Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?
  1. Results 211 to 240 of 908
  2. First
  3. 6
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. Last
post 1698610773 03-02-2024, 09:23 AM
-
#211
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Gonna need you to explain how a cheerleader rooting for a team is the same as a dude windmilling his dick in a child's face the same thing?
One happens, so there's that
post 1698610783 03-02-2024, 09:23 AM
-
#212
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
No point in even bothering with him. Somehow cheerleaders cheering for a football team while wearing skirts are equivalent to a 40 year old man flopping his d!ck around in front of little girls in a locker room.


This is the kind of trolling he does constantly. Either that or he’s actually legit retarded. Either way, no point in trying to discuss things with him or getting worked up about it. The only good that comes out of it is that irritating people online gives his miserable life a tiny bit of temporary pleasure. That’s about it.
Comparing cheerleaders, to men, identifying as women, and walking around naked in a woman's locker room......

Talk about logic.
post 1698610883 03-02-2024, 09:26 AM
-
#213
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
One happens, so there's that
top left

post 1698610893 03-02-2024, 09:26 AM
-
#214
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Comparing cheerleaders, to men, identifying as women, and walking around naked in a woman's locker room......

Talk about logic.



#wholesome
post 1698610933 03-02-2024, 09:27 AM
-
#215
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
top left

Maybe the anger should be directed at the parents who bring their kids?
post 1698611193 03-02-2024, 09:32 AM
-
#216
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Maybe the anger should be directed at the parents who bring their kids?
Sure, but if you go to San Francisco, this is a routine occurrence, nude men are streaking and exposing themselves to children routinely...on the streets..not in a parade. Wife's uncle lives in SF, I saw this happen with my own eyes 3 times in 2 days before we I left the city early, and said I would never come back..that was 5 yrs ago. I can only imagine what is happening now.

So I'm still going to need you to explain how this is the same thing as cheerleaders..


First you denied it was occurring..now you want to not condemn the behavior, but rather shift the narrative. At least you are consistent
post 1698611503 03-02-2024, 09:39 AM
-
#217
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Comparing cheerleaders, to men, identifying as women, and walking around naked in a woman's locker room......

Talk about logic.
And too cowardly to stand by his earlier comments on the topic as well. You know he went full blown retard when even Pattie deleted the thread and begged others not to discuss the topic with conservatives anymore. Just lmmfao. When Peppermint Patty steps back and says “whoa guys this is a bad look” you know it has to be REALLY bad.
post 1698611583 03-02-2024, 09:41 AM
-
#218
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Sure, but if you go to San Francisco, this is a routine occurrence, nude men are streaking and exposing themselves to children routinely...on the streets..not in a parade. Wife's uncle lives in SF, I saw this happen with my own eyes 3 times in 2 days before we I left the city early, and said I would never come back..that was 5 yrs ago. I can only imagine what is happening now.

So I'm still going to need you to explain how this is the same thing as cheerleaders..


First you denied it was occurring..now you want to not condemn the behavior, but rather shift the narrative. At least you are consistent
What suggests the dude in the top left is trans? Here, dunno about there, nudity and indecent exposure are different offences.

What started the discussion was a claim that p3dophilia is being taught in school and school libraries have p3dophilic books. No evidicence has been presented. Instead, the crew is pivoting to trans people. Predictable? Yes. Valid, not so much
post 1698611663 03-02-2024, 09:42 AM
-
#219
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
And too cowardly to stand by his earlier comments on the topic as well. You know he went full blown retard when even Pattie deleted the thread and begged others not to discuss the topic with conservatives anymore. Just lmmfao. When Peppermint Patty steps back and says “whoa guys this is a bad look” you know it has to be REALLY bad.
Lol at you calling anyone or anything cowardly
post 1698611723 03-02-2024, 09:43 AM
-
#220
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 32,467
  6. Rep Power: 539821
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Maybe the anger should be directed at the parents who bring their kids?
Or towards your parents for that one drunken night……
post 1698611793 03-02-2024, 09:44 AM
-
#221
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
What suggests the dude in the top left is trans?
Op's argument was that Conservatives make a false link to p3dough and homosexuality, and somehow trans is involved...that pic is one of many that show they are all connected because they are all a perversion of sexuality, and sexual behavior.

Did you want me to post more, or are the pics ITT enough for you to finally realize it?
post 1698612163 03-02-2024, 09:54 AM
-
#222
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Op's argument was that Conservatives make a false link to p3dough and homosexuality, and somehow trans is involved...that pic is one of many that show they are all connected because they are all a perversion of sexuality, and sexual behavior.

Did you want me to post more, or are the pics ITT enough for you to finally realize it?
Most child (sexual) abuse is committed by heterosexual men.
post 1698612173 03-02-2024, 09:54 AM
-
#223
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
What suggests the dude in the top left is trans? Here, dunno about there, nudity and indecent exposure are different offences.

What started the discussion was a claim that p3dophilia is being taught in school and school libraries have p3dophilic books. No evidicence has been presented. Instead, the crew is pivoting to trans people. Predictable? Yes. Valid, not so much
Nice edit, and yes, p3do and trans books are being pushed on children. Here is my Pastor at our local school board meeting exposing this reality.




As a result of him and parents pushing back, the head of the School board was fired. I'm sure that upsets you in some way though.

Here is a former VP of a local school stating what is happening in the classrooms..don't tell me it's not happening, cause clearly, like everything else you post about..you haven't a damn clue


post 1698612253 03-02-2024, 09:56 AM
-
#224
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Most child (sexual) abuse is committed by heterosexual men.
Most trans are homosexual
post 1698612313 03-02-2024, 09:57 AM
-
#225
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Nice edit, and yes, p3do and trans books are being pushed on children. Here is my Pastor at our local school board meeting exposing this reality.


As a result of him and parents pushing back, the head of the School board was fired. I'm sure that upsets you in some way though.

Here is a former VP of a local school stating what is happening in the classrooms..don't tell me it's not happening, cause clearly, like everything else you post about..you haven't a damn clue
A pastor eh? Lol

Only some views are okay to push onto others I suppose, for freedom.

Just lol
post 1698612363 03-02-2024, 09:58 AM
-
#226
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Most trans are homosexual
False.

But, if true that would suggest they are less likely to (sexually) abuse children.

Just lol
post 1698612423 03-02-2024, 10:00 AM
-
#227
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
A pastor eh? Lol

Only some views are okay to push onto others I suppose, for freedom.

Just lol
My God, imagine having an issue with a Pastor exposing what is happening in schools because you don't like the messenger.

Damn, you are a sad case.
post 1698612563 03-02-2024, 10:02 AM
-
#228
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
False.

But, if true that would suggest they are less likely to (sexually) abuse children.

Just lol
Seldom right, and wrong again

https://www.thetaskforce.org/news/wo...l-orientation/
post 1698612783 03-02-2024, 10:06 AM
-
#229
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
My God, imagine having an issue with a Pastor exposing what is happening in schools because you don't like the messenger.

Damn, you are a sad case.
Pastors and exposure do seem to go together
post 1698612843 03-02-2024, 10:08 AM
-
#230
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Sexual orientation in transgender adults in the United States

"In the transgender population, the most frequently endorsed sexual orientation identities were “bisexual” (18.9%), “queer” (18.1%), and “straight” (17.6%)."


https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentra...89-023-16654-z
post 1698612953 03-02-2024, 10:10 AM
-
#231
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Pastors and exposure do seem to go together
Somehow I don't think the one's so eager to expose their genitalia to children and make it the norm are 'Pastor's"


post 1698613053 03-02-2024, 10:12 AM
-
#232
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Sexual orientation in transgender adults in the United States

"In the transgender population, the most frequently endorsed sexual orientation identities were “bisexual” (18.9%), “queer” (18.1%), and “straight” (17.6%)."


https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentra...89-023-16654-z
So queer was a higher percentile than straight..which was the least...how is this proving your point?


From your study..

Conclusions
Inclusive measures of sexual orientation captured diverse sexual identities, partner genders, and desires. Future research is needed to cognitively test and validate these measures, especially with cisgender respondents, and to assess the relation of sexual orientation and health for transgender people.



Yet..from the LGBTQ community themselves, they state...

" It is a statistical fact that indeed most transgender people also identify on the queer sexual orientation spectrum."

https://www.thetaskforce.org/news/wo...l-orientation/

post 1698613413 03-02-2024, 10:20 AM
-
#233
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
So queer was a higher percentile than straight..which was the least...how is this proving your point?

Conclusions
Inclusive measures of sexual orientation captured diverse sexual identities, partner genders, and desires. Future research is needed to cognitively test and validate these measures, especially with cisgender respondents, and to assess the relation of sexual orientation and health for transgender people.



Yet..from the LGBTQ community themselves, they state...

" It is a statistical fact that indeed most transgender people also identify on the queer sexual orientation spectrum."

https://www.thetaskforce.org/news/wo...l-orientation/

We'd have to test to see if 18.1% is significantly different from 17.6% .

But also:



https://transequality.org/sites/defa...L%201.6.17.pdf
post 1698613453 03-02-2024, 10:21 AM
-
#234
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Somehow I don't think the one's so eager to expose their genitalia to children and make it the norm are 'Pastor's"


While that attire is clearly inappropriate, I don't think tights can be considered exposure.

Let's also keep in mind that the arguments put forth and this line of discussion require accepting a conflation of transgender and p3dophilia. While I get that's the popular narrative, it's not supported by anything presented in this thread.
post 1698613633 03-02-2024, 10:24 AM
-
#235
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
We'd have to test to see if 18.1% is significantly different from 17.6% .

But also:

In this chart, they made a distinction from Gay/lesbian and queer...which is "not straight"


This again does not prove your point, and only validates mine. Would you like to try again?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queer


https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/art...oes-queer-mean

https://www.plannedparenthood.org/le...oes-queer-mean

https://www.them.us/story/what-does-queer-mean
post 1698613693 03-02-2024, 10:26 AM
-
#236
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
While that attire is clearly inappropriate, I don't think tights can be considered exposure.

Let's also keep in mind that the arguments put forth and this line of discussion require accepting a conflation of transgender and p3dophilia. While I get that's the popular narrative, it's not supported by anything presented in this thread.
The genitalia is blurred out. No tights, no underwear.
post 1698613973 03-02-2024, 10:33 AM
-
#237
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  2. Join Date: Feb 2003
  3. Posts: 63,700
  4. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By Paul
The genitalia is blurred out. No tights, no underwear.
Inb4

"No tights, no underwear? No Problem!"
post 1698614063 03-02-2024, 10:36 AM
-
#238
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Polaris
Inb4

"No tights, no underwear? No Problem!"
At this point, I wouldn't be surprised. I'm expecting him to post a cheerleader that went with no underwear next and say.."see, same thing"
post 1698614583 03-02-2024, 10:47 AM
-
#239
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
The genitalia is blurred out. No tights, no underwear.
No.

The performer was wearing beige tights.
post 1698614693 03-02-2024, 10:49 AM
-
#240
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  2. Join Date: Feb 2003
  3. Posts: 63,700
  4. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
No.

The performer was wearing beige tights.
Nice source.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts