Forum
»
So...what was BEFORE the big bang exactly?
01-20-2018, 04:08 AM
-
#151
- WhirlwindTobias
- Man Against Mediocrity
-
- WhirlwindTobias
- Man Against Mediocrity
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: Malopolskie, Poland
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,541
- Rep Power: 101152
-
-
Originally Posted By Aircommander91⏩
Told ya. Look if you're not a theist and you see someone who is enough of a theist to fill his sig and tag with scripture or pro-faith quotes - don't even bother. You may as well have a fox and a hen debate the food chain.Snip.
If any of you quote that post with all it's scripture and imagery I will be in your CP in a colour rhyming with head.
Into- Mountaineering, running & Djent/Progressive music.
Anti- Lack of accountability. Censorship, fat acceptance, & current wave feminism. That's why I left the UK.
PRs: Highest mt. - 2962m (Zugspitze), Longest day hike - 70km.
01-20-2018, 04:12 AM
-
#152
- DrewDarden
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Posts: 23,010
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 507859
-
-
Originally Posted By RushEm⏩
I didn't read the thread so it may have been said already.i mean...what was there? how was there anything for the universe itself to expand into?
But one possible answer is that literally nothing happened before the big bang. Time is something, so if nothing happened, there is no "before."
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)
01-20-2018, 04:16 AM
-
#153
lol I see where this thread is going...have fun debating an endless topic.
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano
If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
01-20-2018, 04:35 AM
-
#154
- SerbianSickKant
- The Eccentric SickKant
-
- SerbianSickKant
- The Eccentric SickKant
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Posts: 7,503
- Rep Power: 24671
-
-
Originally Posted By Fang2⏩
had to stay awake all night, sure am glad someone posted thislol I see where this thread is going...have fun debating an endless topic.
degenmaxx
01-20-2018, 04:59 AM
-
#155
- AlamedaBoy
- Registered User
-
- AlamedaBoy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 7,706
- Rep Power: 3317
-
-
Beyond human scope.
LAY DOWN AND ROT CREW
01-20-2018, 05:11 AM
-
#156
- Kiop
- ™gif me so i can gif you©
-
- Kiop
- ™gif me so i can gif you©
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Posts: 55,724
- Rep Power: 222392
-
-
hard to answer, with our limited brain capabilities
since we couldnt solve our own human issues, we cant understand how its started
i bet we can screw the earth, with atomic bombs,CERN Large Hadron Collider
since we couldnt solve our own human issues, we cant understand how its started
i bet we can screw the earth, with atomic bombs,CERN Large Hadron Collider
01-20-2018, 08:33 AM
-
#157
Sadly, most of you will never reach the mathematical level of competence necessary to even begin to understand the nature of the early universe. Most of you wouldn't even be able to pass a basic Stat Mech or E&M course. Just lol@ you plebs talking about God and acting like that explains physics. It's easy to throw your hands up and make up some bullchit rather than actually learn the science and math necessary to understand something. Good luck with your delusions of 2018, *******s.
And regarding that Ilya Prigogine quote, you are taking it completely out of context. Because you have never taken statistical mechanics, you fail to understand that he is actually making an argument against spontaneous generation of life in a system in thermodynamic equilibrium. The Earth is definitely a far from equilibrium system. It is known now that systems like this can lead to the generation of self replicating structures, and it isn't a stretch to think that this was a precursor to abiogenesis.
Basically, the quote was taken completely out of context, and you have no idea what you are talking about. And to the other guy, no the LHC will not "screw the earth." However, you are right that some technology could be dangerous.
And regarding that Ilya Prigogine quote, you are taking it completely out of context. Because you have never taken statistical mechanics, you fail to understand that he is actually making an argument against spontaneous generation of life in a system in thermodynamic equilibrium. The Earth is definitely a far from equilibrium system. It is known now that systems like this can lead to the generation of self replicating structures, and it isn't a stretch to think that this was a precursor to abiogenesis.
Basically, the quote was taken completely out of context, and you have no idea what you are talking about. And to the other guy, no the LHC will not "screw the earth." However, you are right that some technology could be dangerous.
01-20-2018, 09:11 AM
-
#158
01-20-2018, 09:13 AM
-
#159
- MinisterOfLust
- 👽👽👽👽👽👽
-
- MinisterOfLust
- 👽👽👽👽👽👽
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 65,452
- Rep Power: 688524
-
-
Just lol if you only believe in science.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts