Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Wincel still p4p biggest scumbag on here
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 334
  2. Page 4 of 12
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  9. 6
  11. Last

Thread: Wincel still p4p biggest scumbag on here

post 1566896421 11-22-2018, 04:08 PM
-
#91
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,157
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By DrunkenMoron⏩
I gave wincel my first ever rep I think..

We all got demons, dudes cool by me.
I hope he makes it one day. I'm still FA lol, but I understand what guys go through
post 1566896731 11-22-2018, 04:13 PM
-
#92
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
Ai...Wincel.

NBD to not give a damn about the death of a stranger. Should have just ignored the thread or maybe posted "don't care" if you feel the need. Public grief is often a social signalling thing.

Celebrities are strangers to me so in most cases I don't care with the exceptions being ones that I was particularly fond of. I would care more about the early death of a relative of an acquaintance, not because of the complete stranger who has died, but because of my acquaintance's feelings for that person. Other early deaths that get to me are of people that were similar to me (or people close to me), or people that had particularly compelling personal stories, or had some special gift or skill.

I think you are missing the point a bit re:reproduction being the main goal in life. Yeah, I get the genetic legacy thing, but so what? I could get it if we were talking about someone that loves children and gets a lot of satisfaction out of being a parent. But that doesn't sound like where you are at.
nah brah

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=176435431thread about the band we were joking around and reminiscing about 10 days ago

btw ADD/ADHD is highly associated with lack of empathy so I hope your sig is humorous
post 1566896741 11-22-2018, 04:13 PM
-
#93
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MiscInformed⏩
What you're saying is wrong because you're self-aware. A tree doesn't ponder it's existence. A man does. That inherently makes a man different. Life isn't about reproduction. That's one of several objectives for sure, but that's not why we are here. It's nihilism to define our existence down to little more than life begetting life for no other purpose than instinct. Go ahead and be a nihilist if that's the path you choose, but you're not going to find many people following that path with you.
My point is that self awareness is not necessary for life. It is one of many adaptations we have that helps us achieve our goal of surviving to replicate and ensure the replication of our offspring. Our intelligence may eventually turn out to be a maladaptive trait. We may cause our own extinction eventually. When you strip all of the song and dance away, we are just apes bro. We eat and we fuk and make more apes. If you call that nihilism, then I guess I am a nihilist. I am only going by what unites all life on this planet.
post 1566896791 11-22-2018, 04:14 PM
-
#94
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By SerbianSickKant⏩
Breaking tables, fighting, bullying/trolling kids that deserved it the usual stuff can get away with anything pretty much, probs would have to stab someone to maybe get kicked out
Our Serbian language was a weirdo milf, accused me and my friend of sexually assaulting her lol
****en eastern EU. Love it. All the hot girls that were prime as well and to get attention and get in the drama if you were a only just a semi-bad boy they would **** u hard af. Das it. Good times.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1566896811 11-22-2018, 04:14 PM
-
#95
  1. MiscInformed
  2. Registered User
  1. MiscInformed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 21,630
  5. Rep Power: 144644
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Babies. Not sex. Babies. And btw, ask yourself what would happen if we completely removed world hunger? The population would grow until hunger would again be a problem. What would happen if we "cured" cancer and all severe diseases? Well, massive overpopulation. Life IS about making babies. You've been lied to if you think the purpose of your life is to help other people, etc. The purpose of your life is to spawn babies and make sure they spawn babies. That's all that nature will ever care about. Look at Genghis Khan. Does anyone care that he was a violent rapist and murderer? Nope. All that mattered and is remembered is that about 1/200 living men is descended from him or his close relatives. On the other hand, Isaac Newton never had kids. Newton's legacy may live on for a while, but in a few thousand years, if mankind still exists, he will be long forgotten. What will remain is the y chromosome of a man who had many more babies than the others.
By that logic, why aren't you down at the sperm bank making free donations on a weekly basis?
"Buy a man eat fish, the day, teach man, to lifetime." - Joe Biden

2022 New Year's Resolution: Randomly neg TheScapeGOAT for lulz.
post 1566896881 11-22-2018, 04:16 PM
-
#96
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MiscInformed⏩
By that logic, why aren't you down at the sperm bank making free donations on a weekly basis?
I would. Guess what? They require 6 ft+ and many have salary requirements. Not even joking. Most have your picture on file too. Women choose donors based on their appearance, height, medical background, salary, etc. It's just as selective as real life. If you aren't desirable as a man, you won't be wanted as a donor. I have looked into it.
post 1566897091 11-22-2018, 04:19 PM
-
#97
  1. maori-rap
  2. Dos hand signal
  1. maori-rap
  2. Dos hand signal
  3. Join Date: Sep 2004
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 27,419
  7. Subscribers: 2
  8. Rep Power: 157969
Whilst reproduction is of course ESSENTIAL to the survival of the human species, it isn't the be all and end all. A human who doesn't pass on his genes can still contribute greatly to the species. Think of Nikola Tesla and Isaac Newton; died virgins and childless yet will always be remembered and revered in the world of science. I think its clear that such people contributed more to the human species than some trailer trash skank with 8 bastard children, who will in turn grow up to become criminals. Just because someone has produced children it doesn't mean that their existence is fulfilled. I don't see how the death of a 41 year-old man to cancer is no big deal and not worthy of atleast a little condolence. My parents are just entering their 70s. Sure, they have grandchildren and have seen their children go their own way, but the journey hasn't ended yet. Its always too soon when a loved one dies, regardless of how old they were or what they managed to accomplish in life. I hate to say this Wincel, but you seem to speak about human's like they are some kind of machines made for one purpose, and once they have "served their purpose" their lives are somehow obselete.
Cook the man some eggs!
post 1566897201 11-22-2018, 04:19 PM
-
#98
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
I would. Guess what? They require 6 ft+ and many have salary requirements. Not even joking.
Ok, but instead of making posts as quoted in the OP of this thread, where you will only be faced with hatred and being called a loser, try to improve your situation in your time instead of making thousands of posts.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1566897331 11-22-2018, 04:21 PM
-
#99
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 34,673
  6. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123⏩
nah brah

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=176435431thread about the band we were joking around and reminiscing about 10 days ago

btw ADD/ADHD is highly associated with lack of empathy so I hope your sig is humorous
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1566897351 11-22-2018, 04:22 PM
-
#100
  1. wagtail
  2. wolf pack
  1. wagtail
  2. wolf pack
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Posts: 8,439
  5. Rep Power: 50629
What we should be asking ourselves is "does it matter?"
worse things happen at sea
post 1566897441 11-22-2018, 04:23 PM
-
#101
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 17,088
  6. Rep Power: 52211
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Nature doesn't give a crap about any of that bro. Those section 8 and trailer trash people having 8 kids are winning. Your society is raising their kids. Their genes are being passed on while yours aren't. And if cancer is cured, that's just more competition and population to deal with. And it is maladaptive to save lives without passing on your own genes. In the long run, who wins? If this keeps going, and all the bros curing cancer and saving the lives don't have kids and all the trailer trash people do, what do you think your population will look like in a few generations (assuming being trailer trash is tied to some genetic traits)? Oops. Now, evaluate who had the better life strategy.

I'll remind you of an interesting statistic. Do you know how many lives have ever been saved? The answer is zero. Everyone dies.



Making babies. If they are making more babies, then yes, they are completely winning at life in the biological sense (which is the only one that really matters). You are cucking yourself raising and helping their kids at your own expense.
Your nihilistic mechanistic outlook is weirdly at odds with your obsession of looking at future generations. If you do not care about doing the right thing, about doing what is fun or about doing what people deem right, you should see there is really no reason either to do what you think nature deems right.

Just because nature (according to your very specific definition of biology) made humans to pass on their genetics, does not mean you have to give a damn about that. Especially if you believe, you are just a bunch of cells predetermined by your genetic code, you could care less if Newton's or Genghis Khan's legacy lives longer. (Also considering how few of Khan's genes will be in his descendants nowadays, Newton has already won that race IMO.)
You are dead, done for, finito, your genes being in some child will not help you at all with that.

Just because you believe it to be in your nature to pass on your genetic code, does not mean you are oblidged to do so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
post 1566897541 11-22-2018, 04:24 PM
-
#102
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By maori-rap⏩
Whilst reproduction is of course ESSENTIAL to the survival of the human species, it isn't the be all and end all. A human who doesn't pass on his genes can still contribute greatly to the species. Think of Nikola Tesla and Isaac Newton; died virgins and childless yet will always be remembered and revered in the world of science. I think its clear that such people contributed more to the human species than some trailer trash skank with 8 bastard children, who will in turn grow up to become criminals. Just because someone has produced children it doesn't mean that their existence is fulfilled. I don't see how the death of a 41 year-old man to cancer is no big deal and not worthy of atleast a little condolence. My parents are just entering their 70s. Sure, they have grandchildren and have seen their children go their own way, but the journey hasn't ended yet. Its always too soon when a loved one dies, regardless of how old they were or what they managed to accomplish in life. I hate to say this Wincel, but you seem to speak about human's like they are some kind of machines made for one purpose, and once they have "served their purpose" their lives are somehow obselete.
Contributing to the species is irrelevant. Newton should never have shared his work with us. He cucked himself. He helped Chad's kids build a glorious future for themselves while his own genes faded away. Life isn't about contributing to the species. It's about the replication and survival of individuals. We are machines. We are biological machines. We think with our brains that function in specific ways due to their architecture. Everything we are is just a physical system. When our purpose is fulfilled, we become obsolete. Life is cruel like that.
post 1566897681 11-22-2018, 04:26 PM
-
#103
  1. KingofLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. KingofLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Posts: 3,887
  5. Rep Power: 18135
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123⏩
Well known singer died of stage 4 cancer and here he goes:





what's wrong with this guy????
Rationality and nihilism incarnate
*Reps everyone who negs crew*
*Track Crew*
post 1566897731 11-22-2018, 04:27 PM
-
#104
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By I3igAl⏩
Your nihilistic mechanistic outlook is weirdly at odds with your obsession of looking at future generations. If you do not care about doing the right thing, about doing what is fun or about doing what people deem right, you should see there is really no reason either to do what you think nature deems right.

Just because nature (according to your very specific definition of biology) made humans to pass on their genetics, does not mean you have to give a damn about that. Especially if you believe, you are just a bunch of cells predetermined by your genetic code, you could care less if Newton's or Genghis Khan's legacy lives longer. (Also considering how few of Khan's genes will be in his descendants nowadays, Newton has already won that race IMO.)
You are dead, done for, finito, your genes being in some child will not help you at all with that.

Just because you believe it to be in your nature to pass on your genetic code, does not mean you are oblidged to do so.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
Dude 1 out of 200 living men has his genes...

You can choose not to, but then you are losing the natural game we are all playing.
post 1566897871 11-22-2018, 04:29 PM
-
#105
  1. whogotmuhbeers
  2. Registered User
  1. whogotmuhbeers
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 9,466
  6. Rep Power: 34430
Severe depression I feel sorry for him srs.

Don’t look to far into it man the guys not all there right now.
post 1566898061 11-22-2018, 04:31 PM
-
#106
  1. whogotmuhbeers
  2. Registered User
  1. whogotmuhbeers
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 9,466
  6. Rep Power: 34430
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Contributing to the species is irrelevant. Newton should never have shared his work with us. He cucked himself. He helped Chad's kids build a glorious future for themselves while his own genes faded away. Life isn't about contributing to the species. It's about the replication and survival of individuals. We are machines. We are biological machines. We think with organs in our brains that function in specific ways due to their architecture. Everything we are is just a physical system. When our purpose is fulfilled, we become obsolete. Life is cruel like that.
Might be a depressing dude but this is truth x1000
post 1566898131 11-22-2018, 04:33 PM
-
#107
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 7,027
  7. Rep Power: 57751
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
I'll spare my sorrows for the many children who develop and die of cancer or are brutally murdered or any number of awful things...

Some of them are as young as 2 years old. 2 fuking years. While Chad was off partying and drowning in vagene, this poor child never got the chance to play ball, or swim in a pool, or do anything we all take for granted every day. Fuk off. No tears for Chad. He had a good life.



I am not a sociopath. If I were, I'd be virtue signaling like the rest of you.

At what point has a person lived "long enough"? What is the metric by which you judge a life as complete? Because I judge it the same way nature does: Did the person reproduce and will his kids survive to reproductive age? If so, he succeeded. If you love your life, it makes sense that you would want to live as long as possible, but really, we evolved death. We don't normally die of trauma. We are not biologically immortal. We age and die in a relatively controlled manner. We evolved the lifespan we have. It is detrimental for you to live a whole lot longer. You wouldn't want to compete with your own offspring for mates and resources would you? There are trees that clonally reproduce and have existed for 80,000 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pando_(tree)

We, obviously, have a different life strategy. I will also remind you that this tree, a highly successful lifeform, doesn't have sex, doesn't feel, doesn't give a crap about empathy or any of the other human constructs we think matter to life. All it does is grow and replicate. Just like every other life form on the planet. One day, you will all realize that was the whole point of life. Everything else was just a mechanism to do that.
You are such a sad case, Wincel. I have never witnessed this type of delusion, weak rationalization, or oversimplification of scientific concepts before. If you really believe that replication is the sole purpose of life, then why don't you just get a mail order bride, or a hooker, or find a destitute chick in poverty, and impregnate them? Set aside a trust fund for the kid, or take it into custody after birth?

