Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Whoever built Stonehenge were highly advanced beings. Mind = blown to atoms.
  1. Results 151 to 180 of 213
  2. First
  3. 4
  4. 5
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. Last
post 1560179261 08-31-2018, 04:22 PM
-
#151
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123
Now you're changing the topic.

I was talking about Wikipedia not being a credible source, don't try to move the goalposts here buddy
That's literally the topic under discussion- what the definition of equator is.

So again....I'll ask.....what is your definition of equator if you believe the Wikipedia definition to be unreliable? I'll wait....
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560179511 08-31-2018, 04:26 PM
-
#152
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By numberguy12
That's literally the topic under discussion- what the definition of equator is.

So again....I'll ask.....what is your definition of equator if you believe the Wikipedia definition to be unreliable? I'll wait....
What does my definition of the Equator have to do with Wiki not being a credible source for information?

And no, the topic is Stone Henge in case you can't read the thread title

Why is Wiki a credible source? It's publicly editable and full of trolls

Jesus...you guys can't even keep on track or read.

I feel like I'm being trolled right now
post 1560179671 08-31-2018, 04:28 PM
-
#153
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Hahaha Billy fuk

You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator

READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.

Clue:

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles


REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
fist yourself
post 1560179711 08-31-2018, 04:29 PM
-
#154
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
The equator is about where the sun is closest to the earth, nothing else.
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
This.

Hey guys the equator is etched on the surface of the planet and not anything to do with direct sunlight and neither are the poles to do with being as far away from the sun as possible.

Honestly guys

The equator moves as the earth shifts.

It's a man made marker.

Might well spray paint that line on the earth.

LMFAO.

Jesus Christ you need to remove your signature because you cannot comprehend the basic physics that a 7 year old child grasp.
I'm still laughing at how wrong that first quote is. Just lol at everything you've been taught relating to the earth. You've been misled.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560180051 08-31-2018, 04:33 PM
-
#155
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
Hahaha Billy fuk

You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator

READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.

Clue:

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles


REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
lmao completely ethered

next he'll be saying "that Wiki article isn't a credible source" lmaooo
post 1560180131 08-31-2018, 04:34 PM
-
#156
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By numberguy12
I'm still laughing at how wrong that first quote is. Just lol at everything you've been taught relating to the the earth. You've been misled.
Remove your signature.

You don't know chit SRS.
fist yourself
post 1560180181 08-31-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#157
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By DirtyDon123
What does my definition of the Equator have to do with Wiki not being a credible source for information?

And no, the topic is Stone Henge in case you can't read the thread title

Why is Wiki a credible source? It's publicly editable and full of trolls

Jesus...you guys can't even keep on track or read.

I feel like I'm being trolled right now
Like I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)

If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560180191 08-31-2018, 04:35 PM
-
#158
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
If the sun is really 93 million miles away would a few thousand miles of differential really cause an extreme difference in tempature?
As
post 1560180281 08-31-2018, 04:37 PM
-
#159
  1. Luc1fer
  1. Luc1fer
  2. Join Date: Jun 2014
  3. Posts: 45,573
  4. Rep Power: 685731
LinuxJon please come in here and settle this dispute.
𝕮𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖈𝕶, 𝖓𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗 𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖘𝖊 𝖆 𝖇𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍

█▓▒▒░░🧵Make trolls invisible: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180234573 ░░▒▒▓█
post 1560180391 08-31-2018, 04:38 PM
-
#160
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
Hahaha Billy fuk

You've not even read the link you posted have you? You simply posted s Wikipedia link and hoped I'd nope the fuk out didn't you?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equator

READ IT YOU STUPID FUKCING NEANDERTHAL.

Clue:

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles

equidistant from its poles


REMOVE YOUR SIG YOU COMPLETE AND UTTER BRAIN-DEAD CHARLATAN.
That's the exact point I've been making....that the equator is defined as equidistant from the poles. JUST LOL.

You, on the other hand, are talking about complete nonsensical **** involving the equator "being closest to the sun".

LOL at both of you. Utterly....and sadly....misled.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560180401 08-31-2018, 04:38 PM
-
#161
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By numberguy12
Like I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)

If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
What's happened is you've been proven to be emphatically wrong and now you're changing the goalposts to "you have no comprehension of what's being talked about" to save face

Just take the L and move on brah, it's no biggie
post 1560180521 08-31-2018, 04:40 PM
-
#162
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By numberguy12
Like I'm talking to a brick wall....it has nothing to do with Wikipedia (which by way is generally a great source for information as it's sourced....)

