Only she doesn't have to per Arkansas State Law as outlined by the Arkansas state police

https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/pol...ont-feel-safe/

"Every Tuesday, the Arkansas State Police explain an Arkansas law.

On Tuesday, ASP explained what fleeing is and what to do if you are not comfortable in the location you are getting pulled over at or if you don’t believe it is a real cop pulling you over.

Police explained that if you see blue lights and aren’t comfortable pulling over, you need to follow these instructions:

First, police said if you are not comfortable pulling over in that location or are not sure it is an actual officer, immediately slow down and turn on your hazard lights. Police said that will let the officer know you see them. Next, police said to move to the farthest right lane and continue to drive to a location where you feel same. Police said under a street light, a gas station, and exit ramp or side road are examples of where to stop. Police said if you think the vehicle pulling you over is not a real police officer, call 911.

Arkansas State Police said if these instructions are followed, you will not be charged with fleeing."

1. Did she slow down? Yes
2. Did she Pull to the furthest right lane? Yes
3. Did she put on her hazard lights? Yes

She did her due diligence as a citizen in Arkansas educating herself on what is, and isn't acceptable in this particular encounter.

The law doesn't care about your Devil's advocacy. She had the legal right to do what she did. What was she supposed to do? Slow down to 35mph(50km) on the highway creating another dangerous situation? Cop was wrong morally and legally.

Put the crack pipe down dawg.

You've never been to the US, huh?

Soon as he rode up alongside her the first time I woulda pulled over immediately. Basically was just telling her to pull the fk over now.

(no bootlicker)

Soon as he rode up alongside her the first time I woulda pulled over immediately. Basically was just telling her to pull the fk over now.

(no bootlicker)

This. Instead she sped up to get back infront of the cop. WTF was he supposed to do - there's no indication she was ever going to pull over.

This. Instead she sped up to get back infront of the cop. WTF was he supposed to do - there's no indication she was ever going to pull over.

She was probably gonna continue going 60 mph until she slammed into the car in front of her that wasn't even being pulled over but that slowed down more because they had no clue wtf she was doing or why a police officer was still following with lights blazing after 2 minutes


Cruising along at 135 kph yet doesn't have the cojones to just pull over on a narrow shoulder. I've known some bad drivers that would do similar chit, these people are a legit danger on the road

She was probably gonna continue going 60 mph until she slammed into the car in front of her that wasn't even being pulled over but that slowed down more because they had no clue wtf she was doing or why a police officer was still following with lights blazing after 2 minutes


Cruising along at 135 kph yet doesn't have the cojones to just pull over on a narrow shoulder. I've known some bad drivers that would do similar chit, these people are a legit danger on the road. I've been stopped twice for speeding, both times I was going over 130 kph and both times I was pulled over and digging for my registration/ID within 10 seconds flat. And both times the officers bumped my speeding ticket down to 110 kph.

This. Instead she sped up to get back infront of the cop. WTF was he supposed to do - there's no indication she was ever going to pull over.

You’re allowed to pullover immediately and she’s allowed to not pullover immediately. Cop is 100% in the wrong. Woman literally did nothing wrong at except for whatever made her get pulled over.

Yes you are a bootlicker

Certified bootlicker here but yeah that is excessive use of force and is not appropriate for the crime. PITs are considered lethal use of force in certain jurisdictions and for speeding it's not appropriate. I can see how the officer felt especially with the long pullover time and her missing that exit for pulling over but it doesn't escalate to needing to perform that on her.

Look at this, a vehicle that started off in the middle lane and way ahead of this woman and the police officer @ 01:07



By 02:57 she has closed the gap with this other car, while driving on the shoulder, and with her hazards on



She was doing such a bad job that this driver way ahead of her was clearly confused about what was going on and was preparing to pull over themselves. I bet the police will argue this is when the officer decided she was a safety concern and that doesn't seem far fetched, is she gonna wait until the car ahead of her stops before she stops or what?

The right move is always to protect yourself. You can believe both the cop is wrong and her just continuing while he was driving very aggressively wasn't very bright.

How is that "bootlicking"?

The fact that you implied, no not said, but implied that the two are even remotely similar is certified bootlicking.

“The right move is always to protect yourself” no, no it’s not. That’s a black and white 100% mentality that cops should not have. “There’s the slightest tiniest possibility I’ll get hurt, so even though this woman is following all the rules im going to attempt to murder her because 100% of the time my safety is above everything else with no grey area”

Nah

They are both at fault. She should have pulled over and she is obviously too stupid to drive correctly. He should have given time to make it to and exit and if she didn't get off then she deserved what she got.