The reason is because you want the validation and happiness that comes with a relationship, you know for a fact that you can't escape the "meaningless" feels or emotions which you're so quick to dismiss. This is why you're sad--you don't even believe your own spiel. Your retreat into mechanistic science is pure cope to deal with your inability to forge meaningful relationships.
post 1566898301 11-22-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#108
  1. IronBrahh
  2. Registered User
  1. IronBrahh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 7,588
  6. Rep Power: 31635
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
It's exactly this. 99% of the FAs on here think sex is the only meaning to life, nothing else. I was a virgin till 26, exact same scenario as most FAs, Ugly, Quiet, and bullied. Yeah I thought about sex alot, but it definitely didn't take value over everything
hows your love life now?
post 1566898331 11-22-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#109
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Rebel012⏩
You are such a sad case, Wincel. I have never witnessed this type of delusion, weak rationalization, or oversimplification of scientific concepts before. If you really believe that replication is the sole purpose of life, then why don't you just get a mail order bride, or a hooker, or find a destitute chick in poverty, and impregnate them? Set aside a trust fund for the kid, or take it into custody after birth?

The reason is because you want the validation and happiness that comes with a relationship, you know for a fact that you can't escape the "meaningless" feels or emotions which you're so quick to dismiss. This is why you're sad--you don't even believe your own spiel. Your retreat into mechanistic science is pure cope to deal with your inability to forge meaningful relationships.
I am literally actively pursuing a relationship with a destitute chick in poverty...srs. And ofc I feel. Ofc I want to feel the warmth and fuzziness that comes from being loved. But it's not necessary. All that matters to me is that I pass on my genes. Everything else is a mechanism for that.
post 1566898411 11-22-2018, 04:37 PM
-
#110
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
I am literally actively pursuing a relationship with a destitute chick in poverty...srs
yes and then we are waiting for you to get back when you knock her up and nothing has changed, lmao !
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1566898441 11-22-2018, 04:37 PM
-
#111
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Posts: 20,191
  5. Rep Power: 126540
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
Sounds like he should be on a watch list after reading that chit
This^^^^
Poor ole Wincel Maybe a Good But****ing will get him straightened out...

Wincel sounds like trump No respect for the Holidays- Give some Thanks to the Guy who didn't Pullout
somebody out there is your Real father Bud.
MR.PHF '09

“Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them.”- Don Quixote

''damn right I like the life I live

'Cause I went from negative to positive

And it's allGood..."


"friends come and go but enemies accumulate"


< H.T.C Till I D.I.E >
"Zero tolerance Crew" ZERO, NADA !!!!
post 1566898451 11-22-2018, 04:37 PM
-
#112
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Posts: 58,435
  5. Rep Power: 81966
I don't even know what's wrong with Wincel but i just assume it's the same autism/anxiety/depression issues i have
PC specs

i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''



OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
post 1566899151 11-22-2018, 04:50 PM
-
#113
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Posts: 58,435
  5. Rep Power: 81966
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
It really is priority number 1. Everything else is built around that. It's not even about getting laid. Human life is about chitting out babies and making sure they can chit out more babies, and during this time, we distract ourselves from the sad nature of our doom with the trivialities of daily life. Some of us believe in fairy tales and an imaginary dude in the sky, some of us take mind altering substances, some of us distract ourselves with music, videogames, or shows, some of us compete with each other even though we will all lose in the end...But it's all the same brah.
This. When you stop having sex for long periods of time your body and mind just start to deteriorate because you aren't fulfilling your biological needs. Depression, anxiety, bitterness, desperation and other mental illnesses start to set in.
PC specs

i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''



OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
post 1566900011 11-22-2018, 05:03 PM
-
#114
  1. KingofLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. KingofLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Posts: 3,887
  5. Rep Power: 18135
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
I don't even know what's wrong with Wincel but i just assume it's the same autism/anxiety/depression issues i have
The irony..
*Reps everyone who negs crew*
*Track Crew*
post 1566900251 11-22-2018, 05:07 PM
-
#115
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
OP is a *******
post 1566900851 11-22-2018, 05:15 PM
-
#116
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 17,088
  6. Rep Power: 52211
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Dude 1 out of 200 living men has his genes...

You can choose not to, but then you are losing the natural game we are all playing.
They all share the same Y-chromosome, but even than it would just be a small part of him.
But even the original study where that fact comes from considers it mathematically unlikely that all of these guys descended from Genghis Khan. The time period fits and many guys have a similar genetic make up, but the Genghis Khan part is just a theory.
Could have lots of other reasons. Maybe his people were inbred already.

And no we are not all playing that game. Most people don't care about leaving as many kids as possible. And even if we would, your conclusion would still be illogical. You cannot find the meaning of life in a purely materialistic world. Even if you considered your vague interpretation of biology a true law of nature, that still would not make it amoral law to be followed.
post 1566901171 11-22-2018, 05:21 PM
-
#117
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By I3igAl⏩
They all share the same Y-chromosome, but even than it would just be a small part of him.
But even the original study where that fact comes from considers it mathematically unlikely that all of these guys descended from Genghis Khan. The time period fits and many guys have a similar genetic make up, but the Genghis Khan part is just a theory.
Could have lots of other reasons. Maybe his people were inbred already.

And no we are not all playing that game. Most people don't care about leaving as many kids as possible. And even if we would, your conclusion would still be illogical. You cannot find the meaning of life in a purely materialistic world. Even if you considered your vague interpretation of biology a true law of nature, that still would not make it amoral law to be followed.
The Khan thing is likely true, but it may also be the result of inbreeding. That is correct. My point still stands biologically. We define fitness of an individual by the number of fertile offspring it spawns. I don't think there is any basis for morality in nature beyond what encourages cooperative behavior where it, on average, benefits the individuals in the group.
post 1566901901 11-22-2018, 05:37 PM
-
#118
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  1. Rebel012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 7,027
  7. Rep Power: 57751
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
The Khan thing is likely true, but it may also be the result of inbreeding. That is correct. My point still stands biologically. We define fitness of an individual by the number of fertile offspring it spawns. I don't think there is any basis for morality in nature beyond what encourages cooperative behavior where it, on average, benefits the individuals in the group.
Your mechanistic worldview was debunked by Einstein's theories. But aside from that, the argument you're espousing isn't even valid from an evolutionary standpoint. Homo-sapiens and other primates evolved in cooperative groups as social animals, thus the image of some Robinson Crusoe figure roaming the plains competing with other isolated, atomistic individuals is a pure myth. In fact, some biologists theorize that in the absence of cooperation consciousness and language would have never developed. In other words, people as individuals simply can't be abstracted from communities and the whole species like you're attempting to do, at least not from an evolutionary standpoint.

Again, this is all cope. You wouldn't have this worldview if you weren't an isolated, miserable human being.
post 1566902171 11-22-2018, 05:41 PM
-
#119
  1. BetaAsPhuck
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  1. BetaAsPhuck
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 34,506
  5. Rep Power: 127306
Originally Posted By Rebel012⏩
You are such a sad case, Wincel. I have never witnessed this type of delusion, weak rationalization, or oversimplification of scientific concepts before.
IMO... Take the 'red pill/MGTOW' philosophy, and strip it down to it's bare roots, and you have Wincel's outlook.

A lotof guys on the misc (and the 'red pill' crowd on the internet) justify their value and ethics solely by using Evolutionary psychology (it's simply biology that X should behave this way), which is one step away from biological reductionism and Wincel's worldview.

It doesn't surprise me that pure materialism (mixed with Western individualism) is in growing popularity (ie. the notion that life is only about sex, reproduction, social status, and acquiring resources).
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621

The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851

Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
post 1566902371 11-22-2018, 05:44 PM
-
#120
  1. BetaAsPhuck
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  1. BetaAsPhuck
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 34,506
  5. Rep Power: 127306
Originally Posted By Rebel012⏩
Your mechanistic worldview was debunked by Einstein's theories. But aside from that, the argument you're espousing isn't even valid from an evolutionary standpoint. Homo-sapiens and other primates evolved in cooperative groups as social animals, thus the image of some Robinson Crusoe figure roaming the plains competing with other isolated, atomistic individuals is a pure myth. In fact, some biologists theorize that in the absence of cooperation consciousness and language would have never developed. In other words, people as individuals simply can't be abstracted from communities and the whole species like you're attempting to do, at least not from an evolutionary standpoint.


Free copy of the book, at the link below...

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/libr...r-of-evolution

Excerpt from the book...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnltUzQLqgw
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621

The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851

Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts