Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
12-12-2016, 05:50 AM
#1651
Originally Posted By LieutenantGains⏩
What's up Gary junior
Any posts made are purely fictional in nature and by no means is anything I say to be taken seriously. Any and all pictures I post are pictures widely available on the internet and any discussions I am involved in are purely hypothetical or are commentary in nature and should not constitute advice or be considered advice
12-12-2016, 11:38 AM
#1652
we got our first serious snowfall this weekend..
12-12-2016, 01:07 PM
#1653
You got to watch stuff like the 'maximum' on top of the white truck. And the dash light on the drivers face?
It some nice shots but those two items would make it unusable for us in any advertising…or you gotta pay for photoshoping, etc.
It some nice shots but those two items would make it unusable for us in any advertising…or you gotta pay for photoshoping, etc.
—Chicago Crew—
♒Morning_Workout_Crew♒
12-12-2016, 01:23 PM
#1654
I picked up a Nikon 20mm 1.8 recently, still haven't shot with it yet though
12-12-2016, 07:07 PM
#1655
My all new Sigma 18-35 mm f/1.8 Lens! Couldn't be more excited to shoot with it!
- ErikTheElectric
- Registered User
- ErikTheElectric
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 70,340
- Rep Power: 138,166
-
12-13-2016, 12:08 PM
#1656
Question for brahs that sell stock photography/footage: Is it possible to make money without selling through an agency?
- CorytheKiD
- Registered User
- CorytheKiD
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Location: United States
- Age: 28
- Posts: 4,581
- Rep Power: 3,107
-
12-14-2016, 06:06 AM
#1657
Originally Posted By ErikTheElectric⏩
My all new Sigma 18-35 mm f/1.8 Lens! Couldn't be more excited to shoot with it!
What does the 1.8 mean? Is a higher number or lower number better?
Any posts made are purely fictional in nature and by no means is anything I say to be taken seriously. Any and all pictures I post are pictures widely available on the internet and any discussions I am involved in are purely hypothetical or are commentary in nature and should not constitute advice or be considered advice
12-14-2016, 08:41 AM
#1658
Originally Posted By Fit1NYC⏩
Lower = Better
What does the 1.8 mean? Is a higher number or lower number better?
- ErikTheElectric
- Registered User
- ErikTheElectric
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 70,340
- Rep Power: 138,166
-
12-14-2016, 09:13 AM
#1659
Originally Posted By Fit1NYC⏩
Everything equal, the lower the better. Also known as a "fast" lens.
What does the 1.8 mean? Is a higher number or lower number better?
🎥
Site oldest post: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
12-14-2016, 04:25 PM
#1660
What happened to the Asian dude that photograohed nudes?
Any posts made are purely fictional in nature and by no means is anything I say to be taken seriously. Any and all pictures I post are pictures widely available on the internet and any discussions I am involved in are purely hypothetical or are commentary in nature and should not constitute advice or be considered advice
12-14-2016, 05:45 PM
#1661
Originally Posted By Inavan⏩
I primarily shoot with an x-pro2. I have a 12mm, 56mm and 50-140mm. Thinking about getting the 35mm and 16mm 1.4s next as well as an x-t2 so I can wield dual cameras for the weddings. The reason I was asking about FF cameras is that there are some shots that I want to shoot with a shallower DoF and the aps-c sensor from the Fuji simply can't give it to me. So I wanted to know what FF cameras people were using so that I could weight the pro's and con's of each system (because **** online reviews).
I screwed up my photo shoot. I'm going to get my ass reamed out if you're unable to remove the shaker from the background. SRS.
Spoiler!
Here's a good YouTube lecture:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_sJFslHQsg
You might also find this article helpful:
http://neilvn.com/tangents/full-fram...epth-of-field/
Before you go dropping money on new camera gear, what lighting, lenses, and camera do you have?
Spoiler!
Here's a good YouTube lecture:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_sJFslHQsg
You might also find this article helpful:
http://neilvn.com/tangents/full-fram...epth-of-field/
Before you go dropping money on new camera gear, what lighting, lenses, and camera do you have?
So far I've gathered this:
Nikon: amazing DR, cheap but high quality primes, affordable FF camera with Dual card slots.
Canon: excellent glass, dual pixel auto focus (with the 5D IV), possibility to use said lenses with canon's C line videocameras.
Sony: FF 4k (or super 35 depending on the camera), eye tracking AF, accurate AF, ability to adapt almost every lens.
IQ wise it seems they are all on par with each other so, again, I wanna know what people love/hate about their cameras so that I can make a decision (probably in april/may 2017).
"I want…I can…I will" - toe-pickin' guitar player Tony Melendez
*Misc Entrepreneur Crew* http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...hp?t=160254601
12-15-2016, 07:38 PM
#1662
Originally Posted By Fit1NYC⏩
It the focal ratio of the focal length and maximum aperture size. A larger aperture will let more light in and gives a shallower depth of field. As KRANE said, low numbers are called "fast" lenses. Shooting a fast lens at its maximum aperture is how people get blurry background in portraits.
What does the 1.8 mean? Is a higher number or lower number better?
Originally Posted By Tete⏩
The 90mm F/2 will give you a shallower DoF. Have you look at a DoF calculator to see what kind of difference you'll actually get? In lots of situations, you're only going to get a difference of a few centimeters.
I primarily shoot with an x-pro2. I have a 12mm, 56mm and 50-140mm. Thinking about getting the 35mm and 16mm 1.4s next as well as an x-t2 so I can wield dual cameras for the weddings. The reason I was asking about FF cameras is that there are some shots that I want to shoot with a shallower DoF and the aps-c sensor from the Fuji simply can't give it to me. So I wanted to know what FF cameras people were using so that I could weight the pro's and con's of each system (because **** online reviews).
So far I've gathered this:
Nikon: amazing DR, cheap but high quality primes, affordable FF camera with Dual card slots.
Canon: excellent glass, dual pixel auto focus (with the 5D IV), possibility to use said lenses with canon's C line videocameras.
Sony: FF 4k (or super 35 depending on the camera), eye tracking AF, accurate AF, ability to adapt almost every lens.
IQ wise it seems they are all on par with each other so, again, I wanna know what people love/hate about their cameras so that I can make a decision (probably in april/may 2017).
So far I've gathered this:
Nikon: amazing DR, cheap but high quality primes, affordable FF camera with Dual card slots.
Canon: excellent glass, dual pixel auto focus (with the 5D IV), possibility to use said lenses with canon's C line videocameras.
Sony: FF 4k (or super 35 depending on the camera), eye tracking AF, accurate AF, ability to adapt almost every lens.
IQ wise it seems they are all on par with each other so, again, I wanna know what people love/hate about their cameras so that I can make a decision (probably in april/may 2017).
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...calculator.htm
What kind of lighting do you own?
12-16-2016, 04:42 AM
#1663
Originally Posted By ErikTheElectric⏩
Let us know how it pans out. I'm considering pulling the trigger on this!
My all new Sigma 18-35 mm f/1.8 Lens! Couldn't be more excited to shoot with it!
">
">
">
">
- MercedesGP 2014
- Photography crew
- Delray Misfits crew
12-16-2016, 04:46 AM
#1664
Originally Posted By ErikTheElectric⏩
Good luck, man. I bought the Sigma 50-150 f2.8 a few years ago brand new, and the damn focusing motor (I think they call it HSM or something like that) stopped working with less than 200 shots with it. This happened during a wedding I was shooting too.
Love that focal range and the fast aperture, but Sigma never again.
My all new Sigma 18-35 mm f/1.8 Lens! Couldn't be more excited to shoot with it!
12-16-2016, 06:08 AM
#1665
Fuaaaaaaark are we on Part V already ?
Long time havent posted a shot. Need to get back on posting.
Btw i picked up a 5D Mark 4 in September along with Sigma 24-105 f4 ART and 35mm 1.4 ART lens (sweet lens if you ask me, tack sharp), i feel i have been missing out using the Canon 24-105L all along.
Long time havent posted a shot. Need to get back on posting.
Btw i picked up a 5D Mark 4 in September along with Sigma 24-105 f4 ART and 35mm 1.4 ART lens (sweet lens if you ask me, tack sharp), i feel i have been missing out using the Canon 24-105L all along.
**A State Of Trance Crew**
** Whatsapp OG42 crew**
I always rep back. If I don't, I might be busy gaining aesthetics.
**Official Misc Photography Crew**
Canon 5D Mark 4 | Sigma 24-105 f4 "ART" | Sigma 35mm f1.4 "ART" | Canon 17-40L | 85 1.8 | 100mm f2.8 Macro | Rokinon 14mm f2.8
** Official Bicycle Crew**
Focus Izalco Max | SRAM Force 22 Group Set | Zipp 303 FC |
12-16-2016, 10:15 AM
#1666
Originally Posted By ANP⏩
This. Was seriously thinking about updating to the MK IV for its video auto focus capability but then the negative reviews. Let us know what you think.
Fuaaaaaaark are we on Part V already ?
Long time havent posted a shot. Need to get back on posting.
Btw i picked up a 5D Mark 4 in September along with Sigma 24-105 f4 ART and 35mm 1.4 ART lens (sweet lens if you ask me, tack sharp),
Long time havent posted a shot. Need to get back on posting.
Btw i picked up a 5D Mark 4 in September along with Sigma 24-105 f4 ART and 35mm 1.4 ART lens (sweet lens if you ask me, tack sharp),
In other news, I spoke with my former instructor the other day and he scolded me for not putting up more content. NY resolution: prepare for a photo video fool come 2017.
i feel i have been missing out using the Canon 24-105L all along.
🎥
Site oldest post: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
12-18-2016, 09:21 AM
#1667
עם הנצח לא מפחד מדרך ארוכה
12-18-2016, 09:25 AM
#1668
Originally Posted By gadiper⏩
Not typically a fan of these types of shots but nice work brah. Did you grad the sky on the right to balance it? Works well.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
12-18-2016, 09:29 AM
#1669
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
Thanks a lot. This is almost SOOC except for a tiny bit of sharpening.
Not typically a fan of these types of shots but nice work brah. Did you grad the sky on the right to balance it? Works well.
This is how the sky were when the shot was taken.
עם הנצח לא מפחד מדרך ארוכה
12-18-2016, 04:48 PM
#1670
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
They have their place. Calm waters means tranquil and serene as is. Also make great background photos.
Not typically a fan of these types of shots but nice work brah. Did you grad the sky on the right to balance it? Works well.
🎥
Site oldest post: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
12-18-2016, 06:11 PM
#1671
New portrait of my friend.
12-20-2016, 04:03 PM
#1672
Originally Posted By mglover92⏩
The first thing I notice is the hair? Then the suit and its juxaposition.
New portrait of my friend.
">
">
">
">
🎥
Site oldest post: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
12-21-2016, 08:47 AM
#1673
It's nice shots. I would smooth some of his facial bleamishes. You can do it with GIMP (Gnu Image Manipulation Program) it's free. I do it all the time with pictures of family, etc.
—Chicago Crew—
♒Morning_Workout_Crew♒
12-21-2016, 09:04 AM
#1674
Originally Posted By gadiper⏩
Remove the border. It's amateurish imo and bothers my eye.
But I like the shot!!
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 7,026
- Rep Power: 12,464
-
12-21-2016, 09:12 AM
#1675
I have been reading up on camera repairing and have a question that has not been satisfied. Maybe you guys can help. If dirty or scratched lens and mirror has near or no effect on the shot taken but you still have blemishes, what is causing it in both slr and dslr?
The sensor?
The sensor?
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 7,026
- Rep Power: 12,464
-
12-21-2016, 09:35 AM
#1676
Looking to purchase an entry level-ish dslr and wouldn't mind some of your opinions w/regards to a few cameras. I'm looking at the Pentax K-50, Nikon D5500, and the Canon EOS 750d. I'll mostly be using it for family functions, the ocassional vacation, and some outdoor/scenic shooting. Do any of the three listed stand head and toe above the rest, or are they going to deliver about the same picture/video quality across the board?
Thanks for any input
Thanks for any input
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 576
- Rep Power: 2,967
-
12-21-2016, 10:40 AM
#1677
Originally Posted By MrDeafMuscle⏩
The problem with a dirty lens or a dirt speck on the sensor is you might barely see it but it gets blown up once you take a picture.
I have been reading up on camera repairing and have a question that has not been satisfied. Maybe you guys can help. If dirty or scratched lens and mirror has near or no effect on the shot taken but you still have blemishes, what is causing it in both slr and dslr?
The sensor?
The sensor?
12-21-2016, 12:18 PM
#1678
Originally Posted By lildave⏩
Yea but lens and mirrors have very little effect on your photos even if they were scratched.
The problem with a dirty lens or a dirt speck on the sensor is you might barely see it but it gets blown up once you take a picture.
Sensor is the only thing I can think of nothing else.
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- MrDeafMuscle
- Token Deaf Guy
- Join Date: May 2011
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 7,026
- Rep Power: 12,464
-
12-21-2016, 02:55 PM
#1679
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
The Pentax is going to be terrible for video. The Canon and Nikon will be fairly comparable. For video, the flippy screen on the Canon will be nice to have.
Looking to purchase an entry level-ish dslr and wouldn't mind some of your opinions w/regards to a few cameras. I'm looking at the Pentax K-50, Nikon D5500, and the Canon EOS 750d. I'll mostly be using it for family functions, the ocassional vacation, and some outdoor/scenic shooting. Do any of the three listed stand head and toe above the rest, or are they going to deliver about the same picture/video quality across the board?
Thanks for any input
Thanks for any input
That said, I'd recommend the Panasonic Lumix G7. It will take superior video compared to the other cameras. It's a small mirrorless micro 4/3 camera. No one wants to haul around a heavy camera sight seeing on vacation or going for a hike. The G7 with 2 primes, a zoom, and extra battery will be around 2 pounds and taking up very little space. The same setup with a APS-C DSLR is going to come in around 5 pounds, and will add a noticeable amount of bulk.
As for family functions, you're going to need to learn how to take photos in low light. All of the cameras are going to struggle with low light in auto mode. I would suggest taking the time to learn the basics of how to manually control your exposure, getting a monopod/tripod, and some off camera lighting. Having and understanding how to use some off camera lighting will get better results than any camera you can buy. Learn to bounce a flash off ceilings and walls. Get a cheap light stand and softbox.
12-21-2016, 03:21 PM
#1680
Originally Posted By MrDeafMuscle⏩
Understandable, some people prefer borderless. Nevertheless, borders have purpose and function. Also, sometimes required for display.
Remove the border. It's amateurish imo and bothers my eye.
But I like the shot!!
But I like the shot!!
🎥
Site oldest post: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=172072283&p=1540411941&viewfull=1#post1540411941
Filmmaker Thread: https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=165304201&p=1534834621#post1534834621
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts