Forum
»
Whoever built Stonehenge were highly advanced beings. Mind = blown to atoms.
08-31-2018, 04:22 PM
-
#151
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123⏩
That's literally the topic under discussion- what the definition of equator is.Now you're changing the topic.
I was talking about Wikipedia not being a credible source, don't try to move the goalposts here buddy
I was talking about Wikipedia not being a credible source, don't try to move the goalposts here buddy
So again....I'll ask.....what is your definition of equator if you believe the Wikipedia definition to be unreliable? I'll wait....
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:26 PM
-
#152
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
-
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,261
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
What does my definition of the Equator have to do with Wiki not being a credible source for information?That's literally the topic under discussion- what the definition of equator is.
So again....I'll ask.....what is your definition of equator if you believe the Wikipedia definition to be unreliable? I'll wait....
So again....I'll ask.....what is your definition of equator if you believe the Wikipedia definition to be unreliable? I'll wait....
And no, the topic is Stone Henge in case you can't read the thread title
Why is Wiki a credible source? It's publicly editable and full of trolls
Jesus...you guys can't even keep on track or read.
I feel like I'm being trolled right now
08-31-2018, 04:28 PM
-
#153
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Hahaha Billy fuk
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
fist yourself
08-31-2018, 04:29 PM
-
#154
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
The equator is about where the sun is closest to the earth, nothing else.
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
I'm still laughing at how wrong that first quote is. Just lol at everything you've been taught relating to the earth. You've been misled.This.
Hey guys the equator is etched on the surface of the planet and not anything to do with direct sunlight and neither are the poles to do with being as far away from the sun as possible.
Honestly guys
The equator moves as the earth shifts.
It's a man made marker.
Might well spray paint that line on the earth.
LMFAO.
Jesus Christ you need to remove your signature because you cannot comprehend the basic physics that a 7 year old child grasp.
Hey guys the equator is etched on the surface of the planet and not anything to do with direct sunlight and neither are the poles to do with being as far away from the sun as possible.
Honestly guys
The equator moves as the earth shifts.
It's a man made marker.
Might well spray paint that line on the earth.
LMFAO.
Jesus Christ you need to remove your signature because you cannot comprehend the basic physics that a 7 year old child grasp.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:33 PM
-
#155
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
-
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,261
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
lmao completely etheredHahaha Billy fuk
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
next he'll be saying "that Wiki article isn't a credible source" lmaooo
08-31-2018, 04:34 PM
-
#156
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Remove your signature.I'm still laughing at how wrong that first quote is. Just lol at everything you've been taught relating to the the earth. You've been misled.
You don't know chit SRS.
fist yourself
08-31-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#157
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123⏩
Like I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)What does my definition of the Equator have to do with Wiki not being a credible source for information?
And no, the topic is Stone Henge in case you can't read the thread title
Why is Wiki a credible source? It's publicly editable and full of trolls
Jesus...you guys can't even keep on track or read.
I feel like I'm being trolled right now
And no, the topic is Stone Henge in case you can't read the thread title
Why is Wiki a credible source? It's publicly editable and full of trolls
Jesus...you guys can't even keep on track or read.
I feel like I'm being trolled right now
If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#158
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
-
- BlackJack619
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,066
- Rep Power: 143443
-
-
If the sun is really 93 million miles away would a few thousand miles of differential really cause an extreme difference in tempature?
As
08-31-2018, 04:37 PM
-
#159
LinuxJon please come in here and settle this dispute.
𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖈𝕶, 𝖓𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖇𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
█▓▒▒░░🧵Make trolls invisible: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180234573 ░░▒▒▓█
08-31-2018, 04:38 PM
-
#160
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
That's the exact point I've been making....that the equator is defined as equidistant from the poles. JUST LOL.Hahaha Billy fuk
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator
READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.
Clue:
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
equidistant from its poles
REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
You, on the other hand, are talking about complete nonsensical **** involving the equator "being closest to the sun".
LOL at both of you. Utterly....and sadly....misled.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:38 PM
-
#161
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
-
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,261
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
What's happened is you've been proven to be emphatically wrong and now you're changing the goalposts to "you have no comprehension of what's being talked about" to save faceLike I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)
If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
Just take the L and move on brah, it's no biggie
08-31-2018, 04:40 PM
-
#162
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Hang on.Like I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)
If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
You post a link to wiki as a source, then disagree with it once you read it?
Ethered.
RIP.
I knew you were buried when you claimed the equator shifted with the earth.
Remove your signature or negs on sight for life. You might have negatively affected young minds with your stupidity.
fist yourself
08-31-2018, 04:42 PM
-
#163
- EvanStroud
- 88 IQ
-
- EvanStroud
- 88 IQ
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 2,430
- Rep Power: 20455
-
-
Just lol at the broscience mathematics that led to the conclusion that people of far distant history constructed markers for no purpose beyond solely for mathematical equations based on something like points of latitude and longitude that were created centuries later.
Potato logic at its finest.
Potato logic at its finest.
Change sig every day crew
Lost is the best TV show of all time crew
10+ year miscer crew
Drop pants to the ground at the urinal crew
In Christ alone my hope is found crew
6'2" master race but use the little urinal crew
Too many crews in my sig crew
08-31-2018, 04:42 PM
-
#164
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
The temperature difference from the seasons is not caused by the few thousand mile difference in location. That is indeed minuscule compared to 93 million miles. It is caused by the angle the sun's light is hitting your location on earth.If the sun is really 93 million miles away would a few thousand miles of differential really cause an extreme difference in tempature?
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:44 PM
-
#165
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
When did I disagree with it. That's right...I didnt.Hang on.
You post a link to wiki as a source, then disagree with it once you read it?
Ethered.
RIP.
I knew you were buried when you claimed the equator shifted with the earth.
Remove your signature or negs on sight for life. You might have negatively affected young minds with your stupidity.
You post a link to wiki as a source, then disagree with it once you read it?
Ethered.
RIP.
I knew you were buried when you claimed the equator shifted with the earth.
Remove your signature or negs on sight for life. You might have negatively affected young minds with your stupidity.
Lol at your nonsense thread getting wrecked.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
08-31-2018, 04:45 PM
-
#166
08-31-2018, 04:48 PM
-
#167
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Originally Posted By EvanStroud⏩
This is the entire fukkin point you stupid, mouth breathing cabbage.Just lol at the broscience mathematics that led to the conclusion that people of far distant history constructed markers for no purpose beyond solely for mathematical equations based on something like points of latitude and longitude that were created centuries later.
Potato logic at its finest.
Potato logic at its finest.
Can't you see they hadat leastthe same reasoning skills as us?
Add that to the fact that they constructed perfect megalithic structures with a supposedly sub 50 IQ??
Read between the lines you complete and utter amoeba.
fist yourself
08-31-2018, 04:53 PM
-
#168
08-31-2018, 05:42 PM
-
#169
holy **** after 8 years i have found the two dumbest posters on this forum, bustacapp and his twink dirty don. lmao the dumber you are the smarter you think you are, these guys are so dumb they can even fathom ever being wrong.
08-31-2018, 06:09 PM
-
#170
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Like said previously you can make reverse equations to fit your agenda.
I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.
30/10 = 3
Half Life 3 confirmed.
I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.
30/10 = 3
Half Life 3 confirmed.
09-01-2018, 12:56 AM
-
#171
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
This. Some real bright ones ITT.holy **** after 8 years i have found the two dumbest posters on this forum, bustacapp and his twink dirty don. lmao the dumber you are the smarter you think you are, these guys are so dumb they can even fathom ever being wrong.
Also judging by Busta's last few posts here....looks like the Supreme Rustler is himself rustled, after being called out on his terrible logic and conclusions.
To Dirty Don....since you refuse to accept Wikipedia's obvious (and well-accepted) definition of equator (and at the same time refuse to provide your own definition), here are some more sources that agree with it:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...nglish/equator
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/equator
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equator
The above are mere dictionaries though, feel free to consult any of various astronomy dictionaries, for example "Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy", CRC Press- 2001 for a similar definition.
Lol at your only contribution to the discussion being utterly irrelevant to the discussion itself. As a side-note, Wikipedia articles in general are........sourced, and do have good information usually (that's the entire point- you consult the sources). If you think your average Wikipedia article contains myriads of false facts....I've got some bad news for you.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
09-01-2018, 02:46 AM
-
#172
- Psychotropic
- Registered User
-
- Psychotropic
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Australia
- Posts: 4,238
- Rep Power: 9667
-
-
nice that simple honest people like BustaCapp have an outlet like the misc
do you notice when you start talking that other people's eyes glaze over?
do you notice when you start talking that other people's eyes glaze over?
09-01-2018, 02:51 AM
-
#173
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
-
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,261
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
lol @ spending time typing all that outThis. Some real bright ones ITT.
Also judging by Busta's last few posts here....looks like the Supreme Rustler is himself rustled, after being called out on his terrible logic and conclusions.
To Dirty Don....since you refuse to accept Wikipedia's obvious (and well-accepted) definition of equator (and at the same time refuse to provide your own definition), here are some more sources that agree with it:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...nglish/equator
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/equator
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equator
The above are mere dictionaries though, feel free to consult any of various astronomy dictionaries, for example "Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy", CRC Press- 2001 for a similar definition.
Lol at your only contribution to the discussion being utterly irrelevant to the discussion itself. As a side-note, Wikipedia articles in general are........sourced, and do have good information usually (that's the entire point- you consult the sources). If you think your average Wikipedia article contains myriads of false facts....I've got some bad news for you.
Also judging by Busta's last few posts here....looks like the Supreme Rustler is himself rustled, after being called out on his terrible logic and conclusions.
To Dirty Don....since you refuse to accept Wikipedia's obvious (and well-accepted) definition of equator (and at the same time refuse to provide your own definition), here are some more sources that agree with it:
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...nglish/equator
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/equator
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equator
The above are mere dictionaries though, feel free to consult any of various astronomy dictionaries, for example "Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy", CRC Press- 2001 for a similar definition.
Lol at your only contribution to the discussion being utterly irrelevant to the discussion itself. As a side-note, Wikipedia articles in general are........sourced, and do have good information usually (that's the entire point- you consult the sources). If you think your average Wikipedia article contains myriads of false facts....I've got some bad news for you.
09-01-2018, 02:55 AM
-
#174
- VinnyPazRules
- Chitcoin sell
-
- VinnyPazRules
- Chitcoin sell
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Posts: 14,060
- Rep Power: 37269
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
If they were such geniuses then how come they couldn't figure out germ theory? They are just rocksIf, on a map, you draw a line from the centre of the Stonhenge circle, straight down to the equator, the latitude coordinate is[color=green]51°10'42.3529" N[color]
Now consider that originally there were 60 stones at the outer circle, and a circle = 360°
60 x 360 = 21,600
[color=green]51 x 10 x 42.3529[color]= 21,600

Mind = decimated.
It doesn't stop there either.
All the pyramids, mounds etc found across the world have correlating mathematics linking each other globally, indicating a worldwide civilization that was highly advanced (and not a bunch of pagan degenerates as mainstream science would have you believe).
I realize that 100% of you *******s won't watch this, and even if you don't, at least try and watch the first 20 minutes or so.
Why are we being lied to about our own history?
Now consider that originally there were 60 stones at the outer circle, and a circle = 360°
60 x 360 = 21,600
[color=green]51 x 10 x 42.3529[color]= 21,600

Mind = decimated.
It doesn't stop there either.
All the pyramids, mounds etc found across the world have correlating mathematics linking each other globally, indicating a worldwide civilization that was highly advanced (and not a bunch of pagan degenerates as mainstream science would have you believe).
I realize that 100% of you *******s won't watch this, and even if you don't, at least try and watch the first 20 minutes or so.
Why are we being lied to about our own history?
09-01-2018, 03:22 AM
-
#175
09-01-2018, 04:20 AM
-
#176
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
-
- BustaCapp
- Delivering Negs
- Join Date: Dec 2002
- Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 27,158
- Rep Power: 346296
-
-
Originally Posted By float365⏩
Can someone aware me on this gif? Don't even know who that is srs.real or fake?
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats⏩
I understand where you're coming from.Like said previously you can make reverse equations to fit your agenda.
I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.
30/10 = 3
Half Life 3 confirmed.
I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.
30/10 = 3
Half Life 3 confirmed.
But what you need to process is the exact latitude of Stonehenge coming from 2 numbers presented at the site.
To an accuracy of several decimal points (let's not go back over the earth axis shift etc).
fist yourself
09-01-2018, 04:52 AM
-
#177
so many lols at that poverty shthole Stonehenge
meanwhile at Alpha Greece ..

https://www.traveloompa.com/top-10-m...greek-temples/
meanwhile at Alpha Greece ..

https://www.traveloompa.com/top-10-m...greek-temples/
09-01-2018, 09:08 AM
-
#178
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
His latitude coordinates for Stonehenge proved to be a sham, and here he is still referencing them in a bogus calculation, thinking it's meaningful.Can someone aware me on this gif? Don't even know who that is srs.
I understand where you're coming from.
But what you need to process is the exact latitude of Stonehenge coming from 2 numbers presented at the site.
To an accuracy of several decimal points (let's not go back over the earth axis shift etc).
I understand where you're coming from.
But what you need to process is the exact latitude of Stonehenge coming from 2 numbers presented at the site.
To an accuracy of several decimal points (let's not go back over the earth axis shift etc).
Welp.....so much for misc IQ
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
09-01-2018, 09:12 AM
-
#179
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
-
- DirtyDon123
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,261
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
lol says the guy with the confirmed low IQHis latitude coordinates for Stonehenge proved to be sham, and here he is still referencing them in a bogus calculation, thinking it's meaningful.
Welp.....so much for misc IQ
Welp.....so much for misc IQ
09-01-2018, 09:14 AM
-
#180
- quadfecta
- Registered User
-
- quadfecta
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Age: 36
- Posts: 23,282
- Rep Power: 100308
-
-
Idk much about Stonehenge but the piri neis map from the 1700s showing Antarctica without ice that’s just as acccurate as present day sattelite imaging is all the proof I need there were ancient advanced civilizations here on earth in the past
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts


