This is the thread I caught him plagiarizing all his Covid ideas from. The whole thread is absolutely glorious, but I think it was on page 5 when I called him out from stealing everything from Reddit.


https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=180542743

You clearly just ignored everything I said, and then there is this:https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...post1639069253


So you see, I mentioned there is a professional virologist (James Duehr) who could support everything I was saying. I just didn't mention him by name or show his Reddit paper since the posters here would just piss all over it.


Another one of your boogeymen evaporates, it seems. Now back to the discussion. Where did Reliance commit an argument from ignorance?

What did I do? You must have me confused with someone else

No worries bro. Instead, you decided to plagiarize all his ideas for over a year until I caught you red-handed copying off his paper.

That is true, you have no obligation to answer me, but your accusation that Reliance committed the argument from ignorance is BS until you can substantiate it with evidence.


Seems like "I know you are, but what am I" to me.

Let's not forget the time I caught him plagiarizing fromThe Atlantic:


https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...post1655024973




Absolutely brutal.

I'm not seeing any plagiarism there. Where are the blocks of identical text? A single phase 'myth of sterilising immunity' isn't exactly plagiarism. You can find that phrase in literally thousands of places because sterilising immunity is well, a myth.


So it seems after the James Duehr thing wasn't all that bad since I mentioned he was a source of my info, you've changed tack somewhat but this is an even poorer boogeyman.



And in the worst case scenario, even if one was plagiarising, at least they're contributing to a discussion with good material. That's worlds better than your incessant insulting and thread ruining and sealioning. And how would you even discover posts are being plagiarised? You'd have to be running people's posts through google or plagiarism checkers and that's just frigging weird.


Don't know why you're complaining about supposed plagiarism anyway, when what you're doing is infinitely worse.

Oh wait I got another one of his plagiarisms,where he rips off paragraphsstraight from James Duehr. Everything in bold he straight plagiarized. Notice he says we need to worry about eastern-block labs, and the US-funded Kazahkstan lab. He probably stole more than that, but I stopped after that section.

Now look at James Duehr's paper.

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/com...mment/fqpccr1/

Vaxcels and Gyna dink slurpers ITT after reading rebuttals:



I mean you just have to fuggin lol at this point…

when people start to understand that the vaccine wasn't made for Covid, but that Covid was made for the vaccine, they'll finally get it.

Just like RealID wasn't made because of the Palestine OH, train derailment..the train derailment was made for RealID..

Why do you disingenuously twist my words and fabricate evil intentions which simply aren't there? Because I'm not justifying plagiarism. I'm saying this:

1. I used to provide sources and articles all the time. All the time. But after the only responses were pissing all over them and immediately dismissing them because they were leftist or anti- CT, I just stopped posting the sources because it was futile.


2. The James Duehr thing is far more innocuous than the deliberately framed presentation ITT suggests. Because as my post shows, I said that one of my sources was a professional virologist, but just didn't mention Duehr by name because it was from Reddit and it would get immediately pissed on.

3. Worst case scenario, even if I did plagiarize two articles from two years ago that noone fukking cares about anymore, that's nowhere near as bad as your incessant name calling and childishness and thread ruining. At least it's furthering a discussion. So don't feign innocence here.

I am sure this fits neatly into your "just world" hypothesis.

Isn't this well known?? lol

GWG just dominated this thread (and Reliance lmaoooooo).

remember when they literally called anyone who said this a racist including the president

Once again.

This.

Is all.


So very.



shocking.

And all so very low confidence.

Nothing.

Burger.

It still means they are leaning more towards lab leak over natural origins.

Stay mad, fruitcake.

uh huh.

the virus came from bat soup. its science bro!

a couple months go by.

to say it leaked from a lab is a conspiracy theory and you are a racist for suggesting it. follow the science bro!

a year goes by.

well its on our list of possible causes. but bat soup.

a year goes by.

well we think its more likely that it leaked from a lab than bat soup. but its low confidence.

a year goes by.

......




just fukking lol at you believing in bat soup.

"They" being the US intel community. Their credibility is pretty shot, but hey, if you trust the govt...

I'll wait for the actual evidence lol. I'm not sold when our intel community accuses a country we are engaged in a quasi cold war with of something bad.

You do you.

Fruitcake.

Pretty sure the scientific community always said origin unknown, but likely natty. What the press does is a separate issue. Go yell at CNN for spreading fake news.

And just LOL @ Bodhy.

I post up clear examples of him plagiarizing paragraphs at a time from Reddit, and he's like "oh it's not as bad as it looks, it was adeliberately framed presentationITT."

U wot m8?

Holy shіt, talk about serious mental illness.

what is this one's old screen name?

Wot? The scientific community called you a conspiracy theorist if you said it could have been a lab leak. How are you this retarded?


https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...418-9/fulltext

lol. glad I don't misc on the weekends. that is one pathetic loser.

[QUOTE]The FBI previously came to the conclusion that the pandemic was likely the result of a lab leak[b]in 2021[/b]with “moderate confidence” and still holds to this view.[/QUOTE][img]https://media.tenor.com/0jclPTEHtc4AAAAC/50cent-bert.gif[/img]

[QUOTE]An outbreak at a seafood market in Wuhan had initially been thought to be the source of the virus, but some scientists and Chinese public-health officials now see it as an example of community spread rather than the place where the first human infection occurred, the 2021 intelligence community report said.[/QUOTE]From day 1, what makes more sense:
(A) The epicenter of a rapidly spreading novel virus just happened to be in the city home to one of only a handful of Biosafety Level 4 labs in the entirety of China, or

(B) One of the only Biosafety Level 4 labs in China leaked a rapidly spreading novel virus which was transmitted even faster due to being in the proximity of a city, and one with a dirty-ass wet market no less.

The former is an oddly specific hill to die on as though the latter implies a lab leak was intentional and the whole thing is a giant conspiracy, when the reality is that they're just as prone to accidents and human error as anything else.

Or they're a bunch of bat racists.
[QUOTE]China, which has placed limits on investigations by the World Health Organization, has disputed that the virus could have leaked from one of its labs and has suggested it emerged outside China.[/QUOTE]the same World Health Organization that Biden just handed the entire country over to in the event of another pandemic. The ones who gave[i]China[/i]a year to [i]definitely not clean up any evidence of a lab leak[/url].
[QUOTE=TallTigerTwo post_id=1677997043]Vaxcels and Gyna dink slurpers ITT after reading rebuttals:

[img]https://www.floppingaces.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/what-difference-does-it-make-hillary.jpg[/img]

I mean you just have to fuggin lol at this point…[/QUOTE]To them?
Probably the same difference as dying from COVID and dying from a car crash while being tested positive for COVID.

That's a letter praising the efforts of medical professionals in China. What does that have to do with this?

It's still consensus that the virus likely has a natural origin. It is still a conspiracy theory that it doesn't even if it may be possibly true. And the US intel community has still not yet released this "low confidence evidence" they claim to have.

Like I said, I will wait for actual evidence.

You can look at the arguments put forth in Worobey's paper as well as phylogenetic research on bats in Laos. It's all easily available to anyone with internet access. Go look at any leading virologist's comments on the origins of covid. Note Dr. Ebright and Dr. Chan are actually not virologists, interestingly enough.

Yea I'm not interested in being sealioned. Good luck with your crusade.

Reliance posted it earlier, and you could just google what I said and find it yourself.

Wot? Do you even know how to read?
Just shut the fuсk up already.