Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"
  1. Results 241 to 270 of 3464
  2. Page 9 of 116
  3. First
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. 10
  10. 11
  12. Last

Thread: Official Misc Photography Crew, Part V "Do you even shoot?"

  1. Rate This Thread
09-03-2015, 06:42 AM
#241
We should have a some sort of theme or competition type of events.

If any of you watch Jared Polin, he use to do a monthly competition with certain themes which got me more motivated to get out there and take pictures. However he stopped on the month I decided to take part


Does anyone here enter competitions?
  1. bertmisc
  2. Banned
  3. bertmiscs avatar
  1. bertmisc
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 22
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
09-03-2015, 08:20 AM
#242
Originally Posted By bertmisc⏩
We should have a some sort of theme or competition type of events.

If any of you watch Jared Polin, he use to do a monthly competition with certain themes which got me more motivated to get out there and take pictures. However he stopped on the month I decided to take part


Does anyone here enter competitions?
I agree, I need some motivation to shoot. I used to enter contests through the photography magazines and ones put out by Nikon when I was much younger, but I haven't recently. Doesn't DPreview do some sort of contests still?

Also, can any of the Nikon brahs recommend me a logical next lens? I'm shooting a D750, and I have a 24-120mm that came with the camera and a 50mm 1.8 I got for my birthday. I'm mainly into landscapes and travel stuff. Anyone have experience with the Tokina 16-28mm F2.8 lens on full frame?
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. glossins avatar
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 4,674
  5. Rep Power: 26,952
Quote
09-03-2015, 09:06 AM
#243
Originally Posted By obmas⏩
you can get some pretty crazy background separation at 600mm, even at f/6.3. In good lighting conditions and on a tripod, i can get very sharp images on animals. But most my subjects are small animals. With people, you need to be pretty damn far lol.

I have a friend that wants to do a couples shoot soon. I will give it a shot.
Damn thats crazy. Yeah i'd imagine, you'd have to be ridiculously far but the seperation would be sick!
That lens does look hnng for sports though.


Originally Posted By glossin⏩
I agree, I need some motivation to shoot. I used to enter contests through the photography magazines and ones put out by Nikon when I was much younger, but I haven't recently. Doesn't DPreview do some sort of contests still?

Also, can any of the Nikon brahs recommend me a logical next lens? I'm shooting a D750, and I have a 24-120mm that came with the camera and a 50mm 1.8 I got for my birthday. I'm mainly into landscapes and travel stuff. Anyone have experience with the Tokina 16-28mm F2.8 lens on full frame?
Heck, i'm too lazy to hold anything like that for this thread, but there are tons of ******** groups that do that. Same with other websites.


Is 24 not shooting your landscape needs? Sure wider is better, but 24-120 really covers so much its crazy.

I'd say go for a 70-200 if you are shooting people, but 16-24 is pretty damn wide. 16 especially.
"Learn from Yesterday, Live for Today, Hope for Tomorrow"
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. VmissileXs avatar
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 10,015
  6. Rep Power: 27,656
Quote
09-03-2015, 09:25 AM
#244
Originally Posted By VmissileX⏩
Damn thats crazy. Yeah i'd imagine, you'd have to be ridiculously far but the seperation would be sick!
That lens does look hnng for sports though.




Heck, i'm too lazy to hold anything like that for this thread, but there are tons of ******** groups that do that. Same with other websites.


Is 24 not shooting your landscape needs? Sure wider is better, but 24-120 really covers so much its crazy.

I'd say go for a 70-200 if you are shooting people, but 16-24 is pretty damn wide. 16 especially.
It is pretty damn wide! I used to shoot a 10-22mm when I had my 60D but there were very few situations that I used it at the wide end. You're right… the wide angle sounds good in theory but it's useless for a lot of things just because the perspective is so weird. I would use it for car/ truck interiors, which I shoot a lot of, the 24mm did fine on the last one I shot but I was wishing I had something a little wider so I could get closer to the steering wheel. Maybe I should hold off on it and look for a telephoto. What 70-200mm are you shooting, and is it on full frame? I'm thinking of just going with the Nikon 70-200mm F/4 (instead of the 2.8), the extra F stop wouldn't really benefit me since the camera has such a usable high ISO range.
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. glossins avatar
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 4,674
  5. Rep Power: 26,952
Quote
09-03-2015, 09:58 AM
#245
Originally Posted By glossin⏩
It is pretty damn wide! I used to shoot a 10-22mm when I had my 60D but there were very few situations that I used it at the wide end. You're right… the wide angle sounds good in theory but it's useless for a lot of things just because the perspective is so weird. I would use it for car/ truck interiors, which I shoot a lot of, the 24mm did fine on the last one I shot but I was wishing I had something a little wider so I could get closer to the steering wheel. Maybe I should hold off on it and look for a telephoto. What 70-200mm are you shooting, and is it on full frame? I'm thinking of just going with the Nikon 70-200mm F/4 (instead of the 2.8), the extra F stop wouldn't really benefit me since the camera has such a usable high ISO range.

The tamron 70-200 2.8 is the best you can get. VR+ a tad more sharper than the nikon =win. A little slower autofocus, but for what you shoot, this shan't be an issue.

Oh did i also mention it has some dec macro capabilities.
"Learn from Yesterday, Live for Today, Hope for Tomorrow"
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. VmissileXs avatar
  1. VmissileX
  2. Raver in Training
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 10,015
  6. Rep Power: 27,656
Quote
09-03-2015, 03:38 PM
#246
Originally Posted By VmissileX⏩
The tamron 70-200 2.8 is the best you can get. VR+ a tad more sharper than the nikon =win.
I read that and thought that can't be right but according to DXO it is. And we're not talking a few bucks cheaper either. $1499 on B&H vs. $2395 for the Nikon.

I've never bought a third party lens but that's because most of my lenses are 5-10 years old when Sigma and Tamron weren't making glass like this. Starting from scratch today I would.

  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Dominiks avatar
  1. Dominik
  2. Moderator
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 33,724
  6. Rep Power: 1,876,568
Quote
09-03-2015, 03:44 PM
#247
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
I read that and thought that can't be right but according to DXO it is. And we're not talking a few bucks cheaper either. $1499 on B&H vs. $2395 for the Nikon.

I've never bought a third party lens but that's because most of my lenses are 5-10 years old when Sigma and Tamron weren't making glass like this. Starting from scratch today I would.
That's insane that Sigma (art lenses) and Tamron have gotten so much better. I've had lenses from both companies in the past that were absolute crap, from bad build quality, back focusing, soft, etc. Thanks for the suggestion.
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. glossins avatar
  1. glossin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 4,674
  5. Rep Power: 26,952
Quote
09-03-2015, 03:55 PM
#248
Shooting Formula 1 at Monza this weekend


McLaren Honda MP4-30 Front Wings by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Jacques Villenueve - 2015 Italian Grand Prix by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. LieutenantGainss avatar
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 6,303
  5. Rep Power: 84,603
Quote
09-03-2015, 03:57 PM
#249
Originally Posted By Dominik⏩
I read that and thought that can't be right but according to DXO it is. And we're not talking a few bucks cheaper either. $1499 on B&H vs. $2395 for the Nikon.

I've never bought a third party lens but that's because most of my lenses are 5-10 years old when Sigma and Tamron weren't making glass like this. Starting from scratch today I would.

Swearing by Tamron. My 24-70 and 70-200 SP lenses from them are insanely good performers. The new 35mm and and 45mm look promising as well, and are under $600 from what I saw. I get a lot of flack from other photographers because I'm not using Canon glass, or when I suggest Tamron over Nikon/Canon glass. Usually for no other reason other than it's "third party so it can't be as good". Completely untrue in this day. I almost see no reason to have Canon glass when third parties like Tamron or Sigma are doing it better, and cheaper.

Originally Posted By glossin⏩
That's insane that Sigma (art lenses) and Tamron have gotten so much better. I've had lenses from both companies in the past that were absolute crap, from bad build quality, back focusing, soft, etc. Thanks for the suggestion.
I've heard of people having focus issues with the Tamron 150-600 but those were early copies. I'm sure they've worked it out by now. I've had issues with some Art lenses not focusing (also early copies), as well as read a lot of people having issues with them. Though others have had no issues from the get go from either brand. From my experience with the new Tamron stuff, it's been spot on every time.
Signature keeps disappearing crew
Well under 10 lines crew
Wtf m8 crew

\m/ Metal crew
Misc Photography crew
PC Master race
Katy Perry is my 10/10 crew
Try and edit posts before "Last edit" message shows up crew
  1. ShoryuBrah
  2. ⇒⇓⇘ + P
  3. ShoryuBrahs avatar
  1. ShoryuBrah
  2. ⇒⇓⇘ + P
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 7,432
  5. Rep Power: 28,567
Quote
09-03-2015, 07:06 PM
#250
agreed with all. my first tamron was an old 17-55 or whatever and i thought it was just crap ass build quality and slow focus.

once i decided to get into wildlife, i looked at all the options and ended up going with the tamron 150-600 since it was best bang for buck. I was so impressed with it on my first shoot at the zoo, i ended up getting the 24-70 vc and 70-200 vc shortly after. they are especially impressive when you compare the price difference.

Tamron has impressed the fck out of me, to be honest. Of course, they will never ever match the name brands in focus speed since they have to reverse engineer and whatnot, but its pretty close. Their VC system is really good too.
——————— ϞϞ( ๑⚈ ․̫ ⚈๑). ———————
— Still-plays-PokemonGo-in-2022 Crew —
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. obmass avatar
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 7,659
  7. Rep Power: 38,485
Quote
09-03-2015, 08:52 PM
#251
ugh just got an upped limit on my credit… really hard not to buy more glass lmao fuk
Misc Photography Crew
Sony a7iii - Sigma 35 1.4 art series.

PC Master Race, i7-13700k, EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra

|Minnesota Vikings||Boston Celtics|
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Vikes723s avatar
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 4,638
  7. Rep Power: 34,374
Quote
09-03-2015, 11:06 PM
#252
Originally Posted By Vikes723⏩
ugh just got an upped limit on my credit… really hard not to buy more glass lmao fuk
i am this damn close to buying a canon 7d mkii. lol

going to the mountains (jasper) on saturday. hoping to see some cool wildlife.
——————— ϞϞ( ๑⚈ ․̫ ⚈๑). ———————
— Still-plays-PokemonGo-in-2022 Crew —
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. obmass avatar
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 7,659
  7. Rep Power: 38,485
Quote
09-03-2015, 11:24 PM
#253
Originally Posted By obmas⏩
i am this damn close to buying a canon 7d mkii. lol

going to the mountains (jasper) on saturday. hoping to see some cool wildlife.
im tempted into buying a film camera, gf has one and theyre actually really cool and are very affordable
Misc Photography Crew
Sony a7iii - Sigma 35 1.4 art series.

PC Master Race, i7-13700k, EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra

|Minnesota Vikings||Boston Celtics|
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Vikes723s avatar
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 4,638
  7. Rep Power: 34,374
Quote
09-04-2015, 10:28 AM
#254
I'm on the Tamron bandwagon as well…. i have the 15-30, 24-70, and the 70-200. beasts of glass. 15-30 has a bit of distortion on the wide end and doesn't accept filters…. other than that they take fine pictures and the VC is amazing. If they release an 85mm VC 1.8 prime i'll be all over that!
  1. RayBcomplex
  2. Registered User
  3. RayBcomplexs avatar
  1. RayBcomplex
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 346
  7. Rep Power: 3,155
Quote
09-04-2015, 11:53 AM
#255
Originally Posted By RayBcomplex⏩
I'm on the Tamron bandwagon as well…. i have the 15-30, 24-70, and the 70-200. beasts of glass. 15-30 has a bit of distortion on the wide end and doesn't accept filters…. other than that they take fine pictures and the VC is amazing. If they release an 85mm VC 1.8 prime i'll be all over that!
or a 135mm f2!
——————— ϞϞ( ๑⚈ ․̫ ⚈๑). ———————
— Still-plays-PokemonGo-in-2022 Crew —
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. obmass avatar
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 7,659
  7. Rep Power: 38,485
Quote
09-04-2015, 02:56 PM
#256
I had the 70-200 2.8 Marco Non-VC version for canon and did not like it. Not very sharp, terrible autofocus. I sold it and bought a used 70-200 2.8 Non-IS canon and love it.

My 17-50 2.8 Tamron on the other hand, was fantastic.
Architectural and Interiors Photography | Fine Art Landscapes
| www.codylere.com | instagram.com/codylerephoto
-SP-
*Misc Photography Crew*
  1. M0tibation
  2. dis' gon b gud
  3. M0tibations avatar
  1. M0tibation
  2. dis' gon b gud
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Rapid City, South Dakota, United States
  5. Posts: 4,433
  6. Rep Power: 36,403
Quote
09-04-2015, 09:50 PM
#257
Originally Posted By M0tibation⏩
I had the 70-200 2.8 Marco Non-VC version for canon and did not like it. Not very sharp, terrible autofocus. I sold it and bought a used 70-200 2.8 Non-IS canon and love it.

My 17-50 2.8 Tamron on the other hand, was fantastic.
yeah i heard not so great things about that non-VC version, but i think you would be very impressed with the new version with VC. its a complete redesign.

anywhoooooo, i just picked up a 7D mkii and extreme CF card. lolz. can't wait to shoot some bears up in the mountains
——————— ϞϞ( ๑⚈ ․̫ ⚈๑). ———————
— Still-plays-PokemonGo-in-2022 Crew —
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. obmass avatar
  1. obmas
  2. Monster Hunter
  3. Join Date: Sep 2007
  4. Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 7,659
  7. Rep Power: 38,485
Quote
09-04-2015, 11:11 PM
#258
Some shots from yesterday:


Pastor Maldonado - glowing brakes into turn 1 - 2015 Italian Grand Prix FP2 by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Kimi Raikkonen - 2015 Italian Grand Prix FP2 by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Sergio Perez - Curva di Lesmo - 2015 Italian Grand Prix by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Sergio Perez - 2015 Italian Grand Prix by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Sebastian Vettel - Seconda Variente - 2015 Italian Grand Prix FP2 by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr


Jenson Button - McLaren Honda MP4-30 - 2015 Italian Grand Prix FP2 by Gary Hebding Jr. , on Flickr
Misc photography crew
Chicago crew
Polski crew
Throw keys on bench to claim it crew
6'2" 193lbs crew
#MMGA
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. LieutenantGainss avatar
  1. LieutenantGains
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Posts: 6,303
  5. Rep Power: 84,603
Quote
09-05-2015, 01:49 AM
#259
Originally Posted By M0tibation⏩
I had the 70-200 2.8 Marco Non-VC version for canon and did not like it. Not very sharp, terrible autofocus. I sold it and bought a used 70-200 2.8 Non-IS canon and love it.

My 17-50 2.8 Tamron on the other hand, was fantastic.
The new line of Tamron stuff has "SP" (super performance) in the product name. That's the stuff we're all talking about. I wouldn't doubt if your older Tamron was bad. I always thought of them as a low end company before the SP line came out.

On a related note: Edt: Deal gone, sold out
Tamron's 150-600mm for $779 after rebate:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tamron-SP-15...item4882e5ba2c

These are new USA versions, not grey market. I am so damn tempted to buy one, but I really would have no regular use for it. My 300mm got zero use when I had it.
Signature keeps disappearing crew
Well under 10 lines crew
Wtf m8 crew

\m/ Metal crew
Misc Photography crew
PC Master race
Katy Perry is my 10/10 crew
Try and edit posts before "Last edit" message shows up crew
  1. ShoryuBrah
  2. ⇒⇓⇘ + P
  3. ShoryuBrahs avatar
  1. ShoryuBrah
  2. ⇒⇓⇘ + P
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 7,432
  5. Rep Power: 28,567
Quote
09-05-2015, 03:48 PM
#260
For nightclub photography, which pics look better and why?







or





  1. Foze
  2. God's New Protege
  3. Fozes avatar
  1. Foze
  2. God's New Protege
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 30
  6. Posts: 9,302
  7. Rep Power: 7,051
Quote
09-06-2015, 07:12 AM
#261
I feel like every time I go back to the studio, I'm 10x better than the time before.


***Official Misc Photography Crew***
***Atlanta Falcons Fan***
  1. NinjaKix
  2. Registered User
  3. NinjaKixs avatar
  1. NinjaKix
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2008
  4. Location: Mangilao, Guam, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 3,566
  7. Rep Power: 18,145
Quote
09-06-2015, 03:23 PM
#262
Originally Posted By NinjaKix⏩
I feel like every time I go back to the studio, I'm 10x better than the time before.


Could've done a bit more with the editing, you used frequency separation?

Send a raw and lemme play around with it
Camilla Belle Is My 10/10 Goddess Crew

7/10 Facial Aesthetics Crew

Under 5'7 Manlet Crew

Life Is Tough, But I'm Tougher Crew

Heels Are My Kryptonite Crew
  1. lurker2006
  2. OG Manlet
  3. lurker2006s avatar
  1. lurker2006
  2. OG Manlet
  3. Join Date: Nov 2006
  4. Age: 30
  5. Posts: 885
  6. Rep Power: 5,033
Quote
09-06-2015, 05:38 PM
#263
Picked up a film camera Pentax Superprogram and the thing is actually quite fun. Do any of the bigger stores still do film delevelopment or gotta go to the smaller shops?

Edit: just some quick shots with gf

Misc Photography Crew
Sony a7iii - Sigma 35 1.4 art series.

PC Master Race, i7-13700k, EVGA 3080 FTW3 Ultra

|Minnesota Vikings||Boston Celtics|
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Vikes723s avatar
  1. Vikes723
  2. Ubromad?
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 32
  6. Posts: 4,638
  7. Rep Power: 34,374
Quote
09-07-2015, 11:02 AM
#264
עם הנצח לא מפחד מדרך ארוכה
  1. gadiper
  2. RealistLeftie
  3. gadipers avatar
  1. gadiper
  2. RealistLeftie
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: Israel
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 928
  7. Rep Power: 4,437
Quote
09-08-2015, 03:24 AM
#265
Complete set from my last shoot

https://www.flickr.com/photos/135264...57658197927146
***Official Misc Photography Crew***
***Atlanta Falcons Fan***
  1. NinjaKix
  2. Registered User
  3. NinjaKixs avatar
  1. NinjaKix
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2008
  4. Location: Mangilao, Guam, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 3,566
  7. Rep Power: 18,145
Quote
09-08-2015, 08:55 AM
#266
3 moar boar days until Utah/Nevada for a 4 day photography weekend. Day 1 at Arches, backpacking/camping. Day 2 a 3 hour photography tour of antelope canyon, horseshoe bend. Day 3 hiking Buckskin gulch, about 1/2 of it, so maybe 8 miles of a slot canyon 2' to 10' wide. Then day 4 at Zion Nat Park.

Anyone been to Zion before? Narrows or Angels peak? Don't have the day fully planned yet.


Any SLC brahs have experience with the REI rentals? Needing a tent, can't fly with that ****.
Rugby Crew
Misc Photography Crew
Best Gym Raw 585/405/640
  1. BlueSasquatch
  2. Axebrah
  3. BlueSasquatchs avatar
  1. BlueSasquatch
  2. Axebrah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Posts: 3,251
  5. Rep Power: 34,346
Quote
09-08-2015, 09:02 AM
#267
Originally Posted By BlueSasquatch⏩
3 moar boar days until Utah/Nevada for a 4 day photography weekend. Day 1 at Arches, backpacking/camping. Day 2 a 3 hour photography tour of antelope canyon, horseshoe bend. Day 3 hiking Buckskin gulch, about 1/2 of it, so maybe 8 miles of a slot canyon 2' to 10' wide. Then day 4 at Zion Nat Park.

Anyone been to Zion before? Narrows or Angels peak? Don't have the day fully planned yet.


Any SLC brahs have experience with the REI rentals? Needing a tent, can't fly with that ****.
LOL i'm doing the exact same trip In a couple days. I'll be there by mid week next week. Good luck out there!

I'll be staying in Page Arizona and move from there to the parks
When you come to think of it, almost all human behaviour and activity is not essentially any different from animal behaviour. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human.

*communist Llama crew*
*go vegan or go bust crew*
*anti-imperialist crew*
  1. suave2000
  2. Wizard llama (っ◕‿◕)っ
  3. suave2000s avatar
  1. suave2000
  2. Wizard llama (っ◕‿◕)っ
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: Peru
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 74,253
Quote
09-08-2015, 09:07 AM
#268
Originally Posted By NinjaKix⏩
Complete set from my last shoot

https://www.flickr.com/photos/135264...57658197927146
Nice set , I think that the WB in one of them is off and thats the only one I dont like - DSC_7695
עם הנצח לא מפחד מדרך ארוכה
  1. gadiper
  2. RealistLeftie
  3. gadipers avatar
  1. gadiper
  2. RealistLeftie
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: Israel
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 928
  7. Rep Power: 4,437
Quote
09-08-2015, 10:11 AM
#269
Originally Posted By NinjaKix⏩
Complete set from my last shoot

https://www.flickr.com/photos/135264...57658197927146
Really nice set, I did a quick re-edit of my favorite one from the set.


Camilla Belle Is My 10/10 Goddess Crew

7/10 Facial Aesthetics Crew

Under 5'7 Manlet Crew

Life Is Tough, But I'm Tougher Crew

Heels Are My Kryptonite Crew
  1. lurker2006
  2. OG Manlet
  3. lurker2006s avatar
  1. lurker2006
  2. OG Manlet
  3. Join Date: Nov 2006
  4. Age: 30
  5. Posts: 885
  6. Rep Power: 5,033
Quote
09-08-2015, 01:00 PM
#270
Some pics from a crazy mountain with a piramid on top.

Tepozteco by llama brah , on Flickr

Piramide en el Tepozteco by llama brah , on Flickr

Tepoztlan by llama brah , on Flickr

Tepoztlan by llama brah , on Flickr
When you come to think of it, almost all human behaviour and activity is not essentially any different from animal behaviour. The most advanced technologies and craftsmanship bring us, at best, up to the super-chimpanzee level. Actually, the gap between, say, Plato or Nietzsche and the average human is greater than the gap between that chimpanzee and the average human.

*communist Llama crew*
*go vegan or go bust crew*
*anti-imperialist crew*
  1. suave2000
  2. Wizard llama (っ◕‿◕)っ
  3. suave2000s avatar
  1. suave2000
  2. Wizard llama (っ◕‿◕)っ
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: Peru
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 74,253
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts