Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Harris to give $25k for down payment [rentcels were right]
  1. Results 151 to 165 of 165
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  1. Rate This Thread
08-16-2024, 06:32 PM
#151
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Yeah, and they're in the middle of nowhere. I just love the mentality that someone is "entitled" to a home, and that this will help broke ass Zoomers purchase a home.
I agree that its a stupid idea, im against it.

They're not in the "middle of nowhere" but definitely not the most desirable areas.

And lots of these homes are actually great for buying cash for passive income.
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. 6gorillions avatar
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 3,200
  6. Rep Power: 64,857
Quote
08-16-2024, 06:37 PM
#152
everyone who doesnt own a house should get 25k for their 1st house

get phucked landlord chads
  1. alphaalbertan8
  2. Registered User
  3. alphaalbertan8s avatar
  1. alphaalbertan8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2022
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 3,638
  6. Rep Power: 18,207
Quote
08-16-2024, 06:44 PM
#153
I'll take a BJ
MR.PHF '09

“Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them.”- Don Quixote

''Damn right I like the life I live

'Cause I went from negative to positive

And it's all Good…"


"Friends come and go but Enemies Accumulate"



"Zero tolerance Crew" ZERO, NADA !!!!
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  3. mr.left hooks avatar
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Posts: 12,384
  5. Rep Power: 137,964
Quote
08-16-2024, 06:49 PM
#154
DEI loans at the top of the market? What could possibly go wrong

Just a reminder for the peasants out there with the memory of a goldfish, the government did the same thing with NINJA loans in 2007 and then the big banks vacuumed up the foreclosures for the next three years

Ain’t socialism great?
  1. Masterchieffer
  2. The Creampie Guy
  3. Masterchieffers avatar
  1. Masterchieffer
  2. The Creampie Guy
  3. Join Date: Nov 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 2,987
  6. Rep Power: 22,666
Quote
08-16-2024, 07:35 PM
#155
This may possibly be the dumbest policy proposal ever. This is Bernie Sandersesque Modern Monetary Theory and it is comical.

The only way to make housing more affordable is to increase the supply of homes a) build a chit ton more homes &/or b) deport the 20+ million illegals that occupy housing. Throwing money on the buy side will only make prices continue to climb - 1) cause you are directly driving prices up and 2) the money supply is increasing causing MORE inflation which will make EVERYTHING more expensive for EVERYONE.

Imagine being a first time homebuyer with your crispy 25k credit. You throw your max bid at your dream house only to get outbid by another first time homebuyer with their crispy 25k credit that has a higher pre-approval than you. Get fukkd brokie.

p.s. the tax payers lose, the first time home buyers are at no advantage, and the only winner is the home seller - they just got an additional 25k. LAND CHADS WIN AGAIN!
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  3. ChewYourFoods avatar
  1. ChewYourFood
  2. ▪█───────█▪
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Posts: 7,385
  5. Rep Power: 89,931
Quote
08-16-2024, 07:38 PM
#156
Originally Posted By Masterchieffer
DEI loans at the top of the market? What could possibly go wrong

Just a reminder for the peasants out there with the memory of a goldfish, the government did the same thing with NINJA loans in 2007 and then the big banks vacuumed up the foreclosures for the next three years

Ain’t socialism great?
After the crash was a great time to buy a house.
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Dave22reborns avatar
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 96,888
  6. Rep Power: 316,531
Quote
08-16-2024, 07:44 PM
#157
Originally Posted By FA*******
So far, Harris has proposed

-helicopter money for homebuyers
-tax cuts while govt spending is already 30% higher than income.
-price controls on food

End well this will not…
And left wing retards will gobble this chit up then blame Republicans when it doesn't work
  1. LargePeter
  2. Fuk off, Lahey!
  3. LargePeters avatar
  1. LargePeter
  2. Fuk off, Lahey!
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: Kuntstralia, Australia
  5. Posts: 30,786
  6. Rep Power: 449,513
Quote
08-16-2024, 10:57 PM
#158
Originally Posted By DeadlyStriker
As a first time homebuyer myself waiting to buy, I don't want this. That's absurd.

The only way I could see that as part of a democrat plan is if they show us all the provisions of what makes you eligible. If it's like "Must have 780+ credit score, supporting income, low debt monthly payments, etc" then it could be something she could run on. The only time these things will push through is if they are precise with their stipulations because it automatically shows only a small percentage of the pool is eligible and the policy would at least seem in good faith.

Otherwise giving any first time homebuyer 25k for a down payment is economic suicide. Her economic plan is the most radical insanity I've seen yet. Not even Bernie was throwing out this kind of communist heat.
Originally Posted By r32gojirra
On average, it does affect house prices

If you removed from the market everyone who was gifted money or loan guarantees, prices would be lower than they are.
Originally Posted By r32gojirra
In 1998, I used a AUD$14k federal government home builders grant as a down payment to build my first home (building a house back then started in the low-100ks)

In 1998 dollars that’s much more than US$25k

Kept leveraging the equity I built and now I have a property development business bringing in 7 figures annually after tax, and an identical distribution for my business partner (wife)

So sometimes handing money to immigrants can work out well
I'm with DeadlyStriker on this one, it's pure inflationary policy and you note that in your first post. Your second post only goes further to prove the point.

I've just purchased in the same market as you (Australia), and the fact that you apparently live a CEO 10k/day both on 7 figures based on equity is proof that these sort of policies don't work. I'm around 10 years younger than you, earn a good 6 figures, and had to pay a fortune to just make it into the market so that I could escape the rent bullchit. That fortune goes to those that had the opportunity to enter the market earlier (late 90's is pretty golden), which on the whole is unproductive.

I won't be afforded a similar opportunity to build equity across multiple properties as I cannot conceive how prices could go up to the extent you have experienced on your assets in Australia. I don't have a problem with this either, as I'm happy to work as a productive member of society and have some security in owning my own place (eventually).

What I do have a problem with is that the Australian property market was a one trick pony that was good for around 20 years, now it's phucking over younger people and who knows wtf their children are going to do in 20 years time. Beyond that, it's unproductive and selling houses to one-another in a merry-go-round does not lead to the advancement or stability of the country. Even the boomers are now coming to realise this as it bites their kids who are much less likely to enjoy the same quality of life and retirement as their parents. Australians all got rich selling property to each other and decided that essential productive work like manufacturing was below us and now we're left completely dependent on other countries like China for our continued existence.

I'm no expert on the US but I dare say it's a similar picture there with a widening wealth gap and the middle class becoming relatively poorer and that contributes to the political situation there. I can see why some of Trump's policies speak to the population.
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Chasbrahs avatar
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Posts: 188
  5. Rep Power: 8,427
Quote
08-16-2024, 11:03 PM
#159
Originally Posted By OGfrom06
Funny how when trust fund babies get $100k from their parents, it never seems to affect home prices
also funny how all the people who are against UBI FREEDOM DIVIDENDS TAX ROI also support Rich People Giving their OffSpring some UBInheritance and it is quite possible those Rich People benefit from some Corporate Welfare to fund their SilverSpoon Dynasties
  1. theraskal
  2. Registered User
  3. theraskals avatar
  1. theraskal
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 2,408
  6. Rep Power: 22,477
Quote
08-16-2024, 11:35 PM
#160
Originally Posted By Chasbrah
I'm with DeadlyStriker on this one, it's pure inflationary policy and you note that in your first post. Your second post only goes further to prove the point.

I've just purchased in the same market as you (Australia), and the fact that you apparently live a CEO 10k/day both on 7 figures based on equity is proof that these sort of policies don't work. I'm around 10 years younger than you, earn a good 6 figures, and had to pay a fortune to just make it into the market so that I could escape the rent bullchit. That fortune goes to those that had the opportunity to enter the market earlier (late 90's is pretty golden), which on the whole is unproductive.

I won't be afforded a similar opportunity to build equity across multiple properties as I cannot conceive how prices could go up to the extent you have experienced on your assets in Australia. I don't have a problem with this either, as I'm happy to work as a productive member of society and have some security in owning my own place (eventually).

What I do have a problem with is that the Australian property market was a one trick pony that was good for around 20 years, now it's phucking over younger people and who knows wtf their children are going to do in 20 years time. Beyond that, it's unproductive and selling houses to one-another in a merry-go-round does not lead to the advancement or stability of the country. Even the boomers are now coming to realise this as it bites their kids who are much less likely to enjoy the same quality of life and retirement as their parents. Australians all got rich selling property to each other and decided that essential productive work like manufacturing was below us and now we're left completely dependent on other countries like China for our continued existence.

I'm no expert on the US but I dare say it's a similar picture there with a widening wealth gap and the middle class becoming relatively poorer and that contributes to the political situation there. I can see why some of Trump's policies speak to the population.
I’ve paid back that grant hundreds, if not thousands of times over in GST, income taxes, company taxes, wages and council rates

There’s still plenty of money to be made in residential real estate. The COVID bump alone meant that everyone who had significant exposure to the market is now a multimillionaire
By reading this post you acknowledge r32gojirra is an online persona and all posts by r32gojirra are satirical in nature. Comments by r32gojirra shall not reflect on the integrity and morals of the author portraying the online character nor any professional or contractual affiliates of the author.

AP4C
HTC
Repped by kimm into 200kcrew crew
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Brootal
  3. r32gojirras avatar
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Brootal
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 22,766
  6. Rep Power: 453,881
Quote
08-16-2024, 11:53 PM
#161
So list a starter home for $425,000 instead of $400,000 as originally planned. More corporate profit, let government debt pay the difference. Cha-ching for homebuilders. What am I missing?
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. frankdtank20s avatar
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 16,651
  5. Rep Power: 171,041
Quote
08-17-2024, 12:46 AM
#162
sellers will raise prices, this fixes nothing but wastes government money

idiot policy.
*** Free Thinker Crew ***

*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***

*** HTC ***
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. rocketfishs avatar
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 18,523
  7. Rep Power: 57,311
Quote
08-17-2024, 01:14 AM
#163
Originally Posted By r32gojirra
I’ve paid back that grant hundreds, if not thousands of times over in GST, income taxes, company taxes, wages and council rates

There’s still plenty of money to be made in residential real estate. The COVID bump alone meant that everyone who had significant exposure to the market is now a multimillionaire
I've no doubt with your income it is indeed thousands of times over you've paid back the grant in taxes. The tax rate here is very high once you're earning over 80k/year, not to mention stamp duty, land tax, payroll tax (if you're paying wages) etc.

My problem is that people can become multimillionaires off the back of non-productive speculation alone, and as you say, so many people as well- all for doing sweet phuck all for society. What's worse is they don't seem to have the insight that it's damaging to those that come after them and the country as a whole. While it's a lot of people who've gotten rich off property, there's a whole lot more younger people who won't be afforded that opportunity and are going to likely be economically stuck. In a system where living comfortably increasingly relies on "moving up", this can't be a good thing. We're lucky we have our government funded healthcare but it's always getting worse as the increase in population and population age stresses it.

My parents retired in their 40's off the back of the early property boom, they paid plenty of tax through their business, to employees etc. While they have lived well and think they're pretty clever as a result of their early retirement, they didn't quite make enough to give me a leg up, and I certainly wouldn't have the option to retire in my 40's (not that I'd want to anyway). They can't believe I paid more for a small place then they did for 4 properties combined that ultimately afforded them their retirement. I certainly can't see myself being able to give a meaningful chunk of cash to any kids I may have.
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Chasbrahs avatar
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Posts: 188
  5. Rep Power: 8,427
Quote
08-17-2024, 01:36 AM
#164
Originally Posted By Chasbrah
I've no doubt with your income it is indeed thousands of times over you've paid back the grant in taxes. The tax rate here is very high once you're earning over 80k/year, not to mention stamp duty, land tax, payroll tax (if you're paying wages) etc.

My problem is that people can become multimillionaires off the back of non-productive speculation alone, and as you say, so many people as well- all for doing sweet phuck all for society. What's worse is they don't seem to have the insight that it's damaging to those that come after them and the country as a whole. While it's a lot of people who've gotten rich off property, there's a whole lot more younger people who won't be afforded that opportunity and are going to likely be economically stuck. In a system where living comfortably increasingly relies on "moving up", this can't be a good thing. We're lucky we have our government funded healthcare but it's always getting worse as the increase in population and population age stresses it.

My parents retired in their 40's off the back of the early property boom, they paid plenty of tax through their business, to employees etc. While they have lived well and think they're pretty clever as a result of their early retirement, they didn't quite make enough to give me a leg up, and I certainly wouldn't have the option to retire in my 40's (not that I'd want to anyway). They can't believe I paid more for a small place then they did for 4 properties combined that ultimately afforded them their retirement. I certainly can't see myself being able to give a meaningful chunk of cash to any kids I may have.
We made our money from new development, not passively buying and selling existing homes.

So we employ architects, hydraulic and civil engineers, fire safety engineers, structural engineers, builders and all the subcontractors in productive economic activity
By reading this post you acknowledge r32gojirra is an online persona and all posts by r32gojirra are satirical in nature. Comments by r32gojirra shall not reflect on the integrity and morals of the author portraying the online character nor any professional or contractual affiliates of the author.

AP4C
HTC
Repped by kimm into 200kcrew crew
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Brootal
  3. r32gojirras avatar
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Brootal
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 22,766
  6. Rep Power: 453,881
Quote
08-17-2024, 01:41 AM
#165
Originally Posted By r32gojirra
We made our money from new development, not passively buying and selling existing homes.

So we employ architects, hydraulic and civil engineers, fire safety engineers, structural engineers, builders and all the subcontractors in productive economic activity
This I can get on board with and support. Creating new homes and enabling skilled employment.
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Chasbrahs avatar
  1. Chasbrah
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Posts: 188
  5. Rep Power: 8,427
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts