Forum
»
The 5G Trojan Horse - If You Don't Read Articles Or Studies, Please Watch This!
05-02-2020, 01:36 PM
-
#181
Anyway, if you are concerned about the potential health risks of 5g, LINE YOUR HOUSE WITH ALUMINUM FOIL. SRS. It will 100% defeat (or substantially reduce) any such "harmful radiation". This also works for phones. Don't want the government to track you? Wrap your phone in a couple of layers of tightly wrapped aluminum foil. Boom. Faraday cage, son.
05-02-2020, 01:38 PM
-
#182
Originally Posted By 4ea⏩
The high intensity could potentially heat tissue. It won't be ionizing radiation, but the heating could cause secondary effects. This is the idea behind the ADS energy weapon. The intensities from the cell towers are nowhere near what is needed for such a weapon. And it's a good thing too because otherwise, they'd be rolling out drone cops with pain lasers. And yeah, the way things are going, that could seriously be a thing one day. BRB jaywalked and therefore got zapped by a pain laser.to be honest dude im impressed because you obviously know your physics.
the question is though, what would allow 5G, or any wireless device to actually become dangerous? high intensity. its my understanding that for 5G to work, so they say it would require transmitters to be put up very close to one another, I believe a couple hundred feet or less. and what amplitude signal are they giving out?
i state these as questions because i dont know the details of 5G signal transmission, but do you see the potential for danger under the right circumstances?
the question is though, what would allow 5G, or any wireless device to actually become dangerous? high intensity. its my understanding that for 5G to work, so they say it would require transmitters to be put up very close to one another, I believe a couple hundred feet or less. and what amplitude signal are they giving out?
i state these as questions because i dont know the details of 5G signal transmission, but do you see the potential for danger under the right circumstances?
05-02-2020, 01:39 PM
-
#183
- Werke
- Registered User
-
- Werke
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Location: Oviedo, Florida, United States
- Age: 43
- Posts: 818
- Rep Power: 1357
-
-
Beta when asked to cite studies about 5G hurting people, you linked a study on Microwaves which are over 300GHz while 5g is in the range of 25-90GHz. I don't care either way of this argument but actually link the correct stuff
***A State of Trance Crew***
05-02-2020, 01:39 PM
-
#184
- Black03mach
- Roll Tide
-
- Black03mach
- Roll Tide
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Posts: 1,889
- Rep Power: 15100
-
-
Originally Posted By FA*******⏩
repped, learned something today.Itcan.
It takes a certain amount of energy to release those valence electrons from orbit - the exact energy depends on how tightly they're bound to that specific atom. But anyway, there's two factors determining if you're able to ionize an atom.
-how many photons you hit them with
-and how much energy those photons have.
The sole thing determining #2 is the frequency of the EM wave.
So basically, if your photons are at X frequency, and you have Y number of them, and X * Y is less than the ionization energy for that atom, you're not going to ionize anything.
RF photons are at a very low energy - they're about a million times less ionizing than your lightbulb FFS - so unless you make it up in gigawatts or terawatts of volume, RF will never be able to ionize an atom. It can in theory, but it's near impossible to do in practice.
X-rays and nuclear radiation are ionizing, which is why you have to limit exposure to them, because each of those photons are about a hundred billion times more effective at ionization than cell towers.
EDIT:
Wizard.
It takes a certain amount of energy to release those valence electrons from orbit - the exact energy depends on how tightly they're bound to that specific atom. But anyway, there's two factors determining if you're able to ionize an atom.
-how many photons you hit them with
-and how much energy those photons have.
The sole thing determining #2 is the frequency of the EM wave.
So basically, if your photons are at X frequency, and you have Y number of them, and X * Y is less than the ionization energy for that atom, you're not going to ionize anything.
RF photons are at a very low energy - they're about a million times less ionizing than your lightbulb FFS - so unless you make it up in gigawatts or terawatts of volume, RF will never be able to ionize an atom. It can in theory, but it's near impossible to do in practice.
X-rays and nuclear radiation are ionizing, which is why you have to limit exposure to them, because each of those photons are about a hundred billion times more effective at ionization than cell towers.
EDIT:
Wizard.
Software Eng Crew
Alabama Crimson Tide
*** Alabama 205 Crew ***
*** New Jersey 732 Crew ***
*** MWC ***
PRs : S: 455 / D: 545 / B: 340
CTS-V - Built motor, BTR stg2 cam, ported heads, Magnuson 2650, 85mm upper, 9.45 lower, 30gph meth
C6 Z06 - Heads ; Pfadt & Akrapovič full exhaust ; LG G2 coilovers & swaybars, corner balanced. Other misc HPDE minded mods ; 490/450 on mustang dyno.
Past Vehicles: Bolt on Focus RS ; Built/Turbo 03 Mach 1 ; ATS-V manual sedan
05-02-2020, 01:41 PM
-
#185
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
i hear ya man. i would think that radiation heat transfer even if non ionizing could still inflict harm. i mean, holding a lighter on your skin isnt ionizing, but its still causing harm.The high intensity could potentially heat tissue. It won't be ionizing radiation, but the heating could cause secondary effects. This is the idea behind the ADS energy weapon. The intensities from the cell towers are nowhere near what is needed for such a weapon. And it's a good thing too because otherwise, they'd be rolling out drone cops with pain lasers.
inb4 thats convective heat transfer, not radiation heat transfer.
Merica
<I.L.H.|C.O.E.>
RIP YGST
05-02-2020, 01:44 PM
-
#186
Originally Posted By 4ea⏩
Radiation heat transfer can definitely cause harm even without ionizing radiation...by heating the tissue. But the intensities of these radio towers are pathetic compared to what would be needed. This is kind of like people freaking out over a small amount of poison in their food. As long as the effective concentration of the poison is below some threshold value, it is basically completely safe. You wouldn't see a noticeable effect until longer than your lifetime of constant sampling. Similar goes for 5g. It's basically completely safe. The plastic pipes we use for water are probably more dangerous to our health than 5g is.i hear ya man. i would think that radiation heat transfer even if non ionizing could still inflict harm. i mean, holding a lighter on your skin isnt ionizing, but its still causing harm.
inb4 thats convective heat transfer, not radiation heat transfer.
inb4 thats convective heat transfer, not radiation heat transfer.
05-02-2020, 01:52 PM
-
#187
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
If this is true why do some countries refuse to have 5g? This isnt all just conspiracy theorists saying its bad, its actual governments and communities.Radiation heat transfer can definitely cause harm even without ionizing radiation...by heating the tissue. But the intensities of these radio towers are pathetic compared to what would be needed. This is kind of like people freaking out over a small amount of poison in their food. As long as the effective concentration of the poison is below some threshold value, it is basically completely safe. You wouldn't see a noticeable effect until longer than your lifetime of constant sampling. Similar goes for 5g. It's basically completely safe. The plastic pipes we use for water are probably more dangerous to our health than 5g is.
05-02-2020, 01:53 PM
-
#188
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats⏩
Just people making popular decisions. It really is a bunch of people misunderstanding the science. There are also reasonable privacy concerns, as beta has pointed out. A person might accept 5g as safe, but reject the tech on privacy grounds.If this is true why do some countries refuse to have 5g? This isnt all just conspiracy theorists saying its bad, its actual governments and communities.
My problem is when people scream about 5g being somehow unsafe. That's dumb. The privacy argument is a good one that holds merit. The one about it being harmful to health is mostly backed by pseudoscience and a profound lack of understanding of how radiation interacts with tissue.
Show me one guy with a background in E&M/Optics who thinks 5g is dangerous. Srs.
05-02-2020, 01:55 PM
-
#189
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
im not convinced.Radiation heat transfer can definitely cause harm even without ionizing radiation...by heating the tissue. But the intensities of these radio towers are pathetic compared to what would be needed. This is kind of like people freaking out over a small amount of poison in their food. As long as the effective concentration of the poison is below some threshold value, it is basically completely safe. You wouldn't see a noticeable effect until longer than your lifetime of constant sampling. Similar goes for 5g. It's basically completely safe. The plastic pipes we use for water are probably more dangerous to our health than 5g is.
whats the total radiation intensity that were surrounded by? not just one individual radio tower, but also everyones cell phones, wireless routers, military signals, and who knows what else. even AC current gives off electromagnetic radiation, because you are accelerating charged particles, this gives off electromagnetic radiation.
how is that net intensity going to change when they put 5G towers up every couple hundred feet? and what is the cumulative effect of all of these sources of electromagnetic energy over the course of a lifetime?
look, im not saying lets destroy all electrical devices and live like its 1000 AD. Im just saying i dont think its a good idea to continue to up the amplitude of environmental e&m radiation higher and higher.
Merica
<I.L.H.|C.O.E.>
RIP YGST
05-02-2020, 01:57 PM
-
#190
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
Whether it is harmful to health or not, the privacy reasons alone should be more than enough reason to rise up against it.Just people making popular decisions. It really is a bunch of people misunderstanding the science. There are also reasonable privacy concerns, as beta has pointed out. A person might accept 5g as safe, but reject the tech on privacy grounds.
My problem is when people scream about 5g being somehow unsafe. That's dumb. The privacy argument is a good one that holds merit. The one about it being harmful to health is mostly backed by pseudoscience and a profound lack of understanding of how radiation interacts with tissue.
Show me one guy with a background in E&M/Optics who thinks 5g is dangerous. Srs.
My problem is when people scream about 5g being somehow unsafe. That's dumb. The privacy argument is a good one that holds merit. The one about it being harmful to health is mostly backed by pseudoscience and a profound lack of understanding of how radiation interacts with tissue.
Show me one guy with a background in E&M/Optics who thinks 5g is dangerous. Srs.
The western world is already like a police state, imagine cameras and sensors on every single road
05-02-2020, 01:58 PM
-
#191
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
-
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,024
- Rep Power: 22666
-
-
Originally Posted By 4ea⏩
Thanks for cracking open a HS textbook... lolE=H*F
im gonna neg you
im gonna neg you
More importantly wave energy is proportional to the square of the wave amplitude and as a result amplitude is in 99% of cases the controlling factor.
We encounter radiation everyday that is orders of magnitude higher frequency than 5g yet dont experience side effects because their amplitude is relatively low.
05-02-2020, 02:00 PM
-
#192
Originally Posted By 4ea⏩
It's not significant. Think about it. You need all those towers because the signal attenuates so hard in most materials. So, you're really only exposed to a low level wherever you are. We are exposed to radiation ALL THE TIME. Like literally all the time. Not all radiation is dangerous or matters. You're exposed to even a low baseline level of extremely dangerous radiation, such as gamma rays, when you go outside or eat a banana. But it's not in enough intensity to really do significant damage to you.im not convinced.
whats the total radiation intensity that were surrounded by? not just one individual radio tower, but also everyones cell phones, wireless routers, military signals, and who knows what else. even AC current gives off electromagnetic radiation, because you are accelerating charged particles, this gives off electromagnetic radiation.
how is that net intensity going to change when they put 5G towers up every couple hundred feet? and what is the cumulative effect of all of these sources of electromagnetic energy over the course of a lifetime?
whats the total radiation intensity that were surrounded by? not just one individual radio tower, but also everyones cell phones, wireless routers, military signals, and who knows what else. even AC current gives off electromagnetic radiation, because you are accelerating charged particles, this gives off electromagnetic radiation.
how is that net intensity going to change when they put 5G towers up every couple hundred feet? and what is the cumulative effect of all of these sources of electromagnetic energy over the course of a lifetime?
You should be more concerned about pollution and heating from fossil fuels than heating from 5g lol. That's fuking things up a lot faster.
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats⏩
Right. My logic is we are already there, so we might as well reap all the benefits.Whether it is harmful to health or not, the privacy reasons alone should be more than enough reason to rise up against it.
The western world is already like a police state, imagine cameras and sensors on every single road
The western world is already like a police state, imagine cameras and sensors on every single road
05-02-2020, 02:02 PM
-
#193
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
There are no benefits to constant surveillance, plenty of drawbacks though.It's not significant. Think about it. You need all those towers because the signal attenuates so hard in most materials. So, you're really only exposed to a low level wherever you are. We are exposed to radiation ALL THE TIME. Like literally all the time. Not all radiation is dangerous or matters. You're exposed to even a low baseline level of extremely dangerous radiation, such as gamma rays, when you go outside or eat a banana. But it's not in enough intensity to really do significant damage to you.
Right. My logic is we are already there, so we might as well reap all the benefits.
Right. My logic is we are already there, so we might as well reap all the benefits.
05-02-2020, 02:03 PM
-
#194
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats⏩
I can think of a few. I listed them earlier. Less crime, such as drug dealing, kidnapping, etc. Perhaps counseling to prevent suicides. Reduced incidence of terrorism. Perhaps if a person is injured, help can be dispatched immediately...There are some pluses.There are no benefits to constant surveillance, plenty of drawbacks though.
Minuses are of course a lack of privacy and freedom and the possibility of a privileged class of government elites abusing and controlling everyone.
05-02-2020, 02:07 PM
-
#195
05-02-2020, 02:10 PM
-
#196
Originally Posted By WINCEL19⏩
LMAO at this know it all *******.Just people making popular decisions. It really is a bunch of people misunderstanding the science. There are also reasonable privacy concerns, as beta has pointed out. A person might accept 5g as safe, but reject the tech on privacy grounds.
My problem is when people scream about 5g being somehow unsafe. That's dumb. The privacy argument is a good one that holds merit. The one about it being harmful to health is mostly backed by pseudoscience and a profound lack of understanding of how radiation interacts with tissue.
Show me one guy with a background in E&M/Optics who thinks 5g is dangerous. Srs.
My problem is when people scream about 5g being somehow unsafe. That's dumb. The privacy argument is a good one that holds merit. The one about it being harmful to health is mostly backed by pseudoscience and a profound lack of understanding of how radiation interacts with tissue.
Show me one guy with a background in E&M/Optics who thinks 5g is dangerous. Srs.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
05-02-2020, 02:13 PM
-
#197
- nckid
- Fuk'n Boot
-
- nckid
- Fuk'n Boot
- Join Date: Aug 2007
- Location: Fayetteville, North Carolina, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 490
- Rep Power: 5146
-
-
Definitely not about to watch multiple hours of "independent researchers" talking about 5g & the conspiracy about escaping technology, but I will say a lot of people are going to be in for a reality check when earth CONTINUES to go through its cycles due to the sun which currently we will be experiencing getting worse until 2025 according to occult astrology, technology is the only thing that can save humanity as mother nature does not give a single **** about any human life & this is why the "elites" believe in population control and technology because when history repeats itself and the catastrophes start happening all at the same time in different parts of the world, they will be the ones who see it coming, have the technology to escape and to survive.
5G is at the bottom of the pyramid for things to come and people fear what they dont understand, just as people believe chem trails are bad when its been used to slow the planet changes that are SUPPOSED to be happening that are starting now.
5G is at the bottom of the pyramid for things to come and people fear what they dont understand, just as people believe chem trails are bad when its been used to slow the planet changes that are SUPPOSED to be happening that are starting now.
USMC 0311 Combat Veteran 2010-2017
2018 Porsche Panamera Turbo Owner
05-02-2020, 02:13 PM
-
#198
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Still waiting on an explanation for this. 5g shills keep ignoring it
https://mdsafetech.org/2019/09/28/fi...w-cell-towers/
https://mdsafetech.org/2019/09/28/fi...w-cell-towers/
05-02-2020, 02:15 PM
-
#199
As of 23 April, more than 251,000 people – including tens of thousands of physicians, physicists, medical researchers, and public health officials, as well as officials of several thousand scientific and health-related organizations – have signed an international appeal titled“Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.”
The appeal “urgently call[s] for a halt to the deployment of the 5G wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation [which] has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.”
The appeal is addressed to “the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe, and governments of all nations.”
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
A report from the U.S. National Institutes of Health found a significant rise in instances of brain cancer and a rare kind of cancer that grows in the nerves around the heart among rats under prolonged EMF exposure.
- Researchers at Egypt’s Menoufiya University found that “inhabitants living near mobile phone base stations are at risk of developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions.”
- A study from Turkey’s Marmara University shows that exposure to EMFs can reduce the body’s production of nitric oxide, a key compound that lets cells communicate with each other.
- Lengthy exposure to EMFs before birth can lead to a greater chance of children being born with autism-spectrum disorders, scientists at Arabian Gulf University report.
- Radio frequency radiation damages trees close to mobile phone base stations, according to a study involving scientists at the Spanish National Research Council and Pompeu Fabra University.
The appeal “urgently call[s] for a halt to the deployment of the 5G wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation [which] has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.”
The appeal is addressed to “the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe, and governments of all nations.”
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
A report from the U.S. National Institutes of Health found a significant rise in instances of brain cancer and a rare kind of cancer that grows in the nerves around the heart among rats under prolonged EMF exposure.
- Researchers at Egypt’s Menoufiya University found that “inhabitants living near mobile phone base stations are at risk of developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions.”
- A study from Turkey’s Marmara University shows that exposure to EMFs can reduce the body’s production of nitric oxide, a key compound that lets cells communicate with each other.
- Lengthy exposure to EMFs before birth can lead to a greater chance of children being born with autism-spectrum disorders, scientists at Arabian Gulf University report.
- Radio frequency radiation damages trees close to mobile phone base stations, according to a study involving scientists at the Spanish National Research Council and Pompeu Fabra University.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
05-02-2020, 02:15 PM
-
#200
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
-
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,024
- Rep Power: 22666
-
-
Originally Posted By OneLegSquats⏩
Cameras and sensors that give me real time traffic info, improve safety, and drive down crime rates? Terrifying.Whether it is harmful to health or not, the privacy reasons alone should be more than enough reason to rise up against it.
The western world is already like a police state, imagine cameras and sensors on every single road
The western world is already like a police state, imagine cameras and sensors on every single road
05-02-2020, 02:18 PM
-
#201
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
-
- OneLegSquats
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 26,031
- Rep Power: 118538
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Truth bomb just wiped out 5g shills ITT. GJDMAs of 23 April, more than 251,000 people – including tens of thousands of physicians, physicists, medical researchers, and public health officials, as well as officials of several thousand scientific and health-related organizations – have signed an international appeal titled“Stop 5G on Earth and in Space.”
The appeal “urgently call[s] for a halt to the deployment of the 5G wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation [which] has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.”
The appeal is addressed to “the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe, and governments of all nations.”
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
A report from the U.S. National Institutes of Health found a significant rise in instances of brain cancer and a rare kind of cancer that grows in the nerves around the heart among rats under prolonged EMF exposure.
- Researchers at Egypt’s Menoufiya University found that “inhabitants living near mobile phone base stations are at risk of developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions.”
- A study from Turkey’s Marmara University shows that exposure to EMFs can reduce the body’s production of nitric oxide, a key compound that lets cells communicate with each other.
- Lengthy exposure to EMFs before birth can lead to a greater chance of children being born with autism-spectrum disorders, scientists at Arabian Gulf University report.
- Radio frequency radiation damages trees close to mobile phone base stations, according to a study involving scientists at the Spanish National Research Council and Pompeu Fabra University.
The appeal “urgently call[s] for a halt to the deployment of the 5G wireless network, including 5G from space satellites. 5G will massively increase exposure to radio frequency (RF) radiation [which] has been proven harmful for humans and the environment. The deployment of 5G constitutes an experiment on humanity and the environment that is defined as a crime under international law.”
The appeal is addressed to “the UN, WHO, EU, Council of Europe, and governments of all nations.”
https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal
A report from the U.S. National Institutes of Health found a significant rise in instances of brain cancer and a rare kind of cancer that grows in the nerves around the heart among rats under prolonged EMF exposure.
- Researchers at Egypt’s Menoufiya University found that “inhabitants living near mobile phone base stations are at risk of developing neuropsychiatric problems and some changes in the performance of neurobehavioral functions.”
- A study from Turkey’s Marmara University shows that exposure to EMFs can reduce the body’s production of nitric oxide, a key compound that lets cells communicate with each other.
- Lengthy exposure to EMFs before birth can lead to a greater chance of children being born with autism-spectrum disorders, scientists at Arabian Gulf University report.
- Radio frequency radiation damages trees close to mobile phone base stations, according to a study involving scientists at the Spanish National Research Council and Pompeu Fabra University.
05-02-2020, 02:36 PM
-
#202
- FAPhaggot
- Hawaiian shirt hoarder
-
- FAPhaggot
- Hawaiian shirt hoarder
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Posts: 24,226
- Rep Power: 185354
-
-
Originally Posted By Black03mach⏩
Ehhh, just did some re-reading on the photoelectric effect and I got it totally wrong. My experience is on the engineering side of RF, but it's been a long time since I've dealt with the underlying physics of EM.repped, learned something today.
Volume doesn't matter. That X * Y thing I posted was bunk. Only a single photon can eject electrons and only it has high enough energy; you can bomb an atom with a billion low-energy photons and it will never ionize it.
RF is incapable of ionizing any atom at any volume or wattage.
Originally Posted By Masterchieffer⏩
See above.Thanks for cracking open a HS textbook... lol
More importantly wave energy is proportional to the square of the wave amplitude and as a result amplitude is in 99% of cases the controlling factor.
We encounter radiation everyday that is orders of magnitude higher frequency than 5g yet dont experience side effects because their amplitude is relatively low.
More importantly wave energy is proportional to the square of the wave amplitude and as a result amplitude is in 99% of cases the controlling factor.
We encounter radiation everyday that is orders of magnitude higher frequency than 5g yet dont experience side effects because their amplitude is relatively low.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew
"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
05-02-2020, 02:45 PM
-
#203
- conics
- Registered User
-
- conics
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: Call a jack a jack. Call a spade a spade. But always call a whore a lady. Their lives are hard enoug
- Posts: 17,997
- Rep Power: 15955
-
-
Originally Posted By BetaAsPhuck⏩
that wont do sht, how do i protect myself when its outSpreading the word, and signing the petition to stop the rollout of 5G.
I don't check my CP, IDC about reps/negs
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ RIP Zyzz, The Father Of Aesthetics. 1989 -2011. Forever in our hearts ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
05-02-2020, 02:46 PM
-
#204
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
-
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,024
- Rep Power: 22666
-
-
Originally Posted By FA*******⏩
Takes a real man to admit when they are wrong. Thank you.Ehhh, just did some re-reading on the photoelectric effect and I got it totally wrong. My experience is on the engineering side of RF, but it's been a long time since I've dealt with the underlying physics of EM.
Volume doesn't matter. That X * Y thing I posted was bunk. Only a single photon can eject electrons and only it has high enough energy; you can bomb an atom with a billion low-energy photons and it will never ionize it.
RF is incapable of ionizing any atom at any volume or wattage.
See above.
Volume doesn't matter. That X * Y thing I posted was bunk. Only a single photon can eject electrons and only it has high enough energy; you can bomb an atom with a billion low-energy photons and it will never ionize it.
RF is incapable of ionizing any atom at any volume or wattage.
See above.
05-02-2020, 02:52 PM
-
#205
- Coachbombay
- Killer boots, man!
-
- Coachbombay
- Killer boots, man!
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Location: Rack City, Bitch, Canada
- Age: 39
- Posts: 4,363
- Rep Power: 30298
-
-
Everyone's talking about radiation when the real danger is Skynet.
They got little baby legs that stand so low
you got to pick 'em up just to say hello.
05-02-2020, 03:08 PM
-
#206
- alltrapbrah
- Registered User
-
- alltrapbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 8,035
- Rep Power: 42639
-
-
Fuarkkkk, this thread has been a rollercoaster; legit had fun reading it.
05-02-2020, 03:23 PM
-
#207
- kessel81
- Uwotm8
-
- kessel81
- Uwotm8
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 5,822
- Rep Power: 1078
-
-
srs question for the 5G tinfoil bros -
The "mischievous secret society" that are apparently behind the mass deployment of 5G are also living ON EARTH. Their families are living here. Friends, etc.
Why the fuk would they introduce this supposedly harmful tech when they would be putting themselves and their families at risk? or they all plan to walk around the country in radiation-proof hazmat suits?
Unless they all plan on moving to Mars, which has a .350% chance of happening, and to say that "they" are going ahead with the deployment of 5G while being exposed to it themselves sounds ludicrous.
The "mischievous secret society" that are apparently behind the mass deployment of 5G are also living ON EARTH. Their families are living here. Friends, etc.
Why the fuk would they introduce this supposedly harmful tech when they would be putting themselves and their families at risk? or they all plan to walk around the country in radiation-proof hazmat suits?
Unless they all plan on moving to Mars, which has a .350% chance of happening, and to say that "they" are going ahead with the deployment of 5G while being exposed to it themselves sounds ludicrous.
05-02-2020, 03:23 PM
-
#208
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
-
- Masterchieffer
- The Creampie Guy
- Join Date: Nov 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,024
- Rep Power: 22666
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
HOIn this case, the solution would literally be a tinfoil hat, and I'm not even trying to be sarcastic. If you're worried about the effects of 5G on your brain, that's what it would be...
LEE
FOOK
The fact there is no irony in this post should tell you guys everything you need to know hahahabab
HAAAAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
05-02-2020, 03:55 PM
-
#209
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By vsportsguy⏩
I sincerely hope I am wrong, and what you wrote seems like a really honest post.I work as a radio frequency engineer. I look at high power RF emissions from military and commercial equipment on a spectrum analyzer. I analyze those signals for hazards to ordnance and personnel. I've never encountered a 5G tower, but I can tell you that cell equipment is thought of as a joke in our business. It's exponentially weaker than the stuff the military is putting out.
I've seen cell tower amplifiers operating up to 200 watts. They typically operate under 100W. AN/SPY-1 used on many Navy ships operates in the Megawatt range (that is in the millions of watts). This thing will fry your phone in a heartbeat if you step out far enough on deck. Same with the AN/SPG-62 which is a narrow beamwidth fire control radar. I have put my hand in the beamwidth while over 100 ft away from the antenna and it felt like my hand was in an oven. Transmitter output power is certainly not the only factor, but it's an easy way to determine baseline risk. HF and low VHF (2 - 300 MHz) are the most dangerous frequencies to humans in the radio spectrum. They penetrate the body most easily. 5G has a wide frequency range but I think it could be as low as 700 MHz but should mostly be above 2 GHz. I think they're rolling out the 2nd range which is up in the 24 GHz range.
According to the "research", the only risk of non-ionizing radiation is due to body heating. Even though I give briefs where I reassure people that this is the only danger, I'm not sure if I really believe it. There's a lot of radar technicians that I come across that expose themselves to high levels of RF emissions over time. I always ask them if they have kids and if they had girls. For whatever reason, there's a running joke that if you work in such an environment, you are much more likely to have girls. In my experience it holds true up to an uncomfortable level. I do think RF exposure messes with reproductive health in some way (infertility or girls). However, I don't think there's any basis that it's causing cancer or fuking up your mental health. Certainly not cell equipment.
Cliffs:
Unless you're sleeping on top of a cell tower, I think you're fine exposing yourself to any amount of cell tower radiation.
I've seen cell tower amplifiers operating up to 200 watts. They typically operate under 100W. AN/SPY-1 used on many Navy ships operates in the Megawatt range (that is in the millions of watts). This thing will fry your phone in a heartbeat if you step out far enough on deck. Same with the AN/SPG-62 which is a narrow beamwidth fire control radar. I have put my hand in the beamwidth while over 100 ft away from the antenna and it felt like my hand was in an oven. Transmitter output power is certainly not the only factor, but it's an easy way to determine baseline risk. HF and low VHF (2 - 300 MHz) are the most dangerous frequencies to humans in the radio spectrum. They penetrate the body most easily. 5G has a wide frequency range but I think it could be as low as 700 MHz but should mostly be above 2 GHz. I think they're rolling out the 2nd range which is up in the 24 GHz range.
According to the "research", the only risk of non-ionizing radiation is due to body heating. Even though I give briefs where I reassure people that this is the only danger, I'm not sure if I really believe it. There's a lot of radar technicians that I come across that expose themselves to high levels of RF emissions over time. I always ask them if they have kids and if they had girls. For whatever reason, there's a running joke that if you work in such an environment, you are much more likely to have girls. In my experience it holds true up to an uncomfortable level. I do think RF exposure messes with reproductive health in some way (infertility or girls). However, I don't think there's any basis that it's causing cancer or fuking up your mental health. Certainly not cell equipment.
Cliffs:
Unless you're sleeping on top of a cell tower, I think you're fine exposing yourself to any amount of cell tower radiation.
It's also funny and interesting that you don't fully believe the notion that non-ionizing radiation can't affect biology beyond heating. It's also interesting that your concerns about high EMF exposure negative affecting fertility, is the same conclusion that several studies have come to.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
05-02-2020, 04:01 PM
-
#210
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By arod204⏩
You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to arod204 again.Anyone who has concerns about the loss of privacy we are about to go through as a result of 5G is a conspiracy theorist. I DONT HAVE ANYTHING TO HIDE, which means if people want to know my body weight, every movement, my response to media stimulus, where I go, how long I bang my girlfriend for etc then big business and our government have a right to know.
Privacy is dangerous, can you imagine your cattle running around in a field and not knowing what they are doing? Well we are business and the government's cattle so we should be chipped, tagged, track and used as much as possible.
Privacy is dangerous, can you imagine your cattle running around in a field and not knowing what they are doing? Well we are business and the government's cattle so we should be chipped, tagged, track and used as much as possible.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts