ad was from 1949

no its a conspiracy you dont know what you are sayin lmao

imagine if you applied that same logic to covid

Would it be cute if they also added the actual alleged death count?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HoW7bG6F2Bfi/

Spoiler!

Could possibly blame it on the vaccinated though, considering the vaccine trial in India actually started before the discovery of delta.

Trial of leaky vaccine -> delta

Your post sucks and isn't relevant. Thread's about a front-line worker's experience seeing countless victims of these vaccines. Regardless how you feel about tradies and nurses, they still have a front row seat to people dropping from this snake oil and consequently have more first hand knowledge than you do. Even if you think tradies are second class citizens, you'd probably believe what a plumber told you about what's wrong with your pipes because it's what they do every day.

But more doctors and nurses recommend it than don't; what do?

That's funny because I go to my chiropractor for dental advice.

So there has been a spike in cases with Delta?

Graphic that shows no [significant] correlation between COVID cases in US counties and vaccination rates:



Same author who claims that deaths per million doses is much higher than what is being publicized.^^^
This part I believe I understand pretty clearly. This seems like a restatement of something that has been repeated here:Meanwhile autopsies have been discouraged if not outright denied.And he gives an example of how this works with numbers. Admit I'm much less clear on this, but it seems to me the gist is that this method of calculating relative safety is stupidly flawed and he says that the analytics people w/the CDC must be aware.https://roundingtheearth.substack.co...ty-signals-572

I'm not a numbers gal.

Negged

That much is clear.

Are you going to just ignore the toxicity discussion?

Lol negged you clueless ****g0t. Doctor ruined my adult life with a mistreatment of a flu, blessed me with antibiotic resistant Clostridium Difficile infection. I've read thousands of similar cases because those stupid ****g0ts still use outdated treatments they learned 20 years ago. You have no idea how fukin stupid, careless or corrupt the average GP is, as long as they're making money they don't give a flying fuk about your health.

Respect to firefighter OP.

the NHS in the UK has just spend 3 BILLION £. on over 3,150,000,000 doses of blood clotting drugs........ i wonder what they are expecting to happen next

big pharma just got paid (again)

just lol at the opinion of some tradie dumb firefighter no thanks jeffrey

covid vaxx = patient dies within 24 hours, it was their health conditions not the vaxx.

covid death = patient dies within 30 days of positive test, death for any reason - it was covid.

JFL

By too toxic it clearly means the dosages elicited too strong of an immune response and it gives dangerous side effects.

Try reading the actual article linked instead of linking your own nonsensical article and then responding with passive aggressiveness.

I posted it because the daily positive cases were questioned and yes we are at 230,000.
The positivity rate was......... at 4%, but now almost 12%.
We are in growth mode.

I am not following the vaccination rates, or death rates, those subjects do not interest me unless they are in my state.

Here's my take on vaccines and COVID from reading about this chit and personal experience of people around me:

- nobody I know has got COVID since Feb 2020. 2 people got severe flu like symptoms for 2 weeks last year, tested negative to COVID. No explanation for their flu like symptoms once tested COVID negative (lol, medicine at its finest)
- 3 friends had the vaccine, one is double jabbed. 1 friend was sick the day after the vaccine and felt really chit and said "well that's just the vaccine working", is ok now.
The doubled jabbed friend has been fine. She has complained recently of being tired and having a bad migraine but I don't believe it's related. The 3rd friend is fine.

I believe the vaccine side effects are rare BUT they are more common than COVID causing moderate illness.

You are more likely to get negative moderate-severe symptoms as a result of the vaccine than as a result of encountering the virus. There is no evidence that the vaccine reduces the effects of the virus. It does not reduce transmission.

You are still mandated to wear a mask after being double jabbed by the same "medical health experts" despite mounting evidence that masks do nothing to prevent viral transmission (no chit, the virus is 10x smaller than the pore size of the masks). So a vaccine that allegedly reduces COVID symptoms and morbidity still requires you wear a mask that does nothing. And you trust these "experts"? JFL

When I read vaccine trials in animals and humans for bacterial infections, those kunts go from severely ill to perfectly fine because the antibodies from the serum completely neutralize the toxins that cause illness. The unvaxxed controls die while the vaxxed animals remain completely healthy during infection challenge. That is what you define as a proper vaccine. This whole "it may do this and that and hopefully let's see what happens but you can't sue us" means the vaccine does not work and should not be trusted, period.

So why the fuk would anyone take the COVID vaccine? Both the virus and vaccine are money making scams. Covid is marketing on steroids. I feel sorry for anyone that believes it.

Anecdotes, anecdotes as far as the eye can see.

Try reading the source material (clinical trial) rather than the inciting third hand summary that was posted. Research articles don't use terms like "jabs".

In the actual source material, side effects (e.g., sore arm, flu-like symptoms) increased with dosage. The inciting article uses the term "toxicity" to get the reaction we've seen in this thread.

Yeah, just like COVID cases

Wasn't aware I had ignored it. I replied to a comment that was questioning the possibility that multiple vaccinations could lead to bad outcomes by over stressing peoples' physiology and said that it seemed possible as they found that a higher dosage was too much on people.That works too.

So you didn't read it obviously. The "inciting article" wasn't inciting, but was an article saying that maybe we could vaccinate a higher number of people with our present manufacturing capabilities.

My moms a nurse and she is practically begging me to get it. Also sister in law says same thing, trying to convince my brother to convince us to get it.

I'm not in the medical field but I'm in and out of ER's all the time and know a lot of nurses. I don't necessarily buy any of the conspiracy theories around the vaccine. But a few things I've noticed.


-The people I run across that are vaccinated are far more likely to have socially distanced and/or wear their mask.
-A large portion of people that have been vaccinated still get covid. Some of them end up hospitalized over it. POST vaccination.


My main issues with the vaccine:

1. They can't tell us if it'll work or not. And for how long it'll work for.
2. They can't tell us how often we'll need to get a booster.
3. What kind of long term side effects we'll experience. If we'll experience any. What the chances are that we get any.
4. If it'll conflict with pre-existing medical conditions/medications and cause issue. And which ones.



We know for a fact vaccinated people die under less then ordinary circumstances. Some get other fugged up sides. But nobody is wanting to admit or clarify that its vaccine related.

Pretty alarming when the death count for the jab is just about equal to that for which it's supposed to protect against, no?

You posted this article:
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01893-0

It contains this sentence:
"Two jabs that each contained only one-quarter of the standard dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine gave rise to long-lasting protective antibodies and virus-fighting T cells, according to tests in nearly three dozen people"

Jabs?

Here is the actual study source:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2022483

"Systemic adverse events were more common after the second vaccination, particularly with the highest dose, and three participants (21%) in the 250-μg dose group reported one or more severe adverse events."

(Systemic adverse events mean "feeling sick")

The primary source says nothing about "toxicity".

But, you do you

Didn't you get the memo? You can only refer to doctors and nurses (and science and medicine) as an authority if what they say supports your anti-vax narrative.

Of course the vast majority of medical professionals recommend getting vaccinated. All of the actual data support that as a recommendation.

Arguing semantics. waste of air

Yea it’s funny my mom was actually originally anti vax and said she would never get it but ended up taking after what she observed.

Not saying that means anything but that’s my anecdote. Every I know that works in a hospital is borderline horrified I don’t want it.