Because I write each post quickly, speedread, and post when I am not working. It's not hard. But obviously, my abilities seem alien to you. Look at the hours when I post.Define men. You simply don't get the issue here.

I asked you can men get pregnant. Just answer the question

It’s a yes or no answer unless you are a mentally ill retard

All coronavirus spread droplet transmission..it was known because again..it is a COLD virus. And any cold virus cannot be stopped by wearing a mask.

Sure thing bud. Seems legit

Rhinoviruses and respiratory enteroviruses are more common.

You see, here’s a woman with a severe mental illness who got pregnant but claims to be a man and weak minded liberals will believe here. She’s a woman, not a man

Oh okay…which also spread by aerosol droplets.

Droplets or aerosol?

Lol

Are droplets not aerosol now? What do you think atomized droplets are?

Btw..rhinovirus is the predominant cause for the COLD virus.

No you haven't wincel.

You were an amusing little chew toy for however many years and now you're worn out.

Droplets and aerosols: An artificial dichotomy in respiratory virus transmission

"In the medical literature, three mutually non‐exclusive modes of pathogen transmission associated with respiratory droplets are usually identified: contact, droplet, and airborne (or aerosol) transmission"

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8103093/Correct.

Rhinoviruses are not coronaviruses

STFU, all you do is present personal attacks. You are the only poster that posts personal information about other members because you continually get owned on everything you post.

So you posted a study that affirms my post. Well done dum dum

He and wincel both do that.. That's how desperate they both are to have "A" covid argument.

Must be paid per post. Just lol.

Lol. Happy to hear you read and liked the paper:

"The work reviewed here suggests that the range and duration in which airborne droplets pose a significant infection risk for influenza A and SARS‐CoV‐2 may have been significantly underestimated.

As a consequence, recommendations on the use of N95 or surgical masks or on spatial separation should be continuously reviewed in light of the emerging findings on the biophysics of airborne droplets.

Given that, as argued here, the infectivity of a droplet, and consequently, the transmissivity of the virus, as a function of droplet size is a continuum,recommendations to always wear facemasks in indoor public areas, even if a spatial separation of at least 1 to 2 m can be observed,are, in our view, justified."

So if you're NOT paid to shill for covid then how do you explain your obsession with it?

Nobody should get the shot. Stop misleading people to do otherwise. Everything that vaxcel just said is bull****!

Nowhere in that paper does it state that a mask stops viral transmission dum dum. If it doesn’t stop it..you do understand that only a low infectious dose is needed to infect others..right?


Aerosol transmission of influenza A virus: a review of new studies
Raymond Tellier. J R Soc Interface. 2009.


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19773292/

So now you don't like it?

"Personal protective equipment is traditionally divided into source‐control equipment (eg, surgical facemasks that partially block droplet shedding, thereby protecting nearby individuals providing “outward” protection) and susceptible‐control (eg, N95 respirators that filter inhaled air, thereby protecting the wearer providing “inward” protection This largely arbitrary separation is based on the acceptance of the existence of two distinct non‐contact transmission modes.Both types of personal protective equipmentcontribute in different, but overlapping ways topreventing the spreading of a respiratory pathogen. Similarly, the specification of a well‐defined spatial separation distance (social distancing) is based on the consideration of a well‐defined large‐droplet transmission mode. "

"Given that, as argued here, the infectivity of a droplet, and consequently, the transmissivity of the virus, as a function of droplet size is a continuum, recommendations to always wear facemasks in indoor public areas"

On the contrary, the same paper has proved both points. Viruses spread by atomized aerosol transmission & a mask does not stop viral transmission.
I love this for you.

Your style of review is interesting

Just stating what the paper confirms.

Like I said, it's interesting how you extract information from written text:

"Both types of personal protective equipment contribute in different, but overlapping ways to preventing the spreading of a respiratory pathogen"

We definitely need to emphasize the L in your username, because you just took a huge one. At your own hand, no less.

Yeah. They confirm what's been said. Aerosol transmission and masks help.

The L is for the lulz

Except it doesn’t stop viral transmission..your study did not even use person to person contact/transmission..

I didn't say anything about any studies I've done

I did however share a review article (not a study), that it seems some folks didn't like

The review specifically discusses viral respiratory pathogens (Influenza A and Covid).

Unfortunately your article does not support your claims that a mask stops viral transmission. I’ll put it as simply as I can for you..The reason workers in a virus lab wear moon suits, go through multiple sets of sealed doors with decontamination procedures before that suit is removed and breathe pressurized outside air while inside the lab is that these are facts and said virus -- any virus -- will go right through any "mask."

FACT: There are multiple random clinical trials that have been performed on the efficacy of face coverings of various sorts, from N95 masks on down to cloth coverings in the general population with the aim of identifying effective means of controlling the spread of ILI ("influenza like illness"), specifically respiratory viruses.

FACT: There is NO record established by said Random Clinical Trials (RCTs) in over one hundred years, including those performed in the last 20 years, that establishes statistically-significant effectiveness of face coverings for the prevention of transmission of ILI. Exactly zero science supports such a claim.

FACT: As a direct result of the lack of such evidence the FDA has never issued an approval for any facial covering intended to be used in the general population for the suppression of any illness, including but not limited to Covid-19. In fact I suspect no such approval has ever been sought, otherwise someone would have tried to make money on a "flu mask", making such a medical claim, in previous years.

FACT: It is therefore UNLAWFUL under United States Law for any seller to advertise, market, sell, vend or represent that any facial covering in fact does or will prevent, treat or cure any transmissible disease whatsoever as exactly zero said devices when used by the general population have ever been certified and approved for said use. THIS IS FEDERAL LAW (TITLE 21) AND IS NOT A SUGGESTION.

This is why every package of N95 masks at the Home Deport (and elsewhere) has the clear statement on the "use document" that comes with it which states it does not prevent the transmission of any disease. any disease.

Such a government entity is in fact mandating a direct violation of United States Federal Law and committing said violation itself through promotion of said use.

END OF DISCUSSION.