If you disagree with the definition, then please state your own definition, I'll wait. Not gonna happen though- I suspect you have almost no comprehension of whats being talked about here.
Hang on.

You post a link to wiki as a source, then disagree with it once you read it?

Ethered.

RIP.

I knew you were buried when you claimed the equator shifted with the earth.

Remove your signature or negs on sight for life. You might have negatively affected young minds with your stupidity.
fist yourself
post 1560180611 08-31-2018, 04:42 PM
-
#163
  1. EvanStroud
  2. 88 IQ
  1. EvanStroud
  2. 88 IQ
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 2,430
  6. Rep Power: 20455
Just lol at the broscience mathematics that led to the conclusion that people of far distant history constructed markers for no purpose beyond solely for mathematical equations based on something like points of latitude and longitude that were created centuries later.

Potato logic at its finest.
Change sig every day crew
Lost is the best TV show of all time crew
10+ year miscer crew
Drop pants to the ground at the urinal crew
In Christ alone my hope is found crew
6'2" master race but use the little urinal crew
Too many crews in my sig crew
post 1560180621 08-31-2018, 04:42 PM
-
#164
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BlackJack619
If the sun is really 93 million miles away would a few thousand miles of differential really cause an extreme difference in tempature?
The temperature difference from the seasons is not caused by the few thousand mile difference in location. That is indeed minuscule compared to 93 million miles. It is caused by the angle the sun's light is hitting your location on earth.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560180861 08-31-2018, 04:44 PM
-
#165
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
Hang on.

You post a link to wiki as a source, then disagree with it once you read it?

Ethered.

RIP.

I knew you were buried when you claimed the equator shifted with the earth.

Remove your signature or negs on sight for life. You might have negatively affected young minds with your stupidity.
When did I disagree with it. That's right...I didnt.

Lol at your nonsense thread getting wrecked.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560180971 08-31-2018, 04:45 PM
-
#166
  1. neuron
  2. Veritas. Aequitas.
  1. neuron
  2. Veritas. Aequitas.
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Location: County Donegal, Ireland
  5. Posts: 8,417
  6. Rep Power: 51207
found a picture of bustacapp

twitter: @bullexinferis
post 1560181161 08-31-2018, 04:48 PM
-
#167
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By EvanStroud
Just lol at the broscience mathematics that led to the conclusion that people of far distant history constructed markers for no purpose beyond solely for mathematical equations based on something like points of latitude and longitude that were created centuries later.

Potato logic at its finest.
This is the entire fukkin point you stupid, mouth breathing cabbage.

Can't you see they hadat leastthe same reasoning skills as us?

Add that to the fact that they constructed perfect megalithic structures with a supposedly sub 50 IQ??

Read between the lines you complete and utter amoeba.
fist yourself
post 1560181661 08-31-2018, 04:53 PM
-
#168
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By neuron
found a picture of bustacapp

Location: Ireland
fist yourself
post 1560185291 08-31-2018, 05:42 PM
-
#169
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
holy **** after 8 years i have found the two dumbest posters on this forum, bustacapp and his twink dirty don. lmao the dumber you are the smarter you think you are, these guys are so dumb they can even fathom ever being wrong.
post 1560186791 08-31-2018, 06:09 PM
-
#170
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  1. OneLegSquats
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 26,031
  6. Rep Power: 118538
Like said previously you can make reverse equations to fit your agenda.

I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.

30/10 = 3

Half Life 3 confirmed.
post 1560205271 09-01-2018, 12:56 AM
-
#171
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By gluon
holy **** after 8 years i have found the two dumbest posters on this forum, bustacapp and his twink dirty don. lmao the dumber you are the smarter you think you are, these guys are so dumb they can even fathom ever being wrong.
This. Some real bright ones ITT.

Also judging by Busta's last few posts here....looks like the Supreme Rustler is himself rustled, after being called out on his terrible logic and conclusions.

To Dirty Don....since you refuse to accept Wikipedia's obvious (and well-accepted) definition of equator (and at the same time refuse to provide your own definition), here are some more sources that agree with it:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...nglish/equator

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/equator

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equator

The above are mere dictionaries though, feel free to consult any of various astronomy dictionaries, for example "Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy", CRC Press- 2001 for a similar definition.

Lol at your only contribution to the discussion being utterly irrelevant to the discussion itself. As a side-note, Wikipedia articles in general are........sourced, and do have good information usually (that's the entire point- you consult the sources). If you think your average Wikipedia article contains myriads of false facts....I've got some bad news for you.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560207461 09-01-2018, 02:46 AM
-
#172
  1. Psychotropic
  2. Registered User
  1. Psychotropic
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 4,238
  6. Rep Power: 9667
nice that simple honest people like BustaCapp have an outlet like the misc

do you notice when you start talking that other people's eyes glaze over?
post 1560207561 09-01-2018, 02:51 AM
-
#173
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By numberguy12
This. Some real bright ones ITT.

Also judging by Busta's last few posts here....looks like the Supreme Rustler is himself rustled, after being called out on his terrible logic and conclusions.

To Dirty Don....since you refuse to accept Wikipedia's obvious (and well-accepted) definition of equator (and at the same time refuse to provide your own definition), here are some more sources that agree with it:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/...nglish/equator

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/equator

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/equator

The above are mere dictionaries though, feel free to consult any of various astronomy dictionaries, for example "Dictionary of Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Astronomy", CRC Press- 2001 for a similar definition.

Lol at your only contribution to the discussion being utterly irrelevant to the discussion itself. As a side-note, Wikipedia articles in general are........sourced, and do have good information usually (that's the entire point- you consult the sources). If you think your average Wikipedia article contains myriads of false facts....I've got some bad news for you.
lol @ spending time typing all that out
post 1560207671 09-01-2018, 02:55 AM
-
#174
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  1. VinnyPazRules
  2. Chitcoin sell
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Posts: 14,060
  5. Rep Power: 37269
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
If, on a map, you draw a line from the centre of the Stonhenge circle, straight down to the equator, the latitude coordinate is[color=green]51°10'42.3529" N[color]

Now consider that originally there were 60 stones at the outer circle, and a circle = 360°

60 x 360 = 21,600

[color=green]51 x 10 x 42.3529[color]= 21,600



Mind = decimated.

It doesn't stop there either.

All the pyramids, mounds etc found across the world have correlating mathematics linking each other globally, indicating a worldwide civilization that was highly advanced (and not a bunch of pagan degenerates as mainstream science would have you believe).

I realize that 100% of you *******s won't watch this, and even if you don't, at least try and watch the first 20 minutes or so.



Why are we being lied to about our own history?
If they were such geniuses then how come they couldn't figure out germ theory? They are just rocks
post 1560208211 09-01-2018, 03:22 AM
-
#175
  1. float365
  2. Banned
  1. float365
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 409
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By sdmk
real or fake?
post 1560209371 09-01-2018, 04:20 AM
-
#176
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By float365
real or fake?
Can someone aware me on this gif? Don't even know who that is srs.
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats
Like said previously you can make reverse equations to fit your agenda.

I found 30p in coins on the floor today. At that moment I checked my watch and it was 10am.

30/10 = 3

Half Life 3 confirmed.
I understand where you're coming from.

But what you need to process is the exact latitude of Stonehenge coming from 2 numbers presented at the site.

To an accuracy of several decimal points (let's not go back over the earth axis shift etc).
fist yourself
post 1560210021 09-01-2018, 04:52 AM
-
#177
  1. HardMofo
  2. Banned
  1. HardMofo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 525
  6. Rep Power: 0
so many lols at that poverty shthole Stonehenge

meanwhile at Alpha Greece ..





https://www.traveloompa.com/top-10-m...greek-temples/
post 1560219041 09-01-2018, 09:08 AM
-
#178
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
Can someone aware me on this gif? Don't even know who that is srs.



I understand where you're coming from.

But what you need to process is the exact latitude of Stonehenge coming from 2 numbers presented at the site.

To an accuracy of several decimal points (let's not go back over the earth axis shift etc).
His latitude coordinates for Stonehenge proved to be a sham, and here he is still referencing them in a bogus calculation, thinking it's meaningful.

Welp.....so much for misc IQ
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1560219371 09-01-2018, 09:12 AM
-
#179
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  1. DirtyDon123
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,261
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By numberguy12
His latitude coordinates for Stonehenge proved to be sham, and here he is still referencing them in a bogus calculation, thinking it's meaningful.

Welp.....so much for misc IQ
lol says the guy with the confirmed low IQ
post 1560219471 09-01-2018, 09:14 AM
-
#180
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 23,282
  6. Rep Power: 100308
Idk much about Stonehenge but the piri neis map from the 1700s showing Antarctica without ice that’s just as acccurate as present day sattelite imaging is all the proof I need there were ancient advanced civilizations here on earth in the past
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts