
the nearby university. I think it is retarded to make those tenants go through the side door.
From a business standpoint, the company is taking the deal because they find it financially
advantageous. They are not forced. What they re doing is probably illegal on grounds of
discrimination.
02-02-2017, 03:26 AM
-
#93
- 4everalone
- Registered User
-
- 4everalone
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Age: 34
- Posts: 10,980
- Rep Power: 41395
-
-
The fact that the leeches who live there for free have the nerve to complain about a side entrance rustles my jimmies so hard.
That chit is expected in Norway but didnt think Americans thought like that srs
That chit is expected in Norway but didnt think Americans thought like that srs
Follows Chestbrah's training routine crew
02-02-2017, 03:27 AM
-
#94
- NotANun21
- One Of Our Top Posters!
-
- NotANun21
- One Of Our Top Posters!
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 35
- Posts: 22,904
- Rep Power: 24318
-
-
The fault isn't with the company, or with the rich people, or with the poor people
The fault is with whoever created this system in the first place
The fault is with whoever created this system in the first place
If I laugh, I rep
(All of the posts made by this user account are to be considered satirical in nature and do not necessarily reflect the views, ideologies, opinions or intentions of any person or persons using the account)
02-02-2017, 05:09 AM
-
#95
- Tangential
- Banned
-
- Tangential
- Banned
- Join Date: Dec 2016
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By madBrahhh⏩
Thank you.You know that this is a program for young professionals making under $40000/year right?
They still have to pay 2/3 rent. In my building the reduced rate units are all PhD students at
the nearby university. I think it is retarded to make those tenants go through the side door.
From a business standpoint, the company is taking the deal because they find it financially
advantageous. They are not forced. What they re doing is probably illegal on grounds of
discrimination.
They still have to pay 2/3 rent. In my building the reduced rate units are all PhD students at
the nearby university. I think it is retarded to make those tenants go through the side door.
From a business standpoint, the company is taking the deal because they find it financially
advantageous. They are not forced. What they re doing is probably illegal on grounds of
discrimination.
There is a similiar thing done in London with key workers (nurses, teachers, civil servants) who live in apartments near their places of work that are subsidized because the cost of property in London is ridiculously high. Its amazing how many miscers seem to think that government assistance is only used by leeches...when its obvious that about 2/3 miscers are on some form ofgovernment assistance.
02-02-2017, 07:19 AM
-
#96
- donblaximus
- Registered User
-
- donblaximus
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2010
- Age: 50
- Posts: 12,396
- Rep Power: 70954
-
-
Originally Posted By 5herminator⏩
Thank you for typing this out. I never lived in Manhattan nor rubbed elbows with the elite there but I appreciated the differences that you call out and the different levels of what people all lump into the term "rich". I honestly thought about typing out specific things to Daisygirl but stopped as I didnt want people to think the way I analyzed things was overboard.^Daisygirl you need to get off your high horse because Blaximus has a point here..whatever you're referring to, it's cities other than NYC. The terms of the rat race here are unlike anything else other than places like Monte Carlo, and it's the reason nearly half the city proper leaves after spending their 20s-40s here. It's incredibly easy to discern the levels between old money, dirty rich, wealthy, upper middle class. Old money can't "dress down" because they don't own clothing to facilitate it...and it's definitely not the accessories. They may forgo familiar logos and favor comfortable shoes, but in terms of material, seams and tailoring, it's obvious. There's no such thing as "relaxing" your reputation or looking innocuous, when someone from the same social echelon knows how to appraise you by the way you sit or your rings, cuffs and the laxity/tightness of your shirt and pants in specific areas. Only SAs/the general public look to obvious indicators of wealth or a lack of it. Why do LA/NYC nouveau riche buy flashy cars/jewelry/handbags and pairing it with obnoxious outfits or slummy clothing? Because they grew up consuming media where celebrities and prominent media figures dress this way. You're crazy if you think dressing like the Roosevelts or Rothschild is common knowledge.
I don't doubt you had a more privileged upbringing than most. But the fact you had any close friends outside independent schools/treat SAs and luxury forums as a reliable point of reference to gauge wealth indicates you've never been exposed to NYC high society. Maybe new money who are surgeons/lawyers/entrepeneurs, but not old. No blue-blood Manhattanite knows anyone who would garden in crocs on a estate they barely spend time in, I'm just saying. And they can instantly pinpoint when you're a non-resident of their building when everyone else - including SAs - are unable to tell the difference.
I don't doubt you had a more privileged upbringing than most. But the fact you had any close friends outside independent schools/treat SAs and luxury forums as a reliable point of reference to gauge wealth indicates you've never been exposed to NYC high society. Maybe new money who are surgeons/lawyers/entrepeneurs, but not old. No blue-blood Manhattanite knows anyone who would garden in crocs on a estate they barely spend time in, I'm just saying. And they can instantly pinpoint when you're a non-resident of their building when everyone else - including SAs - are unable to tell the difference.
But you nailed it. Im not looking for a logo, im looking at the material of the sweater, the seams and how the clothing sits on the person's body. These are fine details even if this person "dressed like Mr Rogers" you could tell what level we are dealing with to a certain extent. Then you put into context other things like occasion, the weather, how they interact with people, the information that comes out of their mouth and the way the are communicating with people. These are all the subtle details I was referring to. Im glad im not the only one that paid attention to this type of stuff.
It is also the reason why I wanted to ensure we were all talking on the same page....about wealthy Manahattan/NYC which is quite different than a family that may live in a "mansion/estate" in Texas.
02-02-2017, 08:39 AM
-
#97
- miscdontlift
- Registered User
-
- miscdontlift
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Age: 41
- Posts: 442
- Rep Power: 290
-
-
Can't blame either side for wanting a separate entrance or being against it. I kind of side with at least sharing the entrance if not the amenities.
It's really the developers fault. They decided to build a luxury building while taking advantage of a tax incentive which requires them to provide a percentage of low income housing.
I don't know any details but what they are doing in theory is almost like building 2 buildings next to each other one higher end, one lower end but taking tax breaks on both buildings disguised as one building.
It's really the developers fault. They decided to build a luxury building while taking advantage of a tax incentive which requires them to provide a percentage of low income housing.
I don't know any details but what they are doing in theory is almost like building 2 buildings next to each other one higher end, one lower end but taking tax breaks on both buildings disguised as one building.
02-02-2017, 08:52 AM
-
#98
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
If they want to use the big boys door, they pay more, problem solved.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
02-02-2017, 09:01 AM
-
#99
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
-
- seanb1979
- Platinum User
- Join Date: Dec 2006
- Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
- Posts: 48,650
- Rep Power: 150567
-
-
Originally Posted By Tangential⏩
maybe, just maybe, they recognize there are not infinite jobs and that our countrymen would be better off if there were more opportunities available for them?The luxury apartment should not be offering tax breaks. There is odd idea that people in said income bracketwantto live in luxury apartments...most of them dont or dont really have the choice. This is where the gentrification argument stems from anyway.
Once again, miscs stance on this seems to be unusually vindictive but that seems to be the role they have been told to play by society. Resent those lower down the proverbial ladder than you because they deserve to be in their situation. In another thread they will be complaining about being undercut by those with H1B Visa's because they dont "deserve" to live in American and jobs should be earmarked for Americans...why? Does being an American mean youdeservea job?? Its funny how entitled people are the first to complain about other people's entitlement.
Once again, miscs stance on this seems to be unusually vindictive but that seems to be the role they have been told to play by society. Resent those lower down the proverbial ladder than you because they deserve to be in their situation. In another thread they will be complaining about being undercut by those with H1B Visa's because they dont "deserve" to live in American and jobs should be earmarked for Americans...why? Does being an American mean youdeservea job?? Its funny how entitled people are the first to complain about other people's entitlement.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
02-02-2017, 09:10 AM
-
#100
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
-
- MuzzieChik786
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Posts: 28,332
- Rep Power: 274026
-
-
This isn't a bad scenario.
I know this dude who has an extreme aversion to "lower class" people. His body language, tone of voice, mood - everything changes when he spots someone that he deems as "ghetto."
It's very annoying. I hate people who think they're better than anyone else.
Business and making money is obviously very different. That doesn't mean you can't respect various classes of people.
I know this dude who has an extreme aversion to "lower class" people. His body language, tone of voice, mood - everything changes when he spots someone that he deems as "ghetto."
It's very annoying. I hate people who think they're better than anyone else.
Business and making money is obviously very different. That doesn't mean you can't respect various classes of people.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.
2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
02-02-2017, 09:23 AM
-
#101
- TooAnabolic
- Registered User
-
- TooAnabolic
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 10,572
- Rep Power: 66727
-
-
Originally Posted By donblaximus⏩
agreeIf you want to walk through the fron door like everyone else, don't rely on someone to help pay your living expenses.
02-02-2017, 09:27 AM
-
#102
- GainzMcgee
- Banned
-
- GainzMcgee
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
- Posts: 11,787
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
wouldnt mind if I was receiving the benefits and got a seperate door, still end up in a nice ass apartment.
02-02-2017, 09:41 AM
-
#103
- EnforcerOTF
- Registered User
-
- EnforcerOTF
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Age: 38
- Posts: 12,647
- Rep Power: 94939
-
-
It's hard to accommodate for both the people paying top dollar & the welfare group. I think it's a great strategy, since they would lose all revenue generating clients if they had to mix in and have small talk with people who would say "oh i live here for free, you're payinghow much?"
02-02-2017, 09:46 AM
-
#104
I'm not familiar with the system but I don't see a problem. If people that get free/subsidised housing (or ANYONE looking for a place for that matter) don't like whatever the owner of the building is doing, can't they just find a different place to live? Am I missing something?
I actually think it's a pretty decent system, I definitely wouldn't complain if I had my rent subsidised but had to take a different entrance while living in a fancy apartment building.
I actually think it's a pretty decent system, I definitely wouldn't complain if I had my rent subsidised but had to take a different entrance while living in a fancy apartment building.
02-02-2017, 09:54 AM
-
#105
- MalsorRifleman
- Registered User
-
- MalsorRifleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2014
- Age: 38
- Posts: 655
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
I never support government interference in the market.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts