Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
  1. Results 1291 to 1320 of 3464
  2. Page 44 of 116
  3. First
  5. 41
  6. 42
  7. 43
  8. 44
  9. 45
  10. 46
  12. Last

Thread: Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"

  1. Rate This Thread
08-08-2016, 07:03 PM
#1291
Originally Posted By digitalchi⏩
so many pictures i need to post here and so many more to come(goat fall season)

from Puerto Rico early this year

">
Just my 2 cents if you're interested.

This is a really nice shot however I would level the horizon and selectively sharpen and burn the bottom left edge where DOF falls away, like this .
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-08-2016, 08:34 PM
#1292
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Just my 2 cents if you're interested.

This is a really nice shot however I would level the horizon and selectively sharpen and burn the bottom left edge where DOF falls away, like this .
thanks..i need to selectively sharpen more often..
No soda crew
Always pick 5 crew
Time to cut crew
Photography crew
  1. digitalchi
  2. Unfadeable
  3. digitalchis avatar
  1. digitalchi
  2. Unfadeable
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 14,709
  6. Rep Power: 35,863
Quote
08-09-2016, 05:01 AM
#1293

Lamborghini Huracan GT3 by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. LieutenantGainss avatar
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 6,303
  5. Rep Power: 84,603
Quote
08-10-2016, 02:17 AM
#1294
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Anyone see this?

http://resourcemagonline.com/2016/08...e-seams/68877/

Forget the failed Kickstarter campaign with no refunds, who would buy from a company where the person running it is nameless and faceless?

http://fstopgear.com/about

Seriously, look them up. Under contact there's an email address and phone number. Dig a little deeper and all you'll find is a PO box.
This was always the image I had for gofundme or kickstarter projects. Some idiot at the "company" unable to get venture capital decides to use the money like a private ATM. $27,000 from 227 backers, and their contact is a email and PO BOX.
"Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, that is strength" -Arnold

Photography Crew
Canon T5I
  1. fulloffat
  2. Registered User
  3. fulloffats avatar
  1. fulloffat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Posts: 2,391
  5. Rep Power: 6,961
Quote
08-10-2016, 07:37 AM
#1295
Gonna be shooting a big concert tonight.


Not ready brahs.


Wish me luck.

Heres a pic I shot last sunday im not allowed to post on socials yet…this is of Dierks Bentley…a country music act…

Had to shoot from the soundboard…thought a 200mm is sufficient…boy was a I wrong…

"Learn from Yesterday, Live for Today, Hope for Tomorrow"
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. VmissileXs avatar
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 10,015
  6. Rep Power: 27,656
Quote
08-10-2016, 08:06 AM
#1296
Originally Posted By fulloffat⏩
This was always the image I had for gofundme or kickstarter projects. Some idiot at the "company" unable to get venture capital decides to use the money like a private ATM. $27,000 from 227 backers, and their contact is a email and PO BOX.
Still no mention of the CEO's name anywhere. All trademark applications point to lawyers.



Judging by the comments on the ******** page from people who placed orders months ago and haven't received anything + the failed Kickstarter campaign you would have to be crazy to send this company a single dime now.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-13-2016, 04:06 PM
#1297










*Official Misc Photography Crew *

Pain is temporary. If I quit, however, it lasts forever. So when I feel like quitting, I ask myself, which would I rather live with?
― Lance Armstrong

Accumulating injuries are the price we pay for the thrill of not having sat around on our asses. - Mark Rippetoe

Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general. - Mark Rippetoe
  1. jmelanson
  2. Manlet Extraordinaire
  3. jmelansons avatar
  1. jmelanson
  2. Manlet Extraordinaire
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 2,209
  6. Rep Power: 51,190
Quote
08-14-2016, 12:00 PM
#1298
Visited the National Aviary Yesterday

Dripping Wet by Jeff McKenna , on Flickr

Standing Proud by Jeff McKenna , on Flickr
  1. Firelifter181
  2. Registered User
  3. Firelifter181s avatar
  1. Firelifter181
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 63
  6. Rep Power: 3,340
Quote
08-17-2016, 06:35 AM
#1299
Photography equipment manufacturers sure know how to ream their customers.

Grease for the tripod locks comes in a two pack of tiny tubes for $20. They don't even tell you how much is in it but it's less than travel sized toothpaste.



The exact same stuff in a 500g tub from an auto store costs $10. Enough of a supply for several lifetimes.

  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-17-2016, 08:49 AM
#1300
Amazing! What camera/lens did you use for those bird photos? The detail is crazy!!


Here's a shot I took from the top of a tower in Bologna. Felt like I was in Assasins Creed!
  1. djole08
  2. Registered User
  3. djole08s avatar
  1. djole08
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 280
  7. Rep Power: 2,897
Quote
08-17-2016, 01:18 PM
#1301
5D Mark IV almost-official specss….

I hope this competes with Nikon as I'm too invested to ever switch to Nikon lol.

Although I'm not sure I'll ever be able to afford this if college doesn't quit raping me.

http://petapixel.com/2016/08/17/prod...ark-iv-leaked/
Architectural and Interiors Photography | Fine Art Landscapes
| www.codylere.com | instagram.com/codylerephoto
-SP-
*Misc Photography Crew*
  1. M0tibation
  2. dis' gon b gud
  3. M0tibations avatar
  1. M0tibation
  2. dis' gon b gud
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
  5. Posts: 4,433
  6. Rep Power: 36,403
Quote
08-17-2016, 11:35 PM
#1302
Originally Posted By M0tibation⏩
5D Mark IV almost-official specss….

I hope this competes with Nikon as I'm too invested to ever switch to Nikon lol.
Considering they've intentionally crippled the 5D for a decade to keep it from cannibalizing 1D sales it shouldn't be hard to come out with something that matches or exceeds what Nikon is offering. They've always been ahead of Nikon.

However the real question for me is the sensor. They've been reheating and repackaging the same sensor technology for over 10 years.

Fanboys will be quick to point out if you nail your exposures, use flash, bracket, etc., then it shouldn't matter, but there are definitely situations where you'd prefer to be working with a Nikon RAW file for all that extra clean detail in the shadows.

That's the main reason why I'd still prefer a D800E/D810 to a 50mp Canon 5DSR.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-18-2016, 02:14 AM
#1303
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Considering they've intentionally crippled the 5D for a decade to keep it from cannibalizing 1D sales it shouldn't be hard to come out with something that matches or exceeds what Nikon is offering. They've always been ahead of Nikon.

However the real question for me is the sensor. They've been reheating and repackaging the same sensor technology for over 10 years.

Fanboys will be quick to point out if you nail your exposures, use flash, bracket, etc., then it shouldn't matter, but there are definitely situations where you'd prefer to be working with a Nikon RAW file for all that extra clean detail in the shadows.

That's the main reason why I'd still prefer a D800E/D810 to a 50mp Canon 5DSR.
Canon were behind for years in af and now behind with their poverty sensors. Moving to over 14 stops of DR in my D800E is game changing, you can push a file 5 stops in post and it is almost indistinguishable from one shot at the right iso.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  3. zknarcs avatar
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 11,410
  6. Rep Power: 44,912
Quote
08-18-2016, 02:38 AM
#1304
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
Moving to over 14 stops of DR in my D800E is game changing, you can push a file 5 stops in post and it is almost indistinguishable from one shot at the right iso.
Absolutely.

The reality is the highlight latitude of all digital cameras (aside from Fuji's old Super CCD technology) is straight up garbage. You've got around 2-3 stops above middle gray. There are so many shots where you'll easily need another 3-4 stops above that to expose middle gray as middle gray without clipping highlights.

Unless you can light the subject with flash, use a grad filter to pull back the sky, or bracket exposures and blend later with a subject that isn't moving, then you're forced to underexpose the whole scene to keep those highlights and then try and bring back the rest of the exposure in post.

As you know this is where Nikon and any manufacturer using a Sony sensor has a clear edge over Canon.

It's not marketing spin or meaningless scenarios that don't occur in the real world. Unless you're working in a studio where you can control the lighting it's going to be an issue.

  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-19-2016, 12:02 PM
#1305
Who's got a spare $9K? Ships in a week.

50mp medium format. Weighs 750g. Weather sealing.

  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-19-2016, 12:09 PM
#1306
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
Who's got a spare $9K? Ships in a week.

50mp medium format. Weighs 750g. Weather sealing.

">
If money was no object…

However, my old D800 continues to provide more camera than I can rightly say I need. No justification to upgrade to the D810, let alone this Hassy beast.

Depending on the D900/D820 though it's going to be interesting whether I sell off old gear/canon stuff and get another body.

The D900 would have to do some neat stuff. DR improvements, ~50mp, clean high ISO, maybe some kind of pixel shift high res shot mode, 1 or 2 more frame per second, etc.

I have a feeling that isn't going to happen.
All Hail the Ultimate Master, "I Know More Than The Generals Do", Donald Camacho Dr. Pepper X-Ray AR-15 Trump
BRB getting Brawndo, it has what plants need
BRB Welcome to Costco, I Love You
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Final_Reps avatar
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: North Pole, Alaska, United States
  5. Posts: 19,115
  6. Rep Power: 1,546,836
Quote
08-19-2016, 12:34 PM
#1307
Originally Posted By Final_Rep⏩
If money was no object…

However, my old D800 continues to provide more camera than I can rightly say I need. No justification to upgrade to the D810, let alone this Hassy beast.

Depending on the D900/D820 though it's going to be interesting whether I sell off old gear/canon stuff and get another body.

The D900 would have to do some neat stuff. DR improvements, ~50mp, clean high ISO, maybe some kind of pixel shift high res shot mode, 1 or 2 more frame per second, etc.

I have a feeling that isn't going to happen.
In the same boat. Couldn't see a reason to upgrade to the D810 when IQ is the same.

50mp+ is always a possibility but my guess is they will go with a 42mp sensor like the Sony A7R II.

For landscapes I've got a pano setup that is working pretty well so resolution isn't really an issue. I'd like to see improvements to the interface. No reason why these cameras shouldn't be able to automate processes like panos, exposure blending, focus stacking, etc. and spit out a RAW file. I'd rather spend more time taking photos and less time screwing around in software.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-19-2016, 01:32 PM
#1308
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
In the same boat. Couldn't see a reason to upgrade to the D810 when IQ is the same.

50mp+ is always a possibility but my guess is they will go with a 42mp sensor like the Sony A7R II.

For landscapes I've got a pano setup that is working pretty well so resolution isn't really an issue. I'd like to see improvements to the interface. No reason why these cameras shouldn't be able to automate processes like panos, exposure blending, focus stacking, etc. and spit out a RAW file. I'd rather spend more time taking photos and less time screwing around in software.
Agreed. Having the option to output a 32bit radiance file with like 19 stops of dynamic range would be pretty neat.

Also the auto-pano feature of a phone but with the IQ of a big full frame sensor, as you move it around, even in a sphere, it stitches the pano together.
All Hail the Ultimate Master, "I Know More Than The Generals Do", Donald Camacho Dr. Pepper X-Ray AR-15 Trump
BRB getting Brawndo, it has what plants need
BRB Welcome to Costco, I Love You
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Final_Reps avatar
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: North Pole, Alaska, United States
  5. Posts: 19,115
  6. Rep Power: 1,546,836
Quote
08-19-2016, 09:50 PM
#1309

Lamborghini Huracan Super Trofeo by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. LieutenantGainss avatar
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 6,303
  5. Rep Power: 84,603
Quote
08-21-2016, 03:35 PM
#1310
The house from the upcoming remake of Stephen King's "It".









*Official Misc Photography Crew *

Pain is temporary. If I quit, however, it lasts forever. So when I feel like quitting, I ask myself, which would I rather live with?
― Lance Armstrong

Accumulating injuries are the price we pay for the thrill of not having sat around on our asses. - Mark Rippetoe

Strong people are harder to kill than weak people, and more useful in general. - Mark Rippetoe
  1. jmelanson
  2. Manlet Extraordinaire
  3. jmelansons avatar
  1. jmelanson
  2. Manlet Extraordinaire
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 2,209
  6. Rep Power: 51,190
Quote
08-21-2016, 04:01 PM
#1311
Originally Posted By jmelanson⏩
The house from the upcoming remake of Stephen King's "It".
Yeah that's a whole truckload of NOPE right there. Would not enter that house for money. Scary as fuk.
All Hail the Ultimate Master, "I Know More Than The Generals Do", Donald Camacho Dr. Pepper X-Ray AR-15 Trump
BRB getting Brawndo, it has what plants need
BRB Welcome to Costco, I Love You
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Final_Reps avatar
  1. Final_Rep
  2. Calibrating.. please wait
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: North Pole, Alaska, United States
  5. Posts: 19,115
  6. Rep Power: 1,546,836
Quote
08-21-2016, 04:10 PM
#1312
Originally Posted By jmelanson⏩
The house from the upcoming remake of Stephen King's "It".
idk why but I have an urge to set it on fire
  1. yg7s7
  2. Am I dreaming?
  3. yg7s7s avatar
  1. yg7s7
  2. Am I dreaming?
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: Eunuch Town, Zimbabwe
  5. Posts: 7,568
  6. Rep Power: 629,335
Quote
08-21-2016, 05:37 PM
#1313
Originally Posted By djole08⏩
Amazing! What camera/lens did you use for those bird photos? The detail is crazy!!

The first one was with a Pentax K30 and Sigma 70-300, second was with a Nikon D750 and Nikon 24-120
  1. Firelifter181
  2. Registered User
  3. Firelifter181s avatar
  1. Firelifter181
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 63
  6. Rep Power: 3,340
Quote
08-22-2016, 05:48 PM
#1314
Butterfly by Zawodowy Fotograf , on Flickr
interior crocodie aligator
i drive a chevrolet movie theater

mountain man #77
MISC guitarist #10
  1. abi_yo_shiva
  2. sex.murder.art
  3. abi_yo_shivas avatar
  1. abi_yo_shiva
  2. sex.murder.art
  3. Join Date: Aug 2004
  4. Posts: 1,560
  5. Rep Power: 0
Quote
08-22-2016, 07:21 PM
#1315
This isn't fanboy gloating since I have no strong emotional connection to either brand but how did Canon get into this position of playing catch-up with Nikon?

D500 > 7Dmk2
D750 > 6D

Was looking at 5DmkIV specs: 30.4mp / 7fps / 61 point/41 cross-type AF / etc.

Nikon drops a 42mp D850/D900 with 6-7fps + the D5's 153-point/99 cross-type AF and it's game over.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-23-2016, 08:07 AM
#1316
I've always known Nikon to be the more lit Camera system, albeit the more higher learning curve (not by much).

Cannon = Mac

Nikon = PC
"Learn from Yesterday, Live for Today, Hope for Tomorrow"
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. VmissileXs avatar
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 10,015
  6. Rep Power: 27,656
Quote
08-23-2016, 08:35 AM
#1317
It wasn't that long ago that Canon was way ahead. I'm not talking only sales but technology.

Nikon was "me too" and took years to respond (full frame DSLR, CMOS, etc.) and usually by the time they responded Canon had something better.

That's not the case now. Role reversal. For every Canon DSLR in the range Nikon have one that matches or exceeds it.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-23-2016, 08:43 AM
#1318
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
It wasn't that long ago that Canon was way ahead. I'm not talking only sales but technology.

Nikon was "me too" and took years to respond (full frame DSLR, CMOS, etc.) and usually by the time they responded Canon had something better.

That's not the case now. Role reversal. For every Canon DSLR in the range Nikon have one that matches or exceeds it.
Who gives you the best bang for your buck?
  1. Joska
  2. mes que un club
  3. Joskas avatar
  1. Joska
  2. mes que un club
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: Barcelona, Spain
  5. Posts: 4,110
  6. Rep Power: 22,507
Quote
08-23-2016, 08:58 AM
#1319
Originally Posted By Joska⏩
Who gives you the best bang for your buck?
If you're buying into a system from scratch, I'd lean toward Nikon, especially if you're looking for something in the middle of the range like a D500 or D750.

That being said, if you have friends who own a lot of Canon gear or you've got access to Canon lenses at work for example, that could influence your decision.

For the past 10 years I've only owned full frame DSLRs but a D500 looks extremely tempting. Would have to be the best all round DSLR.
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
08-23-2016, 11:59 AM
#1320
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
It wasn't that long ago that Canon was way ahead. I'm not talking only sales but technology.

Nikon was "me too" and took years to respond (full frame DSLR, CMOS, etc.) and usually by the time they responded Canon had something better.

That's not the case now. Role reversal. For every Canon DSLR in the range Nikon have one that matches or exceeds it.
what era of time are you looking at? When I got seriously into photography circa 2008 Nikon still seemed ahead of the curve.


Now, that is moderately recent…hence you may be talking about a time before mines.
"Learn from Yesterday, Live for Today, Hope for Tomorrow"
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. VmissileXs avatar
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 10,015
  6. Rep Power: 27,656
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts